Prospects for pretreatment methods of lignocellulosic waste biomass for biogas enhancement: opportunities and challenges

References

• Zaldivar J, Nielsen J, Olsson L. Fuel ethanol production from lignocellulose: a challenge for metabolic engineering and process integration. Appl Microbiol Biotech. 2013;56:17–34.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez J, Muñoz-Dorado J, De La Rubia T, et al. Biodegradation and biological treatments of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin: an overview. Int Microbiol. 2002;5:53–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krátký L, Jirout T, Nalezenec J. Lab-scale technol for biogas production from lignocellulose wastes. Acta Polytechnica. 2012;52:54–59.
   Google Scholar
• Jitendra KS, Reetu S, Lakshmi T. Lignocellulosic agriculture wastes as biomass feedstocks for second-generation bioethanol production: concepts and recent developments. 3 Biotech. 2015;5:337–353.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sims R. Biomass and resources bioenergy options for a cleaner environment in developed and developing countries. London, UK: Elsevier Sci; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Delmer DP, Amor Y. review cellulose biosynthesis. Plant cell. 1995;7(7):987–1000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morohoshi N. Chemical characterization of wood and its components. In: Hon DNS, Shiraishi N, editors Wood and cellulosic chemistry. New York, USA: Marcel Dekker, Inc; 1991. p. 31–392.
   Google Scholar
• Taherzadeh MJ, Karimi K. Pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes to improve ethanol and biogas production. A review. Int J Mol Sci. 2008;9:1621–1651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talebnia F, Bafrani MP, Lundin M, et al. Optimization study of citrus wastes saccharification by dilute acid hydrolysis. Bioresour Technol. 2008;3:108–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekar M. Challenges of ethanol production form lignocellulosic biomass. Cincinnati, Ohio: Katzen Int inc Technol and Engenering.
   Google Scholar
• Palonen H, Thomsen AB, Tenkanen M, et al. Evaluation of wet oxidation pretreatment for enzymatic hydrolysis of softwood. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2004;117:1–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grethlein HE. The effect of pore size distribution on the rate of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose substrates. Bioresour Technol. 1985;3:155–160.
   Google Scholar
• Laureano-Perez L, Teymouri F, Alizadeh H, et al. Understanding factors that limit enzymatic hydrolysis of biomass. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2005;121-124:1081–1099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks ATWM, Zeeman G. Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 2009;100:10–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregg D, Saddler JN. A techno-economic assessment of the pretreatment and fractionation steps of a biomass-to-ethanol process. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 1996;57-58(1):711–727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mc Millan JD. Pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. In Himmel ME, Baker JO, Over ends RP, Editors. Enzymatic conversion of biomass for fuels production. Washington,DC: American Chemical Society; 1994. p. 292–324.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar P, Barrett DM, Delwiche MJ, et al. Methods for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for efficient hydrolysis and biofuel production. Ind Engg Chem Res. 2009;48:3713–3729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosier N, Wyman C, Dale B, et al. Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol. 2005;96(6):673–686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmqvist E., Hahn-Hagerdal B. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. I: inhibition and detoxification: Review. Bioresour Technol. 2000;74:17–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmqvist E. Hahn-Hagerdal fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. II: inhibitors and mechanism of inhibition: Review. Bioresour Technol. 2000;74:25–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Y, Cheng J. Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review. Bioresour Technol. 2002;83:1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiaramonti D, Prussi M, Ferreroc S, et al. Review of pretreatment processes for lignocellulosic ethanol production and development of an innovative method. Biomass Bioenerg. 2012;46:25–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashimoto AG. Pretreatment of wheat straw for fermentation to methane. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1986;28(12):1857–1866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma SK, Saini JS, Mishra IM, et al. Biogasification of woody biomass: Ipomoea fistulosa plant stem. Biolog Wast. 1989;28:25–32.
   Google Scholar
• Fox MH, Noike T, Ohki T. Alkaline subcritical-water treatment and alkaline heat treatment for the increase in biodegradability of newsprint waste. Water Sci Technol. 2003;48(4):77–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frigon J-C, Guiot SR. Biomethane production from starch and lignocellulosic crops: a comparative review. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref. 2010;4(4):447–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivers DB, Emert GH. Factors affecting the enzymatic hydrolysis of municipal-solid-waste components. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1988;31(3):278–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson WF, Akin D E. Structural and chemical properties of grass lignocelluloses related to conversion for biofuel. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;35:355–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu O'Dwyer JP, Chang VS, Granda CB, et al. Structural feature affecting biomass enzymatic digestibility. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99:3817–3828.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menardo S, Airoldi G, Balsari P. The effect of particle size and thermal pretreatment onthe methane yield of four agricultural by-products. Bioresour Technol. 2012;104:708–714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma SK, Mishra IM, Sharma MP, et al. Effect of particle-size on biogas generation from biomass residues. Biomass. 1988;17(4):251–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mshandete A, Björnsson L, Kivaisi AK et al. Effect of particle size on biogas yield from sisal fibre waste. Ren Eng. 2006;31(14):2385–2392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruni E, Jensen AP, Angelidaki I. Comparative study of mechanical, hydrothermal chemical and enzymatic treatments of digested biofibers to improve biogas production. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101:8713–8717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ficara E, Malpei F. Maize mono-digestion efficiency: results from laboratory tests. Water Sci Technol. 2011;64(10):2029–2037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumas C, Ghizzi Damasceno-da-Silva G, Rouau X, et al. Wheat straw milling effect on biogas production. Proceeding of 12th World Congress on Anaerobic Digestion. Guadalajara and Jalisco-Mexico. 2010.
   Google Scholar
• González-Fernández C, León-Cofreces C, García-Encina PA. Different pretreatments for increasing the anaerobic biodegradability in swine manure. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99:8710–8714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Take, H, Andou Y, Nakamura Y, et al. Production of methane gas from Japanese cedar chips pretreated by various delignification methods. J Biochem Engg. 2006;28(1):30–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira I, Gominho J, Diberardino S, et al. Characterization of Cynara cardunculus L. stalks and their suitability for biogas production. Ind Crops Prod. 2012;40(0):318–323.
   Google Scholar
• Monlau F, Latrille E, Da Costa AC, et al. Enhancement of methane production from sunflower oil cakes by dilute acid pretreatment. Appl Energy. 2012;102:1105–1113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmowski L, Muller J. Influence of the size reduction of organic waste on their anaerobic digestion. II Int Symposium on Anaerobic Digestion of Solid Waste; Barcelona. 2004. p. 137–144.
   Google Scholar
• Tahir M, Hedegaard M, Ejbye J. Bioresource technology hydrothermal pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of mixed green and woody lignocellulosics from arid regions. Bioresour Technol. 2017;238:369–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei H, Cybulska I, Julson J. Hydrothermal pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass and kinetics. J Sustain Bioenergy Syst. 2013;3:250–259.
   Google Scholar
• Arturi KR, Strandgaard R, Nielsen P, et al. Hydrothermal liquefaction of lignin in near critical water in a new batch reactor: influence of phenol and temperature. J Supercritical Fluids. 2017;123:28–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobleter O. Hydrothermal degradation of polymers derived from plants. Prog Polymer Sci. 1994;19:797–841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teymouri F, Laureano-Perez L, Alizadeh H, et al. Optimization of the ammonia fiber explosion (AFEX) treatment parameters for enzymatic hydrolysis of corn stover. Bioresour Technol. 2005;96(18):2014–2018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaturvedi V, Verma P. An overview of key pretreatment process employed for bioconversion of Lignocellulosic biomass into biofuels and value added product. 3 Biotech. 2013;3(5):415–431.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim TH, Kim JS, Sunwoo C, et al. Pretreatment of corn stover by aqueous ammonia. 2003;90:39–47.
   Google Scholar
• Lehtomaki A, Viinikainen T, Ronkainen O, et al. Effects of pre-treatments on methane production potential of energy crops and crop residues. 10th IWA World Congress on Anaerobic Digestion. Montreal, Canada; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng MX, Li XJ, Li LQ, et al. Enhancing anaerobic biogasification of corn stover through wet state NaOH pretreatment. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100(21):5140–5145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu L, O'Dwyer JP, Chang VS, et al. Multiple linear regression model for predicting biomass digestibility from structural features. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101(13):4971–4979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng M, Li X, Li L, et al. Enhancing solid-state anaerobic biogasification of corn stover through wet state NaOH pretreatment. Bioresour Technol. 2009;101(19):7523–7528.
   Google Scholar
• Ayla- Sant’ A, Ricardo DS, Sobral S, et al. Sugarcane and woody biomass pretreatments for ethanol production. Sustainable degradation of lignocellulosic biomass-Techniques, Appllications and Commercialization. 2013;47–88.
   Google Scholar
• Badshah M, Lam DM, Liu J, et al. Use of an automatic methane potential test system for evaluating the biomethane potential of sugarcane bagasse after different treatments. Bioresour Technol. 2012;114:262–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng Y, Lin H, Tsao GT. Pretreatment for cellulose hydrolysis by carbon dioxide explosion. Biotechnol Prog. 1998;14(6):890–896.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dongyan Y, Xiujin L, Zhijian G, et al. Improving biogas production of corn stalk through chemical and biological pretreatment: A preliminary comparison study. Transactions of the CSAE. 2003;19(5):209–213.
   Google Scholar
• Chandra R, Takeuchi H, Hasegawa S. Hydrothermal pretreatment of rice straw biomass: A potential and promising method for enhanced methane production. Appl Eng. 2012;94:129–140.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang RH, Zhang ZQ. Biogasification of rice straw with an anaerobic-phased solids digester system. Bioresour Technol. 1999;68(3):235–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu J, Peng X, Bingfang H. Bioresource technology advances in improving the performance of cellulase in Ionic liquids for lignocellulose. Biorefinery. 2016;200:961–970.
   Google Scholar
• Ramos LP. The chemistry involved in the steam treatment of lignocellulosic materials. Quím Nova. 2003;26:863–871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang YZ, Liu YP, Li XJ, et al. Improving biodegradability and biogas production of corn stover through sodium hydroxide solid state pretreatment. Energy Fuels. 2008;22(4):2761–2766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo Niee, Liew, BS. Solid- state anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass for biogas production. thesis. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Pakarinen OM, Kaparaju PLN, Rintala JA. Hydrogen and methane yields of untreated, water-extracted and acid (HCl) treated maize in one- and two-stage batch assays. Int J Hydro Eng. 2011;36(22):14401–14407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivaisi AK, Eliapenda S. Pretreatment of bagasse and coconut fibers for enhanced anaerobic degradation by rumen microorganisms. Ren Eng. 1994;5(5–8):791–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson T, Mohan M, Chilukoti B, et al. Goud, ‘Optimization of dilute acid and hot water pretreatment of different lignocellulosic biomass: a comparative study’. Biomass Bioener. 2015;81:9–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao WP, Clarkson WW. Acid solubilization of lignin and bioconversion of treated newsprint to methane. Biodegradation 1997;8:61–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Cegri V, De La Rubia MA, Raposo F, et al. Impact of ultrasonic pretreatment under different operational conditions on the mesophilic anaerobic digestion of sunflower oil cake in batch mode. Ultrason Sonochem. 2012;19(5):1003–1010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pakarinen A. Evaluation of fresh and preserved herbaceous field crops for biogas and ethanol production. University of Helsinki, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry Department of Agricultural Science. Phd Thesis. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Tang Zhang J, Mao Z, et al. Optimization of thermal-dilute sulfuric acid pretreatment for enhancement of methane production from cassava residues. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102(4):3958–3965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivaisi AK, Eliapenda S. Pretreatment of bagasse and coconut fibers for enhanced anaerobic degradation by rumen microorganisms. Renev Eng. 1994;5(5–8):791–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas C, Town J, Iroba K, et al. Pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass using microorganisms:applroaches, advantages and limitations. In: Chandel AK, Silvério da Silva S, editors. Sustainable degradation of lignocellulosic biomass - techniques, appllications and commercialization. Crotia: In Tech Publisher; 2013; p. 181–206.
   Google Scholar
• Caixia Wan Y. Fungal pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Biotechnol Adv. 2012;30:1447–1457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayan Swamy N, Dheeran P, Verma S, et al. Biological pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for enzymatic saccharification. In: Fang Z, editor. Pretreatment technique for biofuels and biorefineries. Berlin, Heidelberg: Green Energy Technol Speringer Verlag; 2013. p. 3–34.
   Google Scholar
• Rouches E, Zhou S, Steyer JP, et al. White-rot fungi pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for anaerobic digestion: impact of glucose supplementation. Proc Biochem. 2015;5:11784–11792.
   Google Scholar
• Chandel AK, Da Silva SS. Biochemistry genetics and molecular biology "sustainable degradation of lignocellulosic biomass techniques applications and commercialization. Crotia: In Tech Publisher; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Ray MJ, Leak DJ, Spanu PD, et al. Brown rot fungal early stage decay mechanism as a biological pretreatment for softwood biomass in biofuel production. Biomass Bioeng. 2010;34(8):1257–1262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amirta R, Tanabe T, Watanabe T, et al. Methane fermentation of Japanese cedar wood pretreated with a white rot fungus, Ceriporiopsissub vermispora. J Biotechnol. 2006;123:71–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasko J, Skripsts E, Dubrovskis V, et al. Anaerobic fermentation of biologically pretreated sawdust for energy appllications. Engg Rural Devlop. 2013;472–476.
   Google Scholar
• Mackulak T, Prousek J, Svorc L. Drtil MIncrease of biogas production from pretreated hay and leaves using wood-rotting fungi. Chem Papers. 2012;66:649–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthangya M, Mshandete AM, Kivaisi AK. Two-stage fungal pre-treatment for improved biogas production from sisal leaf decortication residues. Int J Mol Sci. 2009;10:4805–4815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta P, Sahni N. Effect of Fusarium sp. on paddy straw digestibility and biogas production. J Adv Labo Res Biol. 20102;3(1):12–15.
   Google Scholar
• Mackuľak T, Prousek T, Švorc L, et al. Increase of biogas production from pretreated hay and leaves using wood-rotting fungi. Chem Pap. 2012;66(7):649–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh A, Bhattacharyya BC. Biomethanation of white rotted and brown rotted rice straw. Biopro Engg. 1999;20(4):297–302.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar P, Diane M. Barrett Michael J., et al. Methods for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for efficient hydrolysis and biofuel production. Ind Engg Chem Res. 2009;48(8):3713–3729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamar SAS, Hadjadj A. Radiation pretreatments of cellulose materials for the enhancement of enzymatic hydrolysis. Rad Phy Chem. 1990;35:451–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De la Hoz A, Diaz-Ortiz A, Moreno A. Microwaves in organic synthesis thermal and non-thermal microwave effects. Chem Soc Rev. 2005;34:164–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J, Parameswaran B, Lee JP, et al. Recent development of key technologies on cellulosic ethanol production. J Sci Res. 2008;67:865–887.
   Google Scholar
• Verma AK, Jain PK. Key pretreatment technologies on cellulosic ethanol production. J Sci Res. 2011;55:57–63.
   Google Scholar
• Kumakura M, Kaetsu I. Radiation degradation and the subsequent enzymatic hydrolysis of waste papers. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1982;24:991–997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumakura M, Kojima T, Kaetsu I. Pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes by combination of irradiation and mechanical crushing. Biomass 1982;2:299–308.
   Google Scholar
• Ooshima H, Aso K, Harano YY, et al. Microwave treatment of cellulosic materials for their enzymatic-hydrolysis. Biotechnol Lett. 1984;6:289–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang F, Wang Y, Ji M. Mechanisms and kinetics models for ultrasonic waste activated sludge disintegration. J Hazard Mat. 2005;123:145–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L, Kong X, Yang F, et al. Biogas production potential and kinetics of microwave and conventional thermal pretreatment of grass. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2012;166(5):1183–1191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L. Different pretreatments to enhance biogas production. Master Thesis, Halmstad University; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Take H, Andou Y, Nakamura Y, et al. Production of methane gas from Japanese cedar chips pretreated by various delignification methods. Biochem Engg J. 2006;28(1):30–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi F, Take H, Asada C, et al. Methane production from steam-exploded bamboo. J BioSci Bioeng. 2004;97(6):426–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer A, Bosch P, Fried A, et al. Analysis of methane potentials of steam-exploded wheat straw and estimation of energy yields of combined ethanol and methane production. J Biotechnol. 2009;142(1):50–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teghammar A. Biogas production from lignocelluloses: pretreatment substrate characterization co-digestion and economic evaluation. Gotberg University of Technology; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Hu Z, Wang Y, Wen Z. Alkali (NaOH) pretreatment of switchgrass by radio frequency-based dielectric heating. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2008;148(1–3):71–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theuretzbacher F, Bauer A, Amon B, et al. Biogas production using strong lignified hay – optimization of the steam explosion pretreatment. International Conference of Agricultural Engg. Valencia: 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Itoh H, Wada M, Honda Y, et al. Bioorganosolve pretreatments for simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of beech wood by ethanolysis and white rot fungi. J Biotechnol. 2003;103(3):273–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dohanyos M, Zabranska J, Jenicek P. Innovative technol for the improvement of the anaerobic methane fermentation. Water Sci Technol. 1997;36:333–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason WH. Process and Apparatus for disintegration of wood and the like. US Patent: 1578609; 1926.
   Google Scholar
• Varga E, Reczey K, Zacchi G. Optimization of steam pretreatment of corn stover to enhance enzymatic digestibility. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2004;113:509–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lizasoain J, Mar R, Franz T, et al. Biogas production from reed biomass: effect of pretreatment using different steam explosion conditions. Biomass Bioener. 2016;95:84–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mok WSL, Antal MJA. Un catalyzed solovolysis of whole biomass hemicellulose by hot compressed liquid water. Ind Engg Chem Res. 1992;31:1157–1161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobleter O, Bonn G, Prutsch W. Steam explosion hydrothermolysis organosolv. A comparison) steam explosion technique. PA: Gorden and Breach; 1991. p. 59–82.
   Google Scholar
• Duff SJB, Murray WD. Bioconversion of forest products industry waste cellulosics to fuel ethanol: A review. Bioresour Technol. 1996;55:133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam PS. Steam explosion of biomass to produce durable pellets. PhD thesis, Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Horn SJ, Estevez MM, Nielsen HK, et al. Biogas production and saccharification of Salix pretreated at different steam explosion conditions. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102(17):7932–7936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackowiak, D, Frigon JC, Ribeiro T, et al. Enhancing solubilization and methane production kinetic of switchgrass by microwave pretreatment. Bioresour Technol. 2010;102(3):3535–3540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agbor VB, Cicek N, Sparling R, et al. Biomass pretreatment: fundamentals toward application. Biotechnol Adv. 2011;29(6):675–685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynam JG, Toufiq Reza M, Vasquez VR, et al. Pretreatment of rice hulls by ionic liquid dissolution. Bioresour Technol. 2012;114:629–636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao H, Jones CL, Baker GA, et al. Regenerating cellulose from ionic liquids for an accelerated enzymatic hydrolysis. J Biotechnol. 2009;139:47–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C, Wang Q, Zhao ZK. Acid in ionic liquid: an efficient system for hydrolysis of lignocellulose. Green Chem. 2008;10:177–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilpeläinen I, Xie H, King A, et al. Dissolution of wood in ionic liquids. J Agric Food Chem. 2007;55:9142–9148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lan W, Liu CF, Sun RC. Fractionation of bagasse into cellulose, hemicelluloses and lignin with ionic liquid treatment followed by alkaline extraction. J Agric Food Chem. 2011;59:8691–8701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdmenger T, Haensch C, Hoogenboom R, et al. Homogeneous tritylation of cellulose in 1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride. Macromol Biosci. 2007;7:440–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fort DA, Remsing RC, Swatloski RP, et al. Can ionic liquids dissolve wood? Processing and analysis of lignocellulosic materials with 1-n-butyl-3-methylimidazoliumchloride. Green Chem. 2007;9:63–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swatloski RP, Spear SK, Holbrey JD, et al. Dissolution of cellose with ionic liquids. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124:4974–4975.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W, Sun N, Stoner B, et al. Rapid dissolution of lignocellulosic biomass in ionic liquids using temperatures above the glass transition of lignin. Green Chem. 2011;13:2038–2047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu D, Mazza G, Tamaki Y. Lignin extraction from straw by ionic liquids and enzymatic hydrolysis of the cellulosic residues. J Agri Food Chem. 2010;58:2915–2922.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun N, Rahman M, Qin Y, et al. Complete dissolution and partial delignification of wood in the ionic liquid 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate. Green Chem. 2009;11:646–655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vo HT, Kim CS, Ahn BS, et al. Study on dissolution and regeneration of poplar wood in imidazolium-based ionic liquids. J Wood Chem Technol. 2011;31:89–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weerachanchai P, Leong SSJ, Chang MW, et al. Improvement of biomass properties by pretreatment with ionic liquids for bioconversion process. Bioresour Technol. 2012;111:453–459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou XD, Smith TJ, Li N, et al. Novel renewable ionic liquids as highly effective solvents for pretreatment of rice straw biomass by selective removal of lignin. Biotechnol and Bioeng. 2012;109:2484–2493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale BE, Moreira MJA. freeze-explosion technique for increasing cellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioengg Symposium. 1982;12:31–43.
   Google Scholar
• Puri VP, Mamers H. Explosive pretreatment of lignocellulosic residues with high pressure carbon dioxide for the production of fermentation substrates. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1983;25:3149–3161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu L, Sun J, Li M, et al. Enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis and structural features of corn stover by FeCl3 pretreatment. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100(23):5853–5858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes TV, Bos GJK, Zeeman G, et al. Effects of thermo-chemical pre-treatment on anaerobic biodegradability and hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100(9):2575–2579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michalska K, Miazek K, Krzystek L, et al. Influence of pretreatment with Fenton's reagent on biogas production and methane yield from lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol. 2012;119:72–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonakya V, Raizada N, Kalia VC. Microbial and enzymatic improvement of anaerobic digestion of waste biomass. Biotechnol Lett. 2001;23(18):1463–1466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagiotou G, Olsson L. Effect of compounds released during pretreatment of wheat straw on microbial growth and enzymatic hydrolysis rates. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2007;96(2):250–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen H, Kristensen JB. (Enzymatic conversion of lignocellulose into fermentable sugars: Challenges and opportunities. Biofuel Bioprod Bioref. 2007;1(2):119–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uellendahl H, Wang G, Moller HB, et al. Energy balance and cost-benefit analysis of biogas production from perennial energy crops pretreated by wet oxidation. Water Sci Technol. 2008;58(9):1841–1847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dadi AP, Schall CA, Varanasi S. Mitigation of cellulose recalcitrance to enzymatic hydrolysis by ionic liquid pretreatment. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2007;137:407–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt AS, Thomsen AB. Optimization of wet oxidation pretreatment of wheat straw. Bioresour Technol. 1998;64(2):139–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersson A, Thomsen MH, Hauggaard-Nielsen H, et al. Potential bioethanol and biogas production using lignocellulosic biomass from winter rye, oilseed rape and faba bean. Biomass Bioeng. 2007;31(11–12):812–819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attar, Y, Mhetre ST, Shawale MD. Biogas production enhancement by cellulytic strains of Actinomycetes. Biogas Forum I. 1998;72:11–15.
   Google Scholar
• Yan L, Gao Y, Wang Quan Liu, et al. Diversity of a mesophilic lignocellulolytic microbial consortium which is useful for enhancement of biogas production. Bioresour Technol. 2012;8(111):49–54.
   Google Scholar
• Weerachanchai P, Leong SSJ, Chang MW, et al. Improvement of biomass properties by pretreatment with ionic liquids for bioconversion process. Bioresour Technol. 2012;111:453–459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong W, Zhang Z, Luo Y, et al. Effect of biological pretreatments in enhancing corn straw biogas production. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102(24):11177–11182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukasz D, Adam P, Krzysztof R, et al. Novel molecular markers for the detection of methanogens and phylogenetic analyses of methanogenic communities. Front Microbio. 2015; 6:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuesorn S, Wongwilaiwalin S, Champreda V, et al. Enhancement of biogas production from swine manure by a lignocellulolytic microbial consortium, Bioresour Technol. 2013;144:579–586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qinghua Z, Jiang H, Min T, et al. Enhancement of methane production from cassava residues by biological pretreatment using a constructed microbial consortium, Bioresour Technol. 2011;102(19):8899–8906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan X, Cao Y, Li J, et al. Effect of pretreatment by a microbial consortium on methane production of waste paper and cardboard. Bioresour Technol. 2012;118:281–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meher KK, Murthy MVS, Gollakota KG. Psychrophilic anaerobic digestion of human waste. Bioresour Technol. 1994;50(2):103–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu Y, Lai Q, Zhang C, et al. Characteristics of hydrogen and methane production from corn stalks by an augmented two- or three-stage anaerobic fermentation process. Bioresour Technol. 1994;100:2889–2895.
   Google Scholar
• Zhong W, Zhang Z, Luo Y, et al. 2011; Effect of biological pretreatments in enhancing corn straw biogas production. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:11177–11182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vervaeren H, Hostyn K, Ghekiere G, et al. Biological ensilage additives as pretreatment for maize to increase the biogas production. Renv Eng. 2010;35:2089–2093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tirumale S, Nand K. Influence of Anaerobic Cellulolytic bacterial consortia in the anaerobic digesters on biogas production. Biogas Forum III. 2010;58: 12–15.
   Google Scholar
• Ramchandra. Advance in biodegradation and bioremediation of industrial waste. CRC Press Tylor and Fransis; 2015. p. 490.
   Google Scholar
• Ali SS, Abd El-Fatah A, Jianzhong S. Effective bio-pretreatment of sawdust waste with a novel microbial consortium for enhanced biomethanation. Bioresour Technol. 2017;238:425–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar G, Sivagurunathan P, Bao N, et al. Evaluation of different pretreatments on organic matter solubilization and hydrogen fermentation of mixed microalgae Consortia. Int J Hydrogen Ener. 2016;41:21628–21640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai Y, Li W, Chen C, et al. Biological pretreatment of cotton stalks and domestication of inocula in biogas fermentation. Micro China. 2010;37(4):513–519.
   Google Scholar
• Romano RT, Zhang RH, Teter S, et al. The effect of enzyme addition on anaerobic digestion of Jose Tall Wheat Grass. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100:4564–4571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerhardt M, Pelenc V, Bäuml M. Appllication of hydrolytic enzymes in the agricultural bio gas production results from practical appllications in Germany. Biotechnol J. 2007;2:1481–1484.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zieminski K, Romanowska I, Kowalska M. Enzymatic pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes to improve biogas production. Waste Manag. 2012;32(6):1131–1137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frigon J-C, Guiot SR. Biomethane production from starch and lignocellulosic crops: a comparative review. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref. 2012;4(4):447–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neureite M, Dos Santos JTP, Lopez CP, et al. Effect of silage preparation on methane yields from whole crop maize silages. Proceeding of the 4th International 89 Symp. on Anaerobic Digestion of Solid Waste. 2005 1. p. 109–115.
   Google Scholar
• Yoo CG, Wang C, Yu C, et al. Enhancement of enzymatic hydrolysis and Klason Lignin removal of corn stover using photocatalyst-assisted ammonia pretreatment. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2012;169:1648–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sreekanth KM, Sahu D. Effect of ironoxide nanoparticle in bio digestion of a portable food-waste digesterJOCPR 2015;7 (9):353–359.
   Google Scholar
• Casals E, Barrena R, Gracia A, et al. Programmed iron oxide nanoparticle disintegration in anaerobic digesters boosts biogas production. Small. 2014;10(1–4):305–312.
   Google Scholar
• Otero-Gonzoalez L, Field JA, Sierra-Alvarez R. Inhibition of anaerobic waste water treatment after long- term exposure to low level of CuO nanoparticle. Water Res. 2014;58:160–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luna-Delrisco M, Orupold K, Dubourguier H-C. Particle size effect of CuO and ZnO on biogas and methane production during anaerobic digestion. J Hazard Mater. 2011;189(1–2):603–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Estrella J, Sierra Alvarez R, Field JA. Toxicity assessment of inorganic nanoparticle to acetoclastic and hydrogenotrophic methnogenic activity in anaerobic granular sludge. J Hazard Mater. 2013;260:278–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mu H, Zheng X, Chen Y, et al. Response of anaerobic granular sludge to a shock load of Zinc oxide nanoparticle during biological wastewater tretment. Environ Sci Techol. 2012;46(11):5997–6007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neureite M, Dos Santos JTP, Lopez CP, et al. Effect of silage preparation on methane yields from whole crop maize silages. Proc. 4th Int. 89Symp. on Anaerobic Digestion of Solid Waste. 2005.(1):109–115.
   Google Scholar
• Otero-Gonzalez L, Field JA, Sierra-Alvarez R. Fate and long term inhibitory impact of ZnO nanoparticle during high-rate anaerobic wastewater treatment. J Environ Manage. 2014;135:110–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duc NM. Effect of CeO2 and ZnO nanoparticle on anaerobic digestion and toxicity of digestion sludge. Thailand: Asian institute of Technol; Ms thesis; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Mu H, Chen Y, Xiao N. Effect of metal oxide Nanoparticle (TiO2, Al2O3,SiO2,and ZnO) on waste activated sludge anaerobic digestion. Bioresour Technol. 2011;2(22):10305–10311.
   Google Scholar
• Gracia A, Delgado L, Tora Ja Casals E, et al. Effect of cerium dioxide, titaniumDioxide, silver and gold Nanoparticles on the activity of microbial communities intended in wastewater treatment. J Hzard Mater. 2012;199–200:346–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Mu H, Zheng X. 2014; Chronic response of waste activated sludge fermentation to titanium dioxide nanoparticle. Chin J chem. Eng. 2014;22:1162–1167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma J, Quan X, Si X, et al. Response of anaerobic granule and flocculent sludge to ceria nanoparticle and toxic mechanism. Bioresour Technol 2013;149:346–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casals E, Barrena R, Gracia A, et al. Programmed iron oxide nanoparticle disintegration in anaerobic digesters boosts biogas production.. Small. 2014(1–4):305–312.
   Google Scholar
• Su L, Shi X, Guo G, et al. Stabilization of sewage sludge in the presence Nanoscale zero valent iron (nZVI): Abetment of odour and improvement of biogas production. J Mat Cycle Waste Manag. 2013;15(4):461–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiu Z-M, Jin Z-H, Li T-L, et al. Effect of nanoscale iron particle on a mixed culture dechlorinating Trichloroethylene. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101(4):1141–1146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Guo J, Hu Z. Impact of nonzero valent iron (NZVI) on methanogenic activity and population dynamics in anaerobic digestion. Water Res. 2013;47(17):6790–6800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Xu M, Wall JD, et al. Nanosilver impact on Methanogenesis and biogas production from municipal solid waste. Waste Manag. 2012;l32(5):816–825.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Ahmed A, Hiligsmann S, Delvigne F, et al. Effect of encapsulated nanoparticle on thermophilic anaerobic digestion. 19^th National Symposium on Appl Biological Science. Gembloux: Belgium; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Lo HM, Chiu HY, Lo FC. Effect of micro-nano and non micro non MSWI ashes addition on MSW anaerobic digestion. Bioresour Technol. 2012;7(1):46.
   Google Scholar
• Dong Y, Zheng Y, Zhang RH. Alkali pretreatment of rice straw for increasing the biodegradability. Reno: Nevada: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers; ASABE paper number: 095685; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Alqaralleh RM. Effect of alkaline pretreatment on anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste. University of Ottawa Master; Thesis. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Kumakura M, Kaetsu I. Radiation-induced decomposition and enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1978;(20):1309–1315.
   Google Scholar