References
- Creutzig F, Ravindranath NH, Berndes G, et al. Bioenergy and climate change mitigation: an assessment. GCB. Bioeng. 2014;7:916–944.
- Robbins M. Policy: fuelling politics. Nature. 2011;474:22–24
- Halder P, Arevalo J, Mola-Yudego B, et al. Stakeholders' perceptions of bioenergy – global coverage and policy implications. In: Reddy BS, Ulgiati S editors. Energy Security and Development – The global context and Indian perspectives. New Delhi, India: Springer; 2015. p. 377–391.
- Halder P. Perceptions of energy production from forest biomass among school students in Finland: directions for the future bioenergy policies. Renew Energ. 2014;68:372–377.
- Koster AM, Anderies JM. Institutional factors that determine energy transitions: a comparative case study approach. In: Michalena E, Hills JM editors. Renewable Energy Governance, lecture Notes in Energy 23. London: Springer-Verlag; 2013. p. 33–61.
- Owens S, Driffill L. How to change attitudes and behaviours in the context of energy. Energ Policy. 2008;36:4412–4418.
- Assefa G, Frostell B. Social sustainability and social acceptance in technology assessment: a case study of energy technologies. Technol Soc. 2007;29:63–78.
- Jobert A, Laborgne P, Mimler S. Local acceptance of wind energy: factors of success identified in French and German case studies. Energ Policy. 2007;35:2751–60.
- Ekborg M. How student teachers use scientific conceptions to discuss a complex Environmental issue. J Biol Educ. 2003;37:126–132 8.
- Vlaardingerbroek V, Taylor TGN. The environmental knowledge and attitudes of prospective teachers in Lebanon: a comparative study. Int Res Geog Environ Educ. 2007;16:120–134.
- Chung Ko AC, Kin Lee JC. Teachers' perceptions of teaching environmental issues within the science curriculum: a Hong Kong perspective. J Sci Educ Technol. 2003;12:187–204.
- Kim C, Fortner RW. Issue-specific barriers to addressing environmental issues in the classroom: an explanatory study. The J Environ Educ. 2006;37:15–22.
- Eagly HA, Chaiken S. The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth (TX): Harcourt, Brace, and Janovich; 1993.
- Schultz WP, Shriver C, Tabanico JJ, et al. Implicit connections with nature. J Environ Psychol. 2004;24:31–42.
- Halder P, Prokop P, Chang C-Y, et al. International survey on bioenergy knowledge, perceptions and attitudes among young citizens. BioEn Res. 2011;5:247–261.
- Liarakou G, Gavrilakis C, Flouri E. Secondary school teachers' knowledge and attitudes towards renewable energy sources. J Sci Educ Technol. 2009;18:120–129.
- Zyadin A, Puhakka A, Halder P, et al. The relative importance of home, school, and traditional mass media sources in elevating youth energy awareness. Renew Energ. 2014;114:409–416.
- Zyadin A, Puhakka A, Ahponen P, et al. Secondary school teachers' knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes toward renewable energy in Jordan. Renew Energ. 2014;62:341–348.
- Spiropoulou D, Antonakaki T, Kontaxaki S, et al. Primary teachers' literacy and attitudes on education for sustainable development. J Sci Educ Technol. 2007;5:443–450.
- Halder P, Havu-Nuutinen S, Pietarinen J, et al. Subject knowledge and perceptions of bioenergy among school teachers in India: results from a Survey. Resources. 2014;3:599–613.
- The Finnish Bioeconomy Strategy. Available from: www.tem.fi/files/40366/The_Finnish_Bioeconomy_Strategy.pdf (Accessed 10 April 2015).
- Ernst & Young. Renewable Energy Country Attractiveness Index. Issue 43 (March). Available from: www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/Renewable_Energy_Country_Attractiveness_Index_43/$FILE/RECAI%2043_March%202015.pdf ( Accessed on 15 May 2015).
- IEA (International Energy Agency). Energy for All. Financing access for the Poor. Paris, France: International Energy Agency; 2011.
- Srivastava L, Goswami A, Diljun GM, et al. Energy access: revelations from energy consumption patterns in rural India. Energ Policy. 2012;47:11–20.
- Das S, Priess JA. Zig-zagging into the future: the role of biofuels in India. Biofuel Bioprod Bior. 2011;5:18–27.
- Halder P, Arevalo J, Tahvanainen L, et al. Benefits and challenges associated with the development of forest-Based bioenergy projects in India: results from an expert survey. Challenges. 2014;5:100–111.
- Sovacool BJ. What are we doing here? Analyzing fifteen years of energy scholarship and proposing a social science research agenda. Energ Res Soc Sci. 2014;1:1–29.
- DeVellis R. Scale development: theory and applications: theory and application. Thousand Okas (CA): Sage; 2003.
- Bland J, Altman D. Statistics notes: Cronbach's alpha. BMJ. 1997;314:275–275.
- Nunnally J, Bernstein L. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher, INC; 1994.
- BP (British Petroleum). 2015. BP Energy Outlook 2035. Available from: www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/pdf/Energy-economics/energy-outlook-2015/Energy_Outlook_2035_booklet.pdf ( Accessed 20 May 2015).
- IEA (International Energy Agency). 2014. World Energy Outlook 2014 – Executive Summry. Available from: www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/WEO_2014_ES_English_WEB.pdf ( Accessed 20 May 2015).
- Eurobarometer. 2002. EUR 20624–Energy: Issues, Options and Technologies, Science and Society. European Commission's Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Luxembourg. 2002 (1–126).
- Eurobarometer. Attitudes towards Energy. Special Eurobarometer 247/Wave 64.2-TNS Opinion & Social. European Commission. Brussels. 2006 (1–54).
- Ribeiro F, Ferreira P, Araújo M, et al. Public opinion on renewable energy technologies in Portugal. Energy. 2013;69:39–50.
- Karlstrøm H, Ryghaug M. Public attitudes towards renewable energy technologies in Norway. The role of party preferences Energ Policy. 2014;67: 656–663.
- Khambalkar VP, Katkhede SS, Dahatonde S, et al. Renewable energy: an assessment of public awareness. Int J Amb Energ. 2010;31133–142.
- WWF-India. People's perception study: renewable energy in India 2014. New Delhi: WWF-India Secretariat; 2015. p. 1–54.
- Stigka EK, Paravantis JA, Mihalakakou GK. Social acceptance of renewable energy sources: a review of contingent valuation applications. Renew Sustain Energ Rev. 2014;32:100–106.
- Batley SL, Colbourne D, Fleming PD, et al. Citizen versus consumer: challenges in the UK green power market. Energ Policy. 2001;29:479–87.
- Wiser RH. Using contingent valuation to explore willingness to pay for renewable energy: a comparison of collective and voluntary payment vehicles. Ecol Econ. 2007;62:419–32.
- Zoellner J, Schweizer-Ries P, Wemheuer C. Public acceptance of renewable energies: results from case studies in Germany. Energ Policy. 2008;36:4136–41.
- Damigos C, Tourkolias D, Diakoulaki D. Households' willingness to pay for safeguarding security of natural gas supply in electricity generation. Energ Policy. 2009;37:2008–17.
- Zarnikau J. Consumer demand for “green power” and energy efficiency. Energ Policy. 2003;31:1661–72
- Shobeiri SM, Omidvar B, Prahallada NN. Influence of gender and type of school on environmental attitude of teachers in Iran and India. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2006;3:351–357.
- Larijani M, Yeshodhara K. An empirical study of environmental attitude among higher primary school teachers of India and Iran. J Hum Ecol. 2008;24:195–200.
- Oerke B, Bogner FX. Gender, age and subject matter: impact on teachers' ecological values. Environmentalist. 2010;30:111–122.
- Çelikler D. Awareness about renewable energy of pre-service science teachers in Turkey. Renew Energ. 2013;60:343–348.