Advanced search
Publication Cover
Biofuels Volume 9, 2018 - Issue 3
Submit an article Journal homepage
182
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Crop diversity for mixed first and second generation ethanol production

Michael BuckInstitute of Food Science and Biotechnology, Yeast Genetics and Fermentation Technology, Universität Hohenheim, 70599Stuttgart, GermanyCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
&
Thomas SennInstitute of Food Science and Biotechnology, Yeast Genetics and Fermentation Technology, Universität Hohenheim, 70599Stuttgart, GermanyView further author information
Pages 291-303 | Received 25 Jul 2016, Accepted 02 Nov 2016, Published online: 20 Dec 2016

References

  • Yang B, Wyman CE. Pretreatment: the key to unlocking low-cost cellulosic ethanol. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref. 2007;2:26–40.
  • Zhu JY, Pan XJ. Woody biomass pretreatment for cellulosic ethanol production: Technology and energy consumption evaluation. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101:4992–5002.
  • Hattori T, Morita S. Energy crops for sustainable bioethanol production; which, where and how? Plant Prod Sci. 2010;13:221–234.
  • Pohl F, Senn T. A rapid and sensitive method for the evaluation of cereal grains in bioethanol production using near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:2834–2841.
  • Gunnarsson IB, Svensson SE, Johansson E, et al. Potential of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) as a biorefinery crop. Ind Crops Prod. 2014;56:231–240.
  • Oleskowicz-Popiel P, Lisiecki P, Holm-Nielsen JB, et al. Ethanol production from maize silage as lignocellulosic biomass in anaerobically digested and wet-oxidized manure. Bioresour Technol. 2007;99:5327–5334.
  • Chen J, Zhang W, Zhang H, et al. Screw extrude steam explosion: a promising pretreatment of corn stover to enhance enzymatic hydrolysis. Bioresour Technol. 2014;161:230–235.
  • Sun Y, Cheng J. Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review. Bioresour Technol. 2002;83:1–11.
  • Han Q, Jin Y, Jameel H, et al. Autohydrolysis pretreatment of waste wheat straw for cellulosic ethanol production in a co-located straw pulp mill. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2015;2:1193–1210.
  • Maryana R, Ma'rifatun D, Wheni AI, et al. Alkaline pretreatment on sugarcane bagasse for bioethanol production. Energy Procedia. 2014;47:250–254.
  • Rabelo SC, Carrere H, Maciel Filho R, et al. Production of bioethanol, methane and heat from sugarcane bagasse in a biorefinery concept. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:7887–7895.
  • Tutt M, Olt J. Suitability of various plant species for bioethanol production. Agronomy Res Biosystem Eng Special Issue. 2011;1:261–267.
  • Kim S, Park JM, Kim CH. Ethanol production using whole plant biomass of Jerusalem artichoke by Kluyveromyces marxianus CBS1555. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2013;5:1531–1545
  • Kim S, Kim CH. Evaluation of whole Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) for consolidated bioprocessing ethanol production. Renew Energ. 2014;65:83–91.
  • Barta Z, Kreuger E, Björnsson L. Effects of steam pretreatment and co-production with ethanol on the energy efficiency and process economics of combined biogas, heat and electricity production from industrial hemp. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013;6(56). doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-6-56
  • Sipos B, Kreuger E, Svensson SE, et al. Steam pretreatment of dry and ensiled industrial hemp for ethanol production. Biomass Bioenerg. 2010;34:1721–1731.
  • Sørensen A, Teller PJ, Hilstrøm T, et al. Hydrolysis of miscanthus for bioethanol production using dilute acid presoaking combined with wet explosion pre-treatment and enzymatic treatment. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99:6602–6607.
  • Lee W-C, Kuan W-C. Miscanthus as cellulosic biomass for bioethanol production. Biotechnol J. 2015;10:840–854.
  • Wang Y-N, Ko C-H, Lee C-Y, et al. Evaluation of bamboo as a feedstock for bioethanols in Taiwan. Program and Abstracts of the World Renewable Energy Congress-Sweden. Linköping, SE. 2011 (Abstract 057).
  • Li Z, Jiang Z, Fei B, et al. Bioconversion of bamboo to bioethanol using the two-stage organosolv and alkali pretreatment. BioResources. 2012;4:5691–5699.
  • Vaithanomsat P, Chuichulcherm S, Apiwatanapiwat W. Bioethanol production from enzymatically saccharified sunflower stalks using steam explosion as pretreatment. World Acad Sci Eng Technol. 2009;37:140–143.
  • Camargo D, Sene L. Production of ethanol from the hemicellulosic fraction of sunflower meal biomass. Biomass Conv Biorefin. 2014;4:87–93.
  • Sokhansanj S, Mani S, Turhollow A, et al. Large-scale production, harvest and logistics of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) – current technology and envisioning a mature technology. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref. 2009;3:124–141.
  • Miao Z, Shastri Y, Grift TE, et al. Lignocellulosic biomass feedstock transportation alternatives, logistics, equipment configurations, and modeling. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref. 2012;6:351–362.
  • Stelte W. Steam explosion for biomass pre-treatment. Danish Technological Institute; 2013. Available from: http://www.teknologisk.dk/_root/media/52681_RK%20report%20steam%20explosion.pdf
  • Klinke HB, Thomsen AB, Ahring BK. Inhibition of ethanol-producing yeast and bacteria by degradation products produced during pre-treatment of biomass. Appl Microb Biotechnol. 2004;66:10–26.
  • Heer D, Sauer U. Identification of furfural as a key toxin in lignocellulosic hydrolysates and evolution of a tolerant yeast strain. Microb Biotechnol. 2008;1:497–506.
  • Rahikainen JL, Martin-Sampedro R, Heikkinen H, et al. Inhibitory effect of lignin during cellulose bioconversion: the effect of lignin chemistry on non-productive enzyme adsorption. Bioresour Technol. 2013;133:270–278.
  • Palonen H, Tjerneld F, Zacchi G, et al. Adsorption of Trichoderma reesei CBH I and EG II and their catalytic domains on steam pretreated softwood and isolated lignin. J Biotechnol. 2004;107:65–72.
  • Madhavi V, Lele SS. Laccase: properties and applications. BioResources. 2009;4:1694–1717.
  • Pareek N, Gillgren T, Jönsson LJ. Adsorption of proteins involved in hydrolysis of lignocellulose on lignins and hemicelluloses. Bioresour Technol. 2013;148:70–77.
  • Eriksson T, Börjesson J, Tjerneld F. Mechanism of surfactant effect in enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocelluloses. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2002;31:353–364.
  • Ó’Fágáin C. Enzyme stabilization-recent experimental progress. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2003;33:137–149.
  • Ximenes E, Kim Y, Mosier N, et al. Inhibition of cellulases by phenols. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2010;46:170–176.
  • Qing Q, Yang B, Wyman CE. Xylooligomers are strong inhibitors of cellulose hydrolysis by enzymes. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101:9624–9630.
  • Hu J, Arantes V, Saddler JN. The enhancement of enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic substrates by the addition of accessory enzymes such as xylanase: is it an additive or synergistic effect? Biotechnol Biofuels. 2011;4:1–13.
  • Wieser H. Chemistry of gluten proteins. Food Microbiol. 2007;24:115–119.
  • Shewry PR, Tatham AS. Disulphide Bonds in Wheat Gluten Proteins. J Cereal Sci. 1997;25:207–227.
  • Kaewtatip K, Menut P, Auvergne R, et al. Interactions of kraft lignin and wheat gluten during biomaterial processing: evidence for the role of phenolic groups. J Agric Food Chem. 2010;58:4185–4192.
  • Tang Y, Zhao D, Cristhian C, et al. Simultaneous saccharification and cofermentation of lignocellulosic residues from commercial furfural production and corn kernels using different nutrient media. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2011;4(22). doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-4-22
  • Erdei B, Barta Z, Sipos B, et al. Ethanol production from mixtures of wheat straw and wheat meal. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2010;3(16). doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-3-16
  • Erdei B, Frankó B, Galbe M, et al. Separate hydrolysis and co-fermentation for improved xylose utilization in integrated ethanol production from wheat meal and wheat straw. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2012;5(12). doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-5-12
  • Erdei B, Hancz D, Galbe M, et al. SSF of steam-pretreated wheat straw with the addition of saccharified or fermented wheat meal in integrated bioethanol production. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013;6(169). doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-6-169
  • Buck M, Senn T. Increased enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose and hemicellulose due to the addition of gluten and Triticale grist. Int J Environ Bioener. 2016;11(1):36–52.
  • Ververis C, Georghiou K, Christodoulakis N, et al. Fiber dimensions, lignin and cellulose content of various plant materials and their suitability for paper production. Ind Crop Products. 2004;19:245–254.
  • Sun R-C. Cereal straw as a resource for sustainable biomaterials and biofuels. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier; 2010.
  • Aden A, Ruth M, Ibsen K et al. Lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol process design and economics utilizing co-current dilute acid prehydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis for corn stover. Biomass Bioenerg. 2009;3(3):234–246.
  • Dien BS, Jung H-J G, Vogel KP et al. Chemical composition and response to dilute-acid pretreatment and enzymatic saccharification of alfalfa, reed canarygrass, and switchgrass. Biomass Bioenerg. 2006;30:880–891.
  • Cha Y-L, Moon Y-H, Koo B-C, et al. Evaluation of bioethanol productivity from Sorghum x Sudangrass hybrid for cellulosic feedstocks. Korean J Crop Sci. 2013;58(1):71–77.
  • Vaithanomsat P, Chuichulcherm S, Apiwatanapiwat W. Bioethanol production from enzymatically saccharified sunflower stalks using steam explosion as pretreatment. Int J Biol. Biomol. Agric. Food Biotechnol Eng. 2009;3(1):88–91.
  • Huang W-D, Analysis of biofuels production from sugar based on three criteria: Thermodynamics, bioenergetics and product separation. Energ Environ Sci. 2011;4:784–792.
  • Koppram R, Tomás-Pejó E, Xiros C, et al. Lignocellulosic ethanol production at high-gravity: challenges and perspectives. Trends Biotechnol. 2014;32(1):46–53.
  • Narendranath NV, Thomas KC, Ingledew WM. Effect of acetic acid and lactic acid on the growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in a minimal medium. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2001;26:171–177.
  • Maiorella B, Blanch HW, Wilke CR. By-product inhibition effects on ethanolic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 25, 103–121 (1983).
  • Pakarinen A, Zhang J, Brock T, et al. Enzymatic accessibility of fiber hemp is enhanced by enzymatic or chemical removal of pectin. Bioresour Technol. 2012;107:275–281.
  • Nguyen MH, Prince RGH. A simple rule for bioenergy conversion plant size optimisation: Bioethanol from sugar cane and sweet sorghum. Biomass Bioenerg. 1996;10:361–365.
  • Hallam A, Anderson I.C., Buxton DR. Comparative economic analysis for perennial, annual, and intercrops for biomass production. Biomass Bioenerg. 2001;21:407–424.
  • Thomsen MH, Haugaard-Nielsen H. Sustainable bioethanol production combining biorefinery principles using combined raw materials from wheat undersown with clover-grass. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;35:303–311.

Websites

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.