Application of Archimedean copula in the non-isothermal n^th order distributed activation energy model

References

• Srirangan K, Akawi L, Moo-Young M, et al. Towards sustainable production of clean energy carriers from biomass resources. Appl Energy. 2012;100:172–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhaundiyal A, Gupta VK. The analysis of pine needles as a substrate for gasification. J Water, Energy Environ. 2014;15:73–81.
   Google Scholar
• Dhaundiyal A, Tewari PC. Comparative Analysis of Pine Needles and Coal for Electricity Generation using Carbon Taxation and Emission Reductions. Acta Technol Agriculturae. 2015;18:29–35.
   Google Scholar
• Dhaundiyal A, Tewari PC. Performance Evaluation of Throatless Gasifier Using Pine Needles as a Feedstock for Power Generation. Acta Technol Agriculturae. 2016;19:10–18.
   Google Scholar
• Kader MA, Islam MR, Parveen M, et al. Pyrolysis decomposition of tamarind seed for alternative fuel. Bio Technol. 2014;149:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaqa S, Mamphweli S, Katwire D, et al. Synergistic evaluation of the biomass/coal blends for cogasification purposes. Int J Energy Environ. 2014;5:251–256.
   Google Scholar
• Zaror CA, Pyle DL. Models for low temperature pyrolysis of wood. Thermochemical Processing of Biomass. London: Butterworths and Company Publishers Ltd; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Cai J, Liu R. New distributed activation energy model: Numerical solution and application to pyrolysis kinetics of some types of biomass. Bio Technol. 2008;99:2795–2799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates RB, Ghoniem AF. Biomass torrefaction: Modeling of volatile and solid product evolution kinetics. Bio Technol. 2012;124:460–469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhaundiyal A, Singh SB. Distributed activation energy modelling for pyrolysis of forest waste using Gaussian distribution. Proc Latvian Acad Sci Section B Nat Exact Appl Sci. 2016;70:64–70.
   Google Scholar
• Dhaundiyal A, Singh SB. Asymptotic approximations to the distributed activation energy model for non isothermal pyrolysis of loose biomass using the Weibull distribution. Archivum Combust. 2016;36:131–146.
   Google Scholar
• Dhaundiyal A, Singh SB. Approximations to the non isothermal distributed activation energy model for biomass pyrolysis using the Rayleigh distribution. Acta Technol Agriculturae. 2017;3:78–84.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu HM, Yan JH, Jiang XG, et al. Study on pyrolysis of typical medical waste materials by using TG-FTIR analysis. J Hazardous Mat. 2008;153:670–676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koreòová Z, Juma M, Annus J, et al. Kinetics of pyrolysis and properties of carbon black from a scrap tire. Chem Papers. 2006;60:422–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teng H, Hsieh CT. Activation energy for oxygen chemisorptionon carbon at low temperatures. Ind Eng Chem Res. 1999;38:292–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quan C, Li A, Gao N. Thermogravimetric analysis and kinetic study on large particles of printed circuit board wastes. Waste Management. 2009;29:2353–2360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakshmanan CC, Bennett ML, White N. Implications of multiplicity in kinetic parameters to petroleum exploration: distributed activation energy models. Energy Fuels. 1991;5:110–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Caprariis B, de Filippis P, Herce C, et al. Double-gaussian distributed activation energy model for coal devolatilization. Energy Fuels. 2012;26:6153–6159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Chen T, Wu J, et al. Multi-Gaussian-DAEM-reaction model for thermal decompositions of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin: Comparison of N2 and CO2 atmosphere. Bioresour Technol. 2014;166:87–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang X, Zhang R, Fu J, et al. Pyrolysis kinetic and product analysis of different microalgal biomass by distributed activation energy model and pyrolysis–gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Bioresour Technol. 2014;163:335–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sklar A. Fonctions de repartition ‘a n dimensions et leurs marges. Publications de l'Institut de Statistique de l'Universit´e de Paris. 1959;8:229–231.
   Google Scholar
• Deheuvels P. La fonction de d´ependance empirique et ses propri´et´es: Un test non param´etrique d'ind´ependance. Acad´emie Royale de Belgique Bulletin de la Classe des Sciences 5e S´erie. 1979;65:274–292.
   Google Scholar
• Genest C, MacKay J. The joy of copulas: Bivariate distributions with uniform marginals. Am Statistician. 1986;40:280–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle CD. Estimating isothermal life from thermogravimetric data. J Appl Polym Sci. 1962;6:639–642.
   Google Scholar
• Akahira T, Sunose T. Joint convention of four electrical institutes. Sci Technol. 1971;16:22–31.
   Google Scholar
• Dhaundiyal A, Singh SB. Mathematical insight to non-isothermal pyrolysis of pine needles for different probability distribution functions. Biofuels. 2017May;1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Wang L, Dzenis Y, et al. Thermogravimetric characterization of corn stover as gasification and pyrolysis feedstock. Biomass Bioenergy. 2008;32:460–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhaundiyal A, Tewari PC. Kinetic Parameters for the Thermal Decomposition of Forest Waste Using Distributed Activation Energy Model (DAEM). Environ Climate Technol. 2017;19:15–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar