Croatian and Serbian private forest owners’ perceptions of energy wood mobilization: survey results and relevance for future bioeconomy

References

• European Commission. State of play on the sustainability of solid and gaseous biomass used for electricity, heating and cooling in the EU. SWD (2014) 259 final, Brussels. 2014;33.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. Environment committee backs compromise on cleaner biofuels. Available from: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/news-room/content/20150413IPR41649/html/Environment-committee-backs-compromise-on-cleaner-biofuels [ Accessed on 22.06. 2015].
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Innovating for Sustainable Growth: A Bioeconomy for Europe. Brussels. 2012;9.
   Google Scholar
• Schmithüsen F, Hirsch F. Private forest ownership in Europe. Geneva Timber and Forest Study Paper 26. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe/Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. Geneva, Switzerland: Forestry and Timber Section; 2010;110.
   Google Scholar
• EUROSTAT. Forestry in the EU and the world 2011 edition - A statistical portrait. 2011. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3217494/5733109/KS-31-11-137-EN.PDF [ Accessed on 20.5.2015]
   Google Scholar
• CEPF (Confederation of European Forest Owners). Forest owners call for support for bioeconomy and ownership rights. Available from: http://www.cepf-eu.org/vedl/press%20release_CEPF%20GA%202015.pdf [ Accessed on 29.12.2015].
   Google Scholar
• Lovrić M, Lovrić; N. Integration of Nature Protection in Croatian Forest Policy. INTEGRATE Country Report for Croatia. European Forest Institute, EFICEEC – EFISEE Regional Office. 2013;34.
   Google Scholar
• Paladinić E, Vuletić D, Posavec S. Review of private forest ownerships’ state in Republic of Croatia. Rad.Šumar.Inst. 2008;43:45–58.
   Google Scholar
• MAFWM (Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management of the Republic of Serbia). The National Forest Inventory of the Republic of Serbia: the growing stock of the Republic of Serbia. 2009; 238.
   Google Scholar
• EFI (European Forest Institute). Private Forest Owners in the Western Balkans – Ready for the Formation of Interest Associations. European Forest Institute Research Report 25. 2011; 234.
   Google Scholar
• National Forestry Policy and Strategy of the Croatian Government (Nacionalna šumarska politika i strategija). Narodne novine br. 120/2003.2003. Available from: http://narodne-novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/2003_07_120_1663.html [ Accessed on 17.04.2015].
   Google Scholar
• National Renewable Energy Action Plan 2020 (Nacionalni Akcijski Plan Za Obnovljive Izvore Energije Do 2020. Godine). Ministarstvo Gospodarstva (Ministry of Economy), Republic of Croatia. 2013;118.
   Google Scholar
• HSUPŠ (Hrvatski savez udruga privatnih šumovlasnika). Croatian union of private forest owners' associations. Available from: http://www.hsups.hr/index_eng.html [ Accessed on 29.12.2015].
   Google Scholar
• Energy Community. Serbia Renewable Energy. Available from: https://www.energy-community.org/portal/page/portal/ENC_HOME/AREAS_OF_WORK/Implementation/Serbia/Renewable_Energy [ Accessed on 16.11.2015].
   Google Scholar
• National Renewable Energy Action Plan of the Republic Of Serbia. The development of renewable energy framework in Serbia Serbian-Dutch Government-to-Government (G2G10/SB/9/2). 2013;159.
   Google Scholar
• Biomass Action Plan for the Republic of Serbia 2010-2012. Biomass Action Plan Serbian-Dutch Government-to-Government Project on Biomass and Biofuels (G2G08/SB/6/3). 2010;49.
   Google Scholar
• Nonić D, Bliss J, Milijic V, et al. Challenges of organizing private forest owners in Serbia. Small-Scale Forestry 2011;10:435–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malovrh ŠP, Nonić D, Glavonjić P, et al. Private forest owner typologies in Slovenia and Serbia: Targeting private forest owner groups for policy implementation. Small-Scale Forestry 2015;14:423–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kajba D, Domac J, Segon V. Illustration case for Croatia. Biomass Energy Europe project under the EU 7th Framework Programme; 2010 August 27; Freiburg, Germany; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Domac J, Panoutsou C. Overview of the South-East Europe bioenergy potential. Balkan Energy & Infrastructure Finance Forum 2011; 2011 June 27–28, Bucharest. Available from: http://www.regea.org/assets/files/objavilismo/Domac_28th_June.pdf [ Accessed on 24.05.2015].
   Google Scholar
• Bohlin F, Roos A. Wood fuel supply as a function of forest owner preferences and management styles. Biomass Bioenergy 2002;22:237–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rämö AK, Järvinnen E, Latvala T, et al. Interest in energy wood and energy crop production among Finnish non-industrial private forest owners. Biomass Bioenergy 2009;33:1251–1257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halder P, Weckroth T, Mei Q, et al. Non-industrial private forest owners' opinions to and awareness of energy wood market and forest-based bioenergy certification - results of a case study from Finnish Karelia. Energy, Sustainability and Society 2012;2:2–9.
   Google Scholar
• Brough P, Rørstad PK, Breland TA, et al. Exploring Norwegian forest owner's intentions to provide harvest residues for bioenergy. Biomass Bioenergy 2013;57:57–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shivan GC, Mehmood SR. Factors influencing nonindustrial private forest landowners' policy preference for promoting bioenergy. Forest Policy Econ. 2010;12:581–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi O, Mehmood SR. Factors affecting nonindustrial private forest landowners’ willingness to supply woody biomass for bioenergy. Biomass Bioenergy 2011;35:186–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shivan GC, Mehmood SR. Determinants of nonindustrial private forest landowner willingness to accept price offers for woody biomass. Forest Policy Econ. 2012;25:47–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markowski-Lindsay M, Stevens T, Kittredge DB, et al. 2012. Family forest owner preferences for biomass harvesting in Massachusetts. Forest Policy Econ. 2012;14:127–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi O, Grebner DL, Hussain A, et al. Landowner knowledge and willingness to supply woody biomass for wood-based bioenergy: Sample selection approach. J. Forest Eco. 2013;19:97–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitch ZJ, Lhotka JM, Stainback GA, et al. Private landowner intent to supply woody feedstock for bioenergy production. Biomass Bioenergy 2013;56:127–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker DR, Eryilmaz D, Klapperich JJ, et al. Social availability of residual woody biomass from nonindustrial private woodland owners in Minnesota and Wisconsin. Biomass Bioenergy. 2013;56:82–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halder P, Paladinić E, Stevanov M, et al. Energy wood production from private forests – nonindustrial private forest owners׳ perceptions and attitudes in Croatia and Serbia. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2014;35:515–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raitila J, Kuusinen M, Ridley R, et al. Private forest owners play key role in European forest derived fuel utilization. Journal of Energy and Power Engineering. 2014;8:1575–1582.
   Google Scholar
• Raitila J. Telling the story – how woodheat has become real business in rural areas. Wood heat Solutions Project Report 10/2009, Project IEE/07/726/SI2.499568.2009;10.
   Google Scholar
• Okkonen L, Suhonen N. Business models of heat entrepreneurship in Finland. Energ. Policy. 2010;7:3443–3452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raitila J, Virkkunen M, Kymäläinen M, et al. Activating private forest owners to increase forest fuel supply. Available from: http://www.wood-fuel.org.uk/AFO_2009-12_final_report.pdf [ Accessed on 13.11.2015].
   Google Scholar
• Vasiljević A, Jokić M. Regional profile of the biomass sector in Serbia - Timok forest area. Available from: www.foropa.eu [ Accessed on 11 November 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Gerasimov Y, Senko S, Karjalainen T. Prospects of forest road infrastructure development in northwest Russia with proven Nordic solutions. Scand. J. Forest Res. 2013;28:758–774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danilović M, Ćuprić; N. The state of forests in Serbia in terms of their utilization. Proceedings of the First Serbian Forestry Congress: Future with forests, Univerzitet u Beogradu–Šumarski fakultet, Belgrade, 180–190 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Pentek T, Poršinsky T. Forest transportation systems as a key factor in quality management of forest ecosystems. In: Blanco JA, Yueh-Hsin Lo, editors. Forest ecosystems - more than Just trees. Rijeka: InTech; 2012. p. 433–464. Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/forest-ecosystems-morethan-just-trees/forest-transportation-systems-as-a-key-factor-in-quality-management-of-forest-ecosystems [ Accessed on 11.11.2015].
   Google Scholar
• Domac J, Segon V. Forests, bioenergy and people - key elements for energy transition of South - East Europe. Available from: http://bioresproject.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/WFC-REGEA-published-paper.pdf [ Accessed on 12.11.2015].
   Google Scholar
• IRGC (International Risk Governance Council). Risk Governance Guidelines for Bioenergy Policies. Available from: http://www.irgc.org/IMG/pdf/IRGC_PB_Bioenergy_WEB-2.pdf [ Accessed on 12.11.2015].
   Google Scholar
• VTT. Bioenergy in Europe. Implementation of EU Directives and Policies relating to Bioenergy in Europe and RD&D Priorities for the Future. Available from: http://www.vtt.fi/inf/pdf/tiedotteet/2008/T2441.pdf [ Accessed on 12.11.2015].
   Google Scholar
• Roos A, Rosenqvist H, Ling B, et al. Farm-related factors influencing the adoption of short-rotation willow coppice production among Swedish farmers. Acta Agr. Scand. B-S-P. 2000;50:28–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson P, Börjesson K, Ericsson, LJ Nilsson, et al. The Use of Biomass for Energy in Sweden—Critical Factors and Lessons Learned. IMES/EESS Report 35 Energy Environmental System Studies, Lund, Sweden. 46p (2002).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. European Commission guidance for the design of renewables support schemes. SWD (2013) 439 final, Brussels. 2013;34.
   Google Scholar
• RES LEGAL Europe. Legal Sources on Renewable Energy. Available from: http://www.res-legal.eu/home/ [ Accessed on 17.11.2015].
   Google Scholar
• Peters DM, Wirth K, Böhr B, et al. Energy wood from forests—stakeholder perceptions in five European countries. Energy, Sustainability and Society. 2015;5:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetemäki L, Muys B, Pelkonen P, et al. Forest bioenergy in Europe: Reassessment needed. Available from: http://www.efi.int/files/attachments/thinkforest/thinkforest_brief_forest_bioenergy.pdf [ Accessed on 16.11.2015].
   Google Scholar
• EEB (European Environmental Bureau). Pitfalls and potentials: The role of bioenergy in the eu climate and energy policy post 2020. Available from: http://www.eeb.org/index.cfm/library/the-role-of-bioenergy-in-the-eu-climate-and-energy-policy-post-2020/ [ Accessed on 16.11.2015].
   Google Scholar