Box-Behnken Response Surface Methodology for Optimization of Process Parameters for Dairy Washed Milk Scum Biodiesel Production

References

• Fan X, Wang X, Chen F. Biodiesel production from crude cottonseed oil: an optimization process using response surface methodology. Open Fuels Energy Sci J. 2011;4:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Yasin Y. Optimization of bio catalytic biodiesel production from pomace oil using response surface methodology. Fuel Process Technol. 2012;99:97–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivakumar P, Anbarasu K, Renganathan S. Bio-diesel production by alkali catalyzed transesterification of dairy waste scum. Fuel. 2011;90:147–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yatish KV, Lalithamba HS, Suresh SB, et al. Optimization of scum oil biodiesel production by using response surface methodology. Process Saf Environ. 2016;102:667–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srikanth HV, Venkatesh J, Godiganur S, et al. Bio-based diluents improve cold flow properties of dairy washed milk-scum. Renew Energy. 2017;111:168–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira SLC, Bruns RE, Ferreira HS, et al. Box-Behnken design: an alternative for the optimization of analytical methods. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2007;592:179–186.
   Google Scholar
• Onukwuli DO, Emembolu LN, Ude CN, et al. Optimization of biodiesel production from refined cotton seed oil and its characterization. Egypt J Pet. 2017;26:103–110.
   Google Scholar
• Silva GF, Camargo FL, Ferreira ALO. Application of response surface methodology for optimization of biodiesel production by transesterification of soybean oil with ethanol. Fuel Process Tech. 2011;92:407–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renita AA, Amarnath JD, Sivasubramanian S. A study on the optimization of algal biodiesel reaction parameters using response surface methodology. Int J Chem Eng Appl. 2012;3:311–314.
   Google Scholar
• Aworanti OA, Agarry SE, Ajani AO. Statistical optimization of process variables for biodiesel production from waste cooking oil using heterogeneous base catalyst. British Biotechnol J. 2013;3(2): 116–132.
   Google Scholar
• Aboelazayem O, Gadalla M,Saha B. Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil via supercritical methanol: optimization and reactor simulation. Renew Energy. 2017;1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.06.076.
   Google Scholar
• Singh B. Synthesis of biodiesel using potassium fluoride (KF) supported by hydrotalcite and process optimization by Box- Behnken design. Biomass Conv Bioref. 2012;2: 317–325.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar M, Sharma MP. Optimization of transesterification of chlorella protothecoides oil to biodiesel using box-behnken design method. Waste Biomass Valori. 2016;7:1105–1114. DOI 10.1007/s12649-016-9485-5.
   Google Scholar
• Makareviciene V, Skorupskaite V, Levisauskas D, et al. The optimization of biodiesel fuel production from microalgae oil using response surface methodology. Int J Green Energy. 2014;11(5):527–541. DOI: 10.1080/15435075.2013.777911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibanda W, Pretorius P. Comparative study of the application of central composite face-centred (CCF) and Box-Behnken designs (BBD) to study the effect of demographic characteristics on HIV risk in South Africa. Netw Model Anal Health Inform Bioinform. 2013;2:137–146. .
   Google Scholar
• Witek-Krowiak A, Chojnacka K. Podstawczyk, D., et al. Application of response surface methodology and artificial neural network methods in modelling and optimization of biosorption process. Bioresour Technol. 2014;160:150–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwivedi F, Sharma MP. Application of Box–Behnken design in optimization of biodiesel yield from Pongamia oil and its stability analysis. Fuel 2015;145:256–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma P, Sharma MP, Dwivedi G. Prospects of bio-based alcohols for Karanja biodiesel production: an optimization study by Response surface methodology. Fuel 2016;183:185–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knothe G. Dependence of biodiesel fuel properties on the structure of fatty acid alkyl esters. Fuel Process Tech. 2005;86:1059–1070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knothe G. Analyzing biodiesel: Standards and other methods. J Am Oil Chem Soc. 2006;83(10):823–833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirbas A. Relationships derived from physical properties of vegetable oil and biodiesel fuels, Fuel. 2008;87:1743–1748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirbas A. Calculation of higher heating values of biomass fuels. Fuel. 1997;76(5): 431–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahoo PK, Das LM. process optimization for biodiesel production from Jatropha, Karanja and Polanga oils. Fuel. 2009;88:1588–1594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimipour S, Gerspacher R, Gupta R, et al. Study of factors affecting syngas quality and their interactions in fluidized bed gasification of lignite coal. Fuel. 2013;103:308–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong GT, Kim DH, Park DH. Response surface methodological approach for optimization of free fatty acid removal. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2007;136:583–594.
   Google Scholar
• Nakpong P, Wootthikanokkhan S. Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) oil as an alternative feedstock for biodiesel production in Thailand. Fuel. 2010;89:1806–1811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onukwuli DO, Emembolu LN, Ude CN, et al. Optimization of biodiesel production from refined cotton seed oil and its characterization. Egypt J Pet. 2017;26:103–110.
   Google Scholar