Drivers for and barriers to biogas use in manufacturing, road transport and shipping: a demand-side perspective

References

• Ammenberg J, Anderberg S, Lönnqvist T, et al. Biogas in the transport sector—actor and policy analysis focusing on the demand side in the Stockholm region. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2018;129:70–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergek A, Mignon I. Motives to adopt renewable electricity technologies: evidence from Sweden. Energy Policy. 2017;106:547–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurostat. Renewable energy statistics - Statistics Explained [Internet]. 2018. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Renewable_energy_statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Energy Agency. Energiläget 2017. [Energy in Sweden 2017]. 2018. ET 2017:12.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Government Official Reports. Fossilfrihet på väg [Fossil freedom on roads]. 2013. SOU 2013:84.
   Google Scholar
• Appels L, Baeyens J, Degrève J, et al. Principles and potential of the anaerobic digestion of waste-activated sludge. Prog Energy Combust Sci. 2008;34:755–781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haberl R, Atanasoff K, Braun R. Anaerobic-aerobic treatment of organic high-strength industrial waste water. Water Sci Technol. 1991;23:1909–1918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen R. Livestock-biogas-fruit systems in South China. Ecol Eng. 1997;8:19–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaspersen BS, Christensen TB, Fredenslund AM, et al. Linking climate change mitigation and coastal eutrophication management through biogas technology: evidence from a new Danish bioenergy concept. Sci Total Environ. 2016;541:1124–1131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuéllar AD, Webber ME. Cow power: the energy and emissions benefits of converting manure to biogas. Environ Res Lett. 2008;3:034002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fierro J, Gómez X, Murphy JD. What is the resource of second generation gaseous transport biofuels based on pig slurries in Spain? Appl Energy. 2014;114:783–789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Energigas Sverige, Region Skåne, Swedegas. Förslag till nationell biogasstrategi [Proposal for a national biogas strategy]. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Martin M. Potential of biogas expansion in Sweden: identifying the gap between potential studies and producer perspectives. Biofuels. 2015;6:233–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish Energy Agency. Biogas statistics 2015 (dataset). 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson M, Grönkvist S, Alvfors P. Upgraded biogas for transport in Sweden–effects of policy instruments on production, infrastructure deployment and vehicle sales. J Clean Prod. 2016;112:3774–3784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutter A. Mobilizing sociotechnical imaginaries of fossil-free futures – electricity and biogas in public transport in Linköping, Sweden. Energy Res Soc Sci. 2019;49:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brynolf S, Fridell E, Andersson K. Environmental assessment of marine fuels: liquefied natural gas, liquefied biogas and bio-methanol. J Clean Prod. 2014;74:86–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg A. Biogasanläggningar i Sverige [Biogas plants in Sweden]. 1997. The Swedish Water & Wastewater Association, Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Berglund M. Biogas production from a systems analytical perspective. 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Energy Agency. Produktion och användning av biogas och rötrester år 2017 [Production and use of biogas and digestate 2017]. 2018
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Sweden. Fordonsbestånd 2016 [Vehicle stock 2016]. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Swedegas. The Gas Barometer [Internet]. 2018. Available from: https://www.swedegas.com/smart_energy_systems/biogas_plants/Gas-_Barometer.
   Google Scholar
• Biogas Syd. Användning av biogas i industri växer i Skåne [Internet]. 2017. Available from: https://kfsk.se/biogassyd/uncategorized/anvandning-av-biogas-i-industri-vaxer-i-skane/.
   Google Scholar
• Haaker A. Arvid Nordquist har konverterat från gasol till biogas [Arvid Nordquist has substituted from LPG to biogas] [Internet]. Bioenergitidningen. 2017. Available from: https://bioenergitidningen.se/bioenergi-i-industri/arvid-nordquist-har-konverterat-fran-gasol-till-biogas.
   Google Scholar
• Verken T. Världsunikt samarbete när Toyota tar ett stort kliv mot fossilfrihet med flytande biogas [Unique collaboration when Toyota takes a big step towards fossil freedom with liquefied biogas] 2018. Available from: http://www.mynewsdesk.com/se/tekniskaverken/pressreleases/toyota-tar-stort-kliv-mot-fossilfrihet-med-flytande-biogas-2414206.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Tax Agency. Lägre skatt för industriell verksamhet [Lower tax for manufacturing] [Internet]. 2018. Available from: https://www.skatteverket.se/foretagochorganisationer/skatter/punktskatter/energiskatter/verksamhetermedlagreskatt/industriellverksamhet.4.18e1b10334ebe8bc80002009.html.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Transport Administration. Transportsektorns utsläpp av växthusgaser 1990-2014 [Emissions of greenhouse gases from the transport sector 1990-2014]. (no date). Available from: https://www.trafikverket.se/contentassets/19d462f3eb4944978944b15376da905a/transportsektorns_utslapp_1990_2014.xls.
   Google Scholar
• NGVA Europe. Statistical Report 2017. [Internet]. (2017). Available from: https://www.ngva.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/170648_NGVA_Europe_statistical-Report_2017_5-2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bioenergitidningen. Klimatklivet beviljar Gasum stöd för etablering av biogas- och LNG-stationer för tunga transporter [Klimatklivet grants Gasum support for establishing biogas and LNG stations for heavy vehicles] 2018. Available from: https://bioenergitidningen.se/biodrivmedel-transport/klimatklivet-beviljar-gasum-stod-for-etablering-av-biogas-och-lng-stationer-for-tunga-transporter.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöström P-H. Hälften av alla beställningar LNG-fartyg [Half of all orders LNG-ships] [Internet]. Sjöfartstidningen. 2017. Available from: http://www.sjofartstidningen.se/halften-av-alla-bestallningar-lng-fartyg/.
   Google Scholar
• Mignon I, Bergek A. System- and actor-level challenges for diffusion of renewable electricity technologies: an international comparison. J Clean Prod. 2016;128:105–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montalvo C, Kemp R. Cleaner technology diffusion: case studies, modeling and policy. J Clean Prod. 2008;16:S1–S6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels F, Raven R. Non-linearity and Expectations in Niche-Development Trajectories: Ups and Downs in Dutch Biogas Development (1973–2003). Technol Anal Strateg Manag. 2006;18:375–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations, 5th ed. New York (NY): Free Press; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Kanda W, Hjelm O, Mejía-Dugand S. Promoting the export of environmental technologies: An analysis of governmental initiatives from eight countries. Environ Dev. 2016;17:73–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mejía-Dugand S, Hjelm O, Baas L, et al. Lessons from the spread of Bus Rapid Transit in Latin America. J Clean Prod. 2013;50:82–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenton P, Kanda W. Barriers to the diffusion of renewable energy: studies of biogas for transport in two European cities. J Environ Plan Manag. 2017;60:725–742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittal S, Ahlgren EO, Shukla PR. Barriers to biogas dissemination in India: a review. Energy Policy. 2018;112:361–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvale S. Interviews: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman A. Social research methods. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Xylia M, Silveira S. On the road to fossil-free public transport: The case of Swedish bus fleets. Energy Policy. 2017;100:397–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagman L, Blumenthal A, Eklund M, et al. The role of biogas solutions in sustainable biorefineries. J Clean Prod. 2018;172:3982–3989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung W-T. Taxation on vehicle fuels: its impacts on switching to cleaner fuels. Energy Policy. 2006;34:2566–2571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fichter K, Clausen J. Diffusion dynamics of sustainable innovation-insights on diffusion patterns based on the analysis of 100 sustainable product and service innovations. JIM. 2016;4:30–67.
   Google Scholar
• Carrillo-Hermosilla J, del Río P, Könnölä T. Diversity of eco-innovations: Reflections from selected case studies. J Clean Prod. 2010;18:1073–1083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffen B, Matsuo T, Steinemann D, et al. Opening new markets for clean energy: The role of project developers in the global diffusion of renewable energy technologies. Bus Polit. 2018;20:553–587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiskanen E, Matschoss K. Understanding the uneven diffusion of building-scale renewable energy systems: A review of household, local and country level factors in diverse European countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2017;75:580–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noppers EH, Keizer K, Bolderdijk JW, et al. The adoption of sustainable innovations: Driven by symbolic and environmental motives. Glob Environ Change. 2014;25:52–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergek A, Mignon I, Sundberg G. Who invests in renewable electricity production? Empirical evidence and suggestions for further research. Energy Policy. 2013;56:568–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe AB, Newell RG, Stavins RN. A tale of two market failures: Technology and environmental policy. Technol Change Environ. 2005;54:164–174.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer NI. European schemes for promoting renewables in liberalised markets. Energy Policy. 2003;31:665–676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Energigas Sverige. Het marknad för lastbilar på iskall gas [Internet]. 2018. Available from: http://www.energigas.se/om-oss/nyheter-och-press/nyheter/het-marknad-foer-lastbilar-paa-iskall-gas/.
   Google Scholar
• Bode S, Michaelowa A. Avoiding perverse effects of baseline and investment additionality determination in the case of renewable energy projects. Energy Policy. 2003;31:505–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar