Cultural treatments for accelerated growth and flowering of Panicum virgatum

References

• Searle I, Coupland G. Induction of flowering by seasonal changes in photoperiod. EMBO J. 23, 1217–1222. doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7600117 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yano M, Katayose Y, Ashikari M et al. Hd1, a major photoperiod sensitivity quantitative trait locus in rice, is closely related to the Arabidopsis flowering time gene CONSTANS. Plant Cell 12, 2473–2483 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kojima S, Takahashi Y, Kobayashi Y et al. Hd3a, a rice ortholog of the Arabidopsis FT gene, promotes transition to flowering downstream of Hd1 under short day conditions. Plant Cell Physiol. 43, 1096–1105 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komeda Y. Genetic regulation of time to flower in Arabidopsis thaliana. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 55, 521–535 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samach A, Wigge PA. Ambient temperature perception in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 8, 483–486 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Srikanth A, Schmid M. Regulation of flowering time: all roads lead to Rome. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 68, 2013–2037. doi:10.1007/s00018-011-0673-y (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burson B. Warm-season grasses. In: Hybridization of Crop Plants. Fehr WR, Haddley HH (Eds). ASA, Madison, WI, USA, 695–708 (1980).
   Google Scholar
• Balasubramanian S, Sureshkumar S, Lempe J, Weigel D. Potent induction of Arabidopsis thaliana flowering by elevated growth temperature. PLoS Genet. 2, e106 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doorenbos J. Shortening of the breeding cycle of Rhododendron. Euphytica 4, 141–146 (1955).
   Google Scholar
• Ochatt SJ, Sangwan RS, Marget P, Ndong YA, Rancillac M, Perney P. New approaches towards the shortening of generation cycles for faster breeding of protein legumes. Plant Breed. 121, 436–440 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher DK, Guiltinan MJ. Rapid, efficient production of homozygous transgenic tobacco plants with Agrobacterium tumefaciens: a seed-to-seed protocol. Plant Molec. Biol. Rep. 13, 278–289 (1995).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Datta KS, Nanda KK. Gibberellic acid causes flowering in the short-day plants Panicum miliaceum L., P. miliare Lamk., and Setaria italica L. Planta 134, 95–96 (1977).
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin SB, Kszos LA. Development of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) as a bioenergy feedstock in the United States. Biomass Bioenergy 28, 515–535 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel KP. Switchgrass. In: Warm-Season (C4) Grasses. Moser LE, Burson BL, Sollenberger LE (Eds). Madison, Wisconsin, USA, 561–588 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell RB, Moore KJ, Moser LE, Fritz JO, Redfearn DD. Predicting developmental morphology in switchgrass and big bluestem. Agron. J. 89, 827–832 (1997).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedict HM. Effect of daylength and temperature on the flowering and growth of four species of grasses. J. Agric. Res. 9, 661–671 (1940).
   Google Scholar
• Van Esbroeck GA, Hussey MA, Sanderson MA. Variation between Alamo and Cave-in-Rock switchgrass in response to photoperiod extension. Crop. Sci. 43, 639–643 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro JC, Boe A, Lee DK. A simple system for promoting flowering of upland switchgrass in the greenhouse. Crop. Sci. 51, 2607–2614. doi:10.2135.cropsci2011.03.0142 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernier G. The flowering process as an example of plastic development. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 40, 251–269 (1986).
   Google Scholar
• Kiniry JR, Anderson LC, Johnson MVV et al. Perennial biomass grasses and the Mason-Dixon Line: comparative productivity across latitudes in the Southern Great Plains. Bioenerg. Res. 6, 276–291 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore KJ, Moser LE, Vogel KP, Waller SS, Johnson BE, Pedersen JF. Describing and quantifying growth stages of perennial forage grasses. Agron. J. 83, 1073–1077 (1991).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT User’s guide: Release 9.3. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez GCJ. Design and analysis of commonly used comparative horticultural experiments. Hort. Sci. 42(5), 1052–1069 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Hurlbert SH. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol. Monogr. 54(2), 187–211 (1984).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) Public Law 110-140 www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-110hr6enr/pdf/BILLS-110hr6enr.pdf (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Sripathi R, Kakani VG, Wu Y. Genotypic variation and trait relationships for morphological and physiological traits among new switchgrass populations. Euphytica 191, 437–453. doi:10.1007/s10681-013-0911-5 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Reyna JM, Vogel KP. Heterosis in switchgrass: spaced plants. Crop. Sci. 48, 1312–1320. doi:10.2135/cropsci2007.12.0695 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel KP, Mitchell KB. Heterosis in switchgrass: biomass yield in pastures. Crop. Sci. 48, 2159–2164. doi:10.2135/cropsci2008.02.0117 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins AA, Vogel KP, Moore KJ, Johnson KD, Carlson IT. Genotypic variability and genotype x environment interactions among switchgrass accessions from the Midwestern USA. Crop. Sci. 35, 565–571. doi:10.2135/cropsci1995.0011183 (1995).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen Z, Parrish DJ, Wolf DD, Welbaum GE. Stratification in switchgrass seeds is reversed and hastened by drying. Crop. Sci. 41, 1546–1551 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Esbroeck GA, Hussey MA, Sanderson MA. Selection response and developmental basis for early and late panicle emergence in Alamo switchgrass. Crop. Sci. 38, 342–346 (1998).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanderson MA, Wolf DD. Morphological development of switchgrass in diverse environments. Agron. J. 87, 908–915 (1995).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanderson MA, Moore KJ. Switchgrass morphological development predicted from day of year or degree day models. Agron. J. 91, 732–734 (1999).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balasko JA, Smith D. Influence of temperature and nitrogen fertilization on the growth and composition of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) and timothy (Phleum pretense L.) at anthesis. Agronomy J. 63, 853–857 (1971).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson J, Gesch R, Barbour N. Phenology and biochemical composition of switchgrass (C4) and wheat (C3) grown at contrasting temperatures. Presented at: American Society of Plant Biologists Annual Meeting. Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, July 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Kandel TP. Response to temperature of upland and lowland cultivars of switchgrass [Thesis]. Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University, USA (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Masiunas JB, Carpenter PL. Radicle growth of grasses and legumes in response to temperature. Hort. Sci. 19, 298–300 (1984).
   Google Scholar
• Langridge J. Effect of day-length and gibberellic acid on the flowering time of Arabidopsis. Nature 180, 36–37 (1957).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumitomo K, Li T, Hisamatsu T. Gibberellin promotes flowering of chrysanthemum by upregulating CmFL, a chrysanthemum FLORICAULA/LEAFY homologous gene. Plant Sci. 176, 643–649. doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.02.003 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King R, Moritz T, Evans LT, Junttila O, Herlt AJ. Long-day induction of flowering in Lolium temulentum involves sequential increases in specific gibberellins at the shoot apex. Plant Phys. 127, 624–632 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross SD. Effects of temperature, drought, gibberellin A4/7, and timing of treatment on flowering time in potted Picea engelmannii and Picea glauca grafts. Can. J. For. Res. 18, 163–171 (1988).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Zeeuw D, Leopold AC. The promotion of floral initiation by auxin. Am. J. Bot. 43(1), 47–50 (1956).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nada Y. Effects of temperature on the 
growth of main tropical pasture grasses. J. Japan. Soc. Grassl. Sci. 26, 165–173 
(1980).
   Google Scholar
• McMillan C. The role of ecotypic variation in the distribution of the central grassland of North America. Ecol. Monogr. 29, 285–308. doi:10.2307/1942132 (1959).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel KP, Dewald CL, Gorz HJ, Haskins FA. Improvement of switchgrass, indiangrass, and eastern gamagrass – current status and future. Presented at: Symp Range Plant Improvement in Western North America. Soc Range Manag, Denver, Colorado, USA, 51–62 (1985).
   Google Scholar
• Meilan R. Floral induction in woody angiosperms. New Forest 14, 179–202 (1997).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar