Environmental cost-effectiveness analysis of alternative rural energy programs in Ethiopia

References

• Roni MS, Chowdhury S, Mamun S, et al. Biomass co-firing technology with policies, challenges, and opportunities: a global review. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2017;78:1089–1101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bluffstone R, Robinson E, Guthiga P. REDD + and community-controlled forests in low-income countries: any hope for a linkage? Ecol Econ. 2013;87(2013):43–52.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2014. Burden of disease from household air pollution for 2012. Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Asian Development Bank (ADB). 2003. Performance Audit Report: rural electrification project in Bhutan Manila. Mandaluyong, Philippines.
   Google Scholar
• Dutta S. 2003. Mainstreaming gender in energy planning and policies. UNESCAP Project. Available from: www.energia.org/pubs/index.asp.
   Google Scholar
• Lambrou Y, Piana G. 2006. Energy and gender in rural sustainable development. Rome, Italia: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).
   Google Scholar
• Gwavuya SG, Abele S, Barfuss I, et al. Household energy economics in rural Ethiopia: a cost-benefit analysis of biogas energy. Renew Energy. 2012;48:202–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mengistu M, Simane B, Eshete G, et al. Factors affecting households' decisions in biogas technology adoption, the case of Ofla and Mecha Districts, northern Ethiopia. Renewable Energy. 2016a;93:215–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mengistu M, Simane B, Eshete G, et al. The environmental benefits of domestic biogas technology in rural Ethiopia. Biomass Bioenergy. 2016b;90:131–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajebe L. Bio-gas technology adoption in rural Ethiopia: its effect on the crisis of deforestation. J Energy Technol Policy. 2016;6(1).
   Google Scholar
• Lansche J, Müller J. Life cycle assessment (LCA) of biogas versus dung combustion household cooking systems in developing countries–a case study in Ethiopia. J Cleaner Prod. 2017;165:828–835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajgain S, Shakya I. The Nepal Biogas Support Program: A successful model of public private partnership for rural household energy supply. Netherlands: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Timko M, Kozak A. The influence of an improved firewood cookstove, Chitetzo mbaula, on tree species preference in Malawi. Energy Sustain Dev. 2016;33(2016):53–60.
   Google Scholar
• Semple S, Apsley A, Wushishi A, et al. Commentary: switching to biogas–what effect could it have on indoor air quality and human health? Biomass Bioenergy. 2014;70:125–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dohoo C, Guernsey R, Critchley K, et al. Pilot study on the impact of biogas as a fuel source on respiratory health of women on rural Kenyan smallholder dairy farms. J Environ Public Health. 2012;2012:636298.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Emmelin A, Wall S. 2007. Unpublished report on utilisation of bioslurry for increasing agricultural production. Mekelle, Ethiopia: National Biogas Program Ethiopia (NBPE).
   Google Scholar
• Mondal MAH, Bryan E, Ringler C, et al. Ethiopian energy status and demand scenarios: prospects to improve energy efficiency and mitigate GHG emissions. Energy. 2018;149(15):161–172.
   Google Scholar
• Kamp LM, Forn EB. Ethiopia's emerging domestic biogas sector: current status, bottlenecks and drivers. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2016;60:475–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu L, Yaoqiu K, Ningsheng H, et al. Popularizing household-scale biogas digesters for rural sustainable energy development and greenhouse gas mitigation. Renewable Energy. 2008;33(9):2027–2035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasertsana S, Sajjakulnukit B. Biomass and biogas energy in Thailand: Potential, opportunity and barriers. Renewable Energy. 2005;31(5):599–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perman R, Ma Y, McGilvray J, et al. 2003. Natural resources and environmental economics, pearson higher education. Addison Wesley. Edinburgh Gate Harlow
   Google Scholar
• Kronbak L, Vestergaard N. Environmental cost-effectiveness analysis in intertemporal natural resource policy: evaluation of selective fishing gear. J Environ Manage. 2013;131:270–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berndes G, Hansson J. Bioenergy expansion in the E.U.: cost-effective climate change mitigation, employment creation and reduced dependency on imported fuels. Energy Policy. 2007;35(12):5965–5979. e
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schou S, Skop E, Jensen D. Integrated agri-environmental modelling: a cost-effectiveness analysis of two nitrogen tax instruments in the Vejle Fjord watershed, Denmark. J Environ Manage. 2000;58(3):199–212. e
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madsen JD, Shearer J, Smart RM, et al. 1994. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. USA.
   Google Scholar
• Jeuland MA, Pattanayak SK. Benefits and costs of improved cookstoves: assessing the implications of variability in health, forest and climate impacts. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e30338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dresen and Müller Fuelwood savings and carbon emission reductions by the use of improved cooking stoves in an afromontane forest. Ethiopia Land. 2014;3(3). 1137–1157.
   Google Scholar
• Kooser H. Clean cooking: the value of clean cookstoves in Ethiopia. J Environ Resour Econ Colby. 2014;1(1). 106089
   Google Scholar
• FAO. Global forest resources assessments. Rome Italy: FAO; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard T. 2012. Impact analysis of rural electrification projects in sub-Saharan Africa. Oxford University Press on behalf of the World Bank. Washington DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• David R, Ngulube P, Dube A. A cost–benefit analysis of document management strategies used at a financial institution in Zimbabwe: a case study. S Afr J Inf Manage. 2013;15(2): a540
   Google Scholar
• Dawit G. Assessment of biomass fuel resource potential and utilization in Ethiopia: sourcing strategies for renewable energies international. J Renewable Energy Res. 2012;2(1): 132–139
   Google Scholar
• Gebreegziabher Z, van Kooten G C, Van Soest D P. Stove adoption and implications for deforestation and land degradation: the case of Ethiopia, In G. Alemu and W. Gebeyehu (Eds), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on the Ethiopian Economy, Vol. I, Addis Ababa: EEA (Ethiopian Economics Association). June 2012, pp. 107–137.
   Google Scholar
• Feyisa N, Feyssa D, Jiru D. Fuel wood utilization impacts on forest resources of Gechi District, South Western Ethiopia. J Ecol Environ. 2017;9(8):140–150.
   Google Scholar
• Hajkowicz S, Spencer R, Higgins A, et al. Evaluating water quality investments using cost utility analysis. J Environ Manage. 2008;88(4):1601–1610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall DO. Biomass energy in industrialized countries—a view of the future. For Ecol Manage. 1997; 91(1):17–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The National Biogas Program of Ethiopia (NBPE). 2010. Available from: http://www.isd.org.et/nbpe.php.
   Google Scholar