References
- Adank, P. (2012). The neural bases of difficult speech comprehension and speech production: Two Activation Likelihood Estimation (ALE) meta-analyses. Brain and Language, 122(1), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2012.04.014
- Anumanchipalli, G. K., Chartier, J., & Chang, E. F. (2019). Speech synthesis from neural decoding of spoken sentences. Nature, 568(7753), 493–498. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1119-1
- Assaneo, M. F., Ripolles, P., Orpella, J., Lin, W. M., De Diego-balaguer, R., & Poeppel, D. (2019). Spontaneous synchronization to speech reveals neural mechanisms facilitating language learning. Nature Neuroscience, 22(4), 627–632. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-019-0353-z
- Baldo, J. V., Wilkins, D. P., Ogar, J., Willock, S., & Dronkers, N. F. (2011). Role of the precentral gyrus of the insula in complex articulation. Cortex, 47(7), 800–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2010.07.001
- Bonte, M., Hausfeld, L., Scharke, W., Valente, G., & Formisano, E. (2014). Task-dependent decoding of speaker and vowel identity from auditory cortical response patterns. Journal of Neuroscience, 34(13), 4548–4557. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4339-13.2014
- Carey, D., & Mcgettigan, C. (2016). Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and vocal tract: Applications to the study of speech production and language learning. Neuropsychologia, 98(2017), 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.06.003
- Carey, D., Miquel, M. E., Evans, B. G., Adank, P., & McGettigan, C. (2017). Vocal tract images reveal neural representations of sensorimotor transformation during speech imitation. Cerebral Cortex, 27(5), 3064–3079. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhx056
- Cogan, G. B., Thesen, T., Carlson, C., Doyle, W., Devinsky, O., & Pesaran, B. (2014). Sensory–motor transformations for speech occur bilaterally. Nature, 507(7490), 94–98. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12935
- Correia, J. M., Jansma, B. M., & Bonte, M. (2015). Decoding Articulatory Features from fMRI Responses in Dorsal Speech Regions. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(45), 15015–15025. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0977-15.2015
- Evans, S., & Davis, M. H. (2015). Hierarchical organization of auditory and motor representations in speech perception: Evidence from searchlight similarity analysis. Cerebral Cortex, 25(12), 4772–4788. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhv136
- Feng, G., Gan, Z., Wang, S., Wong, P. C. M., & Chandrasekaran, B. (2017). Task-general and acoustic-invariant neural representation of speech categories in the human brain. Cerebral Cortex, 28(9), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhx195
- Guenther, F. H., Ghosh, S. S., & Tourville, J. A. (2006). Neural modeling and imaging of the cortical interactions underlying syllable production. Brain and Language, 96(3), 280–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2005.06.001
- Hickok, G. (2012). Computational neuroanatomy of speech production. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13(2), 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3158
- Hickok, G., Buchsbaum, B., Humphries, C., & Muftuler, T. (2003). Auditory–motor interaction revealed by fMRI: Speech, music, and working memory in area Spt. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(5), 673–682. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892903322307393
- Hickok, G., Holt, L. L., & Lotto, A. J. (2009). Response to Wilson: What does motor cortex contribute to speech perception? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(8), 330–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.05.002
- Hjortkjaer, J., Kassuba, T., Madsen, K. H., Skov, M., & Siebner, H. R. (2017). Task-modulated cortical representations of natural sound source categories. Cerebral Cortex, 28(1), 1–12. http://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhx263
- Houde, J. F., & Nagarajan, S. S. (2011). Speech production as state feedback control. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5(2011), 82. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00082
- Houde, J. F., Nagarajan, S. S., Sekihara, K., & Merzenich, M. M. (2002). Modulation of the auditory cortex during speech: An MEG study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(8), 1125–1138. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892902760807140
- Huang, J., Carr, T. H., & Cao, Y. (2002). Comparing cortical activations for silent and overt speech using event‐related fMRI. Human Brain Mapping, 15(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.1060
- Jimura, K., & Poldrack, R. A. (2011). Analyses of regional-average activation and multivoxel pattern information tell complementary stories. Neuropsychologia, 50(4),544-552. doi:doi.10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.11.007
- Kleber, B., Friberg, A., Zeitouni, A., & Zatorre, R. (2017). Experience-dependent modulation of right anterior insula and sensorimotor regions as a function of noise-masked auditory feedback in singers and nonsingers. Neuroimage, 147(2017), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.059
- Kriegeskorte, N., Formisano, E., Sorger, B., & Goebel, R. (2007). Individual faces elicit distinct response patterns in human anterior temporal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(51), 20600–20605. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0705654104
- Li, S., Zhu, H., & Tian, X. (2020). Corollary Discharge Versus Efference Copy: Distinct neural signals in speech preparation differentially modulate auditory responses. Cerebral Cortex. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhaa154
- Liu, X., & Tian, X. (2018). The functional relations among motor-based prediction, sensory goals and feedback in learning non-native speech sounds: Evidence from adult Mandarin Chinese speakers with an auditory feedback masking paradigm. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17765-5
- Ma, O., & Tian, X. (2019). Distinct mechanisms of imagery differentially influence speech perception. eNeuro, 6(5), 1-11.https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0261-19.2019
- Mesgarani, N., Cheung, C., Johnson, K., & Chang, E. F. (2014). Phonetic feature encoding in human superior temporal gyrus. Science, 343(6174), 1006–1010. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1245994
- Mur, M., Bandettini, P. A., & Kriegeskorte, N. (2009). Revealing representational content with pattern-information fMRI—an introductory guide. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 4(nsn044), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsn044
- Okada, K., Matchin, W., & Hickok, G. (2017). Neural evidence for predictive coding in auditory cortex during speech production. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 25(1), 423–430. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1284-x
- Oosterhof, N. N., Connolly, A. C., & Haxby, J. V. (2016). CoSMoMVPA: Multi-modal multivariate pattern analysis of neuroimaging data in Matlab/GNU Octave. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 10(2016), 27. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2016.00027
- Oppenheim, G. M., & Dell, G. S. (2008). Inner speech slips exhibit lexical bias, but not the phonemic similarity effect. Cognition, 106(1), 528–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.02.006
- Oppenheim, G. M., & Dell, G. S. (2010). Motor movement matters: The flexible abstractness of inner speech. Memory & Cognition, 38(8), 1147–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.8.1147
- Parrell, B., Agnew, Z., Nagarajan, S., Houde, J., & Ivry, R. B. (2017). Impaired feedforward control and enhanced feedback control of speech in patients with cerebellar degeneration. Journal of Neuroscience, 37(38), 9249–9258. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3363-16.2017
- Poldrack, R. A. (2007). Region of interest analysis for fMRI. Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience, 2(1), 67–70. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsm006
- Price, C. J. (2012). A review and synthesis of the first 20 years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading. NeuroImage, 62(2), 816–847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.062
- Rampinini, A. C., Handjaras, G., Leo, A., Cecchetti, L., Ricciardi, E., Marotta, G., & Pietrini, P. (2017). Functional and spatial segregation within the inferior frontal and superior temporal cortices during listening, articulation imagery, and production of vowels. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 17029. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17314-0
- Rogalsky, C., Poppa, T., Chen, K. H., Anderson, S. W., Damasio, H., Love, T., & Hickok, G. (2015). Speech repetition as a window on the neurobiology of auditory-motor integration for speech: A voxel-based lesion symptom mapping study. Neuropsychologia, 71(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.03.012
- Stokes, R. C., Venezia, J. H., & Hickok, G. J. (2019). The motor system’s [modest] contribution to speech perception. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 26(4), 1354–1366. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01580-2
- Tian, X., Ding, N., Teng, X., Bai, F., & Poeppel, D. (2018). Imagined speech influences perceived loudness of sound. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(3), 225–234. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0305-8
- Tian, X., & Poeppel, D. (2010). Mental imagery of speech and movement implicates the dynamics of internal forward models. Frontiers in Psychology, 1(3), 255–262. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00166
- Tian, X., & Poeppel, D. (2012). Mental imagery of speech: Linking motor and perceptual systems through internal simulation and estimation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6(6), 314. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00314
- Tian, X., & Poeppel, D. (2013). The effect of imagination on stimulation: The functional specificity of efference copies in speech processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(7), 1020–1036. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00381
- Tian, X., & Poeppel, D. (2015). Dynamics of self-monitoring and error detection in speech production: Evidence from mental imagery and MEG. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(2), 352–364. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00692
- Tian, X., Zarate, J. M., & Poeppel, D. (2016). Mental imagery of speech implicates two mechanisms of perceptual reactivation. Cortex, 77(7), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2016.01.002
- Tremblay, S., Shiller, D. M., & Ostry, D. J. J. N. (2003). Somatosensory basis of speech production. Nature, 423(6942), 866–869. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01710
- Whitford, T. J., Jack, B. N., Pearson, D., Griffiths, O., Luque, D., Harris, A. W., Spencer, K. M., & Le Pelley, M. E. (2017). Neurophysiological evidence of efference copies to inner speech. eLife, 6(2017), e28197. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.28197
- Wolpert, D. M., & Ghahramani, Z. (2000). Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nature Neuroscience, 3(Suppl), 1212–1217. https://doi.org/10.1038/81497
- Yee, E., Drucker, D. M., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2010). fMRI-adaptation evidence of overlapping neural representations for objects related in function or manipulation. NeuroImage, 50(2), 753–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.036
- Zhao, L., Chen, C., Shao, L., Wang, Y., Xiao, X., Chen, C., … Xue, G. (2016). Orthographic and phonological representations in the fusiform cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 27(11), 5197–5210. http://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhw300
- Zhen, A., Van Hedger, S., Heald, S., Goldin-Meadow, S., & Tian, X. (2019). Manual directional gestures facilitate cross-modal perceptual learning. Cognition, 187(2019), 178–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.03.004