Optimization of microwave pretreatment parameters of elephant grass by response surface methodology and kinetic study of its biomethanation

References

• Jagadabhi PS, Kaparaju P, Rintala J. Two-stage anaerobic digestion of tomato, cucumber, common reed and grass silage in leach-bed reactors and upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors. Bioresour Technol. 2011; 102(7):4726–4733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somerville C, Youngs H, Taylor C, et al. Feedstocks for lignocellulosic biofuels. Science. 2010; 329(5993):790–792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nizami AS, Korres NE, Murphy JD. Review of the integrated process for the production of grass biomethane. Environ Sci Technol. 2009; 43(22):8496–8508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prochnow A, Heiermann M, Plochl M, et al. Bioenergy from permanent grassland-a review: 1. Biogas. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100(21):4931–4944.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun YM, Li LH, Li D, et al. Effect of temperature and solid concentration on anaerobic digestion of rice straw in South China. Int J Hydrog Energy. 2010; 35(13):7261–7266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks ATWM, Zeeman G. Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol. 2009; 100(1):10–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratky L, Jirout T. Biomass size reduction machines for enhancing biogas production. Chem Eng Technol. 2011; 34(3):391–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L, Xiaoying K, Yang F, et al. Biogas production potential and kinetics of microwave and conventional thermal pretreatment of grass. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2012;166(5):1183–1191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muharja M, Darmayanti RF, Palupi B, et al. Optimization of microwave-assisted alkali pretreatment for enhancement of delignification process of cocoa pod husk. Bull Chem React Eng Catal. 2021;16(1):31–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toreci I, Kennedy KJ, Droste RL. Evaluation of continuous mesophilic anaerobic sludge digestion after high temperature microwave pretreatment. Water Res. 2009;43(5):1273–1284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eskicioglu C, Kennedy KJ, Droste RL. Enhancement of batch waste activated sludge digestion by microwave pretreatment. Water Environ Res. 2007;79(11):2304–2317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marin J, Kennedy KJ, Eskicioglu C. Enhanced solubilization and anaerobic biodegradability of source-separated kitchen waste by microwave pre-treatment. Waste Manag Res. 2011;29(2):208–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo KV, Yu Y, Lo IW, et al. Treatment of dairy manure using the microwave enhanced advanced oxidation process under a continuous mode operation. J Environ Sci Health B. 2010;45(8):804–809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himmelsbach JN, Raman DR, Anex RP, et al. Effect of ammonia soaking pretreatment and enzyme addition on biochemical methane potential of switchgrass. Trans Asabe. 2010;53(6):1921–1927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong Q, Guoqing HE, Chen Q, et al. Optimization of medium composition for cultivating clostridium butyricum with response surface methodology. J Food Sci. 2006;69(7):163–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubis MR, Fujianti DS, Zahara R, et al. The optimization of the electrocoagulation of palm oil mill effluent with a Box-Behnken design. IJTech. 2019;10(1):137–146.
   Google Scholar
• Ghanbari M, Mozafari-Vanani L, Dehghani-Soufi M, et al. Effect of alumina nanoparticles as additive with diesel–biodiesel blends on performance and emission characteristic of a six-cylinder diesel engine using response surface methodology (RSM). Energy Convers Manage. 2021;11:100091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harahap AFP, Rahman AA, Sadrina IN, et al. Optimization of pretreatment conditions for microwaveassisted alkaline delignification of empty fruit bunch by response surface methodology. IJTech. 2019; 10(8):1479–1487.
   Google Scholar
• Sombatpraiwan S, Junyusen T, Treeamnuk T, et al. Optimization of microwave-assisted alkali pretreatment of cassava rhizome for enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis glucose yield. Foof Energy Secur. 2019; 8(4):174–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levenspiel O. Chemical reaction engineering. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Wiley; 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Fogler HS. Elements of chemical reaction engineering. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice Hall; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Masse D, Gilbert Y, Savoie P, et al. Methane yield from switchgrass harvested at different stages of development in Eastern Canada. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101(24):9536–9541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahnert P, Linke B. Kinetic study of biogas production from energy crops and animal waste slurry: effect of organic loading rate and reactor size. Environ Technol. 2009;30(1):93–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Public Health Association. Water environment federation. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 19, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• AOAC. AOAC official methods of analysis: association of analytical chemists. 14th ed. Washington, USA: AOAC; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Presura A, Robescu LD, Panaitescu II, Raja SC, et al. Modeling and simulation of biological anaerobic treatment of sludge resulted from wastewater treatment.Recent Advances in Energy, Environment, Economics and Technological Innovation. Published by WSEAS Press, Paris, France. 2010; p. 55–60.
   Google Scholar
• Yusuf MOL, Debora A, Ogheneruona DE. Ambient temperature kinetic assessment of biogas production from co-digestion of horse and cow dung. Res Agric Eng. 2011;57(3):97–104.
   Google Scholar
• Yusuf MOL, Ify NL. The effect of waste paper on the kinetics of biogas yield from the co-digestion of cow dung and water hyacinth. Biomass Bioenergy. 2011;35(3):1345–1351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Igoni AH, Ayotamuno MJ, Ogaji SOT, et al. Municipal solid-waste in port harcourt, Nigeria. Appl Energy. 2007;84(6):664–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonopoulou G, Gavala HN, Skiadas IV, et al. The effect of aqueous ammonia soaking pretreatment on methane generation using different lignocellulosic biomasses. Waste Biomass Valor. 2015;6(3):281–291. 9352–9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdullah N, Senem OC, Ayah AH, et al. Operational parameters of biogas plants: a review and evaluation study. Energies. 2020;13:3761–3789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doğan I, Sanin FD. Alkaline solubilization and microwave irradiation as a combined sludge disintegration and minimization method. Water Res. 2009;43(8):2139–2148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhibbu-Din EI, Adebayo GB, Odedele OS. Production and characterization of biogas from domestic waste by anaerobic digestion. Int J Environ Bioenergy. 2020;15(1):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Jemmett R. Methane biogas, production guide. United Kingdom, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Ziana Z, Rajesh P. Production and analysis of biogas from kitchen waste. Int Res J Eng Technol. 2015;2(4):622–632.
   Google Scholar
• Vishwanath JM. Tech Renewable Energy Enthusiast. Biogas calorific value, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Benyahia B. Modélisationet observation des bioprocédés à membranes: application à la digestion anaérobie, Laboratoired’Automatique. L’Université de tlemcen. Algérie, Laboratoire de Biotechnologie de l’Environnement. Narbonne. Université de Montpellier 2, France, 2012.
   Google Scholar