Cattle manure for biogas production. Does ensiling and wheat straw addition enhance preservation of biomass and methane potential?

References

• Degueurce A, Capdeville J, Perrot C, et al. Fumiers de bovins, une ressource à fort potentiel pour la filière de méthanisation en France ? Sci Eaux Territ. 2016;24:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Teixeira Franco R, Buffière P, Bayard R. Optimizing storage of a catch crop before biogas production: impact of ensiling and wilting under unsuitable weather conditions. Biomass Bioenerg. 2017;100:84–91. DOI:10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.03.017
   Google Scholar
• Teixeira Franco R, Buffière P, Bayard R. Optimizing agricultural wastes storage before anaerobic digestion : impact of ensiling on methane potential of lignocellulosic biomass. 4th International Conference on Sustainable Solid Waste Management; Limassol, Cyprus; 2016. Available from: http://uest.ntua.gr/cyprus2016/proceedings/pdf/RTeixeira_Franco_et_al-_Optimizing_agricultural_wastes_storage_before_anaerobic_digestion.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Berg W, Pazsiczki I. Mitigation of methane emissions during manure storage. Int Congr Ser. 2006;1293:213–216. DOI:10.1016/j.ics.2006.02.050
   Google Scholar
• Egg R, Coble C, Engler C, et al. Feedstock storage, handling and processing. Biomass Bioenerg. 1993;5:71–94.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald P, Henderson A, Heron. SJ. The biochemistry of silage. 2nd ed. Marlow, Bucks: Chalcombe Publications; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Teixeira Franco R, Buffière P, Bayard R. Ensiling for biogas production: critical parameters. A review. Biomass Bioenerg. 2016;94:94–104. DOI:10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.08.014
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg ZG, Ashbell G. Engineering aspects of ensiling. Biochem Eng J. 2003;13:181–188.
   Google Scholar
• Herrmann C, Heiermann M, Idler C. Effects of ensiling, silage additives and storage period on methane formation of biogas crops. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:5153–5161. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2011.01.012
   Google Scholar
• Kreuger E, Nges I, Björnsson L. Ensiling of crops for biogas production: effects on methane yield and total solids determination. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2011;4:44. DOI:10.1186/1754-6834-4-44
   Google Scholar
• Porter MG, Murray RS. The volatility of components of grass silage on oven drying and the inter-relationship between dry-matter content estimated by different analytical methods. Grass Forage Sci. 2001;56:405–411. DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2494.2001.00292.x
   Google Scholar
• Van Soest PJ, Wine RH. Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds IV. Determination of plant cell-wall constituents. J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1967;50:50–55.
   Google Scholar
• Holliger C, Alves M, Andrade D, et al. Towards a standardization of biomethane potential tests. Water Sci Technol. 2016;74:2515–2522. DOI:10.2166/wst.2016.336
   Google Scholar
• Kalač P. The required characteristics of ensiled crops used as a feedstock for biogas production: a review. J Agrobiol. 2011;28:85–96. DOI:10.2478/s10146-011-0010-y
   Google Scholar
• Liu X, Bayard R, Benbelkacem H, et al. Evaluation of the correlations between biodegradability of lignocellulosic feedstocks in anaerobic digestion process and their biochemical characteristics. Biomass Bioenerg. 2015;81:534–543. DOI:10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.06.021
   Google Scholar
• Neal HDSC, Thornley JHM. A model of the anaerobic phase of ensiling. Grass Forage Sci. 1983;38:121–134. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2494.1983.tb01630.x
   Google Scholar
• Pitt RE, Muck RE, Leibensperger RY. A quantitative model of the ensilage process in lactate silages. Grass Forage Sci. 1985;40:279–303. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2494.1985.tb01755.x
   Google Scholar
• Batstone DJ, Keller J, Angelidaki I, et al. The IWA anaerobic digestion model no 1 (ADM1). Water Sci Technol. 2002;45:65–73. DOI:10.2166/wst.2008.678
   Google Scholar
• Mahmoud SAZ, Zaki MM, Saleh EA. Factors affecting the microbial and chemical composition of silage: IV. Effect of wilting on maize silage, Zentralblatt Fuer Bakteriol. Parasitenkunde, Infekt. Und Hyg. Zweite Naturwissenschaftliche Abteilung Mikrobiol. Der Landwirtschaft. Der Technol Und Des Umweltschutzes. 1979;134:34–39. DOI:10.1016/S0323-6056(79)80061-0
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson JM. A laboratory evaluation of comfrey (Symphytum officinale L.) as a forage crop for ensilage. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2003;104:227–233.
   Google Scholar
• Lehtomäki A. Biogas production from energy crops and crop residues [ Academic dissertation]. Jyväskylä (Finland): Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Pakarinen O, Lehtoma A, Rissanen S, et al. Storing energy crops for methane production: effects of solids content and biological additive. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99:7074–7082. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2008.01.007
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh S, Henry MP, Christopher RW. Hemicellulose conversion by anaerobic digestion. Biomass. 1985;6:257–269. DOI:10.1016/0144-4565(85)90052-6
   Google Scholar
• Manyi-Loh C, Mamphweli S, Meyer E, et al. An overview of the control of bacterial pathogens in cattle manure. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13:843. DOI:10.3390/ijerph13090843
   Google Scholar
• Marañón E, Castrillón L, Fernández JJ, et al. Anaerobic mesophilic treatment of cattle manure in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor with prior pasteurization. J Air Waste Manage Assoc. 2006;56:137–143. DOI:10.1080/10473289.2006.10464448
   Google Scholar
• Bastiman B. Factors affecting silage effluent production. Exp Husb. 1976;31:40–46.
   Google Scholar
• Sutter A. Problem of waste effluent from silage making and feeding of silage. Eur Product Agency Organ Eur Econ Co-Operation. 1957;307:74–82.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmer E. Efficient silage systems. In: Thomas C, editor. Forage Conserv. 80's. Brighton (UK): British Grassland Society; 1980. p. 186–197.
   Google Scholar