Energy performance of biomass cookstoves using fuel briquettes

References

• World Bank. Clean and improved cooking in sub-Sahara Africa. 2nd ed. Washington (DC): World Bank; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho RL, Jensen OM, Tarelho LA. Mapping the performance of wood-burning stoves by installations worldwide. Energy Build. 2016;127:658–679.
   Google Scholar
• Bonjour S, Adair-Rohani H, Wolf J, et al. Solid fuel use for household cooking: country and regional estimates for 1980–2010. Environ Health Perspect. 2013;121(7):784–790.
   Google Scholar
• Geist HJ, Lambin EF. Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation: tropical forests are disappearing as the result of many pressures, both local and regional, acting in various combinations in different geographical locations. BioScience. 2002;52(2):143–150.
   Google Scholar
• Vaccari M, Vitali F, Mazzù A. Improved cookstove as an appropriate technology for the Logone Valley (Chad–Cameroon): analysis of fuel and cost savings. Renew Energy. 2012;47:45–54.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes DF, Singh B, Shi X. Modernizing energy services for the poor: a world bank investment review—Fiscal 2000–08. ESMAP. Washington (DC): World Bank; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. Household cookstoves, environment, health, and climate change: a new look at an old problem. Washington (DC): World Bank; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes DF, Openshaw K, Smith KR, et al. The design and diffusion of improved cooking stoves. World Bank Res Obs. 1993;8(2):119–141.
   Google Scholar
• Obi OF, Ezeoha SL, Okorie IC. Energetic performance of a top-lit updraft (TLUD) cookstove. Renew Energy. 2016;99:730–737.
   Google Scholar
• Parmigiani SP, Vitali F, Lezzi AM, et al. Design and performance assessment of a rice husk fueled stove for household cooking in a typical sub-Saharan setting. Energy Sustain Dev. 2014;23:15–24.
   Google Scholar
• Mehetre S, Sengar S, Panwar N, et al. Performance evaluation of improved carbonized cashew nut shell based cookstove. Waste Biomass Valorization. 2016;7(5):1221–1225.
   Google Scholar
• Pal K, Jha MK, Gera P, et al. Experimental study on the performance evaluation and emission reduction potential of different cookstove models using standard design parameters and testing protocols. Biofuels. 2016;7(4):313–335.
   Google Scholar
• Lask K, Booker K, Han T, et al. Performance comparison of charcoal cookstoves for Haiti: laboratory testing with water boiling and controlled cooking tests. Energy Sustain Dev. 2015;26:79–86.
   Google Scholar
• Adkins E, Chen J, Winiecki, J, et al. Testing institutional biomass cookstoves in rural Kenyan schools for the millennium villages project. Energy Sustain Dev. 2010;14(3):186–193.
   Google Scholar
• Panwar N. Design and performance evaluation of energy efficient biomass gasifier based cookstove on multi fuels. Mitig Adapt Strategies Glob Change. 2009;14(7):627–633.
   Google Scholar
• Boy E, Bruce N, Smith KR, et al. Fuel efficiency of an improved wood-burning stove in rural Guatemala: implications for health, environment and development. Energy Sustain Dev. 2000;4(2):23–31.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar M, Kumar S, Tyagi SK. Design, development and technological advancement in the biomass cookstoves: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2013;26:265–285.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM Standard E711-87. Standard test method for gross calorific value of refuse-derived fuel by the bomb calorimeter. West Conshohocken (PA); 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Jigisha P, Channiwala SA, Ghosal GK. A correlation for calculating elemental composition from proximate analysis of biomass materials. Fuel. 2007;86:1710–1719.
   Google Scholar
• Bailis R, Ogle D, MacCarty N, et al. The water boiling test (WBT) Version 3.0. Household Energy and Health Programme. Berkeley: Shell Foundation, University of California; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Jetter J, Zhao Y, Smith KR, et al. Pollutant emissions and energy efficiency under controlled conditions for household biomass cookstoves and implications for metrics useful in setting international test standards. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46:10827–10834.
   Google Scholar
• Berrueta VM, Edwards RD, Masera OR. Energy performance of wood-burning cookstoves in Michoacan, Mexico Renew Energy. 2008;33:859–870.
   Google Scholar
• Yuntenwi EA, MacCarty N, Still D, et al. Laboratory study of the effects of moisture content on heat transfer and combustion efficiency of three biomass cook stoves. Energy Sustain Dev. 2008;12(2):66–77.
   Google Scholar
• Bailis R, Berrueta V, Chengappa C, et al. Performance testing for monitoring improved biomass stove interventions: experiences of the household energy and health project. Energy Sust Dev. 2007;11(2):57–70.
   Google Scholar
• Panwar NL. Energetic and exergetic performance evaluation of improved biomass cookstoves. Int J Exergy. 2014;14(4):430–440.
   Google Scholar
• Sutar KB, Kohli S, Ravi M R, et al. Biomass cookstoves: a review of technical aspects. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2015;41:1128–1166.
   Google Scholar
• Tryner J, Willson BD, Marchese AJ. The effects of fuel type and stove design on emissions and efficiency of natural-draft semi-gasifier biomass cookstoves. Energy Sustain Dev. 2014;23:99–109.
   Google Scholar
• Raman P, Ram NK, Gupta R. Development, design and performance analysis of a forced draft clean combustion cookstove powered by a thermo electric generator with multi-utility options. Energy. 2014;69:813–825.
   Google Scholar