Influence of high carbonization temperatures on key performance indicators of Arundo donax derived biochars

References

• Oginni O, Singh K, Zondlo JW. Pyrolysis of dedicated bioenergy crops grown on reclaimed mine land in West Virginia. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2017;123:319–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge X, Xu F, Vasco-Correa J, et al. Giant reed: a competitive energy crop in comparison with miscanthus. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2016;54:350–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oginni O, Singh K. Pyrolysis characteristics of Arundo donax harvested from a reclaimed mine land. Ind Crops Prod. 2019;133:44–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mantineo M, D’Agosta GM, Copani V, et al. Biomass yield and energy balance of three perennial crops for energy use in the semi-arid Mediterranean environment. Field Crops Res. 2009;114(2):204–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams CMJ, Biswas TK, Black ID, et al. Use of poor quality water to produce high biomass yields of giant reed (Arundo donax L.) on marginal lands for biofuel or pulp/paper. In International Society for Horticultural Science (ISHS), Leuven, Belgium; 2009. pp. 595–602.
   Google Scholar
• Bracmort K. Energy provisions in the 2014 farm bill (P.L. 113-79): status and funding, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Saikia R, Chutia RS, Kataki R, et al. Perennial grass (Arundo donax L.) as a feedstock for thermo-chemical conversion to energy and materials. Bioresour Technol. 2015;188:265–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oginni O, Singh K, Oporto G, et al. Influence of one-step and two-step KOH activation on activated carbon characteristics. Bioresour Technol Rep. 2019;7:100266.
   Google Scholar
• Oginni O, Singh K, Oporto G, et al. Effect of one-step and two-step H3PO4 activation on activated carbon characteristics. Bioresour Technol Rep. 2019;8:100307.
   Google Scholar
• Waqas M, Aburiazaiza AS, Miandad R, et al. Development of biochar as fuel and catalyst in energy recovery technologies. J Cleaner Prod. 2018;188:477–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oginni O, Singh K. Influence of high carbonization temperatures on microstructural and physicochemical characteristics of herbaceous biomass derived biochars. J Environ Chem Eng. 2020;8(5):104169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oris C, Luo Z, Zhang W, et al. Forms of potassium and chlorine from oxy-fuel co-combustion of lignite coal and corn stover. Carbon Resour Convers. 2019;2(2):103–110.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Wang Z, Xia J, et al. Measurement and kinetics of elemental and atomic potassium release from a burning biomass pellet. Proc Combust Inst. 2019;37(3):2681–2688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oginni O, Singh K. Effect of carbonization temperature on fuel and caffeine adsorption characteristics of white pine and Norway spruce needles derived biochars. Ind Crops Prod. 2021;162:113261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bueno CC, Maia AAD, Morais LCd, et al. Investigation on prospective energy power from corncob husk biomass and its biochars by kinetic parameters and isoconversional models. J Braz Chem Soc. 2017;28:2202–2210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu JJ, Chen WH. Investigation on the ignition and burnout temperatures of bamboo and sugarcane bagasse by thermogravimetric analysis. Appl Energy. 2015;160:49–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Quek A, Kent Hoekman S, et al. Production of solid biochar fuel from waste biomass by hydrothermal carbonization. Fuel. 2013;103:943–949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Han G. Production of solid fuel biochar from waste biomass by low temperature pyrolysis. Fuel. 2015;158:159–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verheijen F, Jeffery S, Bastos AC. Biochar application to soils: a critical scientific review of effects on soil properties, processes and functions. European Commission, Luxembourg; 2010. pp. 149.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffery S, Verheijen FGA, van der Velde M, et al. A quantitative review of the effects of biochar application to soils on crop productivity using meta-analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2011;144(1):175–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser B, Lehmann J, Zech W. Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal – a review. Biol Fertil Soils. 2002;35(4):219–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackwell P, Riethmuller G, Collins M. Biochar application to soil. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S, editors. Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. London (UK): Earthscan; 2009. p. 207.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter SR, Caraco NF, Correll DL, et al. Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogen. Ecol Appl. 1998;8(3):559–568.2.0.CO;2]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oginni O, Yakaboylu GA, Singh K, et al. Phosphorus adsorption behaviors of MgO modified biochars derived from waste woody biomass resources. J Environ Chem Eng. 2020;8(2):103723.,
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skousen J, Brown C, Griggs T, et al. Establishment and growth of switchgrass and other biomass crops on surface mines. JASMR. 2014;3:136–156.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM, Standard test method for ash in the analysis sample of coal and coke from coal. ASTM D3174-12, West Conshohocken (PA); 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Parikh J, Channiwala SA, Ghosal GK. A correlation for calculating HHV from proximate analysis of solid fuels. Fuel. 2005;84(5):487–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey OR, Kuo LJ, Zimmerman AR, et al. An index-based approach to assessing recalcitrance and soil carbon sequestration potential of engineered black carbons (biochars). Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46(3):1415–1421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windeatt JH, Ross AB, Williams PT, et al. Characteristics of biochars from crop residues: potential for carbon sequestration and soil amendment. J Environ Manage. 2014;146:189–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oginni O. Characteristics of activated carbons produced from herbaceous biomass feedstock. Graduate theses, dissertations, and problem reports. 2018. 3719. pp.145.
   Google Scholar
• Gollmer C, Höfer I, Harms D, et al. Potential additives for small-scale wood chip combustion – laboratory-scale estimation of the possible inorganic particulate matter reduction potential. Fuel. 2019;254:115695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clery DS, Mason PE, Rayner CM, et al. The effects of an additive on the release of potassium in biomass combustion. Fuel. 2018;214:647–655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tchoffor PA, Davidsson KO, Thunman H. Transformation and release of potassium, chlorine, and sulfur from wheat straw under conditions relevant to dual fluidized bed gasification. Energy Fuels. 2013;27(12):7510–7520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters B, Smuła-Ostaszewska J. Simultaneous prediction of potassium chloride and sulphur dioxide emissions during combustion of switchgrass. Fuel. 2012;96:29–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Hoekman SK, Balasubramanian R, et al. Improvement of fuel qualities of solid fuel biochars by washing treatment. Fuel Process Technol. 2015;134:130–135.,
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biederman LA, Harpole WS. Biochar and its effects on plant productivity and nutrient cycling: a meta-analysis. GCB Bioenergy. 2013;5(2):202–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohi S, Loez-Capel E, Krull E, et al. Biochar's roles in soil and climate change: a review of research needs in: CSIRO Land and Water Science Report; 2009. p. 64.
   Google Scholar
• Verheijen FGA, Graber ER, Ameloot N, et al. Biochars in soils: new insights and emerging research needs. Eur J Soil Sci. 2014;65(1):22–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson CJ, Fitzgerald JD, Hipps NA. Potential mechanisms for achieving agricultural benefits from biochar application to temperate soils: a review. Plant Soil. 2010;337(1-2):1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng X, Ye LL, Wang CH, et al. Temperature- and duration-dependent rice straw-derived biochar: characteristics and its effects on soil properties of an Ultisol in southern China. Soil Tillage Res. 2011;112(2):159–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kloss S, Zehetner F, Dellantonio A, et al. Characterization of slow pyrolysis biochars: effects of feedstocks and pyrolysis temperature on biochar properties. J Environ Qual. 2012;41(4):990–1000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefaniuk M, Oleszczuk P. Characterization of biochars produced from residues from biogas production. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2015;115:157–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yargicoglu EN, Sadasivam BY, Reddy KR, et al. Physical and chemical characterization of waste wood derived biochars. Waste Manag. 2015;36:256–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith JL, Doran JW. Measurement and use of pH and electrical conductivity for soil quality analysis. In: JW Doran, AJ Jones, editors. Methods for assessing soil quality. 2015. pp. 169–185. Soil Science Society of America, Inc, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Wabel MI, Al-Omran A, El-Naggar AH, et al. Pyrolysis temperature induced changes in characteristics and chemical composition of biochar produced from conocarpus wastes. Bioresour Technol. 2013;131:374–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correia R, Gonçalves M, Nobre C, et al. Impact of torrefaction and low-temperature carbonization on the properties of biomass wastes from Arundo donax L. and Phoenix canariensis. Bioresour Technol. 2017;223:210–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler DS, Resende FLP. Effects of warm water washing on the fast pyrolysis of Arundo Donax. Biomass Bioenergy. 2018;113:65–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulson M, Bridgwater T. Fast pyrolysis of annually harvested crops for bioenergy applications. Proceedings of 2nd World Conference on Biomass, Rome, Italy. Vol. 1; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Tag AT, Duman G, Ucar S, et al. Effects of feedstock type and pyrolysis temperature on potential applications of biochar. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2016;120:200–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng G, Koziński JA. Thermal events occurring during the combustion of biomass residue. Fuel. 2000;79(2):181–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang CW, Li Y-H, Xiao K-L, et al. Cofiring characteristics of coal blended with torrefied Miscanthus biochar optimized with three Taguchi indexes. Energy. 2019;172:566–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Quek A, Kent Hoekman S, et al. Thermogravimetric investigation of hydrochar-lignite co-combustion. Bioresour Technol. 2012;123:646–652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toptas A, Yildirim Y, Duman G, et al. Combustion behavior of different kinds of torrefied biomass and their blends with lignite. Bioresour Technol. 2015;177:328–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santín C, Doerr SH, Merino A, et al. Carbon sequestration potential and physicochemical properties differ between wildfire charcoals and slow-pyrolysis biochars. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):11233.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar