Hydrogen production from biomass via an iron oxide thermochemical cycle

References

• DOE. Energy Information Agency. International Energy Outlook. Washington: U.S. Department of Energy; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• IEA. World Energy Outlook 2008. Paris: International Energy Agency; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• BP p.I.c. BP Statistical Review of World Energy. London: BP p.I.c.; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Parikh J, Channiwala SA, Ghosal GK. A correlation for calculating HHV from proximate analysis of solid fuels. Fuel. 2005;84:487–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cormos C-C. Biomass direct chemical looping for hydrogen and power co-production: Process configuration, simulation, thermal integration and techno-economic assessment. Fuel Process Tech. 2015;137:16–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asadullah M. Barriers of commercial power generation using biomass gasification gas: A review. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2014;29:201–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright DG, Dey PK, Brammer J. A barrier and techno-economic analysis of small-scale bCHP (biomass combined heat and power) schemes in the UK. Energy. 2014;71:332–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan L-S, Li F, Ramkumar S. Utilization of chemical looping strategy in coal gasification processes. Particuology. 2008;6:131–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong A, Bayham S, Kathe M, et al. Iron-based syngas chemical looping process and coal-direct chemical looping process development at Ohio State University. Appl Energ. 2014;113:1836–1845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HR, Wang D, Zeng L, et al. Coal direct chemical looping combustion process: Design and operation of a 25-kWth sub-pilot unit. Fuel. 2013;108:370–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnanapragasam NV, Reddy BV, Rosen MA. Hydrogen production from coal using coal direct chemical looping and syngas chemical looping combustion systems: Assessment of system operation and resource requirements. Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2009;34:2606–2615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleeton JPE, Bohn CD, Müller CR, et al. Clean hydrogen production and electricity from coal via chemical looping: Identifying a suitable operating regime. Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2009;34(1):1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho P, Mattisson T, Lyngfelt A. Comparison of iron-, nickel-, copper-and manganese-based oxygen carriers for chemical-looping combustion. Fuel. 2004;83(9):1215–1225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge H, Shen L, Gu H, et al. Combustion performance and sodium transformation of high-sodium ZhunDong coal during chemical looping combustion with hematite as oxygen carrier. Fuel. 2015;159:107–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang W, Zhao H, Ma J, et al. Copper-decorated hematite as an oxygen carrier for in situ gasification chemical looping combustion of coal. Energ Fuel. 2014;28(6):3970–3981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydén M, Lyngfelt A. Using steam reforming to produce hydrogen with carbon dioxide capture by chemical-looping combustion. Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2006;31(10):1271–1283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydén M, Källén M, Jing D, et al. (Fe1−xMnx)TiyO3 based oxygen carriers for chemical-looping combustion and chemical-looping with oxygen uncoupling. Energ Procedia. 2014;51:85–98.
   Google Scholar
• Sorgenfrei M, Tsatsaronis G. Design and evaluation of an IGCC power plant using iron-based syngas chemical-looping (SCL) combustion. Appl Energ. 2014;113:1958–1964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu J, Corripio AB, Harrison DP, et al. Analysis of the sorbent energy transfer system (SETS) for power generation and CO2 capture. Adv Environ Res. 2003;7:335–345.
   Google Scholar
• Adanez J, Abad A, Garcia-Labiano F, Gayan P, de Diego L. Progress in chemical looping combustion and reforming technologies. Prog Energy Combust Sci. 2012;38: 215–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaiyan J, Cheremisinoff NP. Gasification technologies: a primer for engineers and scientists. London: Taylor and Francis; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Zeng L, He F, Li F, et al. Coal-direct chemical looping gasification for hydrogen production: Reactor modeling and process simulation. Energ Fuel. 2012;26:3680–3690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cormos C-C. Integrated assessment of IGCC power generation technology with carbon capture and storage, CCS. Energy. 2012;42:434–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnanapragasam NV, Reddy BV, Rosen MA. Iron oxide-based thermo-chemical cycle for effective hydrogen production using coals and biomasses. Proceedings of 23rd International Conference on Efficiency, Cost, Optimization, Simulation and Environmental Impact of Energy Systems. Vol. II; 2010 14–17 June; Lausanne (Switzerland): Biomass and Renewable; 2010. p. 225–232.
   Google Scholar
• Aspen Technology Inc. ASPEN Plus 12.1 User Guide; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Yan L, He B, Pei X, et al. Design and comparisons of three biomass based hydrogen generation systems with chemical looping process. Int J Hydrog Energ. 2014;39:17540–17553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta P, Velazquez-Vargas LG, Fan L-S. Syngas redox (SGR) process to produce hydrogen from coal derived syngas. Energ Fuel. 2007;21:2900–2908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattisson T, Lyngfelt A, Leion H. Chemical-looping with oxygen uncoupling for combustion of solid fuels. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 2009;3(1):11–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cormos C-C, Cormos AM, Petrescu L, Assessment of hydrogen and power cogeneration based on biomass direct chemical looping systems. Chem Eng Trans. 2014;39:247–252.
   Google Scholar
• Thurnhofer A, Schachinger M, Winter F, et al. Iron ore reduction in a laboratory-scale fluidized bed reactor – effect of pre-reduction on final reduction degree. ISIJ International. 2005;45(2):151–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyngfelt A, Leckner B. A 1000 MWth boiler for chemical-looping combustion of solid fuels - Discussion of design and costs. Appl Energ. 2015;157:475–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanxing Li F, Liang Zeng L, Liang-Shih Fan L-S. Biomass direct chemical looping process: Process simulation. Fuel. 2010;89:3773–3784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leion H, Mattisson T, Lyngfelt A. Solid fuels in chemical-looping combustion. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 2008;2:180–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu Z, Li C, Fang Y, et al. Reduction rate enhancements for coal direct chemical looping combustion with an iron oxide oxygen carrier. Energ Fuel. 2012;26(4):2505–2511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basavaraja RJ, Jayanti S. Viability of fuel switching of a gas-fired power plant operating in chemical looping combustion mode. Energy. 2015;81:213–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agudelo A, Valero A, Usón S. The fossil trace of CO2 emissions in multi-fuel energy systems. Energy. 2013;58:236–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar