Effectiveness of enriched microbial culture under mesophilic and thermophilic condition in palm oil mill effluent for anaerobic digestion of Brachiaria mutica

References

• Li Y, Chen Y, Wu J. Enhancement of methane production in anaerobic digestion process: a review. Appl Energy 2019;240:120–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan YD, Lim JS. Feasibility of palm oil mill effluent elimination towards sustainable Malaysian palm oil industry. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2019;111:507–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habib MAB, Yusoff FM, Phang SM, et al. Nutritional values of chironomid larvae grown in palm oil mill effluent and algal culture. Aquaculture 1997;158(1-2):95–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu TY, Mohammad AW, Jahim JM, et al. A holistic approach to managing palm oil mill effluent (POME): Biotechnological advances in the sustainable reuse of POME. Biotechnol Adv. 2009;27(1):40–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khemkhao M, Techkarnjanaruk S, Phalakornkule C. Simultaneous treatment of raw palm oil mill effluent and biodegradation of palm fiber in a high-rate CSTR. Bioresour Technol. 2015;177:17–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuchdang S, Khemkhao M, Techkarnjanaruk S, et al. Comparative biochemical methane potential of paragrass using an unacclimated and an acclimated microbial consortium. Bioresour Technol. 2015;183:111–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poh PE, Chong MF. Biomethanation of palm oil mill effluent (POME) with a thermophilic mixed culture cultivated using POME as a substrate. Chem Eng J. 2010;164:146–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khemkhao M, Nuntakumjorn B, Techkarnjanaruk S, et al. UASB performance and microbial adaptation during a transition from mesophilic to thermophilic treatment of palm oil mill effluent. J Environ Manage. 2012;103:74–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poh PE, Chong MF. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket-hollow centered packed bed (UASB-HCPB) reactor for thermophilic palm oil mill effluent (POME) treatment. Biomass Bioenerg. 2014;67:231–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benner R, Maccubbin AE, Hodson RE. Anaerobic biodegradation of the lignin and polysaccharide components of lignocellulose and synthetic lignin by sediment microflora. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1984;47(5):998–1004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, et al. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215:403–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelidaki I, Alves M, Bolzonella D, et al. Defining the biomethane potential (BMP) of solid organic wastes and energy crops: a proposed protocol for batch assays. Water Sci Technol. 2009;59:927–934.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valcke D, Verstraete W. A practical method to estimate the acetoclastic methanogenic biomass in anaerobic sludge. J Water Pollut Control Fed. 1983;55:1191–1195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Public Health Association. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 21st ed. Washington (DC): APHA; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Miller GL. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem. 1959;31(3):426–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golkowska K, Greger M. Anaerobic digestion of maize and cellulose under thermophilic and mesophilic conditions - a comparative study. Biomass Bioenerg. 2013;56:545–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasaki K, Morita M, Sasaki D, et al. Syntrophic degradation of proteinaceous materials by the thermophilic strains Coprothermobacter proteolyticus and Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus. J Biosci Bioeng. 2011;112(5):469–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan X, Wen B, Ma X, et al. Enhancing the anaerobic digestion of lignocellulose of municipal solid waste using a microbial pretreatment method. Bioresour Technol. 2014;154:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simůnek J, Hodrová B, Bartonová H, et al. Chitinolytic bacteria of the mammal digestive tract. Folia Microbiol. 2001;46:76–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain S, Jain S, Wolf IT, et al. A comprehensive review on operating parameters and different pretreatment methodologies for anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2015;52:142–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen JE, Larsen HE. Bacterial decimation times in anaerobic digestions of animal slurries. Biol Waste 1987;21:153–168.
   Google Scholar
• Burtscher C, Fall PA, Christ O, et al. Detection and survival of pathogens during two stage thermophilic/mesophilic anaerobic treatment of suspended organic waste. Water Sci Technol. 1998;38:123–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimizu T, Ohtani K, Hirakawa H, et al. Complete genome sequence of Clostridium perfringens, an anaerobic flesh-eater. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99(2):996–1001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koeck DE, Maus I, Wibberg D, et al. Draft genome sequence of Herbinix hemicellulosilytica T3/55T, a new thermophilic cellulose degrading bacterium isolated from a thermophilic biogas reactor. J Biotechnol. 2015;214:59–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trzcinski AP, Ray MJ, Stuckey DC. Performance of a three-stage membrane bioprocess treating the organic fraction of municipal solid waste and evolution of its archaeal and bacterial ecology. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101(6):1652–1661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xin K, Chun-Yong W, Run-Dong L, et al. Effects of oxytetracycline on methane production and the microbial communities during anaerobic digestion of cow manure. J Integr Agric. 2014;13:1373–1381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasney MA, Holley RA, Jayas DS. Cresol red thallium acetate sucrose inulin (CTSI) agar for the selective recovery of Carnobacterium spp. Int J Food Microbiol. 2001;64(1-2):167–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christy PM, Gopinath LR, Divya D. A review on anaerobic decomposition and enhancement of biogas production through enzymes and microorganisms. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2014;34:167–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Fernandez C, Sialve B, Molinuevo-Salces B. Anaerobic digestion of microalgal biomass: challenges, opportunities and research needs. Bioresour Technol. 2015;198:896–906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah HN, Olsen I, Bernard K, et al. Approaches to the study of the systematics of anaerobic, Gram-negative, non-sporeforming rods: current status and perspectives. Anaerobe 2009;15(5):179–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maspolim Y, Guo C, Xiao K, et al. Performance and microbial community analysis in alkaline two-stage enhanced anaerobic sludge digestion system. Biochem Eng J. 2016; 105:296–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batstone DJ, Keller J, Angelidaki I, et al. Anaerobic digestion model No. 1 (ADM1). London: IWA Publishing; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Segers R. Methane production and methane consumption: a review of processes underlying wetland methane fluxes. Biogeochemistry 1998;41(1):23–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim W, Shin SG, Han G, et al. Structures of microbial communities found in anaerobic batch runs that produce methane from propionic acid — Seeded from full-scale anaerobic digesters above a certain threshold. J Biotechnol. 2015;214:192–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagliano MC, Braguglia CM, Gianico A, et al. Thermophilic anaerobic digestion of thermal pretreated sludge: role of microbial community structure and correlation with process performances. Water Res. 2015;68:498–509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonin AS, Boone DR. The order Methanobacteriales. In Dworkin M, Falkow S, Rosenberg E, et al., editors. The prokaryotes: archaea. Bacteria: firmicutes, actinomycetes. 3rd ed. Vol. 3. Singapore: Springer Science & Business Media; 2006. p. 236–241.
   Google Scholar
• Thamsiriroj T, Nizami AS, Murphy JD. Why does mono-digestion of grass silage fail in long term operation? Appl Energy 2012;95:64–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar