Comparing greenhouse gas footprints and payback times of crop-based biofuel production worldwide

References

• Goldemberg J, Mello FFC, Cerri CEP, et al. Meeting the global demand for biofuels in 2021 through sustainable land use change policy. Energy Policy. 2014;69:14–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su Y, Zhang P, Su Y. An overview of biofuels policies and industrialization in the major biofuel producing countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2015;50:991–1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US EPA. (2005). Renewable Fuel Standard Program. Available from https://www.epa.gov/renewable-fuel-standard-program.
   Google Scholar
• Renewable Energy Directive. 2009. Available from http://ec.europa.eu/energy/en/topics/renewable-energy/biofuels.
   Google Scholar
• Goldemberg J. How much could biomass contribute to reaching the Paris Agreement goals? Biofuels Bioprod Bioref. 2017;11:237–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldemberg J, Coelho ST, Lucon O. How adequate policies can push renewables. Energy Policy. 2004;32:1141–1146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson W, Whistance J, Meyer S. Effects of US biofuel policies on US and world petroleum product markets with consequences for greenhouse gas emissions. Energy Policy. 2011;39:5509–5518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daioglou V, Doelman JC, Stehfest E, et al. Greenhouse gas emission curves for advanced biofuel supply chains. Nature Clim Change. 2017;7:920–924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danielsen F, Beukema H, Burgess ND, et al. Biofuel plantation on forested lands: Double jeopardy for biodiversity and climate. Conserv Biol. 2009;23:348–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller-Wenk R, Brandão M. Climatic impact of land use in LCA – carbon transfers between vegetation/soil and air. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2010;15:172–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fargione J, Hill J, Tilman D, et al. Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science 2008;319:1235–1238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs HK, Johnston M, Foley JA, et al. Carbon payback times for crop-based biofuel expansion in the tropics: The effects of changing yield and technology. Environ Res Lett. 2008;3:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searchinger T, Heimlich R, Houghton RA, et al. Use of U.S. croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 2008;319:1238–1240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallgren W, Schlosser CA, Monier E, et al. Climate impacts of a large-scale biofuels expansion. Geophys Res Lett. 2013;40:1624–1630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elshout PMF, Van Zelm R, Balkovic J, et al. Greenhouse-gas payback times for crop-based biofuels. Nature Clim Change. 2015;5:604–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malça J, Freire F. Life-cycle studies of biodiesel in Europe: a review addressing the variability of results and modeling issues. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2011;15:338–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoefnagels R, Smeets E, Faaij A. Greenhouse gas footprints of different biofuel production systems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2010;14:1661–1694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall A, Yuan J. Comparing life cycle assessments of different biofuel options. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2013;17:439–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond GP, Seth SM. Carbon and environmental footprinting of global biofuel production. Appl Energy. 2013;112:547–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfister S, Scherer L. Uncertainty analysis of the environmental sustainability of biofuels. Energy, Sustain Soc. 2015;5:30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mekonnen MM, Romanelli TL, Ray C, et al. Water, energy, and carbon footprints of bioethanol from the U.S. and Brazil. Environ Sci Technol. 2018;52:14508–14518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen TH, Williams S, Paustian K. Impact of ecosystem carbon stock change on greenhouse gas emissions and carbon payback periods of cassava-based ethanol in Vietnam. Biomass Bioenergy. 2017;100:126–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim H, Kim S, Dale BE. Biofuels, land use change, and greenhouse gas emissions: Some unexplored variables. Environ Sci Technol. 2009;43:961–967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Suh S. Marginal yield, technological advances, and emissions timing in corn ethanol’s carbon payback time. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2015;20:226–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searchinger T, C, Hanson, J, Ranganathan et al. Creating a Sustainable Food Future: A Menu of Solutions to Sustainably Feed More Than 9 Billion People by 2050. Washington D.C., World Resources Institute, World Bank, UNEP and UNDP. World Resources Report 2013-14: Interim Findings, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• You L, U, Wood-Sichra, S, Fritz et al. (2014). Spatial Production Allocation Model (SPAM) 2005 v2.0. May 22, 2015. Available from http://mapspam.info.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen DM, Dinerstein E, Wikramanayake ED, et al. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: A new map of life on earth. BioScience 2001;51:933–938.2.0.CO;2]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs HK, Yui S, Plevin RJ. New estimates of soil and biomass carbon stocks for global economic models. GTAP Technical Paper No.33, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Ruesch A, Gibbs HK. (2008). New IPCC Tier-1 Global Biomass Map for the Year 2000. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, Available online from the Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center. Available from http://cdiac.ornl.gov.
   Google Scholar
• FAO, IIASA, ISRIC, ISSCAS and JRC (2012). Harmonized World Soil Database (version1.2) Rome Italy and IIASA Laxenburg, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn HC, Canals L. M I, Keller E, et al. Quantifying global greenhouse gas emissions from land-use change for crop production. Glob Change Biol. 2012;18:1622–1635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weidema BP, C, Bauer, R, Hischier, et al. Overview and methodology. Data Quality Guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3. St. Gallen, The Ecoinvent Centre. Ecoinvent Report. 2013;1.
   Google Scholar
• Williams JR, Jones CA, Dyke PT. A modeling approach to determining the relationship between erosion and soil productivity. Trans ASAE. 1984;27:129–0144.
   Google Scholar
• Shcherbak I, Millar N, Robertson GP. Global metaanalysis of the nonlinear response of soil nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions to fertilizer nitrogen. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:9199–9204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO. (1997). Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework, ISO 14040, 1st ed., June.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, M, Huo, H, Arora, S. Methods of dealing with co-products of biofuels in life-cycle analysis and consequent results within the U.S. context. Energy Policy. 2011;39:5726–5736. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.03.052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerssen-Gondelach SJ, Wicke B, Faaij APC. GHG emissions and other environmental impacts of indirect land use change mitigation. GCB Bioenergy. 2017;9:725–742.
   Google Scholar
• Lambin EF, Meyfroidt P. Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:3465–3472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthew K, Griffin WM, Matthews HS. Indirect land use change and biofuel policy. Environ Res Lett. 2009;4:034008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broch A, Hoekman SK, Unnasch S. A review of variability in indirect land use change assessment and modeling in biofuel policy. Environ Sci Policy. 2013;29:147–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia R, Freire F. Carbon footprint of particleboard: a comparison between ISO/TS 14067, GHG Protocol, PAS 2050 and Climate Declaration. J Clean Prod. 2014;66:199–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke IC, Yonker CM, Parton WJ, et al. Texture, climate and cultivation effects on soil organic matter content in U.S. grassland soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1989;53:800–805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar