A genetic algorithm-based artificial neural network model with TOPSIS approach to optimize the engine performance

References

• IEA. World energy outlook. International Energy Agency; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• BP statistical review. Energy outlook 2030. London; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Kyto Protocol and Copenhagen climate change reference. United Nations Framework convention on climate change. 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar N, VarunKumar A. Biodiesel as an alternative fuel for CI engines: Environmental effect. Indian J Sci Technol. 2010;3:602–606.
   Google Scholar
• Vilela L, Mata TM, Caetano NS. Biodiesel production from fish oil with high acidity. In: Paper presented at 3rd International Symposium on Energy from Biomass and Waste; Italy; 2010. p. 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd M, Murray HA, Schaddelee K. Biodiesel in british columbia-Feasibility study report. Canada: WISE Energy Co-op/Eco-Literacy; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Lin CY, Li RJ. Fuel properties of biodiesel produced from the crude fish oil from the soapstock of marine fish. Fuel Process, Technol. 2009a;90:130–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senthamaraikannan P, Sivaprakasam S, Saravanan CG. Combustion and emission analysis on DI diesel engine run on animal fat oil. In 8th Asia Pacific Conference on Combustion (ASPACC 2010); India; 2010. p. 1005–1009.
   Google Scholar
• Reyes JF, Sepulveda MA. PM-10 emissions and power of a diesel engine fueled with crude and refined biodiesel from salmon oil. Fuel. 2006;85:1714–1719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godiganur S, Murthy CS, Reddy RP. Performance and emission characteristics of a Kirloskar HA394 diesel engine operated on fish oil methyl esters. Renew Energy. 2010;35:355–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakthivel G, Ilangkumaran M, Nagarajan G, et al. Comparative analysis of performance, emission and combustion parameters of diesel engine fuelled with ethyl ester of fish oil and its diesel blends. Fuel. 2014;132:116–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behçet R. Performance and emission study of waste anchovy fish biodiesel in a diesel engine. Fuel Process, Technol 2011;92:1187–1194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin CY, Li RJ. Engine performance and emission characteristics of marine fish-oil biodiesel produced from the discarded parts of marine fish. Fuel Process. Technol. 2009b;90:883–888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhaskar K, Nagarajan G, Sampath S. Optimization of FOME (fish oil methyl esters) blend and EGR (exhaust gas recirculation) for simultaneous control of NOx and particulate matter emissions in diesel engines. Energy. 2013;62: 224–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaminathan C, Sarangan J. Performance and exhaust emission characteristics of a CI engine fueled with biodiesel (fish oil) with DEE as additive. Biomass Bioenergy. 2012;39:168–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mrad N, Varuvel EG, Tazerout M, et al. Effects of biofuel from fish oil industrial residue Diesel blends in diesel engine. Energy. 2012;44:955–963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najafi G, Ghobadian B, Tavakoli T, et al. Performance and exhaust emissions of a gasoline engine with ethanol blended gasoline fuels using artificial neural network. Appl Energy. 2009;86:630–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ushakov S, Valland H, Esoy V. Combustion and emissions characteristics of fish oil fuel in a heavy-duty diesel engine. Energy Convers Manage. 2013;65:228–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steigers JA. Demonstrating the use of fish oil as fuel in a large stationary diesel engine. Alaska energy authority: 2002; 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Jayasinghe P, Hawboldt K. A review of bio-oils from waste biomass: Focus on fish processing waste. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2012;16:798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vedaraman N, Puhan S, Nagarajan G, et al. Preparation of palm oil biodiesel and effect of various additives on NOx emission reduction in B20: An experimental study. Int J Green Energy. 2011;8(3):383–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakthivel G, Nagarajan G. Experimental studies on the performance and emission characteristics of a diesel engine fuelled with ethyl ester of waste fish oil and its diesel blends. SAE paper No.-01: 2011; 2402.
   Google Scholar
• Canakci M, Erdil A, Arcaklioglu E. Performance and exhaust emissions of a biodiesel engine using Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs). Appl Energy. 2006;83:594–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanmugam P, Sivakumar V, Murugesan A, et al. Performance and exhaust emissions of a diesel engine using hybrid fuel with an artificial neural network’, Energy Sources Part A. 2011;33(15):1440–1450.
   Google Scholar
• Ghobadian BG, Barat H, Rahimi AM, et al. Diesel engine performance and exhaust emission analysis using waste cooking biodiesel fuel with an artificial neural network. Renew Energy. 2009;34:976–982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prakash Maran PJ, Priya B. Modelling of ultrasound assisted intensification of biodiesel production from neem (Azadirachta indica) oil using response surface methodology and artificial neural network. Fuel. 2015;143:262–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barradas Filho AOB, Barros AKD, Labidi S, Application of artificial neural networks to predict viscosity, iodine value and induction period of biodiesel focused on the study of oxidative stability. Fuel. 2015;145:127–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tumac D. Artificial neural network application to predict the sawability performance of large diameter circular saws. Measurement. 2016;80:12–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarve A, Sonawane SS, Varma MN. Ultrasound assisted biodiesel production from sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) Oil using barium hydroxide as a heterogeneous catalyst: Comparative assessment of prediction abilities between response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural network (ANN). Ultrason Sonochem. 2015;26:218–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gokalp B, Ertunc HM, Hosoz M, et al. Performance prediction of a CI engine using artificial neural network for various SME and diesel fuel blends. Int. J. Vehicle Design. 2010;54:156–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yusaf TF, Buttsworth DR, Saleh KH, et al. CNG–diesel engine performance and exhaust emission analysis with the aid of artificial neural network. Appl Energy. 2010;87:1661–1669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balabin MR, Lomakina EI, Safieva RZ. Neural network (ANN) approach to biodiesel analysis: Analysis of biodiesel density, kinematic viscosity, methanol and water contents using near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy. Fuel. 2011;90:2007–2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moradi GR, Dehghani S, Khosravian F, et al. The optimized operational conditions for biodiesel production from soybean oil and application of artificial neural networks for estimation of the biodiesel yield. Renew Energ 2013;50:915–920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy SR, Banerjee PK, Bose PK. Performance and exhaust emissions prediction of a CRDI assisted single cylinder diesel engine coupled with EGR using artificial neural network. Appl Energy 2014;119:330–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng X, Jia M, Wang T. Neural network prediction of biodiesel kinematic viscosity at 313 K. Fuel. 2014;121:133–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booker LB, Goldberg DE, Holland JH. Classifier systems and genetic algorithms. Artificial intelligence 235; 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes RM, Fernandes, Rocha C, et al. A simple and effective genetic algorithm for the two-stage capacitated facility location problem. Comput Ind Eng. 2014;75:200–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan J, He C, Gao W, et al. A novel hard decision decoding scheme based on genetic algorithm and neural network. Optik - Int J Light Electron Opt. 2014;125:3457–3461.
   Google Scholar
• Link H, Vera J, Weuster-Botz D, et al. Multi-objective steady state optimization of biochemical reaction networks using a constrained genetic algorithm. Comput Chem Eng. 2008;32:1707–1713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betiku E, Okunsolawo SS, Ajala SO, et al. Performance evaluation of artificial neural network coupled with generic algorithm and response surface methodology in modelling and optimization of biodiesel production process parameters from shea tree (Vitellaria paradoxa) nut butter. Renew Energy. 2015;76:408–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fayyazi E, Ghobadian B, Najafi G, et al. An ultrasound-assisted system for the optimization of biodiesel production from chicken fat oil using a genetic algorithm and response surface methodology. Ultrason Sonochem 2015;26:312–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro LDA, Soares ADS, Lima TWD. Multi-objective GeneticAlgorithm for variable selection in multivariate classification problems: A case study in verification of biodiesel adulteration. Procedia Comput Sci. 2015;51:346–355.
   Google Scholar
• Hajra B, Sultana N, Pathak AK, et al. Response surface method and genetic algorithm assisted optimal synthesis of biodiesel from high free fatty acid sal oil (Shorea robusta) using ion-exchange resin at high temperature. J Environ Chem Eng. 2015;3:2378–2392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• , Hwang C, Yoon K. Multiple attribute decision making methods and applications. A state -of- the-Art survey. 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Rassafi AA, Vaziri M, Azadani AN. Strategies for utilizing alternative fuels by Iranian passenger cars. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2006;3(1):59–68.
   Google Scholar
• Perimenis A, Walimwipi H, Zinoviev S, et al. Development of a decision support tool for the assessment of biofuels. Energy Policy. 2011;39(1):1782–1793.
   Google Scholar
• Nwokoagbara E, Olaleye AK, Wang M. Biodiesel from microalgae: The use of multi-criteria decision analysis for strain selection. Fuel. 2015;159:241–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganapathy T, Gakkhar RP, Murugesan K. Artificial neural network modelling of jatropha oil fueled diesel engine for emission predictions. Therm Sci. 2009;13: 91–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalogirou SA. Artificial neural networks in the renewable energy systems applications: A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2001;5:373–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayin C, Ertunc HM, Hosoz M, et al. Performance and exhaust emissions of a gasoline engine using artificial neural network. Appl Therm Eng. 2007;27:46–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty TL. Fundamentals of the analytic network process in: The Fifth International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process ISAHP; August 12–14; Kobe, Japan; 1999. p. 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Gencer C, Gurpinar D. Analytic network process in supplier selection: A case study in an electronic firm. Appl Math Modell. 2007;31(11):2475–2486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung SH, Lee AHI, Pearn WL. Analytic network process (ANP) approach for product mix planning in semiconductor fabricator. Int J Prod Econ. 2005;96(1):15–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulter K, Sarkis J. An application of the analytic network process to the advertising media budget allocation decision. Clark Univ, USA. 2006;8(4):164–172.
   Google Scholar
• Chen SH, Lee HT, Wu YF. Applying ANP approach to partner selection for strategic alliance Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Manage Decis. 2008;46(3):449–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang CL, Chuang SP, Huang RH. Manufacturing evaluation system based on AHP/ANP approach for wafer fabricating industry. Expert Syst Appl. 2009;36(8):11369–11377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banar M, Ozkan A, Kulac A. Choosing a recycling system using ANP and ELECTRE III techniques. Turkish J Eng Environ Sci. 2010;34(3):145–154.
   Google Scholar
• Pramod VR, Banwet DK. Analytic Network Process Analysis of an Indian Telecommunication Service Supply Chain: A Case Study, Service Science, . 2010;2(4):281–293.
   Google Scholar
• Yazgan E, and Ustun AK. Application of analytic network process: weighting of selection criteria for civil pilots. J Aeronaut Space Technol. 2011;5(2):1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Das S, Chakraborty S. Selection of non-traditional machining processes using analytic network process. J Manuf Syst. 2011;30(1):41–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toosi SLR, Samani JMV. Evaluating water transfer projects using analytic network process (ANP), Journal of Property Investement and Finance. 2012;26(7): 1999–2014.
   Google Scholar
• Shahroudi K, Rouydel H. Using a multi-criteria decision making approach (ANP-TOPSIS) to evaluate suppliers in Iran's auto industry. Int J Appl Oper Res. 2012;2(2):37–48.
   Google Scholar
• Chen CC, Shih HS, Shyur HJ, et al. A business strategy selection of green supply chain management via an analytic network process. Comput Math Appl. 2012;64(8):2544–2557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiue Y-C, Lin C-Y. Applying analytic network process to evaluate the optimal recycling strategy in upstream of solar energy industry. Energy. 2012;54:266–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Promentilla MBA, Tapia JFD, Arcilla CA, et al. Interdependent ranking of sources and sinks in CCS systems using the analytic network process. Environ Modell Software. 2013;50:21–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanian A, Savadogo O. TOPSIS multiple-criteria decision support analysis for material selection of metallic bipolar plates for polymer electrolyte fuel cell. J Power Sources. 2006;159(2):1095–1104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irfan E, Nilsen K. Performance evaluation of Turkish cement firms with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS methods. Expert Syst Appl. 2009;36(1):702–715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YM, Elhag TMS. Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment. Expert Syst Appl. 2006;31(2):309–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YJ. Applying MCDM to evaluate financial performance of domestic airlines in Taiwan. Expert Syst Appl. 2007;34(4):1837–1845.
   Google Scholar
• Ho W, Xu X, Dey PK. Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review. European J Oper Res. 2010;202(1):16–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alemi M, Jalalifar H, Kamali G, et al. A prediction to the best artificial lift method selection on the basis of TOPSIS model. J Petrol Gas Eng. 2010;1(1):009–015.
   Google Scholar
• Cavallaro F. Fuzzy TOPSIS approach for assessing thermal-energy storage in concentrated solar power (CSP) systems. Appl Energy. 2010;87(2):496–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan G, Ling Z, Dequn Z. Performance Evaluation of coal enterprises energy conservation and reduction of pollutant emissions base on GRD-TOPSIS. Energy Procedia. 2011;5:535–539.
   Google Scholar
• Peiyue L, Qian H, Jianhua WU. Hydro chemical formation mechanisms and quality assessment of groundwater with improved TOPSIS method in Peng yang county northwest china. E-J Chem. 2011;8(8):1164–1173.
   Google Scholar
• Rouhani S, Ghazanfari M, Jafari M. Evaluation model of business intelligence for enterprise systems using fuzzy TOPSIS. Expert Syst Appl. 2012;39(3):3764–3771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavana M, Khalili-Damghani K, Abtahi AR. A hybrid fuzzy group decision support framework for advanced-technology prioritization at NASA. Expert Syst Appl. 2013;40(2):480–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z-X, Wang Y-Y. Evaluation of the provincial competitiveness of the Chinese high-tech industry using an improved TOPSIS method. Expert Syst Appl. 2014;41(6):2824–2831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soufi1 MD, Maleki1 MRS, Ghobadian B, et al. The feasibility of using bio lubricants instead of the available lubricants with the help of the multi-criteria decision making software “TOPSIS”. Int J Agron Plant Prod. 2013;4(8):2054–2060.
   Google Scholar
• Lin CY, Lin HA. Engine performance and emission characteristics of a three-phase emulsion of biodiesel produced by peroxidation. Fuel Process Technol. 2007;88:35–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etghani MM, Shojaeefard MH, Khalkhali A, et al. A hybrid method of modified NSGA-II and TOPSIS to optimize performance and emissions of a diesel engine using biodiesel. Appl Therm Eng. 2013;59(1–2):309–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kato S, Kunisawa K, Kojima T, et al. Evaluation of ozone treated fish waste oil as a fuel for transportation. J Chem Eng Japan. 2004;37:863–870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu WW, Lee YT. Selecting knowledge management strategies by using the analytic network process. Expert Syst Appl. 2007;32(3):841–847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobylev N. Comparative analysis of environmental impacts of selected underground construction technologies using the analytic network process. Autom Constr. 2011;20(8):1030–1040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar