Sensitivity to morpheme units in English as L2 word recognition

REFERENCES

• Baayen, R. H., Dijkstra, T., & Schreuder, R. (1997). Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual route model. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 94–117. doi:10.1006/jmla.1997.2509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertram, R., Baayen, R. H., & Schreuder, R. (2000). Effects of family size for complex words. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 390–405. doi:10.1006/jmla.1999.2681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burani, C., Marcolini, S., & Stella, G. (2002). How early does morpholexical reading develop in readers of a shallow orthography? Brain and Language, 81, 568–586. doi:10.1006/brln.2001.2548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlisle, J. F., & Stone, C. A. (2005). Exploring the role of morphemes in word reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 428–449. doi:10.1598/RRQ.40.4.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clahsen, H., Felser, C., Sato, M., & Silva, R. (2010). Morphological structure in native and nonnative language processing. Language Learning, 60, 21–43. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00550.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of Europe E. C. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deacon, H., & Whalen, R. (2011). Do children see the danger in dangerous? Grade 4, 6, and 8 children's reading of morphologically complex words. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 467–481. doi:10.1017/S0142716411000166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diependaele, K., Duñabeitia, J. A., Morris, J., & Keuleers, E. (2011). Fast morphological effects in first and second language word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 344–358. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2011.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., & Grainger, J. (2005). Masked cross-modal morphological priming: Unraveling morpho-orthographic and morpho-semantic influences in early word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 75–114. doi:10.1080/01690960444000197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duñabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2008). Does darkness lead to happiness? Masked suffix priming effects. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 1002–1020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, L., Gray, E., Quémart, P., & Casalis, S. (2010). Do good and poor readers make use of morphemic structure in English word recognition? Journal of Portuguese Linguistics, 9–10, 143–160.
   Google Scholar
• E-Prime (2.0) [Computer software]. http://www.pstnet.com/eprime.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, L. B., Kostic, A., Basnight-Brown, D. M., Filipovic-Durdevic, D., & Pastizzo, M. J. (2009). Morphological facilitation for regular and irregular verb formations in native and non-native speakers: Little evidence for two distinct mechanisms. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 119–135. doi:10.1017/S1366728909990459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, L. B., O’Connor, P. A., & Moscoso del Prado Martín, F. (2009). Early morphological processing is morphosemantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: A violation of form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 684–691. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.4.684
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gor, K., & Jackson, S. (2013). Morphological decomposition and lexical access in a native and second language: A nesting doll effect. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 1065–1091. doi:10.1080/01690965.2013.776696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S. Y, Wang, M., & Ko, I. Y. (2011). The processing of derived words in Korean-English bilingual readers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 473–488. doi:10.1017/S1366728910000477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koda, K., Takahashi, E., & Fender, M. (1998). Effects of L1 processing experience on L2 morphological awareness. Ilha do Desterro Florianópolis, 35, 57–85.
   Google Scholar
• Lemhöfer, K., Koester, D., & Schreuder, R. (2011). When bicycle pump is harder to read than bicycle bell: Effects of parsing cues in first and second language compound reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 364–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longtin, C. M., & Meunier, F. (2005). Morphological decomposition in early visual word processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 26–41. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longtin, C. M., Segui, J., & Hallé, P. A. (2003). Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 313–334. doi:10.1080/01690960244000036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101(1), 3–33. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masterson, J., Stuart, M., Dixon, M., & Lovejoy, S. (2003). The children's printed word database. Retrieved from www.essex.ac.uk/psychology/cpwd
   Google Scholar
• Merkx, M., Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2011). The acquisition of morphological knowledge investigated through artificial language learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(6), 1200–1220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New, B., Pallier, C., Ferrand, L., & Matos, R. (2001). Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur internet [A French lexical Database on Internet]: LEXIQUE. L'Année Psychologique [Trends in Cognitive Psychology], 101, 447–462. http://www.lexique.org
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otto, J. (2012). Morphological processing in bilingual speakers of German and English ( Unpublished PhD thesis). University of London, Royal Holloway.
   Google Scholar
• Quémart, P., Casalis, S., & Duncan, L. (2012). Exploring the role of bases and suffixes when reading familiar and unfamiliar words: Evidence from French young readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16, 424–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2008). Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 942–971. doi:10.1080/01690960802069730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (2000). Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes. 15, 507–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B. (2004). The Broth in my brother's brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1090–1098.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, W., Eschmann, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (Eds.). (2002). E-prime reference guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
   Google Scholar
• Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R. H. (1995). Modeling morphological processing. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 131–154). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M. S., & Gonnerman, L. M. (2000). Explaining derivational morphology as the convergence of codes. Trends in cognitive Sciences, 4, 353–361. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01515-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, R., & Clahsen, H. (2008). Morphologically complex words in L1 and L2 processing: Evidence from masked priming experiments in English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 245–260. doi:10.1017/S1366728908003404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taft, M. (1994). Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 271–294. doi:10.1080/01690969408402120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 638–647. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80051-X
   Google Scholar
• Ullman, M. (2004). Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92, 231–270. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullman, M. (2005). A cognitive neuroscience perspective on second language acquisition: The declarative/procedural model. In C. Sanz (Ed.), Mind and context in adult second language acquisition: Methods, theory and practice (pp. 141–178). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar