Lignocellulosic feedstock conversion, inhibitor detoxification and cellulosic hydrolysis – a review

References

• Gupta R, Sharma KK, Kuhad RC. Separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) of Prosopis juliflora, a woody substrate, for the production of cellulosic ethanol by Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Pichia stipitis-NCIM 3498. Bioresour. Technol. 100, 1214–1220 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keshwani DR, Cheng JJ. Switchgrass for bioethanol and other value-added applications: a review. Bioresour. Technol. 100, 1515–1523 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayrakci AG, Koçar G. Second-generation bioethanol production from water hyacinth and duckweed in Izmir: a case study. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. [Internet] . 30, 306–316 (2014). Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1364032113007107.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Singh LK, Ghosh S. Bioconversion of lignocellulosic fraction of water-hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) hemicellulose acid hydrolysate to ethanol by Pichia stipitis. Bioresour. Technol. 100, 3293–3297 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn-Hägerdal B, Galbe M, Gorwa-Grauslund MF, Lidén G, Zacchi G. Bio-ethanol – the fuel of tomorrow from the residues of today. Trends Biotechnol. 24, 549–556 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias DE, Oliveira ME, Vaughan BE, Rykiel EJ. Ethanol as fuel: energy, carbon dioxide balances, and ecological footprint. Bioscience 55, 593 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapouri H, Gallagher P. USDA's 2002 Ethanol cost-of-production survey. Energy Policy [Internet]. Agricultur, 1099–1110 (2005). Available from: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1376616.1376726.
   Google Scholar
• Demirbas A. The importance of bioethanol and biodiesel from biomass. Energ. Sources, B Econ. Plan. Pol. 3, 177–185 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EPA. Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies Calculator [Internet]. (2014). Available from: http://www.epa.gov/cleanenergy/energy-resources/calculator.html#results.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Osmani A, Awudu I, Gonela V. An integrated optimization model for switchgrass-based bioethanol supply chain. Appl. Energ. 102, 1205–1217 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macrelli S, Mogensen J, Zacchi G. Techno-economic evaluation of 2nd generation bioethanol production from sugar cane bagasse and leaves integrated with the sugar-based ethanol process. Biotechnol. Biofuels 5, 1–8 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taherzadeh MJ, Karimi K. Pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes to improve ethanol and biogas production: a review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 9, 1621–1651 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh P, Ghose TK. Bioethanol in India: recent past and emerging future. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 85, 1–27 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Geddes CC, Nieves IU, Ingram LO. Advances in ethanol production. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 22, 312–319 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar N, Ghosh SK, Bannerjee S, Aikat K. Bioethanol production from agricultural wastes: an overview. Renew. Energ. 37, 19–27 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandel AK, Singh O V., Venkateswar Rao L, Chandrasekhar G, Lakshmi Narasu M. Bioconversion of novel substrate Saccharum spontaneum, a weedy material, into ethanol by Pichia stipitis NCIM3498. Bioresour. Technol. 102, 1709–1714 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber GW, Dale BE. Grassoline at the pump. Sci. Am. 301, 52–59 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demain A, Newcomb M, Wu J. Cellulase, Clostridia, and ethanol. This review is dedicated to the late Marek Romaniec, who brought …. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. [Internet]. (2004). Available from: http://mmbr.asm.org/cgi/content/abstract/69/1/124\ nfile:///Users/sergiosnicolaou/Documents/Papers2/Articles/2004/Demain/Demain 2004 Cellulase Clostridia and Ethanol This review is dedicated to the late Marek Romaniec 
who brought ….pdf\npapers2://publication/uuid/E274F62A-804A-4D38-B419-6B88
C0ECB0B9.
   Google Scholar
• Kim S, Dale BE. Global potential bioethanol production from wasted crops and crop residues. Biomass Bioenerg. 26, 361–375 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta VK, Potumarthi R, O'Donovan A, Kubicek CP, Sharma GD, Tuohy MG. Bioenergy research: an overview on technological developments and bioresources. In: Bioenerg. Res. Adv. Appl. 23–47 (2014).
   Google Scholar
• Olsson L, Hahn-Hägerdal B. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates for ethanol production. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 18, 312–331 (1996).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale BE. Biobased industrial products: Bioprocess engineering when cost really counts. Editorial. Biotechnol. Prog. 15, 775–776 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wayman M, Parekh SR. Biotechnology of Biomass Conversion (1990).
   Google Scholar
• Neureiter M, Danner H, Thomasser C, Saidi B, Braun R. Dilute-acid hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse at varying conditions. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 98–100, 49–58 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Dogaris I, Vakontios G, Kalogeris E, Mamma D, Kekos D. Induction of cellulases and hemicellulases from Neurospora crassa under solid-state cultivation for bioconversion of sorghum bagasse into ethanol. Ind. Crops Prod. 29, 404–411 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao X, Lynd L, Wyman C, Bakker A. Kinetic modeling of cellulosic biomass to ethanol via simultaneous saccharification and fermentation: Part I. accommodation of intermittent feeding and analysis of staged reactors . Biotechnol. Bioeng. 102, 59–65 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang H, Yan R, Chen H, Lee DH, Zheng C. Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis. Fuel 86, 1781–1788 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Severe J, ZoBell DR. Review: Technical aspects for the utilization of small grain straws as feed energy sources for ruminants: emphasis on beef cattle. Digital Commons: All Current Publications. Paper 95. Available at http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/extension_curall/95 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Tutt M, Olt J, et al. Suitability of various plant species for bioethanol production. Agron. Res. 9, 261–267 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Méndez-VilasA. Current Research, Technology and Education Topics in Applied Microbiology and Microbial Biotechnology. FORMATEX Microbiology Series No. 2, book Vol. 2, 897–907 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Sun Y, Cheng J. Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review. Bioresour. Technol. [Internet]. 83(1), 1–11 (2002). Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12058826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesselink B, Harmsen R, Wolfgang E. Energy Savings 2020: How to triple the impact of energy saving policies in Europe – a contributing study to Roadmap 2050 [Internet]. Available from: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:ENERGY+SAVINGS+2020+How+to+triple+the+impact+of+energy+saving+policies+in+Europe#1.
   Google Scholar
• Jung HG, Vogel KP. Influence of lignin on digestibility of forage cell wall material. J. Anim. Sci. 62(6), 1703–1712 (1986).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin SB, Samson R, Bransby D, Wiselogel A. Evaluating physical, chemical, and energetic properties of perennial grasses as biofuels. Proc. BioEnergy. 15–20 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen A, Teller PJ, Hilstrøm T, Ahring BK. Hydrolysis of Miscanthus for bioethanol production using dilute acid presoaking combined with wet explosion pre-treatment and enzymatic treatment. Bioresour. Technol. 99, 6602–6607 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sreenath HK, Koegel RG, Moldes AB, Jeffries TW, Straub RJ. Ethanol production from alfalfa fiber fractions by saccharification and fermentation. Process Biochem. 36, 1199–1204 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh P, Suman A, Tiwari P, Arya N, Gaur A, Shrivastava AK. Biological pretreatment of sugarcane trash for its conversion to fermentable sugars. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 24, 667–673 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jingura RM, Musademba D, Matengaifa R. An evaluation of utility of Jatropha curcas L. as a source of multiple energy carriers . Int. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2(7) (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Yamamura M, Akashi K, Yokota A, et al. Characterization of Jatropha curcas lignins. Plant Biotechnol. 29(2), 179–183 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ververis C, Georghiou K, Danielidis D, et al. Cellulose, hemicelluloses, lignin and ash content of some organic materials and their suitability for use as paper pulp supplements. Bioresour. Technol. 98, 296–301 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandel AK, Lakshmi Narasu M, Chandrasekhar G, Manikyam A, Venkateswar Rao L. Use of Saccharum spontaneum (wild sugarcane) as biomaterial for cell immobilization and modulated ethanol production by thermotolerant Saccharomyces cerevisiae VS3. Bioresour. Technol. 100, 2404–2410 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasha C, Nagavalli M, Venkateswar Rao L. Lantana camara for fuel ethanol production using thermotolerant yeast. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 44, 666–672 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao X, Zhang L, Liu D. Comparative study on chemical pretreatment methods for improving enzymatic digestibility of crofton weed stem. Bioresour. Technol. 99, 3729–3736 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao X, Liu D. Chemical and thermal characteristics of lignins isolated from Siam weed stem by acetic acid and formic acid delignification. Ind. Crops Prod. 32, 284–291 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ackerson MD, Clausen EC, Gaddy JL. Production of ethanol from MSW via concentrated acid hydrolysis of the lignocellulosic fraction. 16th IGT Conference on Energy from Biomass Wastes, Washington, DC, USA, 25–29March 1991, 725–743 (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Harmsen P, Huijgen W. Literature review of physical and chemical pretreatment processes for lignocellulosic biomass [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ecn.nl/docs/library/report/2010/e10013.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Komilis DP, Ham RK. The effect of lignin and sugars to the aerobic decomposition of solid wastes. In: Waste Manage. 419–423 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamborn J. Characterisation of municipal solid waste composition into model inputs. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Work. Hydro-Physico-Mechanics Landfills (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Muller ZO, others. Feed from animal wastes: state of knowledge. FAO Anim. Prod. Heal. Pap. (18) (1980).
   Google Scholar
• Jordan SN, Mullen GJ, Murphy MC. Composition variability of spent mushroom compost in Ireland. Bioresour. Technol. 99, 411–418 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim EJ, Amezcua CM, Utterback PL, Parsons CM. Phosphorus bioavailability, true metabolizable energy, and amino acid digestibilities of high protein corn distillers dried grains and dehydrated corn germ. Poult. Sci. 87, 700–705 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasangulapati V, Ramachandriya KD, Kumar A, Wilkins MR, Jones CL, Huhnke RL. Effects of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin on thermochemical conversion characteristics of the selected biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 114, 663–669 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L. Relationship between crystallinity index and enzymatic hydrolysis performance of celluloses separated from aquatic and terrestrial plant materials. 9, 3993–4005 (2014).
   Google Scholar
• Cheng G, Varanasi P, Li C, et al. Transition of cellulose crystalline structure and surface morphology of biomass as a function of ionic liquid pretreatment and its relation to enzymatic hydrolysis. Biomacromolecules [Internet]. 12(4), 933–41 (2011). Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21361369.
   Google Scholar
• Wan ECH, Yu JZ. Determination of sugar compounds in atmospheric aerosols by liquid chromatography combined with positive electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A. 1107(1), 175–181 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng H, Li H, Luo H, Xu J. A novel combined pretreatment of ball milling and microwave irradiation for enhancing enzymatic hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose. Bioresour. Technol. 130, 81–87 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan JK. Biobased Industrial Products. Agric. Res. [Internet] . 50, 16 (2002). Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=6580353&site=ehost-live.
   Google Scholar
• Zwolinski MD, Harris RF, Hickey WJ, et al. No title. Bioresour. Technol. [Internet] . 5(1), 1–11 (2013). Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?
artid=3574029&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.
   Google Scholar
• Toma M, Bandow H, Vinatoru M, Maeda Y. Ultrasonically assisted conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol. Proceedings of the AlChE Annual Meeting, San Francisco. CA, 12–17 November (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Luo J, Fang Z, Smith RL. Ultrasound-enhanced conversion of biomass to biofuels. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. [Internet] . 41, 56–93 (2014). Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S036012851300052X.
   Google Scholar
• Yachmenev V, Condon B, Klasson T, Lambert A. Acceleration of the enzymatic hydrolysis of corn stover and sugar cane bagasse celluloses by low intensity uniform ultrasound. J. Biobased Mater. Bioenerg. 3, 25–31 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitayavardhana S, Shrestha P, Rasmussen ML, Lamsal BP, van Leeuwen J (Hans), Khanal SK. Ultrasound improved ethanol fermentation from cassava chips in cassava-based ethanol plants. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 2741–2747 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velmurugan R, Muthukumar K. Sono-assisted enzymatic saccharification of sugarcane bagasse for bioethanol production. Biochem. Eng. J. 63, 1–9 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García A, Alriols MG, Llano-Ponte R, Labidi J. Ultrasound-assisted fractionation of the lignocellulosic material. Bioresour. Technol. 102, 6326–6330 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasmal S, Goud V, Mohanty K. Ultrasound assisted lime pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass toward bioethanol production. Energ. Fuels 26(6), 3777–3784 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sindhu R, Kuttiraja M, Elizabeth Preeti V, Vani S, Sukumaran RK, Binod P. A novel surfactant-assisted ultrasound pretreatment of sugarcane tops for improved enzymatic release of sugars. Bioresour. Technol. 135, 67–72 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobucci-Ponsano B, Ionata E, La Cara F. Extremophilic (Hemi) cellulolytic microorganisms and enzymes [Internet]. In: Lignocellulose Conversion, 111–130 (2013). Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/
978-3-642-37861-4.
   Google Scholar
• Hu Z, Wen Z. Enhancing enzymatic digestibility of switchgrass by microwave-assisted alkali pretreatment. Biochem. Eng. J. 38, 369–378 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weil JR, Dien B, Bothast R, Hendrickson R, Mosier NS, Ladisch MR. Removal of fermentation inhibitors formed during pretreatment of biomass by polymeric adsorbents. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. [Internet] . 41, 6132–6138 (2002). Available from: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-2242426285&partnerID=40&md5=b851c077b38e44ca2e11fe62371f7f95.
   Google Scholar
• Bals B, Rogers C, Jin M, Balan V, Dale B. Evaluation of ammonia fibre expansion (AFEX) pretreatment for enzymatic hydrolysis of switchgrass harvested in different seasons and locations. Biotechnol. Biofuel. 3, 1 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan C, da Costa Sousa L, Jin M, Chang L, Dale BE, Balan V. Alkali-based AFEX pretreatment for the conversion of sugarcane bagasse and cane leaf residues to ethanol. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 107, 441–450 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balan V, Bals B, Chundawat SPS, Marshall D, Dale BE. Lignocellulosic biomass pretreatment using AFEX. Methods Mol. Biol. 581, 61–77 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Soccol CR, Vandenberghe LP de S, Medeiros ABP, et al. Bioethanol from lignocelluloses: Status and perspectives in Brazil. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 4820–4825 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öhgren K, Vehmaanperä J, Siika-Aho M, Galbe M, Viikari L, Zacchi G. High temperature enzymatic prehydrolysis prior to simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of steam pretreated corn stover for ethanol production. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 40, 607–613 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heitz M, Carrasco F, Rubio M, Brown A, Chornet E, Overend RP. Physico-chemical characterization of lignocellulosic substrates pretreated via autohydrolysis: an application to tropical woods. Biomass. 13, 255–273 (1987).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez A, Rodriguez ME, Wells ML, York SW, Preston JF, Ingram LO. Detoxification of dilute acid hydrolysates of lignocellulose with lime. Biotechnol. Prog. 17, 287–293 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosier N, Wyman C, Dale B, et al. Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 96, 673–686 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan J. pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Biotechnol. Adv. [Internet]. 30, 1447–57 (1994). Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23899571.
   Google Scholar
• Saha BC, Iten LB, Cotta MA, Wu YV. Dilute acid pretreatment, enzymatic saccharification and fermentation of wheat straw to ethanol. Process Biochem. 40, 3693–3700 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ximenes E, Kim Y, Ladisch MR. Biological conversion of plants to fuels and chemicals and the effects of inhibitors. In: C.E. Wyman (Ed), Aqueous Pretreatment of Plant Biomass for Biological and Chemical Conversion to Fuels and Chemicals, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 39–60 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Jung YH, Kim IJ, Kim HK, Kim KH. Dilute acid pretreatment of lignocellulose for whole slurry ethanol fermentation. Bioresour. Technol. 132, 109–114 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik A. Environmental challenge vis a vis opportunity: the case of water hyacinth. Environ. Int. 33, 122–138 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nigam JN. Bioconversion of water-hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) hemicellulose acid hydrolysate to motor fuel ethanol by xylose-fermenting yeast. J. Biotechnol. [Internet] . 97(2), 107–16 (2002). Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12067517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abraham M, Kurup GM. Bioconversion of tapioca (Manihot esculenta) waste and water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes)—Influence of various physico-chemical factors. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 82(3), 259–263 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Isarankura-na-ayudhya C, Tantimongcolwat T. Original article : appropriate technology for the bioconversion of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) to liquid ethanol : future prospects for community strengthening and sustainable development. EXCLI J. 6, 167–176 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Harmsen P, Gosselink R, Mulder W, Yilmaz G, Bakker R. Biorefinery: key for a successful biobased bioeconomy. Symp. Biorefinery Food, Fuel Mater. 2013. (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Wettstein P, Vos J de. net energy balance of ethanol production from wood. Proceedings of the fourth International Symposium on Alcohol Fuels Technology, Guaruja-SP-Brasil, 5-8 October 1980. (1980).
   Google Scholar
• Iglesias G, Bao M, Lamas J, Vega A. Soda pulping of Miscanthus sinensis. Effects of operational variables on pulp yield and lignin solubilization. Bioresour. Technol. 58, 17–23 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Fan L, Lee YH, Gharpuray M. The nature of lignocellulosics and their pretreatments for enzymatic hydrolysis [Internet]. In: Microbial Reactions. Springer, 157–187 (1982). Available from: http://www.springerlink.com/index/yr8375162445675j.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fengel D, Wegener G. Wood: chemistry, ultrastructure, reactions.
   Google Scholar
• Mussatto S, Teixeira J. Lignocellulose as raw material in fermentation processes. Appl. Microbiol. Microb. Biotechnol. [Internet] . 2, 897–907 (2010). Available from: http://repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt/handle/1822/16762\n www.formatex.
info.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Singh SP, Mishra IM, Adhikari DK. Recent advances in production of bioethanol from lignocellulosic biomass. Chem. Eng. Technol. 32, 517–526 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim S, Holtzapple MT. Delignification kinetics of corn stover in lime pretreatment. Bioresour. Technol. 97, 778–785 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang VS, Nagwani M, Kim CH, Holtzapple MT. Oxidative lime pretreatment of high-lignin biomass: poplar wood and newspaper. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 94, 1–28 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabber JH, Ralph J, Hatfield RD. Model studies of ferulate – Coniferyl alcohol cross-product formation in primary maize walls: Implications for lignification in 
grasses. J. Agric. Food Chem. 50, 6008–6016 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie G, Peng L. Genetic engineering of energy crops: a strategy for biofuel production in China. J. Integr. Plant Biol. [Internet]. 53(2), 143–50 (2011). Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21205188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmsen P, Huijgen W, Bermudez L, Bakker R. Literature review of physical and chemical pretreatment processes for lignocellulosic biomass. Wageningen UR, Food & Biobased Research.
   Google Scholar
• Avgerinos E, Billa E, Papatheofanous M, Koullas D, Koukios E. Developing molecular strategies for fractionation, delignification and characterisation of plant fibres. Comptes Rendus - Biol. 327, 927–933 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao H, Baker GA, Cowins JV. Fast enzymatic saccharification of switchgrass after pretreatment with ionic liquids. Biotechnol. Prog. [Internet]. 26(1), 127–33 (2009). Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19918908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonough T. The chemistry of organosolv delignification [Internet]. Available from: http://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/2069.
   Google Scholar
• Kootstra MJ, Beeftink HH, Scott EL, Sanders JPM. Comparison of dilute mineral and organic acid pretreatment for enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat straw. Biochem. Eng. J. [Internet]. 46(2), 126–131. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1369703×09001405 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earle MJ, Seddon KR. Ionic liquids. Green solvents for the future. Pure Appl. Chem. 72, 1391–1398 (2000).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder JB, Raines RT. Fermentable sugars by chemical hydrolysis of biomass. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 4516–4521 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C, Zhang Z, Zhao ZK. Direct conversion of glucose and cellulose to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural 
in ionic liquid under microwave irradiation. Tetrahedron Lett. 50, 5403–5405 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fort DA, Remsing RC, Swatloski RP, Moyna P, Moyna G, Rogers RD. Can ionic liquids dissolve wood? Processing and analysis of lignocellulosic materials with 1-n-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride. Green Chem. 9, 63 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu L, Chen H. Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose materials treated with ionic liquid [BMIM] Cl. Chinese Sci. Bull. 51, 2432–2436 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dadi AP, Varanasi S, Schall CA. Enhancement of cellulose saccharification kinetics using an ionic liquid pretreatment step. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 95, 904–910 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo CH, Lee CK. Enhancement of enzymatic saccharification of cellulose by cellulose dissolution pretreatments. Carbohydr. Polym. 77(1), 41–46 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen TAD, Kim KR, Han SJ, et al. Pretreatment of rice straw with ammonia and ionic liquid for lignocellulose conversion to fermentable sugars. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 7432–7438 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinke HB, Olsson L, Thomsen AB, Ahring BK. Potential inhibitors from wet oxidation of wheat straw and their effect on ethanol production of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: wet oxidation and fermentation by yeast. Biotechnol. Bioeng. [Internet]. 81(6), 738–747. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12529889 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Rogers RD, Seddon KR. Chemistry. Ionic liquids – solvents of the future? Science. 302, 792–793 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamiya N, Matsushita Y, Hanaki M, et al. Enzymatic in situ saccharification of cellulose in aqueous-ionic liquid media. Biotechnol. Lett. 30, 1037–1040 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C, Knierim B, Manisseri C, et al. Comparison of dilute acid and ionic liquid pretreatment of switchgrass: Biomass recalcitrance, delignification and enzymatic saccharification. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 4900–4906 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Silva ASA, Inoue H, Endo T, Yano S, Bon EPS. Milling pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse and straw for enzymatic hydrolysis and ethanol fermentation. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 7402–7409 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardona CA, Sánchez OJ. Fuel ethanol production: process design trends and integration opportunities. Bioresour. Technol. 98, 2415–2457 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi J, Chinn MS, Sharma-Shivappa RR. Microbial pretreatment of cotton stalks by solid state cultivation of Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Bioresour. Technol. [Internet]. 99(14), 6556–64. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18242083 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arantes V, Jellison J, Goodell B. Peculiarities of brown-rot fungi and biochemical Fenton reaction with regard to their potential as a model for bioprocessing biomass. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 94, 323–338 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray MJ, Leak DJ, Spanu PD, Murphy RJ. Brown rot fungal early stage decay mechanism as a biological pretreatment for softwood biomass in biofuel production. Biomass Bioenerg. 34(8), 1257–1262 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong DWS. Structure and action mechanism of ligninolytic enzymes. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 157, 174–209 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchette RA. Degradation of the lignocellulose complex in wood. Can. J. Bot. 73, 999–1010 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Washington ASMP, Benneti KG, Faison BD. Use of Fungi Biodegradation. In: Environmental Microbiology, 960–970 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Rabinovich ML, Bolobova A V., Vasil'chenko LG. Fungal decomposition of natural aromatic structures and xenobiotics: a review. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 40, 1–17 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng Y, Yang X, Yu H, Zhang X, Ma F. Comparative studies on thermochemical characterization of corn stover pretreated by white-rot and brown-rot fungi. J. Agric. Food Chem. 59, 9965–9971 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novotný ČCˇ , Cajthaml T, Svobodová K, Šušla M, Šašek V. Irpex lacteus, a white-rot fungus with biotechnological potential – review. Folia Microbiol. (Praha). 54, 375–390 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Q, He YC, Xian M, et al. Improving enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat straw using ionic liquid 1-ethyl-3-methyl imidazolium diethyl phosphate pretreatment. Bioresour. Technol. 100, 3570–3575 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang FQ, Xie H, Chen W, Wang ET, Du FG, Song AD. Biological pretreatment of corn stover with ligninolytic enzyme for high efficient enzymatic hydrolysis. Bioresour. Technol. 144, 572–578 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong W, Zhang Z, Qiao W, Fu P, Liu M. Comparison of chemical and biological pretreatment of corn straw for biogas production by anaerobic digestion. Renew. Energ. 36, 1875–1879 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto MS, Europe B, Markets WB. Global biofuels outlook 2010-2020.(2011).
   Google Scholar
• Salvachúa D, Prieto A, López-Abelairas M, Lu-Chau T, Martínez ÁT, Martínez MJ. Fungal pretreatment: an alternative in second-generation ethanol from wheat straw. Bioresour. Technol. 102, 7500–7506 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvachúa D, Prieto A, Vaquero ME, Martínez ÁT, Martínez MJ. Sugar recoveries from wheat straw following treatments with the fungus Irpex lacteus. Bioresour. Technol. 131, 218–225 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma H, Liu WW, Chen X, Wu YJ, Yu ZL. Enhanced enzymatic saccharification of rice straw by microwave pretreatment. Bioresour. Technol. 100, 1279–1284 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potumarthi R, Baadhe RR, Nayak P, Jetty A. Simultaneous pretreatment and sacchariffication of rice husk by Phanerochete chrysosporium for improved production of reducing sugars. Bioresour. Technol. 128, 113–117 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller FA, Hamilton JE, Nguyen QA. Microbial pretreatment of biomass: potential for reducing severity of thermochemical biomass pretreatment. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 105–108, 27–41 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bak JS, Ko JK, Choi IG, Park YC, Seo JH, Kim KH. Fungal pretreatment of lignocellulose by Phanerochaete chrysosporium to produce ethanol from rice straw. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 104, 471–482 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saritha M, Arora A, Lata. Biological Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Substrates for Enhanced Delignification and Enzymatic Digestibility. Indian J. Microbiol. 52, 122–130 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford DL, Barder MJ, Pometto AL, Crawford RL. Chemistry of softwood lignin degradation by Streptomyces viridosporus. Arch. Microbiol. 131, 140–145 (1982).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenn JK, Gold MH. Decolorization of several polymeric dyes by the lignin-degrading basidiomycete Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 45, 1741–1747 (1983).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tien M, Kirk TK. Lignin-Degrading Enzyme from the Hymenomycete Phanerochaete chrysosporium Burds. Science 221, 661–663 (1983).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawada T, Nakamura Y, Kobayashi F, Kuwahara M, Watanabe T. Effects of fungal pretreatment and steam explosion pretreatment on enzymatic saccharification of plant biomass. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 48, 719–724 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaidya A, Singh T. Pre-treatment of Pinus radiata substrates by basidiomycetes fungi to enhance enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotechnol. Lett. 34, 1263–1267 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomascolo A, Record E, Herpoël-Gimbert I, et al. Overproduction of laccase by a monokaryotic strain of Pycnoporus cinnabarinus using ethanol as inducer.
 J. Appl. Microbiol. 94, 618–624 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvira P, Tomás-Pejó E, Ballesteros M, Negro MJ. Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: a review. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 4851–4861 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jönsson LJ, Palmqvist E, Nilvebrant NO, Hahn-Hägerdal B. Detoxification of wood hydrolysates with laccase and peroxidase from the white-rot fungus Trametes versicolor. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 49, 691–697 (1998).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim Y, Yu A, Han M, Choi GW, Chung B. Enhanced enzymatic saccharification of barley straw pretreated by ethanosolv technology. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 163, 143–152 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björklund L, Larsson S, Jönsson LJ, Reimann E, Nilvebrant N-O. Treatment with lignin residue: a novel method for detoxification of lignocellulose hydrolysates. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 98–100, 563–575 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersson A, Almeida JRM, Modig T, et al. A 5-hydroxymethyl furfural reducing enzyme encoded by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ADH6 gene conveys HMF tolerance. Yeast 23, 455–464 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gorsich SW, Dien BS, Nichols NN, Slininger PJ, Liu ZL, Skory CD. Tolerance to furfural-induced stress is associated with pentose phosphate pathway genes ZWF1, GND1, RPE1, and TKL1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 71, 339–349 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasunuma T, Kondo A. Consolidated bioprocessing and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of lignocellulose to ethanol with thermotolerant yeast strains. Process Biochem. 47, 1287–1294 (2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battista OA. Hydrolysis and crystallization of cellulose. Ind. Eng. Chem. 42(3), 502–507 (1950).
   Google Scholar
• Vohra M, Manwar J, Manmode R, Padgilwar S, Patil S. Bioethanol production: Feedstock and current technologies. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2(1), 573–584 (2014).
   Google Scholar
• Jönsson LJ, Alriksson B, Nilvebrant N-O. Bioconversion of lignocellulose: inhibitors and detoxification. Biotechnol. Biofuels [Internet]. 6, 16 (2013). Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3574029&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alriksson B, Horváth IS, Sjöde A, Nilvebrant N-O, Jönsson LJ. Ammonium hydroxide detoxification of spruce acid hydrolysates. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 121–124, 911–922 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenske JJ, Griffin DA, Penner MH. Comparison of aromatic monomers in lignocellulosic biomass prehydrolysates. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 20, 364–368 (1998).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenske JJ, Hashimoto A, Penner MH. Relative fermentability of lignocellulosic diluteacid prehydrolysates. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 73, 145–157 (1998).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo P, Wang X, Zhu W, Yang H, Cheng X, Cui Z. Degradation of corn stalk by the composite microbial system of MC1.
 J. Environ. Sci. 20, 109–114 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran A V, Chambers RP. Red oak wood derived inhibitors in the ethanol fermentation of xylose by Pichia stipitis.pdf. Biotechnol. Lett. 7, 841–846 (1985).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran AV, Chambers RP. Ethanol fermentation of red oak acid prehydrolysate by the yeast Pichia stipitis CBS 5776. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 8, 439–444 (1986).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark TA, Mackie KL. Fermentation inhibitors in wood hydrolysates derived from the softwood Pinus radiata. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 34B, 101–110 (1984).
   Google Scholar
• Luo C, Brink DL, Blanch HW. Identification of potential fermentation inhibitors in conversion of hybrid poplar hydrolyzate to ethanol. Biomass Bioenerg. 22, 125–138 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson S, Reimann A, Nilvebrant N-O, Jönsson LJ. Comparison of Different Methods for the Detoxification of Lignocellulose Hydrolyzates of Spruce. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 77, 91–104 (1999).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson P, Larsson S, Jönsson LJ, et al. Supercritical fluid extraction of a lignocellulosic hydrolysate of spruce for detoxification and to facilitate analysis of inhibitors. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 79, 694–700 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín C, Galbe M, Wahlbom CF, Hahn-Hägerdal B, Jönsson LJ. Ethanol production from enzymatic hydrolysates of sugarcane bagasse using recombinant xylose-utilising Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 31, 274–282 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esteghlalian A, Hashimoto AG, Fenske JJ, Penner MH. Modeling and optimization of the dilute-sulfuric-acid pretreatment of corn stover, poplar and switchgrass. Bioresour. Technol. 59, 129–136 (1997).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrić P, Meyer AS, Jensen PA, Dam-Johansen K. Reactor design for minimizing product inhibition during enzymatic lignocellulose hydrolysis: I. Significance and mechanism of cellobiose and glucose inhibition on cellulolytic enzymes. Biotechnol. Adv. 28, 308–324 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podkaminer KK, Shao X, Hogsett DA, Lynd LR. Enzyme inactivation by ethanol and development of a kinetic model for thermophilic simultaneous saccharification and fermentation at 50??C with Thermoanaerobacterium saccharolyticum ALK2. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 108, 1268–1278 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezerra RMF, Dias AA. Enzymatic kinetic of cellulose hydrolysis. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 126, 49–59 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisaria VS, Ghose TK. Biodegradation of cellulosic materials: Substrates, microorganisms, enzymes and products. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 3, 90–104 (1981).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reese ET, Siu RG, Levinson HS. The biological degradation of soluble cellulose derivatives and its relationship to the mechanism of cellulose hydrolysis. J. Bacteriol. 59, 485–497 (1950).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deshpande M V, Eriksson KE, Pettersson LG. An assay for selective determination of exo-1,4,-beta-glucanases in a mixture of cellulolytic enzymes. Anal. Biochem. 138, 481–487 (1984).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarantili PA, Koullas DP, Christakopoulos P, Kekos D, Koukios EG, Macris BJ. Cross-synergism in enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosics: mathematical correlations according to a hyperbolic model. Biomass Bioenerg. 10, 213–219 (1996).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghose TK, Das K. A simplified kinetic approach to cellulose-cellulase system. In: Ghose, TK & Fiechter A (Eds), Advances in Biochemical Engineering, Volume 1. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 55–76 (1971).
   Google Scholar
• Ganesh K, Joshi JB, Sawant SB. Cellulase deactivation in a stirred reactor. Biochem. 
Eng. J. 4, 137–141 (2000).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar