A review of hydrogen production using coal, biomass and other solid fuels

References

• Collot A-G. Matching gasification technologies to coal properties. Int J Coal Geol. 2006;65:191–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen MA. The prospects for renewable energy through hydrogen energy systems. J Power Energ Eng. 2015;3(4):373–377.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen MA, Koohi-Fayegh S. The prospects for hydrogen as an energy carrier: an overview of hydrogen energy and hydrogen energy systems. Energ, Ecol Environ. 2016;1(1):10–29.
   Google Scholar
• Collot A-G. Prospects for hydrogen from coal. Report CCC/78, Clean Coal Centre, International Energy Agency; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Marbán G, Valdés-Solís T. Towards the hydrogen economy? Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2007;32:1625–1637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer FM, Tzimas E, Kaltschmitt M. Techno-economic assessment of hydrogen production processes for the hydrogen economy for the short and medium term. Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2007;32:3797–3810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asif M, Muneer T. Energy supply, its demand and security issues for developed and emerging economies. Renew Sustain Energ Rev. 2007;11:1388–1413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEA. World Energy Outlook 2008. International Energy Agency; 2008. Accessible at: www.worldenergyoutlook.org/media/weowebsite/2008-1994/weo2008.pdf
   Google Scholar
• British Petroleum. BP statistical review of world energy. 2003.
   Google Scholar
• DOE. Energy information agency. International energy outlook. U.S. Department of Energy. 2005. Available from: www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/ieo/index.html
   Google Scholar
• IEA. World Energy Outlook 2006. Paris: International Energy Agency; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• IEA. World Energy Outlook 2007. Paris: International Energy Agency; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Stringfellow T, Beaumont L. Why Should Used Tires Be Considered as a Renewable Energy Source? Proceedings on compact disc of the Alternative Energy Symposium 2008, Chicago State University, Chicago IL. October 2 and 3; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Aznar MP, Caballero MA, Sancho JA, et al. Plastic waste elimination by co-gasification with coal and biomass in fluidized bed with air in pilot plant. Fuel Process Technol. 2006;87:409–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USEPA. Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2006. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, April 15; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Moriarty P, Honnery D. Intermittent renewable energy: The only future source of hydrogen? Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2007;32:1616–1624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrabin R. 2008. Germany leads ‘clean coal’ pilot. BBC News, Sept. 3. Accessed Nov. 4, 2008 at http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7584151.stm
   Google Scholar
• Pennline HW, Luebke DR, Jones KL, et al. Progress in carbon dioxide capture and separation research for gasification-based power generation point sources. Fuel Process Technol. 2008;89:897–907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higman C, Burgt MVD. Gasification. New York: Elsevier; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Rezaiyan J, Cheremisinoff NP. Gasification technologies: A primer for engineers and scientists. London: Taylor and Francis; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Chmielniak T, Sciazko M. Co-gasification of biomass and coal for methanol synthesis. Appl Energ. 2003;74:393–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mozaffarian M, Zwart RWR, Boerrigter H, et al. “Green Gas” as SNG (Synthetic Natural Gas): A renewable fuel with conventional quality. In: Bridgwater AV Boocock DGB, editors. Science in thermal and chemical biomass conversion. Vol. 2, CPL Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Muradov NZ, Veziroglu TN. “Green” path from fossil-based to hydrogen economy: An overview of carbon-neutral technologies. Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2008;33(23):6804–6839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damen K, Troost MV, Faaij A, et al. A comparison of electricity and hydrogen production systems with CO2 capture and storage. Part A: Review and selection of promising conversion and capture technologies. Progress Energ Combust. 2006;32:215–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damen K, Troost MV, Faaij A, et al. A comparison of electricity and hydrogen production systems with CO2 capture and storage. Part B: Chain analysis of promising CCS options. Prog Energ Combust. 2007;33:580–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furimsky E. Gasification of oil sand coke: Review. Fuel Process Technol. 1998;56:263–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirubakaran V, Sivaramakrishnan V, Nalini R, et al. A review on gasification of biomass. Renew Sustain Energ Rev. 2009;13:179–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxena RC, Seal D, Kumar S, et al. Thermo-chemical routes for hydrogen rich gas from biomass: A review. Renew Sustain Energ Rev. 2008a;12:1909–1927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valero A, Uson S. Oxy-co-gasification of coal and biomass in an integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) power plant. Energy. 2006;31:1643–1655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner J, Sverdrup G, Mann MK, et al. Renewable hydrogen production. Int J Energ Res. 2008;32:379–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargigli S, Raugei M, Ulgiati S. Comparison of thermodynamic and environmental indexes of natural gas, syngas and hydrogen production processes. Energy. 2004;29:2145–2159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lior N. Energy resources and use: The present situation and possible paths to the future. Energy. 2008;33:842–857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DOE. Hydrogen from coal program: Research, Development and Demonstration Plan for the Period 2007 through 2016. National Energy Technology Laboratory, Office of Fossil Energy, US Department of Energy, September; 2007. Available from: http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/hydrogen_clean_fuels/refshelf/pubs/External_H2_from_Coal_RDD_Plan_September_13.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Al-Zareer M, Dincer I, Rosen MA. Effects of various gasification parameters and operating conditions on syngas and hydrogen production. Chem Eng Res Des. 2016;115(Part A):1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiegel GJ, Ramezan M. Hydrogen from coal gasification: An economical pathway to a sustainable energy future. Int J Coal Geol. 2006;65:173–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer JM. Combustion technology developments in power generation in response to environmental challenges. Prog Energ Combust. 2000;26:301–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu G-S, Niksa S. Coal conversion submodels for design applications at elevated pressures. Part II. Char gasification. Prog Energ Combust. 2004;30:679–717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trapp B. Coal gasification: When does it make sense? Presented at Power-Gen International Conference, IGCC session, Las Vegas, Nevada; 2005. Available from: www.gasification.org/Docs/Penwell%202005/Eastman.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Almahdi M, Dincer I, Rosen MA. Analysis and assessment of methanol production by integration of carbon capture and photocatalytic hydrogen production. Int J Greenh Gas Con. 2016;51:56–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagato S, Oshita T, Miyoshi M, et al. Fluidized bed gasification and combustion furnace. US Patent No. 7,285,144 B2, October 23. 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Muller S, Stidl M, Proll T, et al. Hydrogen from biomass: large-scale hydrogen production based on a dual fluidized bed steam gasification system. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 2011;1:55–61.
   Google Scholar
• DOE. Gasification: Reference Shelf - System Studies. National Energy Technology Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy; 2000. Available from: http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/coalpower/gasification/pubs/system-studies.html
   Google Scholar
• Lewis FM. Generation of an ultra-superheated steam composition and gasification therewith. US Patent No. 7,229,483 B2, June 12. 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Pei P, Kulkarni M. Modeling of ultra superheated steam gasification in integrated gasification combined cycle power plant with carbon dioxide capture. Proceedings of ES2008 Energy Sustainability 2008 August 10-14, 2008, Jacksonville, Florida USA, paper 54325; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Gasafi E, Meyer L, Schebek L. Exergetic efficiency and options for improving sewage sludge gasification in supercritical water. Int J Energ Res. 2007;31:346–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida Y, Dowaki K, Matsumura Y, et al. Comprehensive comparison of efficiency and CO2 emissions between biomass energy conversion technologies—position of supercritical water gasification in biomass technologies. Biomass Bioenerg. 2003;25:257–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Guo L, Zhang X, et al. Hydrogen production from coal gasification in supercritical water with a continuous flowing system. Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2010;35:3036–3045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin H, Chen Y, Ge Z, et al. Hydrogen production by Zhundong coal gasification in supercritical water. Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2015;40(46):16096–16103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvita V, Messerle VE, Ustimenko AB. Hydrogen production by coal plasma gasification for fuel cell technology. Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2007;32:3899–3906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mountouris A, Voutsas E, Tassios E. Plasma gasification of sewage sludge: Process development and energy optimization. Energ Convers Manage. 2008;49:2264–2271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carabin P, Gagnon J-R. Plasma gasification and vitrification of ash-conversion of ash into glass-like products and syngas. Proc. 2007 World of Coal Ash (WOCA), May 7-10, Covington, Kentucky; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Castaldi MJ, Dooher JP. Investigation into a catalytically controlled reaction gasifier (CCRG) for coal to hydrogen. Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2007;32:4170–4179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang LQ, Dun YH, Xiang XN, et al. Thermodynamic research on hydrogen production from biomass and coal co-gasification with catalyst. Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2011;36(18):11676–11683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Wang J, Shiyong W, et al. Potassium-catalyzed steam gasification of petroleum coke for H2 production: Reactivity, selectivity and gas release. Fuel Process Technol. 2011;92:523–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu S.-Y, Huang S, Wu Y.-Q, et al. The reactivity and H2 production characteristics of petroleum coke-steam gasification catalyzed by potassium salts. Energ Source. 2014;36:184–190.
   Google Scholar
• Lv P, Yuan Z, Wu C, et al. Bio-syngas production from biomass catalytic gasification. Energ Convers Manage. 2007;48:1132–1139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugiyama S, Suzuki N, Kato Y. Gasification performance of coals using high temperature air. Energy. 2005;30:399–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshikawa K. R&D (Research and Development) on distributed power generation from solid fuels. Energy. 2006;31:1656–1665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young L, Pian CCP. High-temperature, air-blown gasification of dairy-farm wastes for energy production. Energy. 2003;28:655–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorace V. Process and apparatus for the production of hydrogen and carbon dioxide from the gasification of raw materials. US Patent No. 7,247,293 B2. July 24. 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Dueck R, Wierzbowski MG. Biomass gasification system. US Patent No. 7,228,806 B2, June 12. 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Weimer T, Berger R, Hawthorne C, et al. Lime enhanced gasification of solid fuels: Examination of a process for simultaneous hydrogen production and CO2 capture. Fuel. 2008b;87:1678–1686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan L, Li F, Ramkumar S. Utilization of chemical looping strategy in coal gasification processes. Particuology. 2008;6:131–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez A, Pröll T, Romeo LM. Lime enhanced biomass gasification. Energy penalty reduction by solids preheating in the calciner. Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2012;37(20):15086–15095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnanapragasam NV, Reddy BV, Rosen MA. Hydrogen production using solid fuels. Chapter 4 in: Handbook of Hydrogen Energy, edited by Sherif SA Goswami DY Lee Stefanakos EK Steinfeld A. CRC Press; 2014. p. 61–112. Available from:http://www.crcnetbase.com/doi/abs/10.1201/b17226-7
   Google Scholar
• Wall TF. Combustion processes for carbon capture. Proc Combusti Inst. 2007;31:31–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corella J, Toledo JM, Molina G. Calculation of the conditions to get less than 2 g tar/mn3 in a fluidized bed biomass gasifier. Fuel Process Technol. 2006;87:841–846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yun Y, Yoo YD, Chung SW. Selection of IGCC candidate coals by pilot-scale gasifier operation. Fuel Process Technol. 2007;88:107–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moghtaderi B. Effects of controlling parameters on production of hydrogen by catalytic steam gasification of biomass at low temperatures. Fuel. 2007;86:2422–2430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Rossum G, Potic B, Kersten SRA, et al. Catalytic gasification of dry and wet biomass. Catal Today. 2008;145(1-2):10–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe H, Otaka M. Numerical simulation of coal gasification in entrained flow coal gasifier. Fuel. 2006;85:1935–1943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerun L, Paraschiv M, Vijeu R, et al. Numerical investigation of the partial oxidation in a two-stage downdraft gasifier. Fuel. 2008;87:1383–1393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross D, Noda R, Horio M, et al. Axial gas profiles in a bubbling fluidised bed biomass gasifier. Fuel. 2007;86:1417–1429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saravanakumar A, Haridasan TM, Reed TB, et al. Experimental investigation and modelling study of long stick wood gasification in a top lit updraft fixed bed gasifier. Fuel. 2007;86:2846–2856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song T, Wu J, Shen L, et al. Experimental investigation on hydrogen production from biomass gasification in interconnected fluidized beds. Biomass Bioenerg. 2012;36:258–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Zhou J, Wang Q, et al. Thermodynamic equilibrium analysis of hydrogen production by coal based on coal/CaO/H2O gasification system. Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2006;31:945–952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahishi MR, Goswami DY. Thermodynamic optimization of biomass gasifier for hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2007;32:3831–3840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohce MK, Dincer I, Rosen MA. Energy and exergy analyses of a biomass-based hydrogen production system. Bioresource Technol. 2011a;102(18):8466–8474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohce MK, Dincer I, Rosen MA. Efficiency evaluation of a biomass gasification-based hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2011b;36(17):11388–11398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseini M, Dincer I, Rosen MA. Steam and air fed biomass gasification: comparisons based on energy and exergy. Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2012;37(21):16446–16452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng X, Shao R, Wang F, et al. Industrial demonstration plant for the gasification of herb residue by fluidized bed two-stage process. Bioresource Technol. 2016;206:93–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yakaboylu O, Albrecht I, Harinck J, et al. Supercritical water gasification of biomass in fluidized bed: First results and experiences obtained from TU Delft/Gensos semi-pilot scale setup. Biomass Bioenerg. 2016; In Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moustakas K, Fatta D, Malamis S, et al. Demonstration plasma gasification/vitrification system for effective hazardous waste treatment. J Hazard Mater. 2005;123(1-3):120–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pio DT, Tarelho LAC, Matos MAA. Characteristics of the gas produced during biomass direct gasification in an autothermal pilot-scale bubbling fluidized bed reactor. Energy. 2016; in Press.
   Google Scholar
• Khan Z, Yusup S, Ahmad MM, et al. Integrated catalytic adsorption (ICA) steam gasification system for enhanced hydrogen production using palm kernel shell. Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2014;39(7):3286–3293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duerr M, Gair S, Cruden A. Hydrogen and electrical energy from organic waste treatment. Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2007;32:705–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishida M, Jin H. Chemical-looping combustion power generation plant system. Patent number: US005447024A. 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Jin H, Ishida M. A new type of coal gas fueled chemical-looping combustion. Fuel. 2004;83:2411–2417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu J, Corripio AB, Harrison DP, et al. Analysis of the sorbent energy transfer system (SETS) for power generation and CO2 capture. Adv Environ Res. 2003;7:335–345.
   Google Scholar
• Dincer I, Rosen MA. Exergy: Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development. 2d ed. Oxford (UK): Elsevier; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Anheden M, Svedberg G. Exergy analysis of chemical-looping combustion systems. Energ Convers Manage. 1998;39(16-18):1967–1980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta P, Velazquez-Vargas LG, Fan L-S. Syngas Redox (SGR) process to produce hydrogen from coal derived syngas. Energ Fuel. 2007;21:2900–2908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattisson T, Lyngfelt A, Leion H. Chemical-looping with oxygen uncoupling for combustion of solid fuels. Int J Greenh Gas Con. 2008;3(1):11–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campen A, Mondal K, Wiltowski T. Separation of hydrogen from syngas using a regenerative system. Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2008;33:332–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nandy A, Loha C, Gu S, et al. Present status and overview of Chemical Looping Combustion technology. Renew Sustain Energ Rev. 2016;59:597–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weimer AW, Perkins C, Mejic D, et al. Rapid solar thermal conversion of biomass to syngas. US Patent Application No. US 2008/0086946 A1, April 17. 2008a.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins CM, Woodruff B, Andrews L, et al. Synthesis gas production by rapid solar thermal gasification of corn stover. Proc. 14th Biennial CSP SolarPACES (Solar Power and Chemical Energy Systems) Symposium, March 4-7, Las Vegas, Nevada; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Zedtwitz PV, Steinfeld A. The solar thermal gasification of coal: Energy conversion efficiency and CO2 mitigation potential. Energy. 2003;28:441–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zedtwitz PV, Petrasch J, Steinfeld A. Hydrogen production via the solar thermal decarbonization of fossil fuels. Sol Energy. 2006;80:1333–1337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon HC, Erickson PA. Hydrogen from coal-derived methanol via auto-thermal reforming processes. Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2008;33:57–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halloran JW. Extraction of hydrogen from fossil fuels with production of solid carbon materials. Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2008;33:2218–2224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muradov NZ. Thermocatalytic process for CO2-free production of hydrogen and carbon from hydrocarbons. US Patent No. 7,157,167 B1, January 2. 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Serio MA, Kroo E, Wojtowicz MA, et al. Pyrolysis processing for producing fuel gas. US Patent No. 7,241,323 B2. July 10. 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Clark SL. Reduced emission gasification and oxidation of hydrocarbon materials for hydrogen and oxygen extraction. US Patent Application No.: US 2008/0078122 A1. April 3. 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Kayukawa N. Open-cycle magneto-hydrodynamic electrical power generation: A review and future perspectives. Prog Energ Combust. 2004;30:33–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxena SK, Drozd D, Durygin A. A fossil-fuel based recipe for clean energy. Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2008b;33(14):3625–3631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan J, Wang Q, Li X, et al. Thermodynamic analysis of a biomass anaerobic gasification process for hydrogen production with sufficient CaO. Renew Energ. 2007;32:2502–2515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiesa P, Consonni S, Kreutz T, et al. Co-production of hydrogen, electricity and CO2 from coal with commercially ready technology. Part A: Performance and emissions. Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2005;30:747–767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartone LM, White J. Industrial size gasification for syngas, substitute natural gas and power production. National Energy Technology Laboratory, US Department of Energy. DOE/NETL-401/040607; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Jin H, Xu Y, Lin R, et al. A proposal for a novel multi-functional energy system for the production of hydrogen and power. Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2008;33:9–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabro A, Deiana P, Fiorini P, et al. Possible optimal configurations for the ZECOMIX high efficiency zero emission hydrogen and power plant. Energy. 2008;33:952–962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cormos C-C, Starr F, Tzimas E, et al. Innovative concepts for hydrogen production processes based on coal gasification with CO2 capture. Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2008;33:1286–1294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler W, Nehter P, Williams MC, et al. General fuel cell hybrid synergies and hybrid system testing status. J Power Sources. 2006;159:656–666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuchonthara P, Bhattacharya S, Tsutsumi A. Combination of thermochemical recuperative coal gasification cycle and fuel cell for power generation. Fuel. 2005;84:1019–1021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh S, De S. Energy analysis of a cogeneration plant using coal gasification and solid oxide fuel cell. Energy. 2006a;31:345–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh S, De S. Exergy analysis of a cogeneration plant using coal gasification and solid oxide fuel cell. Int J Energ Res. 2006b;30:647–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seitarides Th, Athanasiou C, Zabaniotou A. Modular biomass gasification-based solid oxide fuel cells (SOFC) for sustainable development. Renew Sustain Energ Rev. 2008;12:1251–1276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshiba F, Izaki Y, Watanabe T. System calculation of integrated coal gasification/molten carbonate fuel cell combined cycle: Reflection of electricity generating performances of practical cell. J Power Sources. 2004;132:52–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke D. The battle for barrels: Peak oil, yths and world oil futures. London: Profile Books; 2007
   Google Scholar
• Committee on Alternatives and Strategies for Future Hydrogen Production and Use. The hydrogen economy: Opportunities, costs, barriers, and R&D needs. Board on Energy and Environmental Systems, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, National Research Council and National Academy of Engineering; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Uhrig RE, Schultz KR, Bogart SL. Implementing the “hydrogen economy” with synfuels. The Bent of Tau Beta Pi, Summer:18-23; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Cicconardi SP, Perna A, Spazzafumo G. Combined power and hydrogen production from coal. Part B: Comparison between the IGHP and CPH systems. Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2008;33:4397–4404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perna A. Combined power and hydrogen production from coal. Part A: Analysis of IGHP plants. Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2008;33:2957–2964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoko E, McLellan B, da Costa D. Hydrogen from coal: Production and utilisation technologies. Int J Coal Geol. 2006;65:213–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowaki K, Mori S, Fukushima C, et al. A comprehensive economic analysis of biomass gasification systems. Electr Eng Jpn. 2005;153(3):52–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozbilen A, Dincer I, Rosen MA. Comparative environmental impact and efficiency assessment of selected hydrogen production methods. Environ Impact Assessment Rev. 2013;42:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SDTC. Renewable fuel – hydrogen. SD Business Case, Version 1, Sustainable Development Technology Canada, November. 2006. Available from: http://sdtc.ca/en/knowledge/RenewableFuel-Hydrogen.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tzimas E, Peteves SD. The impact of carbon sequestration on the production cost of electricity and hydrogen from coal and natural-gas technologies in Europe in the medium term. Energy. 2005;30:2672–2689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COP 21. 21st Conference of the Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. 2015. Agreement adopted in Paris on 12 December 15. Available from:http://unfccc.int/paris_agreement/items/9485.php
   Google Scholar
• Muresan M, Cormos C-C, Agachi P-S. Techno-economical assessment of coal and biomass gasification-based hydrogen production supply chain system. Chem Eng Res Des. 2013;91(8):1527–1541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnanapragasam NV, Reddy BV, Rosen MA. Solid fuels based integrated hydrogen production. Poster presentation at Ontario Centers of Excellence – Discovery 2008, May 12-13, 2008. Toronto ON, Canada; 2008.
   Google Scholar