Enzymatic saccharification of cellulose: a study of mixing and agitation in an oscillatory baffled reactor and a stirred tank reactor

References

• Sgroi F, Di Trapani AM, Foderà M, et al. Economic assessment of eucalyptus (spp.) for biomass production as alternative crop in Southern Italy. Renew Sust Ener Rev. 2015;44:614–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imai M, Ikari K, Suzuki I. High-performance hydrolysis of cellulose using mixed cellulase species and ultrasonication pretreatment. Biochem Eng J. 2004;17(2):79–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullings R. Measurement of saccharification by cellulases. Enzym Microb Technol. 1985;7:586–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Zuhair S. The effect of crystallinity of cellulose on the rate of reducing sugars production by heterogeneous enzymatic hydrolysis. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99(10):4078–4085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coward-Kelly G, Aiello-Mazzari C, Kim S, et al. Suggested improvements to the standard filter paper assay used to measure cellulase activity. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2003;82(6):745–749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandels M, Andreotti R, Roche C. Measurement of saccharifying cellulase. In: Gaden (jr) EL, Mandels MH, Reese ET, Spano LA, editors. Enzymatic conversion of cellulosic materials: technology and applications. biotechnology and bioengineering symposium no. 6. New York: John Wiley & Sons;1976. p. 21–33.
   Google Scholar
• Hall M, Bansal P, Lee JH, et al. Cellulose crystallinity – a key predictor of the enzymatic hydrolysis rate. The FEBS Journal. 2010;277:1571–1582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takagi M, Abe S, Suzuki S, et al. A method for production of alcohol direct from cellulose using cellulase and yeast. In: Ghose TK, editor. Proceedings of the bioconversion symposium. Delhi, India: Indian Institute of Technology; 1977 p. 551–571.
   Google Scholar
• Philippidis GP, Smith TK, Wyman CE. Study of the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose for production of fuel ethanol by the simultaneous saccharification and fermentation process. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1993;41(9):846–853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao Z, Storms R, Tsang A. Microplate-based filter paper assay to measure total cellulase activity. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2004;88(7):832–837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye Z, Hatfield KM, Berson RE. Deactivation of individual cellulase components. Bioresour Technol. 2012;106:133–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szczodrak J. The enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation of pretreated wheat straw to ethanol. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1988;32:771–776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Y, Cheng J. Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review. Bioresour Technol. 2002;83(1):1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghose TK. Measurement of cellulase activities. Pure Appl Chem. 1987;59(2):257–268 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandels M, Andreotti R, Roche C. Measurement of saccharifying cellulase. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1976;(6):21–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hari Krishna S, Prasanthi K, Chowdary GV, et al. Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of pretreated sugar cane leaves to ethanol. Process Biochem. 1998;33(8):825–830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mais U, Esteghlalian AR, Saddler JN. Influence of mixing regime on enzymatic saccharification of steam-exploded softwood chips. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2002;98:463–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reese ET, Ryu DY. Shear inactivation of cellulase of Trichoderma reesei. Enzym Microb Technol. 1980;2(3):239–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaya F, Heitmann JA, Joyce TW. Deactivation of cellulase and hemicellulase in high shear fields. Cellul Chem Technol. 1996;30(1–2):49–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganesh K, Joshi JB, Sawant SB. Cellulase deactivation in a stirred reactor. Biochem Eng J. 2000;4(2):137–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunjikar TP, Sawant SB, Joshi JB. Shear deactivation of cellulase, exoglucanase, endoglucanase, and β-glucosidase in a mechanically agitated reactor. Biotechnol Prog. 2001;17(6):1166–1168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enayati N, Parulekar SJ. Enzymatic saccharification of soybean hull based materials. Biotechnol Prog. 1995;11:708–711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingesson H, Zacchi G, Yang B, et al. The effect of shaking regime on the rate and extent of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. J Biotechnol. 2001;88(2):177–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmqvist B, Wiman M, Liden G. Effect of mixing on enzymatic hydrolysis of steam-pretreated spruce: a quantitative analysis of conversion and power consumption. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2011;4(10):1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukataka S, Tada M, Takahashi J. Effects of agitation on enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose in a astirred tank reactor. J Ferm Technol. 1983;61(6):615–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samaniuk JR, Scott CT, Root TW, et al. The effect of high intensity mixing on the enzymatic hydrolysis of concentrated cellulose fiber suspensions. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102(6):4489–4494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaya F, Heitmann JA, Joyce TW. Cellulase binding to cellulose fibres in high-shear fields. J Biotechnol. 1994;36(1):1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey AP, Mackley MR, Stonestreet P. Operation and optimization of an oscillatory flow continuous reactor. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2001;40(23):5371–5377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ni X, Mackley MR, Harvey AP, et al. Mixing through oscillations and pulsations – a guide to achieving process enhancements in the chemical and process industries. Chem Eng Res Des. 2003;81(3):373–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackley MR, Tweddle GM, Wyatt ID. Experimental heat transfer measurements for pulsatile flow in baffled tubes. Chem Eng Sci. 1990;45(5):1237–1242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ni X, Mackley MR. Chemical reaction in batch pulsatile flow and stirred tank reactors. The Chem Eng J. 1993;52(3):107–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackley MR, Stonestreet P. Heat transfer and associated energy dissipation for oscillatory flow in baffled tubes. Chem Eng Sci. 1995;50(14):2211–2224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewgill MR, Mackley MR, Pandit AB, et al. Enhancement of gas-liquid mass transfer using oscillatory flow in a baffled tube. Chem Eng Sci. 1993;48(4):799–809 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ni X, Gao S, Cumming RH, et al. A Comparative-study of mass-transfer in yeast for a batch pulsed baffled bioreactor and a stirred-tank fermenter. Chem Eng Sci. 1995;50(13):2127–2136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaidhani HK, McNeil B, Ni XW. Production of pullulan using an oscillatory baffled bioreactor. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2003;78(2–3):260–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis N, Goncalves CN, Aguedo M, et al. Application of a novel oscillatory flow micro-bioreactor to the production of γ-decalactone in a two immiscible liquid phase medium. Biotechnol Lett. 2006;28(7):485–490 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selig N, Weiss N, Ji Y. Enzymatic sacharification of lignocellulosic biomass. Laboratory Analytical Procedure (LAP) National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). No. 009(1–5); 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Ikwebe J. Intensification of bioethanol production by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation in an oscillatory baffled reactor [PhD Thesis]. Newcastle upon Tyne (UK): Newcastle University; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Ni X, Cosgrove JA, Arnott AD, et al. On the measurement of strain rate in an oscillatory baffled column using particle image velocimetry. Chem Eng Sci. 2000;55(16):3195–3208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakata M, Ooshima H, Harano Y. Effects of agitation on enzymatic saccharification of cellulose. Biotechnol Lett. 1985;7(9):689–694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbott MSR, Valente Perez G, Harvey AP, et al. Reduced power consumption compared to a traditional stirred tank reactor (STR) for enzymatic saccharification of alpha-cellulose using oscillatory baffled reactor (OBR) technology. Chem Eng Res Des. 2014;92(10):1969–1975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitch AW, Jian H, Ni X. An investigation of the effect of viscosity on mixing in an oscillatory baffled column using digital particle image velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics simulation. Chem Eng J. 2005;112(1–3):197–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao Y, Tan HM. The effect of shear field on the hydrolysis of cellulose. J Macro Sci Phy. 2004;B43(6):1115–1121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charm SE, Wong BL. Shear effects on enzymes. Enzym Microb Technol. 1981;3(2):111–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sgroi, F., Di Trapani, A.M., Foderà, M., et al. Economic performance of biogas plants using giant reed silage biomass feedstock. Ecol Eng. 2015;81:481–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar