260
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Public opinions of biofuels: attitude strength and willingness to use biofuels

, , &

References

  • Hurt C, Tyner W, Doering O. Economics of ethanol (ID-339). Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service <http://www.ces.purdue.edu/bioenergy> (2006).
  • Solomon BD, Barnes JR, Halvorsen KE. Grain and cellulosic ethanol: history, economics, and energy policy. Biomass Bioenerg. 31, 416–425 (2007).
  • Tyner WE, Viteri D. Implications of blending limits on the US ethanol and biofuels markets. Biofuels 1(2), 251–253 (2010).
  • Task Force on Biofuels Infrastructure. National Commission on Energy Policy (2009).
  • Allport GW. Attitudes. In: Handbook of Social Psychology. Murchison C (Ed.). Clark University Press, Worcester, MA, USA, 798–884. (1935).
  • Pratkanis AR, Breckler SJ, Greenwald AG (Eds). Attitude Structure and Function. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, USA. (1989).
  • Homer PM, Kahle LR. A structural equation test of the value-attitude-behavior hierarchy. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 54(4), 638–646 (1988).
  • Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Attitude-behavior relations: a theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychol. Bull. 84(5), 888–918 (1977).
  • Petty RE, Wegener DT. Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. In: The Handbook of Social Psychology, Volume 1. Gilbert DT, Fiske ST, Lindzey G (Eds). McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA. 323–390 (1998).
  • Petty RE, Krosnick JA (Eds). Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, USA (1995).
  • Provides chapters on the history and importance of the attitude-strength construct, including reviews of a number of specific properties of attitudes (including knowledge and ambivalence) that contribute to strength-related outcomes.
  • Fabrigar LR, MacDonald TK, Wegener DT. The origin and structure of attitudes. In: The Handbook of Attitudes. Albarracín D, Johnson BT, Zanna MP (Eds). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, USA. 79–124 (2005).
  • Along with a review of various strength-related properties of attitudes and their implications for persuasion and for attitude-behavior consistency, reports a table of observed empirical relations among many of the most-studied strength-related attitude properties.
  • Wegener DT, Downing J, Krosnick JA, Petty RE. Strength-related properties of attitudes: Measures, manipulations, and future directions. In: Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences. Petty RE, Krosnick JA (Eds). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, USA, 455–487 (1995).
  • Lists typical measures and manipulations of strength-related features of attitudes.
  • Fazio RH, Zanna MP. Direct experience and attitude behavior consistency. In: Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Volume 14. Berkowitz L (Ed.). Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 161–202. (1981).
  • Wegener DT, Kelly JR. Social psychological dimensions of bioenergy development and public acceptance. Bioenerg. Res. 1, 107–117 (2008).
  • Discusses theoretical background for a social psychological approach to attitudes and norms related to bioenergy.
  • Davidson AR, Yantis S, Norwood M, Montano DE. Amount of information about the attitude object and attitude-behavior consistency. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 49, 1184–1198 (1985).
  • Lusk CM, Judd CM. Political expertise and the structural mediators of candidate evaluations. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 24(2), 105–126 (1988).
  • Wood W. Retrieval of attitude-relevant information from memory: effects on susceptibility to persuasion and on intrinsic motivation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 42, 798–910 (1982).
  • Ethanol across America. Issue brief: economic impacts of ethanol production. <www.ethanolacrossamerica.net/CFDC_EconImpact.pdf> (2008).
  • Renewable Fuels Association. Ethanol facts: energy security. http://www.ethanolrfa.org/pages/ethanol-facts-energy-security
  • Englehaupt E. Biofueling water problems. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41(22), 7593–7595 (2007).
  • Howarth RW. Congressional Testimony: Hearing on Non-point Source Pollution: The Impacts of Agriculture on Water Quality(2007, April 19).
  • Priester JR, Petty RE. The gradual threshold model of ambivalence: Relating the positive and negative bases of attitudes to subjective ambivalence. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 71(3), 431–449 (1996).
  • Refling EJ, Calnan CM, Fabrigar LR, MacDonald TK, Johnson VC, Smith SM. To partition or not to partition evaluative judgments: Comparing measures of structural ambivalence. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 4(4), 387–394 (2013).
  • Clark JK, Wegener DT, Fabrigar LR. Attitude ambivalence and message-based persuasion: Motivated processing of proattitudinal information and avoidance of counterattitudinal information. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 34, 565–577 (2008).
  • Conner M, Sparks P, Povey R, James R, Shepherd R, Armitage CJ. Moderators effects of attitudinal ambivalence on attitude–behaviour relationships. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 32, 705–718 (2002).
  • Cooke R, Sheeran P. Moderation of cognition–intention and cognition–behaviour relations: A meta-analysis of properties of variables from the theory of planned behavior. Brit. J. Soc. Psychol. 43, 159–186 (2004).
  • Rabe BG, Borick C. Survey of Michigan residents on the issue of global warming and climate policy options: key findings report. Center for the Local, State, and Urban Policy: University of Michigan. Policy Report, Number 11 (2008).
  • Steiner E. Consumer views on transportation and energy. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. <http://www.osti.gov/bridge> (2003).
  • Kubik M. Consumer Views on Transportation and Energy (3rd Edition). National Renewable Energy Laboratory. <http://www.osti.gov/bridge> (2006).
  • Aiken LS, West SG. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sage, San Diego, CA, USA, (1991).
  • Fazio RH, Williams CJ. Attitude accessibility as a moderator of the attitude-perception and attitude-behavior relations: an investigation of the 1984 presidential election. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 51, 505–514 (1986).
  • Converse, PE. Attitudes and non-attitudes: continuation of a dialogue. In: The Quantitative Analysis of Social Problems. Tufte ER (Ed.). Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, USA, 168–189 (1970).
  • Lewan PC, Stotland E. The effects of prior information on susceptibility to an emotional appeal. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 62, 450–453 (1961).
  • Glasman LR, Albarracín D. Forming attitudes that predict future behavior: A meta-analysis of the attitude-behavior relation. Psychol. Bull. 132, 778–822 (2006).
  • Armitage CJ, Conner M. Attitudinal ambivalence: a test of three key hypotheses. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 26, 1421–1432 (2000).
  • Delshad AB, Raymond L, Sawicki V, Wegener DT. Public attitudes toward political and technical options for biofuels. Energy Policy 38, 3414–3425 (2010).
  • Delshad AB, Raymond L. Media framing and public attitudes toward biofuels. Rev. Policy Res. 30(2), 190–210 (2013).
  • Cacciatore MA, Binder AR, Scheufele DA, Shaw BR. Public attitudes toward biofuels: Effects of knowledge, political partisanship, and media use. Polit. Life Sci. 31(1-2), 36–51 (2012).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.