Predicting the methane number of gaseous fuels using an artificial neural network

References

• Brunt M, Pond C, Biundo J. Gasoline engine knock analysis using cylinder pressure data. SAE Technical Paper. 980896. 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Leiker M, Christoph K, Rankl M. Evaluation of anti−knock property of gaseous fuels by means of the methane number and its practical application to gas engines. 72-DGP-4, ASME, New York, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan TW, III Callahan TJ, King SR. Engine Knock Rating of Natural Gases—Methane Number. J Eng Gas Turbines Power.. 1993;115:769–776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callahan TJ, Ryan TWI, Buckingham JP, et al. Engine knock rating of natural gases - Expanding the methane number database, United States.
   Google Scholar
• European Committee for Standardization, FprEN 16726:2015. Gas infrastructure – quality of gas – group H. Brussels. July 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Gieseking B, Brown AS. Novel algorithm for calculating the methane number of liquefied natural gas with defined uncertainty. Fuel. 2016;185:932–940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen P. Algorithm for methane number determination for natural gasses. Dansk Gasteknisk Center (DGC). Denmark, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Wise DM, Olsen DB, Kim M. Characterization of methane number for producer gas blends. ASME. internal combustion engine division fall technical conference, Volume 2: Fuels; Numerical Simulation; Engine Design, Lubrication, and Applications. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Arunachalam A, Olsen DB. Experimental evaluation of knock characteristics of producer gas. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2012;37:169–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolon L, Mohaghegh SD, Ameri S, et al. Using artificial neural networks to generate synthetic well logs. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering. 2009;1:118–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadian M, AliAkbari N, Karami M. Using artificial neural network predictive controller optimized with Cuckoo Algorithm for pressure tracking in gas distribution network. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering. 2015; 27:1446–1454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javed S, Murthy YS, Baig RU, et al. Vibration analysis of a diesel engine using biodiesel fuel blended with nano particles by dual fueling of hydrogen. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering. 2016;33:217–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thakur AK, Mer KK, Kaviti A. An artificial neural network approach to predict the performance and exhaust emissions of a gasoline engine using ethanol–gasoline blended fuels. Biofuels. 2018;9:379–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakthivel G, Kumar SK, Ilangkumaran M. A genetic algorithm-based artificial neural network model with TOPSIS approach to optimize the engine performance. Biofuels. 2017;1.
   Google Scholar
• Javed S, Murthy YV, Baig RU, et al. Development of ANN model for prediction of performance and emission characteristics of hydrogen dual fueled diesel engine with Jatropha Methyl Ester biodiesel blends. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering. 2015;26:549–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy S, Ghosh A, Das AK, et al. A comparative study of GEP and an ANN strategy to model engine performance and emission characteristics of a CRDI assisted single cylinder diesel engine under CNG dual-fuel operation. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering. 2014;21:814–828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu B, Zhao C, Zhang F, et al. Misfire detection of a turbocharged diesel engine by using artificial neural networks. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2013;55:26–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo Z, Lim KH, Chen M, et al. Predicting cetane numbers of hydrocarbons and oxygenates from highly accessible descriptors by using artificial neural networks. Fuel. 2017;207:344–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler T, Sacia ER, Bell AT, et al. Artificial neural network based predictions of cetane number for furanic biofuel additives. Fuel. 2017;206:171–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jameel AGA, Oudenhoven VV, Emwas A, et al. Predicting octane number using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and artificial neural networks. Energy Fuels.. 2018;32:6309–6329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubesh J, King S, Liss W. Effect of gas composition on octane number of natural gas fuels. SAE Technical Paper. 922359. 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Klimstra J. Interchangeability of gaseous fuels — the importance of the Wobbe-Index. SAE Technical Paper. 861578. 1986
   Google Scholar
• Hajbabaei M, Karavalakis G, Johnson KC, et al. Impact of natural gas fuel composition on criteria, toxic, and particle emissions from transit buses equipped with lean burn and stoichiometric engines. Energy. 2013;62:425–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nigro F, Trielli M, Zabeu C, et al. Effects of natural gas composition on bus engine performance. SAE Technical Paper.973038. 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Malenshek M, Olsen DB. Methane number testing of alternative gaseous fuels. Fuel. 2009;88:650–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz GJA, Martinez LMC, Montoy JPG, et al. Methane number measurements of hydrogen/carbon monoxide mixtures diluted with carbon dioxide for syngas spark ignited internal combustion engine applications. Fuel. 2019;236:535–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamzehie ME, Mazinani S, Davardoost F, et al. Developing a feed forward multilayer neural network model for prediction of CO2 solubility in blended aqueous amine solutions. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering. 2014;21:19–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azizi S, Ahmadloo E. Prediction of heat transfer coefficient during condensation of R134a in inclined tubes using artificial neural network. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2016;106:203–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çay Y, Çiçek A, Kara F, et al. Prediction of engine performance for an alternative fuel using artificial neural network. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2012;37:217–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanjari E, Lay EN. Estimation of natural gas compressibility factors using artificial neural network approach. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering. 2012;2:220–226.
   Google Scholar
• Williams PM. Bayesian Regularization and Pruning Using a Laplace Prior. Neural Computation. 1995;7:117–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang JSR. ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE Trans Syst, Man, Cybern.. 1993;23:665–685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Møller MF. A scaled conjugate gradient algorithm for fast supervised learning. Neural Netw.. 1993;6:525–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moré JJ. The Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm: Implementation and theory. Heidelberg: Springer. 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Rao KP, Babu TV, Anuradha G. IDI diesel engine performance and exhaust emission analysis using biodiesel with an artificial neural network (ANN. ). Egyptian Journal of Petroleum. 2017;26:592–600.
   Google Scholar
• Roy S, Banerjee R, Das AK, et al. Development of an ANN based system identification tool to estimate the performance-emission characteristics of a CRDI assisted CNG dual fuel diesel engine. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering. 2014;21:147–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parlak A, Islamoglu Y, Yasar H, et al. Application of artificial neural network to predict specific fuel consumption and exhaust temperature for a Diesel engine. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2006;26:824–828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar