Investigating the future supply distribution of industrial grade wood pellets in the global bioenergy market

References

• EBIOM. AEBIOM Statistical Report - European Bioenergy Outlook Full Report 2016. Brussels, Belgium; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• EIA. World markets for wood pellets 2016 [cited 2016 8/29/2016]. Available from: http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/ieo/electricity.cfm.
   Google Scholar
• USITC. Development in the global trade of wood pellets. Washington, DC, USA: U.S. International Trade Commission; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Enecho. Strategic energy plan -provisional translation 2014 [cited 2016 7/09/2016]. Available from: http://www.enecho.meti.go.jp/en/category/others/basic_plan/pdf/4th_strategic_energy_plan.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Evans P. Wood-based Biomass Blossoming in Asia: Renewable Energy World magazine 2014 [cited 2016 9/14/2016]. Available from: http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/articles/2013/02/wood-based-biomass-blossoming-in-asia.html.
   Google Scholar
• DOE. 2016 billion-ton report advancing domestic resources for a thriving bioeconomy. Oakridge, TN, USA: Oak Ridge National Laboratory; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Lamers P, Tan ECD, Searcy EM, et al. Strategic supply system design - a holistic evaluation of operational and production cost for a biorefinery supply chain. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref. 2015;9(6):648–660.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen QN, Cloutier A, Achim A, et al. Effect of process parameters and raw material characteristics on physical and mechanical properties of wood pellets made from sugar maple particles. Biomass Bioenerg. 2015;80:338–349.
   Google Scholar
• Aragón-Garita S, Moya R, Bond B, et al. Production and quality analysis of pellets manufactured from five potential energy crops in the Northern Region of Costa Rica. Biomass Bioenerg. 2016;87:84–95.
   Google Scholar
• Telmo C, Lousada J. Heating values of wood pellets from different species. Biomass Bioenerg. 2011;35(7):2634–2639.
   Google Scholar
• Shahrukh H, Oyedun AO, Kumar A, et al. Techno-economic assessment of pellets produced from steam pretreated biomass feedstock. Biomass Bioenerg. 2016;87:131–143.
   Google Scholar
• Lamers P, Roni MS, Tumuluru JS, et al. Techno-economic analysis of decentralized biomass processing depots. Bioresource Technol. 2015;194:205–213.
   Google Scholar
• Kebede E, Ojumu G, Adozssi E. Economic impact of wood pellet co-firing in South and West Alabama. Energy Sustain Dev. 2013;17(3):252–256.
   Google Scholar
• Roni MS, Eksioglu SD, Searcy E, et al. A supply chain network design model for biomass co-firing in coal-fired power plants. Transport Res Part E: Log Transport Rev. 2014;61:115–134.
   Google Scholar
• Prando D, Boschiero M, Campana D, et al. Assessment of different feedstocks in South Tyrol (Northern Italy): Energy potential and suitability for domestic pellet boilers. Biomass Bioenerg. 2016;90:155–162.
   Google Scholar
• Pa A, Bi X, Sokhansanj S. Evaluation of wood pellet application for residential heating in British Columbia based on a streamlined life cycle analysis. Biomass Bioenerg. 2013;49:109–122.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson O, Hillring B, Vinterbäck J. European wood pellet market integration–A study of the residential sector. Biomass Bioenerg. 2011;35(1):153–160.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson H, Liddell C. The suitability of wood pellet heating for domestic households: A review of literature. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2015;42:1362–1369.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Gilless JK, Stewart W. Modeling price-driven interactions between wood bioenergy and global wood product markets. Biomass Bioenerg. 2014;60:68–78.
   Google Scholar
• Kim K, Kim Y, Yang C, et al. Long-term operation of biomass-to-liquid systems coupled to gasification and Fischer–Tropsch processes for biofuel production. Bioresource Technol. 2013;127:391–399.
   Google Scholar
• Hoefnagels R, Resch G, Junginger M, et al. International and domestic uses of solid biofuels under different renewable energy support scenarios in the European Union. Appl Energ. 2014 10/15/;131:139–157.
   Google Scholar
• Lamers P, Hoefnagels R, Junginger M, et al. Global solid biomass trade for energy by 2020: an assessment of potential import streams and supply costs to North-West Europe under different sustainability constraints. GCB Bioenerg. 2014;7:618–634. DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.12162.
   Google Scholar
• Hoefnagels R, Searcy E, Cafferty K, et al. Lignocellulosic feedstock supply systems with intermodal and overseas transportation. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref. 2014 Nov-Dec;8(6):794–818.
   Google Scholar
• Uasuf A, Becker G. Wood pellets production costs and energy consumption under different framework conditions in Northeast Argentina. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2011;35(3):1357–1366.
   Google Scholar
• Matzenberger J, Daioglou V, Junginger M, et al. Future perspectives of international bioenergy trade. IEA Bioenerg Task. 2013;40:
   Google Scholar
• García-Maroto I, Muñoz-Leiva F, Rey-Pino JM. Qualitative insights into the commercialization of wood pellets: the case of Andalusia, Spain. Biomass Bioenerg. 2014;64:245–255.
   Google Scholar
• Sun L, Niquidet K. Elasticity of import demand for wood pellets by the European Union. Forest Policy Econ. 2017;81:83–87.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang W, Searle S, Siddiqui S. Analysis of the global wood‐chip trade's response to renewable energy policies using a spatial price equilibrium model. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref. 2017;11:505–520.
   Google Scholar
• Von Stackelberg H. Market structure and equilibrium. Bonn, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Bai Y, Ouyang Y, Pang J-S. Biofuel supply chain design under competitive agricultural land use and feedstock market equilibrium. Energ Econ. 2012;34(5):1623–1633.
   Google Scholar
• Esmaeili M, Aryanezhad M-B, Zeephongsekul P. A game theory approach in seller–buyer supply chain. Eur J Oper Res. 2009;195(2):442–448.
   Google Scholar
• Nasiri F, Zaccour G. An exploratory game-theoretic analysis of biomass electricity generation supply chain. Energ Policy. 2009;37(11):4514–4522.
   Google Scholar
• Yue D, You F. Game-theoretic modeling and optimization of multi-echelon supply chain design and operation under Stackelberg game and market equilibrium. Comput Chem Eng. 2014;71:347–361.
   Google Scholar
• Majumder P, Srinivasan A. Leadership and competition in network supply chains. Manag Sci. 2008;54(6):1189–1204.
   Google Scholar
• Fukushima M. Restricted generalized Nash equilibria and controlled penalty algorithm. Comput Manag Sci. 2011;8(3):201–218.
   Google Scholar
• Krawczyk J. Numerical solutions to coupled-constraint (or generalised Nash) equilibrium problems. Comput Manag Sci. 2007;4(2):183–204.
   Google Scholar
• Bard JF. Practical bilevel optimization: algorithms and applications. Vol. 30. Austin, Texas, USA: Springer Science & Business Media; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Colson B, Marcotte P, Savard G. An overview of bilevel optimization. Ann Oper Res. 2007;153(1):235–256.
   Google Scholar
• Brotcorne L, Labbé M, Marcotte P, et al. A bilevel model for toll optimization on a multicommodity transportation network. Transp Sci. 2001;35(4):345–358.
   Google Scholar
• Bracken J, McGill JT. Mathematical programs with optimization problems in the constraints. Oper Res. 1973;21(1):37–44.
   Google Scholar
• Pousinho H, Esteves J, Mendes V, et al. Bilevel approach to wind-CSP day-ahead scheduling with spinning reserve under controllable degree of trust. Renew Energ. 2016;85:917–927.
   Google Scholar
• Brown G, Carlyle M, Diehl D, et al. A two-sided optimization for theater ballistic missile defense. Oper Res. 2005;53(5):745–763.
   Google Scholar
• Scaparra MP, Church RL. A bilevel mixed-integer program for critical infrastructure protection planning. Comput Oper Res. 2008;35(6):1905–1923.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Ayed O, Boyce DE, Blair CE. A general bilevel linear programming formulation of the network design problem. Transp Res Part B: Methodol. 1988;22(4):311–318.
   Google Scholar
• Candler W, Townsley R. A linear two-level programming problem. Comput Oper Res. 1982;9(1):59–76.
   Google Scholar
• Bialas WF, Karwan MH. Two-level linear programming. Manage Sci. 1984;30(8):1004–1020.
   Google Scholar
• Bard JF. An efficient point algorithm for a linear two-stage optimization problem. Oper Res. 1983;31(4):670–684.
   Google Scholar
• White DJ, Anandalingam G. A penalty function approach for solving bi-level linear programs. J Glob Optim. 1993;3(4):397–419.
   Google Scholar
• Judice JJ, Faustino A. The liner-quadratic bilevel programming problem. INFOR. 1994;32(2):87.
   Google Scholar
• Fortuny-Amat J, McCarl B. A representation and economic interpretation of a two-level programming problem. J Oper Res Soc. 1981;50:783–792.
   Google Scholar
• Dempe S, Kalashnikov V, Pérez-Valdés GA, et al. Bilevel programming problems. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Gabriel SA, Leuthold FU. Solving discretely-constrained MPEC problems with applications in electric power markets. Energ Econ. 2010;32(1):3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Bliek C, Bonami P. IBM CPLEX global non-convex MIQP. INFORMS Annual Meeting; 2013; Phoenix, AZ, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Hoefnagels R, Resch G, Junginger M, et al. International and domestic uses of solid biofuels under different renewable energy support scenarios in the European Union. Appl Energ. 2014 10/15/;131:139–157.
   Google Scholar
• Pöyry. The dynamics of the global wood pellet industry moving forward. In: Gemmel A. editor. Nordic Baltic Bioenergy Conference: Pöyry Management Consulting; 2015; London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Resch G, Ortner A, Welisch M, et al. Policy Dialogue on the assessment and convergence of RES Policy in EU Member States. Denmark: Fraunhofer ISI; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Hoefnagels R, Junginger M, Resch G. Coordination of biomass resource availability import strategies and demand Utrecht University. Netherlands: Fraunhofer ISI; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Pöyry. The dynamics of global pellet markets. In: Mergner S. editor. . 4. Central European Biomass Conference: Pöyry Management Consulting; 2014; London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Sea-Distance. Sea distances / port distances - online tool for calculation distances between sea ports 2016 [cited 2015 07/20/2015]. Available from: http://www.sea-distances.org/.
   Google Scholar
• DOE. Multi-year program plan. Washington, D.C., USA: U.S. Department of Energy D; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• USDA. Global agricultural trade system (GATS). Washington, DC, USA: US Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service; 2016. [cited 2016]. Available from:http://www.fas.usda.gov/gats/default.aspx.
   Google Scholar