References
- Mondou M, Skogstad G. The Regulation of Biofuels in the United States, European Union and Canada. Network, CAER (Eds). University of Toronto (2012)
- Jensen M, Andersen AH. Biofuels: a contested response to climate change. Sustain. Sci. Pract. Pol. 9(1), 42–56 (2013).
- Savvanidou E, Zervas E, Tsagarakis K. Public acceptance of biofuels. Energy Policy 38, 3482–3488 (2010).
- Ribeiro F, Ferreira P, Araujo M, Braga A. Public opinion on renewable technologies in Portugal. Energy, Epub: 18 November, 2013 (2013).
- Upreti B, Van Der Horst D. National renewable energy policy and local opposition in the UK: the failed development of a biomass electricity plant. Biomass Bioenerg. 26(1), 61–69 (2004).
- Dessureault D. Canada biofuels annual. In: GAIN Report. Gray, R (Eds). USDA Foreign Agricultural Service (2011)
- Evans B. Biofuels Canada: USDA Report. In: Global Agricultural Information Network (GAIN) Report. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service (2013)
- Pratt S. US corn making much of Canada's ethanol. In: The Western Producer. (Eds) (2013)
- Smith E, Janzen H, Newlands N. Energy balances of biodiesel production from soybean and canola in Canada. Can. J. Plant Sci. 87(4), 793–801 (2007).
- Crano WD, Prislin R. Attitudes and persuasion. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 57, 345–374 (2006).
- Schwartz A, Hasnain M. Risk perception and risk attitude in informed consent. Risk Decis. Policy 7, 121–130 (2002).
- Farrow K, Teisl M, Noblet C, McCoy S, Rubin J. Does money grow on trees? People's willingness to pay for cellulosic wood ethanol. In: Economic Effects of Biofuel Production. Bernardes, MAdS (Ed). InTech (2011).
- Solomon BD, Johnson NH. Valuing climate protection through willingness to pay for biomass ethanol. Ecol. Econ. 68, 2137–2144 (2009).
- Johnson DM, Halvorsen KE, Solomon BD. Upper Midwestern U.S. consumers and ethanol: knowledge, beliefs and consumption. Biomass Bioenerg. 35, 1454–1464 (2011).
- Borick CP, Lachapelle E, Rabe BG. Climate compared: public opinion on climate change in the United States and Canada. In: Issues in Governance Studies. (Eds) The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC (2011)
- Cacciatore MA, Scheufele DA, Shaw BR. Labeling renewable energies: How the language surrounding biofuels can influence its public acceptance. Energy Policy 51, 673–682 (2012).
- **Reports on a split-ballot experiment, in which US respondents are randomly assigned to rate either a ‘biofuel’ or ‘ethanol’.
- Cacciatore MA, Binder AR, Scheufele DA, Shaw BR. Public attitudes toward biofuels. Polit. Life Sci. 31(1), 36–51 (2012).
- Delshad A, Raymond L. Media framing and public attitudes toward biofuels. Rev. Policy Res. 30(2), 190–210 (2013).
- Petrolia DR, Bhattacharjee S, Hudson D, Herndon CW. Do Americans want ethanol? A comparative contingent-valuation study of willingness to pay for E-10 and E-85. Energ. Econ. 32, 121–128 (2010).
- Kahan DM, Peters E, Wittlin M et al. The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nature Clim. Change 2, 732–735 (2012).
- **Demonstrates that attitudes towards climate change are culturally polarized in the USA, and that this polarization increases with science literacy and numeracy.
- Douglas M, Wildavsky A. Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technical and Environmental Dangers. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA (1982).
- Kahan DM, Braman D, Gastil J, Slovic P, Mertz CK. Culture and identity-protective cognition: explaining the white male effect in risk perception. J. Empir. Legal Stud. 4(3), 465–505 (2007).
- Marra AE, Jensen KL, Clark CD, English BC, Toliver DK. GHG emission reductions as a motivator of e85 purchases across market segments. Energ. Sustain. Soc. 2, 21–35 (2012).
- Wegener DT, Kelly JR. Social psychological dimensions of bioenergy development and public acceptance. Bioenerg. Res. 1, 107–117 (2008).
- Sniderman P, Brody R, Tetlock PE. Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. Cambridge University Press, New York (1991).
- Converse. The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In: Ideology and Discontent. Apter DE (Ed). The Free Press, New York (1964).
- Zaller J. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York (1992).
- Talamini E, Caldarelli CE, Wubben EFM, Dewes H. The composition and impact of stakeholders’ agendas on US ethanol production. Energy Policy 50, 647–658 (2012).
- **Uses quantitative content analysis to explore how the frames used to discuss liquid biofuels changed over time in scientific papers, policy documents and the news media.
- Jensen KL, Clark CD, English BC, Menard RJ, Skahan DK, Marra AC. Willingness to pay for E85 from corn, switchgrass, and wood residues. Energ Econon. 32, 1253–1262 (2010).
- Delshad AB, Raymond L, Sawicki V, Wegener DT. Public attitudes toward political and technological options for biofuels. Energy Policy 38, 3414–3425 (2010).
- Lawrence RZ. How good politics results in bad policy: the case of biofuel mandates. In: CID Working Paper & Belfer Center Discussion Paper. (Eds). Harvard University (2010).
- Kahan DM. Cultural Cognition as a Conception of the Cultural Theory of Risk. In: Handbook of Risk Theory: Epistemology, Decision Theory, Ethics and Social Implications of Risk. Roeser, S (Ed.): Springer Publishing, (2012).
- Miller JD. The measurement of civic scientific literacy. Public Underst. Sci. 7, 203–223 (1998).
- Miller JD. Public understanding of, and attitudes toward, scientific research: what we know and what we need to know. Public Underst. Sci. 13, 273–294 (2004).
- Brambor T, Clark WR, Golder M. Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analysis. Polit.l Anal. 14, 63–82 (2006).
- Ai C, Norton EC. Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Econ. Lett. 80, 123–129 (2003).
- Tomz M, Wittenberg J, King G. CLARIFY: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results. (Eds). Harvard Unviersity, Cambridge, MA (2001) http://gking.harvard.edu.
- King G, Tomz M, Wittenberg J. Making the most of statistical analyses: improving interpretation and presentation. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 44(2), 341–355 (2000).
- Greenberg M. Energy sources, public policy, and public preferences: Analysis of US national and site-specific data. Energy Policy 37(8), 3242–2349 (2009).
- Einsiedel EF, Boyd AD, Medlock J, Ashworth P. Assessing socio-technical mindsets: Public deliberations on carbon capture and storage in the context of energy sources and climate change. Energy Policy 53, 149–158 (2013).
- Firestone J, Kempton W, Lilley MB, Samoteskui K. Public acceptance of offshore wind power across regions and through time. J. Environ. Plan. Mgmt 55(10), 1369–1386 (2012).
- Richards G, Noble B, Belcher K. Barriers to renewable energy development: a case study of large-scale wind energy in Saskatchewan. Energy Policy 42, 691–698 (2012).
- Faiers A, Neame C. Consumer attitudes toward domestic solar power systems. Energy Policy 34(14), 1797–1806 (2006).
- Kahan DM, Braman D, Cohen GL, Gastil J, Slovic P. Who fears the HPV vaccine, who doesn’t, and why? An experimental study of the mechanisms of cultural cognition. Law Human Behav. 34(6), 501–516 (2010).
- Bridle R, Collings J, Cottrell J, Leopold A. Communication best practices for renewable energy. In: http://iea-retd.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/IEA-RETD-RE-COMMUNICATE-Report_Final_20130403.pdf. (IEA-RETD), IEA-RETD (Eds) (http://iea-retd.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/IEA-RETD-RE-COMMUNICATE-Report_Final_20130403.pdf, 2013)
- www.nytimes.com/2012/01/02/business/energy-environment/after-three-decades-federal-tax-credit-for-ethanol-expires.html?_r=0,
- www.nature.com/news/eu-debates-u-turn-on-biofuels-policy-1.13313
- www.reuters.com/article/2013/07/11/eu-biofuel-idUSL6N0FH1QK20130711,
- www.euractiv.com/climate-environment/ministers-block-eu-proposal-limi-news-518698
- www.euractiv.com/energy/european-parliament-votes-block-news-531161,
- ec.gc.ca/lcpe-cepa/eng/regulations/detailReg.cfm?intReg=186
- Available from the Roper Center for Public Opinion Research's (www.ropercenter.uconn.edu/) iPOLL database, item # USCBSNYT.042607A.R46.
- “Energy Learning Curve Survey,” January 2009. Available from the Roper Center for Public Opinion Research's (www.ropercenter.uconn.edu/) iPOLL database, item # USPAF.09ENLC.R18E.
- www.people-press.org/2008/09/24/declining-public-support-for-global-engagement/
- http://energycommerce.house.gov/rfs
- www.statcan.gc.ca/tables-tableaux/sum-som/l01/cst01/demo02a-eng.htm
- www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2006/dp-pd/tbt/Rp-eng.cfm?LANG=E&APATH=3&DETAIL=0&DIM=0&FL=A&FREE=0&GC=0&GID=0&GK=0&GRP=1&PID=99016&PRID=0&PTYPE=88971,97154&S=0&SHOWALL=0&SUB=0&Temporal=2006&THEME=70&VID=0&VNAMEE=&VNAMEF=
- www5.statcan.gc.ca/cansim/a26?lang=eng&retrLang=eng&id=0510001&pattern=age&tabMode=dataTable&srchLan=-1&p1=1&p2=49