Drought effects on composition and yield for corn stover, mixed grasses, and Miscanthus as bioenergy feedstocks

References

• Hess JR, Foust TD, Wright LL et al. Roadmap for agriculture biomass feedstock supply in the United States (DOE/NE-ID-11129 Rev 1) (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007. Public Law 110-140 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Agriculture-National Agriculture Statistics Service. Crop Production 2012 Summary: January 2013 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Gulati M, Kohlmann K, Ladisch MR, Hespell R, Bothast RJ. Assessment of ethanol production options for corn products. Biores. Technol. 58(3), 253–264 (1996).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heaton E, Voigt T, Long SP. A quantitative review comparing the yields of two candidate C4 perennial biomass crops in relation to nitrogen, temperature and water. Biomass Bioenerg. 27(1), 21–30 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelini LG, Ceccarini L, Nassi O Di Nasso N, Bonari E. Comparison of Arundo donax L. and Miscanthus × giganteus in a long-term field experiment in Central Italy: analysis of productive characteristics and energy balance. Biomass Bioenerg. 33(4), 635–643 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heaton EA, Dohleman FG, Long SP. Meeting US biofuel goals with less land: the potential of Miscanthus. Glob. Change Biol. 14(9), 2000–2014 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee DK, Aberle E, Chen C et al. Nitrogen and harvest management of Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) grassland for sustainable biomass feedstock production. Glob. Change Biol. Bioenerg. 5(1), 6–15 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilman D, Socolow R, Foley JA et al. Beneficial biofuels—the food, energy, and environment trilemma. Science 325(5938), 270–271 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perlack RD, Wright LL, Turhollow AF, Graham RL, Stockes BJ, Erbach DC. Biomass as feedstock for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry: the technical feasibility of a billion-ton annual supply. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. 25–50 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Tilman D, Hill J, Lehman C. Carbon-negative biofuels from low-input high-diversity grassland biomass. Science 314(5805), 1598–1600 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone KC, Hunt PG, Cantrell KB, Ro KS. The potential impacts of biomass feedstock production on water resource availability. Biores. Technol. 101(6), 2014–2025 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson TC, Heim RR, Hirsch R et al. Monitoring and understanding changes in heat waves, cold waves, floods, and droughts in the United States: state of knowledge. B. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 94(6), 821–834 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Department of Agriculture-National Agriculture Statistics Service: crop production: November 2012, Washington, DC (2012).
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Agriculture-Economic Research Service: USDA Agricultural Projections 2017 (No. OCE-2008-1). Washington, DC (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Hess JR, Wright CT, Kenney KL, Searcy EM. Uniform-format solid feedstock supply system: a commodity-scale design to produce an infrastructure-compatible bulk solid from lignocellulosic biomass-section 2: conventional-bale. (INL/EXT-10-20372) (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Oliver RJ, Finch JW, Taylor G. Second generation bioenergy crops and climate change: a review of the effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 and drought on water use and the implications for yield. Glob. Change Biol. Bioenerg. 1(2), 97–114 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaves MM, Maroco JP, Pereira JS. Understanding plant responses to drought: from genes to the whole plant. Funct. Plant Biol. 30(3), 239–264 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Hakimi AMA. Counteraction of drought stress on soybean plants by seed soaking in salicylic acid. Int. J. Bot. 2(4), 421–426 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Keyvan S: The effects of drought stress on yield, relative water content, proline, soluble carbohydrates and chlorophyll of bread wheat cultivars. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 8(3), 1051–1060 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Stancato GC, Mazzafera P, Buckeridge MS. Effect of a drought period on the mobilisation of non-structural carbohydrates, photosynthetic efficiency and water status in an epiphytic orchid. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 39(11), 1009–1016 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mostajeran A, Rahimi-Eichi V. Effects of drought stress on growth and yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars and accumulation of proline and soluble sugars in sheath and blades of their different ages leaves. Am.-Euras. J. Agric. & Environ. Sci. 5(2), 264–272 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Iraki NM, Bressan RA, Hasegawa PM, Carpita NC. Alteration of the physical and chemical structure of the primary cell wall of growth-limited plant cells adapted to osmotic stress. Plant Physiol. 91(1), 39–47 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfrum E, Sluiter A. Improved mulivariate calibration models for corn stover feedstock and dilute-acid pretreated corn stover. Cellulose 16(5), 567–576 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sluiter JB, Ruiz RO, Scarlata CJ, Sluiter AD, Templeton DW. Compositional analysis of lignocellulosic feedstocks. 1. Review and description of methods. J. Agr. Food Chem. 58(16), 9043–9053 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu F, Yu J, Tesso T, Dowell F, Wang D. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of lignocellulosic biomass using infrared techniques: a mini-review. Appl. Energ. 104, 801–809 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philip Ye X, Liu L, Hayes D, Womac A, Hong K, Sokhansanj S. Fast classification and compositional analysis of cornstover fractions using Fourier transform near-infrared techniques. Biores. Technol. 99(15), 7323–7332 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin S, Chen H. Near-infrared analysis of the chemical composition of rice straw. Ind. Crop. Prod. 26(2), 207–211 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel K, Dien B, Jung H, Casler M, Masterson S, Mitchell R. Quantifying actual and theoretical ethanol yields for switchgrass strains using NIRS analyses. BioEnerg. Res. 4(2), 96–110 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monono EM, Haagenson DM, Pryor SW. Developing and evaluating NIR calibration models for multi-species herbaceous perennials. Industrial Biotechnology 8(5), 285–292 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Perez FLDDS, Guillemain A. Characterisation of feedstock biorefinery raw material by near infrared spectroscopy. 16th International Symposium on Wood, Fiber, and Pulping Chemistry V, 166–175 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Hou S, Li L. Rapid characterization of woody biomass digestibility and chemical composition using near-infrared spectroscopyfree access. J. Integrat. Plant Biol. 53(2), 166–175 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chataigner F, Surault F, Huyghe C, Julier B. Determination of botanical composition in multispecies forage mixtures by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. In: Sustainable Use of Genetic Diversity in Forage and Turf Breeding. Huyghe C (Ed.): Springer, the Netherlands, 199–203 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Liu L, Ye XP, Womac AR, Sokhansanj S. Variability of biomass chemical composition and rapid analysis using FT-NIR techniques. Carbohyd. Polym. 81(4), 820–829 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Templeton DW, Scarlata CJ, Sluiter JB, Wolfrum EJ. Compositional analysis of lignocellulosic feedstocks. 2. Method uncertainties. J. Agr. Food Chem. 58(16), 9054–9062 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monono EM, Nyren PE, Berti MT, Pryor SW. Variability in biomass yield, chemical composition, and ethanol potential of individual and mixed herbaceous biomass species grown in North Dakota. Ind. Crop. Prod. 41(0), 331–339 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Pioneer: Pioneer brand HTF Ethanol Hybrids: Iowa (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Martinez J-P, Lutts S, Schanck A, Bajji M, Kinet J-M. Is osmotic adjustment required for water stress resistance in the Mediterranean shrub Atriplex halimus L? J. Plant Physiol. 161(9), 1041–1051 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell PJ, O’Grady AP, Tissue DT, White DA, Ottenschlaeger ML, Pinkard EA. Drought response strategies define the relative contributions of hydraulic dysfunction and carbohydrate depletion during tree mortality. New Phytol. 197(3), 862–872 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runion GB, Entry JA, Prior SA, Mitchell RJ, Rogers HH. Tissue chemistry and carbon allocation in seedlings of Pinus palustris subjected to elevated atmospheric CO2 and water stress. Tree Physiol. 19(4-5), 329–335 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu Z, Neumann PM. Water-stressed maize, barley and rice seedlings show species diversity in mechanisms of leaf growth inhibition. J. Exp. Bot. 49(329), 1945–1952 (1998).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent D, Lapierre C, Pollet B, Cornic G, Negroni L, Zivy M. Water deficits affect caffeate o-methyltransferase, lignification, and related enzymes in maize leaves. A proteomic investigation. Plant Physiol. 137(3), 949–960 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez S, Marsh EL, Schroeder SG, Schachtman DP. Metabolomic and proteomic changes in the xylem sap of maize under drought. Plant Cell Environ. 31(3), 325–340 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels D, Sunkar R. Drought and salt tolerance in plants. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 24(1), 23–58 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heaton EA, Dohleman FG, Miguez AF et al. Chapter 3 – Miscanthus: a promising biomass crop. In: Advances in Botanical Research. Jean-Claude K, Michel D (Eds). Academic Press, London, 75–137 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Linden DR, Clapp CE, Dowdy RH. Long-term corn grain and stover yields as a function of tillage and residue removal in east central Minnesota. Soil Till. Res. 56(3–4), 167–174 (2000).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *This paper was helpful for determination of water deficit effects on the yields of both corn grain and stover for a number of years and weather conditions. It showed that water deficits strongly influenced harvest yield over other manually applied treatments or harvesting methods.
   Google Scholar
• Tao L, Templeton DW, Humbird D, Aden A. Effect of corn stover compositional variability on minimum ethanol selling price (MESP). Biores. Technol. 140, 426–430 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Drought Monitor. National Drought Mitigation Center University Nebraska-Lincoln, http://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/MapsandDataServices/MapService.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Renewable Fuels Association. Biorefinery Locations. http://www.ethanolrfa.org/bio-refinery-locations.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer M. US Drought Monitor. National Climatic Data Center/National Oceanic and Atomospheric Administration. http://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/MapsandDataServices/MapService.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Leubehusen E. US Drought Monitor October 26, 2010. US Department of Agriculture http://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/MapsandDataServices/MapService.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Midwestern Regional Climate Center. Cli-Mate, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, http://mrcc.sws.uiuc.edu.
   Google Scholar
• National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Climatic Data Center. Climate data online. www.nws.noaa.gov/climate
   Google Scholar
• Theoretical ethanol yield calculator. US Department of Energy. Bioenergy Technologies Office. www1.eere.energy.gov/bioenergy/ethanol_yield_calculator.html.
   Google Scholar