Acceptance of Brazilian ethanol fuel and the role of expertise

References

• McIntyre T, Hanney P, Secko D, Einsiedel E, Rayner J. Genomics and green energy (GGE) quadrilemma symposium. Symposium primer. Montreal. (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Chateauraynaud F, Debaz J. Observer la sécurité sanitaire dans la durée. Leçons cognitives et pratiques d’un observatoire socio-informatique. Socio-informatique et argumentation: sociologie argumentative des controverses, concepts et méthodes socio-informatiques, http://socioargu.hypotheses.org/2786, (2011).
   Google Scholar
• PMO. Les rebelles de l’acceptabilité. Aujourd’hui le nanomonde. Pièces et main d’œuvre, http://www.nanomonde.org/Les-rebelles-de-l-acceptabilite (12 September 2009) (2009).
   Google Scholar
• RFA. The Gallagher review of the indirect effects of biofuels production The Renewable Fuels Agency. St. Leonards-on-Sea. July 2008. http://www.dft.gov.uk/rfa/_db/_documents/Report_of_the_Gallagher_review.pdf (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Amaral WaN, Marinho JP, Tarasantchi R, Beber A, Giuliani E. Environmental sustainability of sugarcane ethanol in Brazil. In: Sugarcane Ethanol – Contributions to Climate Change Mitigation and the Environment, Vooren PZaJVD (Ed.) Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, 113–138 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Wolford W. Of land and labor: agrarian reform on the sugarcane plantations of northeast Brazil. Lat. Am. Perspect. 31, 147–170 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Martinelli LA, Garrett R, Ferraz S, Naylor R. Sugar and ethanol production as a rural development strategy in Brazil: Evidence from the state of São Paulo. Agr. Syst. 104, 419–428 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Martinelli L, Filoso S. Expansion of sugarcane ethanol production in Brazil: environmental and social challenges. Ecol. Appl. 18(4), 885–898 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Alves F. Porque Morrem os Cortadores de Cana? Saúde e Sociedade 15(3), 90–98 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Noronha S, Ortiz L, Schlesinger S. Agribusiness and biofuels: an explosive mixture (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Cotula L, Dyer N, Vermeulen S. Fuelling exclusion? The biofuels boom and poor people's access to land (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Abramovay R. A political-cultural approach to the biofuels market in Brazil (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Plataforma BNDES. Impactos da Industria Canavieira no Brasil: Poluição atmosférica, ameaça a recursos hídricos, riscos para a produção de alimentos, relações de trabalho atrasadas e proteção insuficiente à saúde de trabalhadores (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Lehtonen M. Power, social sustainability, and certification of ethanol fuel: view from the Northeast of Brazil. In: Socioeconomic and Environmental Impacts of Biofuels: Evidence from Developing Nations. Gasparatos A, Strömberg P (Eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 144–170 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Lehtonen M. Social sustainability of the Brazilian bioethanol: power relations in a centre-periphery perspective. Biomass Bioenerg. 35(6), 2425–2434 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Abramovay R. Incertitudes socioenvironnementales dans la géopolitique de l’éthanol bresilien. Conférence internationale sur les biocarburants en Afrique. Session plénière 3: ‘Usage et application des biocarburants et stratégies nationales de développement’ (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Lehtonen M. Proálcool, ympäristö ja valta: Tilanteellinen analyysi Brasilian alkoholipolttoaineohjelman arvioinnissa (Proálcool, environment and power: The application of the situational analysis to the assessment of the Brazilian alcohol fuel program). Department of Limnology and Environmental Protection, Master's thesis (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Lehtonen M. Situational analysis as a tool for environmental impact assessment: the case of the Brazilian alcohol fuel program. In: Governing Our Environment, Report of a Conference, November 17–18. CeSaM and SØM. Copenhagen. p. 333–349. Copenhagen. (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Cowell R, Bristow G, Munday M. Acceptance, acceptability and environmental justice: the role of community benefits in wind energy development. Journal of Environ. Plann. Mgmt 54(4), 539–557 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Wüstenhagen R, Wolsink M, Bürer J. Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation – an introduction to the concept. Energy Policy 35(5), 2683–2691 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• A concise and analytical presentation of the various dimensions of acceptance of energy technologies.
   Google Scholar
• Sengers F, Raven RPJM, Van Venrooij A. From riches to rags: biofuels, media discourses, and resistance to sustainable energy technologies. Energy Policy 38(9), 5013–5027 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Upham P, Tomei J, Dendler L. Governance and legitimacy aspects of the UK biofuel carbon and sustainability reporting system. Energy Policy 39(5), 2669–2678 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Discussion of the key issues and challenges of legitimacy as applied to debates on the sustainability of biofuels.
   Google Scholar
• Aldrich HE, C. Fiol M. Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Acad. Mgmt Rev. 19(4), 645–670 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Hall J, Matos S, Silvestre B, Martin M. Managing technological and social uncertainties of innovation: the evolution of Brazilian energy and agriculture. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 78(7), 1147–1157 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Suchman MC. Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Acad. Mgmt Rev. 20, 571–610 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Cashore B. Legitimacy and the privatization of environmental governance: how non-state market-driven (NSMD) governance systems gain rulemaking authority. Governance 15, 503–529 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Gauder M, Graeff-Hönninger S, Claupein W. The impact of a growing bioethanol industry on food production in Brazil. Appl. Energ. 88, 672–679 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Novo A, Jansen K, Slingerland M, Giller K. Biofuel, dairy production and beef in Brazil: Competing claims on land use in São Paulo state. J. Peasant Stud. 37, 769–92 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Sandalow D. Ethanol: lessons from Brazil. In: A high growth strategy for ethanol. Aspen Institute; (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Schaffel SB, La Rovere E. The quest for eco-social efficiency in biofuels production in Brazil. J. Clean. Prod. 18, 1663–1670 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Feltran-Barbieri R, Abramovay R, Metzger JP. Some more biofuel lessons from Brazil. Nature 475 (28 July 2011), 455 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson J, Herrera S. Biofuels in Brazil: debates and impacts. J. Peasant Stud. 37, 749–768 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Compéan RG, Polenske KR. Antagonistic bioenergies: technological divergence of the ethanol industry in Brazil. Energy Policy 39, 6951–6961 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Gasparatos A, Borzoni M, Abramovay R. The Brazilian bioethanol and biodiesel programmes: drivers, policies and impacts. In: Socioeconomic and Environmental Impacts of Biofuels: Evidence from Developing Nations. Gasparatos ASP (Ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Comprehensive yet concise and up-to-date presentation of the state of Brazilian biofuel policies, including discussion on some of the key social challenges associated with biofuel development in the country.
   Google Scholar
• Gunkel G, Kosmol J, Sobral M, Rohn H, Montenegro S, Aureliano J. Sugar cane industry as a source of water pollution—case study on the situation in Ipojuca River, Pernambuco, Brazil. Water Air Soil Pollut. 180, 261–269 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Balsadi O: O mercado de trabalho assalariado na cultura da cana-de-açúcar. Revista Eletrônica da SBPC, Dossie Ethanol 86, (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Brasil R. O Brasil dos agrocombustíveis: Impactos das lavouras sobre a terra, o meio e a sociedade – Cana 2009. (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Fargione J, Hill J, Tilman D, Polasky S, Hawthorne P. Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science 319, 1235–1238 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Searchinger T, Heimlich R, Houghton RA, Dong F, Elobeid A, Fabio J, Tokgoz, S, Hayes D, Yu TH. Use of US croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land use change. Science 319, 1238–1240 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Doornbosch R, Steenblick R. Biofuels: is the cure worse than the disease? (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Royal Society. Sustainable Biofuels: Prospects and Challenges. Royal Society, London (2008).
   Google Scholar
• UN. Sustainable Bioenergy: A Framework for Decision Makers. United Nations (2007).
   Google Scholar
• FAO. Biofuels: prospects, risks and opportunities: the state of food and agriculture (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Oxfam. Another inconvenient truth. Oxfam Briefing Paper 114, Bailey R. (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Herzog AL. Um lobby exemplar para o etanol. Revista Exame, 24 February 2010, (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Almeida W. Ethanol diplomacy: Brazil and US in search of renewable energy. J. Globaliz. Compet. Governab. 3(3), 114–124 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• CGEE. Bioetanol combustível: uma oportunidade para o Brasil (2009).
   Google Scholar
• The main output of the work conducted by Brazilian researchers, commissioned by the Brazilian government in 2005, to examine the potential of the country supplying sustainably ethanol sufficient to substitute up to 10% of world's petrol demand.
   Google Scholar
• Cerqueira Leite RC, Leal MRLV, Cortez LAB, Griffin M, Scandiffio MIG. Can Brazil replace 5% of the 2025 gasoline world demand with ethanol? Energy 34, 655–661 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Goldemberg J, Coelho ST, Nastari PM, Lucon O. Ethanol learning curve – the Brazilian experience. Biomass Bioenerg. 26, 301–304 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Goldemberg J, Coelho ST, Guardabassi P. The sustainability of ethanol production from sugarcane. Energy Policy 36, 2086–2097 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Amaral WaND, Marinho JP, Tarasantchi R, Beber A, Giuliani E. Environmental sustainability of sugarcane ethanol in Brazil. In: Sugarcane Ethanol – Contributions to Climate Change Mitigation and the Environment. Zuurbier P, Vooren JVD (Eds). Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, 113–138 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Sugarcane Ethanol: Contributions to Climate Change Mitigation and the Environment. Zuurbier P, Van De Vooren J (Eds). Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen (2008).
   Google Scholar
• One of the most comprehensive presentations of Brazilian bioethanol potential and challenges, produced at the height of the international biofuel controversy, in collaboration by Brazilian and foreign experts.
   Google Scholar
• Upham P, Thornley P, Tomei J, Boucher P. Substitutable biodiesel feedstocks for the UK: a review of sustainability issues. J. Clean. Prod. 17, S37–S45 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Pilgrim S, Harvey M. Battles over biofuels in Europe: NGOs and the politics of markets. Sociol. Res. Online 15(3) (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Herrera S. As certificações globais de sustentabilidade dos biocombustíveis como instrumento de governança – subsídios a partir do caso brasileiro. Congresso LASA (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes BM, Welch CA, Gonçalves EC. Agrofuel policies in Brazil: paradigmatic and territorial disputes. J. Peasant Stud. 37, 793–819 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• An article describing the polarisation of biofuel debate in Brazil, between groups advocating radically contrasting development visions.
   Google Scholar
• Assis WFT, Zucarelli MC, Ortiz L. Despoluindo incertezas: Impactos Territoriais da Expansão das Monoculturas Energéticas no Brasil e Replicabilidade de Modelos Sustentáveis de Produção e Uso de Biocombustíveis (2007).
   Google Scholar
• De Andrade MC. Area do Sistema Canavieiro. Superintendência de Desenvolvimento do Nordeste (SUDENE). Estudos Regionais 18, Recife. 18, (1988).
   Google Scholar
• Grenier P. The alcohol plan and the development of Northeast Brazil. GeoJournal 11, 61–68 (1985).
   Google Scholar
• Smeets E, Junginger M, Faaij A, Walter A, Dolzan P, Turkenburg W. The sustainability of Brazilian ethanol: an assessment of the possibilities of certified production. Biomass Bioenerg. 32, 781–813 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• FIAN. Agrofuels in Brazil (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Cana-de-açúcar. Multinacionais não preocupam fornecedor. Jornal do Commercio (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Imasato T. A critical appraisal of legitimation and delegitimation strategies in the Brazilian ethanol market: de-linking legitimacy and legitimation. Sixth International Critical Management Studies Conference (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Stedile JP. The neoliberal agrarian model in Brazil. Mon. Rev. 58(8), (2007).
   Google Scholar
• WWF-Brasil. O impacto do mercado mundial de biocombustíveis na expansão da agricultura brasileira e suas consequências para as mudanças climáticas (2009).
   Google Scholar
• WWF-SNV. WWF and SNV's statement on Bioenergy, CBD COP 9 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR. Science for the ­post-normal age. Futures 25(7), 739–755 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Wynne B. Knowledges in context. Sci. Technol. Hum. Val. 16(1), 111–121 (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Pielke Jr. RA. The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Mouchard D. Contre-expertise: hypotheses à propos d’une forme spécifique de mobilisation. Congrés de l’Association française de science politique (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Topçu S. Confronting nuclear risks: counter-expertise as politics within the French nuclear energy debate. Nature Cult. 3(2), 225–245 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Lascoumes P. L’expertise, de la recherche d’une action rationnelle à la démocratisation des connaissances et des choix. Revue française d’administration publique (103), 369–377 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. Jasanoff S (Ed). Routledge, London (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Stirling A. ‘Opening up’ and ‘closing down’: power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology. Sci. Technol. Hum. Val. 33(2), 262–294 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Chilvers J. Towards analytic-deliberative forms of risk governance in the uk? reflecting on learning in radioactive waste. J. Risk Res. 10(2), 197–222 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Söderbaum P. Political economic person, ideological orientation and institutional change: on competition between schemes of interpretation in economics. J. Interdisipl. Econ. 12, 179–197 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• TNI. Paving the way for agrofuels: EU policy, sustainability criteria and climate calculation. (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Bound K. Brazil: The Natural Knowledge Economy. Demos, London (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Furtado AT, Scandiffo MIG, Cortez LaB. The Brazilian sugarcane innovation system. Energy Policy 39, 156–166 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Description of the emergence, development and success of the “innovation system” built over the past four decades through collaboration between various private and public sector actors and institutions, allowing Brazilian ethanol sector to reach competitiveness and remarkable improvement in productivity.
   Google Scholar
• Herrera S, Wilkinson J. The role of the State in the governance of the global biofuels market – lessons from Brazil. Environ. Pol. (forthcoming).
   Google Scholar
• Chateauraynaud F. Argumenter dans un champ de forces. Essai de balistique sociologique. Pétra, Paris (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski L, Thévenot L. On Justification. The Economies of Worth. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2006).
   Google Scholar