Biogas potential determination and production optimisation through optimal substrate ratio feeding in co-digestion of water hyacinth, municipal solid waste and cow dung

References

• Pradhan A, Mbohwa C. Development of biofuels in South Africa: challenges and opportunities. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2014;39:1089–1100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sárvári Horváth I, Tabatabaei M, Karimi K, et al. Recent updates on biogas production—a review. BRJ. 2016;3(2):394–402.
   Google Scholar
• Jingura RM, Kamusoko R. Methods for determination of biomethane potential of feedstocks: a review. Biofuel Res J. 2017;4(2):573–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godin B, Mayer F, Agneessens R, et al. Biochemical methane potential prediction of plant biomasses: comparing chemical composition versus near infrared methods and linear versus non-linear models. Bioresour Technol. 2015;175:382–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekiaris G, Triolo JM, Peltre C, et al. Rapid estimation of the biochemical methane potential of plant biomasses using Fourier transform mid-infrared photoacoustic spectroscopy. Bioresour Technol. 2015;197:475–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mejdoub H, Ksibi H. Regulation of biogas production through waste water anaerobic digestion process: modeling and parameters optimization. Waste Biomass Valor. 2015;6(1):29–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen F, Tian L, Yuan H, et al. Improving the mixing performances of rice straw anaerobic digestion for higher biogas production by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2013;171(3):626–642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beltramo T, Ranzan C, Hinrichs J, et al. Artificial neural network prediction of the biogas flow rate optimised with an ant colony algorithm. Biosyst Eng. 2016;143:68–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorin E, Nordlander E, Lindmark J, et al. Modeling of the biogas production process-a review. Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Energy ICAE; 2012 Jul 5–8; Suzhou, China, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Tetteh E, Amano KOA, Asante-Sackey D, et al. Response surface optimisation of biogas potential in co-digestion of miscanthus fuscus and cow dung. IJTech. 2018;9(5):944–954.
   Google Scholar
• Feng R, Zaidi AA, Zhang K, et al. Optimisation of microwave pretreatment for biogas enhancement through anaerobic digestion of microalgal biomass. Period Polytech Chem Eng. 2018;63(1):65–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiya A, Ijah U, Galadima M, et al. Optimisation of biogas production through variation of PH, detention time and ratio of substrate to water for rural utilization. J BioMed Res Clin Pract. 2019;2(1):52–59.
   Google Scholar
• García-Gen S, Rodríguez J, Lema JM. Optimisation of substrate blends in anaerobic co-digestion using adaptive linear programming. Bioresour Technol. 2014;173:159–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaida D, Wolf C, Bäck T, et al. Nonlinear model predictive substrate feed control of biogas plants. Proceedings of the 20th Mediterranean Conference on Control & Automation (MED); 2012; IEEE, Barcelona, Spain, July 3-6, pp. 652–657.
   Google Scholar
• Álvarez J, Otero L, Lema J. A methodology for optimising feed composition for anaerobic co-digestion of agro-industrial wastes. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101(4):1153–1158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedailaine M, Moussi K, Khitous M, et al. Modeling of the anaerobic digestion of organic waste for biogas production. Proc Comput Sci. 2015;52:730–737.
   Google Scholar
• Xie S, Hai FI, Zhan X, et al. Anaerobic co-digestion: a critical review of mathematical modelling for performance optimization. Bioresour Technol. 2016;222:498–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu L, Wensel PC, Ma J, et al. Mathematical modeling in anaerobic digestion (AD). J Bioremed Biodeg. 2013;s4(2):003.
   Google Scholar
• Kunatsa T, Madiye L, Chikuku T, et al. Feasibility study of biogas production from water hyacinth a case of Lake Chivero–Harare, Zimbabwe. Int J Eng Technol. 2013;3(2):119–128.
   Google Scholar
• Weiland P. Biogas production: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;85(4):849–860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchaim U. Biogas processes for sustainable development (no. 95–96). Food & Agriculture Organization; Rome, Italy, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Haug R. The practical handbook of compost engineering. Routledge, New York; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Huang GF, Wong J, Wu Q, et al. Effect of C/N on composting of pig manure with sawdust. Waste Manag. 2004;24(8):805–813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang P, Zeng G, Zhang G, et al. Anaerobic co-digestion of biosolids and organic fraction of municipal solid waste by sequencing batch process. Fuel Process Technol. 2008;89(4):485–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sievers DM, Brune DE. Carbon/nitrogen ratio and anaerobic digestion of swine waste. Trans ASAE. 1978;21(3):537–0541.
   Google Scholar
• Liu A, Ren F, Lin WY, et al. A review of municipal solid waste environmental standards with a focus on incinerator residues. Int J Sustain Built Environ. 2015;4(2):165–188.
   Google Scholar
• Kabouris JC, Tezel U, Pavlostathis SG, et al. Methane recovery from the anaerobic codigestion of municipal sludge and FOG. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100(15):3701–3705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikkhah A, Khojastehpour M, Abbaspour-Fard MH. Valorization of municipal solid wastes through biogas production in Iran. Energy Equip Syst. 2019;7(1):57–65.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh P, Kumar M, Kapoor R, et al. Enhanced biogas production from municipal solid waste via co-digestion with sewage sludge and metabolic pathway analysis. Bioresour Technol. 2020;296:122275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta KK, Aneja KR, Rana D. Current status of cow dung as a bioresource for sustainable development. Bioresour Bioprocess. 2016;3(1):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Mukhuba M, Roopnarain A, Moeletsi ME, et al. Metagenomic insights into the microbial community and biogas production pattern during anaerobic digestion of cow dung and mixed food waste. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2020;95(1):151–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oladejo OS, Dahunsi SO, Adesulu-Dahunsi AT, et al. Energy generation from anaerobic co-digestion of food waste, cow dung and piggery dung. Bioresour Technol. 2020;313:123694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barua VB, Rathore V, Kalamdhad AS. Anaerobic co-digestion of water hyacinth and banana peels with and without thermal pretreatment. Renew Energy. 2019;134:103–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House H, Eng P. Alternative energy sources–biogas production. Proceedings of the London Swine Conference-Today’s Challenges-Tomorrow’s Opportunities; 2007; London, Ontario, pp. 3–4, April.
   Google Scholar
• Uzodinma E, Ofoefule A. Biogas production from blends of field grass (Panicum maximum) with some animal wastes. Int J Phys Sci. 2009;4(2):91–95.
   Google Scholar
• Tasnim F, Iqbal SA, Chowdhury AR. Biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of cow manure with kitchen waste and water hyacinth. Renew Energy. 2017;109:434–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capson-Tojo G, Rouez M, Crest M, et al. Food waste valorization via anaerobic processes: a review. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol. 2016;15(3):499–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatt AH, Tao L. Economic perspectives of biogas production via anaerobic digestion. Bioengineering. 2020;7(3):74.
   Google Scholar
• Carlini M, Mosconi EM, Castellucci S, et al. An economical evaluation of anaerobic digestion plants fed with organic agro-industrial waste. Energies. 2017;10(8):1165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajpai P. Anaerobic technology in pulp and paper industry. Springer; Singapore; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders WTM. Anaerobic hydrolysis during digestion of complex substrates. 2001, Doctoral Thesis, Wageningen University, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Sikora A, Detman A, Mielecki D, et al. Searching for metabolic pathways of anaerobic digestion: a useful list of the key enzymes. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber M, Span R. An analysis of available mathematical models for anaerobic digestion of organic substances for production of biogas. Proceedings of the IGRC; Paris; 2008, 8-10 October.
   Google Scholar
• Buswell A, Mueller H. Mechanism of methane fermentation. Ind Eng Chem. 1952;44(3):550–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle W. Energy recovery from sanitary landfills - a review. In: Microbial energy conversion. Schlegel HG, Barnea S. Pergamon Press, Oxford; 1977. pp. 119–138.
   Google Scholar
• Bong CPC, Lim LY, Lee CT, et al. The characterisation and treatment of food waste for improvement of biogas production during anaerobic digestion–A review. J Clean Prod. 2018;172:1545–1558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandrappa R, Das DB. Waste quantities and characteristics. In: Solid waste management. Environmental Science and Engineering. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg; 2012. pp. 47–63.
   Google Scholar
• ECN Laboratories. ECN Phyllis classification-water hyacinth. Technical report. The Netherlands: ECN. [Online] Available from: https://www.ecn.nl/phyllis2/Biomass/View/1148. Report Number 1148, Accessed 29 May 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Sweeten JM, Korenberg J, LePori WA, et al. Combustion of cattle feedlot manure for energy production. Energy Agric. 1986;5(1):55–72.
   Google Scholar
• Achinas S, Euverink GJW. Theoretical analysis of biogas potential prediction from agricultural waste. Resour-Effic Technol. 2016;2(3):143–147.
   Google Scholar
• Ault A. How to say how much: amounts and stoichiometry. J Chem Educ. 2001;78(10):1347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Khanal SK. Bioenergy: principles and applications. Wiley; 2016, Hoboken, New Jersey.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng H, Hu Y. Municipal solid waste (MSW) as a renewable source of energy: current and future practices in China. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101(11):3816–3824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunatsa T, Mufundirwa A. Biogas production from water hyacinth case of lake Chivero-Zimbabwe a review. Int J Recent Technol Eng. 2013;2(2):138–142.
   Google Scholar
• Paolini V, Petracchini F, Segreto M, et al. Environmental impact of biogas: a short review of current knowledge. J Environ Sci Health A. 2018;53(10):899–906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miranda ND, Tuomisto HL, McCulloch MD. Meta-analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from anaerobic digestion processes in dairy farms. Environ Sci Technol. 2015;49(8):5211–5219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jingura RM, Musademba D, Kamusoko R. A review of the state of biomass energy technologies in Zimbabwe. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2013;26:652–659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwari G, Sharma AK, Singh P. Volume-weight relationship of water hyacinth plant (Eichhornia crassipes) under axial loading. Ann Arid Zone. 2005;44(1):101.
   Google Scholar
• [Online] Available: https://www.aqua-calc.com/page/density-table/substance/manure.
   Google Scholar
• Harris R. Water level accuracy and correcting for errors due to gravitational acceleration and liquid density. Fort Collins: Situ Inc.; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Khairul Anuar N, Che Man H, Idrus S, et al. Biochemical methane potential (BMP) from anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and decanter cake. MS&E. 2018;368(1):012027.
   Google Scholar
• Rasi S. Biogas composition and upgrading to biomethane (no. 202). University of Jyväskylä; 2009, Jyväskylä, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Vanegas C, Bartlett J. Green energy from marine algae: biogas production and composition from the anaerobic digestion of Irish seaweed species. Environ Technol. 2013;34(13–16):2277–2283.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kossmann W, Pönitz U. Biogas digest: Volume I-Biogas basics. 2011, Eschborn.
   Google Scholar
• McGlashan M. Amount of substance and the mole. Metrologia. 1995;31(6):447–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astals S, Nolla-Ardèvol V, Mata-Alvarez J. Anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure and crude glycerol at mesophilic conditions: biogas and digestate. Bioresour Technol. 2012;110:63–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yen H-W, Brune DE. Anaerobic co-digestion of algal sludge and waste paper to produce methane. Bioresour Technol. 2007;98(1):130–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li R, Chen S, Li X, et al. Anaerobic codigestion of kitchen waste with cattle manure for biogas production. Energy Fuels. 2009;23(4):2225–2228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tufaner F, Avşar Y. Effects of co-substrate on biogas production from cattle manure: a review. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2016;13(9):2303–2312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monteiro E, Mantha V, Rouboa A. Prospective application of farm cattle manure for bioenergy production in Portugal. Renew Energy. 2011;36(2):627–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Wei Y, Han H, et al. Enhancing bioethanol production from water hyacinth by new combined pretreatment methods. Bioresour Technol. 2018;251:358–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strazzera G, Battista F, Garcia NH, et al. Volatile fatty acids production from food wastes for biorefinery platforms: a review. J Environ Manag. 2018;226:278–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar