Biogas policies and production development in Europe: a comparative analysis of eight countries

References

• Hagman L, Blumenthal A, Eklund M, et al. The role of biogas solutions in sustainable biorefineries. J Cleaner Prod . 2018;172:3982–3989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson D. Farmers in rural Africa turn to biogas solutions to enable energy independence and cut deforestation rates. Gas Int. 2012:22–23.
   Google Scholar
• Lindfors A, Feiz R, Eklund M, et al. Assessing the potential, performance and feasibility of urban solutions: methodological considerations and learnings from biogas solutions. Sustainability. 2019;11(14):3756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiselev A, Magaril E, Magaril R, et al. Towards circular economy: evaluation of sewage sludge biogas solutions. Resources. 2019;8(2):91.
   Google Scholar
• Hagman L, Eklund M. The role of biogas solutions in the circular and bio-based economy. Biogas Research Center; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Dada O, Mbohwa C. Energy from waste: a possible way of meeting goal 7 of the sustainable development goals. Mater. Today: Proc. 2018;5(4):10577–10584.
   Google Scholar
• World Biogas Association. Factsheet 3: how to achieve the sustainable development goals through biogas 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Scarlat N, Dallemand J-F, Fahl F. Biogas: developments and perspectives in Europe. Renew Energy. 2018;129:457–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conti C, Mancusi ML, Sanna-Randaccio F, et al. Transition towards a green economy in Europe: innovation and knowledge integration in the renewable energy sector. Res Policy. 2018;47(10):1996–2009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarty T, Sesmero J. Uncertainty, irreversibility, and investment in Second-Generation biofuels. Bioenerg Res. 2015;8(2):675–687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseini SE, Wahid MA. Development of biogas combustion in combined heat and power generation. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2014;40:868–875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvador R, Barros MV, Rosário J, et al. Life cycle assessment of electricity from biogas: a systematic literature review. Environ Prog Sustain Energy. 2019;38(4):13133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadi Moghaddam E, Ahlgren S, Hulteberg C, et al. Energy balance and global warming potential of biogas-based fuels from a life cycle perspective. Fuel Process Technol . 2015;132:74–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyng K-A, Brekke A. Environmental life cycle assessment of biogas as a fuel for transport compared with alternative fuels. Energies. 2019;12(3):532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen S, Chen B, Song D. Life-cycle energy production and emissions mitigation by comprehensive biogas-digestate utilization. Bioresour Technol. 2012;114:357–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasar A, Nazir S, Tabinda AB, et al. Socio-economic, health and agriculture benefits of rural household biogas plants in energy scarce developing countries: a case study from Pakistan. Renew Energy. 2017;108:19–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EurObserv’ER. Biogas Barometer. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• EurObserv’ER. Biogas Barometer. 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Kampman B, Leguijt C, Scholten T, et al. Optimal use of biogas from waste streams - An assessment of the potential of biogas from digestion in the EU beyond 2020. European Commission; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. Supply, transformation and consumption of renewables and wastes - Indigenous production (Biogases, Landfill gas, Sewage sludge gas and Other anaerobic digestion) 2021. Available from ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database. (accessed February 16, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Huttunen S, Kivimaa P, Virkamäki V. The need for policy coherence to trigger a transition to biogas production. Environ Innov Soc Transit. 2014;12:14–30.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson M, Zamparutti T, Petersen JE, et al. Understanding policy coherence: analytical framework and examples of Sector-Environment policy interactions in the EU: understanding policy coherence. Env Pol Gov. 2012;22(6):395–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermann L, Hermann R. Report on regulations governing AD and NRR in EU member states SYSTEMIC, Grant Agreement no 730400; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• van Grinsven A, Leguijt C, Tallat-Kelpsaite J. Supporting mechanisms for the development of biomethane in transport CE Delft; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Klackenberg L. Production and use of biogas and digestate in 2019 (Produktion och användning av biogas och rötrester år 2019). Energimyndigheten; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Directive 2018/851 of the European parliament and of the council amending directive 2008/98/EC on waste. Off J Eur Union. 2018:109–140.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Directive 2008/98/EC of the European parliament and of the council on waste and repealing certain directives. Off J Eur Union. 2008:3–30.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council and the European economic and social committee of the Regions – A sustainable bioeconomy for Europe: strengthening the connection between economy, society and the environment Brussels, Belgium: 2018.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Directive 2018/2001 of the European parliament and of the council on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (recast). Off J Eur Union. 2018:82–206.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Directive 2009/28/EC of the European parliament and of the council on the promotion of the use of energy from renwable sources. Off J Eur Union. 2009:16–62.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Directive 1999/31/EC of the European parliament and of the council on the landfill of waste. Off J Eur Union. 1999:1–19.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Regulation 1305/2013 of the European parliament and of the council of 17 december 2013 on support for rural development by the European agricultural fund for rural development (EAFRD) and repealing council regulation (EC) no 1698/2005. Off J Eur Union. 2013:487–548.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Regulation 1310/2013 of the european parliament and of the council of 17 december 2013 laying down certain transitional provisions on support for rural development by the european agricultural fund for rural development (EAFRD), amending regulation (EU) no 1305/2013 of the european parliament and of the council as regards resources and their distribution in respect of the year 2014 and amending council regulation (EC) no 73/2009 and regulations (EU) no 1307/2013, (EU) no 1306/2013 and (EU) no 1308/2013of the european parliament and of the council as regards their application in the year 2014. Off J Eur Union. 2013:865–883.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Communication from the commission to the european parliament, the council and the european economic and social committee of the regions on an EU strategy to reduce methane emissions Brussels, Belgium: 2020.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Communication from the commission to the european parliament, the council and the european economic and social committee of the Regions - Powering a climate-neutral economy: an EU strategy for energy system integration Brussels, Belgium: 2020.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Communication from the commission to the european parliament, the council and the european economic and social committee of the Regions - A farm to fork strategy for a fair, healthy and environmentally-friendly food system Brussels, Belgium: 2020.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Commission proposes new EU framework to decarbonise gas markets, promote hydrogen and reduce methane emissions. European Commission, Press Corner 2021. Available from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_21_6682. (accessed December 20, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Nevzorova T, Kutcherov V. Barriers to the wider implementation of biogas as a source of energy: a state-of-the-art review. Energy Strategy Rev. 2019;26:100414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson M, Anderberg S. Dimensions and characteristics of biogas policies – modelling the european policy landscape. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2021;135:110200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deremince B, Scheidl S, Stambasky J, et al. Data bank with existing incentives and subsequent development of biogas plants compared to national targets Biogas Action, Grant Agreement no 691755; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Barré C, Przadka A, Kovacs A, et al. Inventory and analysis of the EU and national regulatory framework BIOSURF, Grant agreement no 646533; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Rogstrand G. Overview on administrative and legal conditions as well as on financial and other support programs, for small to medium scale biomethane production and supply Record Biomap, Grant Agreement no 691911; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Decorte M, Tessens S, Fernández D, et al. Mapping the state of play of renewable gases in Europe. REGATRACE; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Spijker E, Jepma C, Hofman E, et al. A level playing field for the European biogas and biomethane markets – Case of The Netherlands and Germany: policy environment, key differences and harmonisation issues. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson M, Anderberg S, Fredriksson Möller B, et al. The institutional conditions of biogas (biogasens institutionella villkor). Biogas Research Center; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• RES LEGAL Europe. RES LEGAL Europe - Legal sources on renewable energy 2021. Available from http://www.res-legal.eu/en/comparison-tool/. (accessed March 19, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. Population on 1 January by age and sex 2020. Available from ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database. (accessed February 16, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• NGVA Europe. CNG/LNG map 2020. Available from https://www.ngva.eu/stations-map/. (accessed August 13, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• CzBA. Česká Bioplynová Asociace (Czech Biogas Association) 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Club Biogaz. Club Biogaz de l’Association Technique Énergie Environnement (French Biogas Association) 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Måge J. Avfall Norge (Norwegian Waste Association) 2020.
   Google Scholar
• EBA. European biogas association statistical report: 2019 European overivew Brussels, Belgium: 2020.
   Google Scholar
• EBA. New German Renewable Energy Act (EEG) shoots biogas in Germany (Press Release) 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Stolpp S. Fachverband Biogas (German Biogas Association) 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Stubholt LM, Grønnbakk MT. EØS-avtalens betydning for norsk regelutvikling – passiv resepsjon av fremmed rett eller aktiv europapolitikk? IP. 2019;77(4):350.
   Google Scholar
• Thrän D, Schaubach K, Majer S, et al. Governance of sustainability in the german biogas sector—adaptive management of the renewable energy act between agriculture and the energy sector. Energ Sustain Soc. 2020;10(1):3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stürmer B. Biogas – part of austria’s future energy supply or political experiment? Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2017;79:525–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundmark R, Anderson S, Hjort A, et al. Establishing local biogas transport systems: policy incentives and actor networks in swedish regions. Biomass Bioenergy. 2021;145:105953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eden A. Bio-Methane support policy in France. Federal Ministriy for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU); 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Finnish Biocycle and Biogas Association (Suomen Biokierto ja Biokaasu ry). Association (Yhdistys) 2019. Available from https://biokierto.fi/yhdistys/. (accessed January 11, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Ministry of Environment. Förordning (2015:517) om stöd till lokala klimatinvesteringar. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. Om Klimatklivet 2021. Available from https://www.naturvardsverket.se/Miljoarbete-i-samhallet/Miljoarbete-i-Sverige/Uppdelat-efter-omrade/Klimat/Om-Klimatklivet/. (accessed January 11, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Maggioni L, Iperoni C, Pezzaglia M. The biogas and biomethane market in Italy. Gas for Energy 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Government of France. LOI no. 2015-992. vol. LOI no. 2015-992. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• GRDF. Gaz Réseau Distribution France - Découvrir les untiés d’injection 2020. Available from https://www.grdf.fr/institutionnel/actualite/dossiers/biomethane-biogaz/unites-injection-gaz-vert. (accessed April 15, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Energinet. Biogas via gasnettet. energinet.dk 2021. Available from https://energinet.dk/Gas/Biogas. (accessed February 17, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Folketinget. Fremtiden for olie- og gasinvinding i Nordsøen 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Germany (Deutscher Bundestag). Gesetz zur Neuregelung des Rechts der Erneuerbarer Energien im Strombereich und zur Änderung damit zusammenhängender Vorschriften. Bundesgesetzblatt 2008.
   Google Scholar
• CIB. Consorzio Italiano Biogas (Italian Biogas Consortium) 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Ministry of Enterprise and Innovation. Förordning (2014:1528) om statligt stöd till produktion av biogas. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Luostarinen S, Tampio E, Niskanen O, et al. Lantabiokaasutuen toteuttamisvaihtoehdot. Helsinki: Luke Luonnonvarakeskus; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Virolainen-Hynnä A. Suomen Biokierto ja Biokaasu ry (Finnish Biocycle and Biogas Association) 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Board of Agriculture. Gödselgasstöd 2020. Available from https://jordbruksverket.se/stod/fornybar-energi/godselgasstod#h-Forfattningar. (accessed January 11, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Mozgovoy A. Fachverband Biogas (German Biogas Association) 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen BS. Biogas Danmark (Danish Biogas Association) 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Denmark, Ministry of Climate, Energy and Utilities. Energiaftale af 29. juni 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Finnish Energy Agency. Information about the Power Plants Accepted to the Feed- In-Tariff System 2018 (Syöttötariffijärjestelmään Hyväksyttyjen Voimalaitoksien Tietoja 2018) 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Rabetsimamanga O, de Singly B, Barneto M, et al. Panorama du gaz renouvable en 2018. GRDF/GRTgaz/SER/SPEGNIN/Teréga; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Germany (Deutscher Bundestag). Gesetz zur Einführung von Ausschreibungen für Strom aus erneuerbaren Energien und zu weiteren Änderungen des Rechts der erneuerbaren Energien. Bundesgesetzblatt 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Remøy TD. Virkemidler for økt bruk og produksjon av biogass. Miljødirektoratet; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Westlund Å. Mer biogas! För ett hållbart Sverige. Biogasmarknadsutredningen; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Torrijos M. State of development of biogas production in Europe. Procedia Environ Sci . 2016;35:881–889.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Denmark, Ministry of Climate, Energy and Utilities. Energiaftale af 22. marts 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson M, Ammenberg J, Murphy JD. IEA bioenergy task 37 - Country reports summaries 2019 IEA Bioenergy; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Eyl-Mazzega M-A, Mathieu C. Biogas and biomethane in Europe: lessons from Denmark, Germany and Italy. Paris: Ifri; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Directive 2003/96/EC restructuring the community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity. Off J Eur Union. 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Lieu J, Spyridaki N, Alvarez-Tinoco R, et al. Evaluating consistency in environmental policy mixes through policy, stakeholder, and contextual interactions. Sustainability. 2018;10(6):1896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasan ASMM, Kabir MA, Hoq MT, et al. Drivers and barriers to the implementation of biogas technologies in Bangladesh. Biofuels. 2020(11):1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Mittal S, Ahlgren EO, Shukla PR. Barriers to biogas dissemination in India: a review. Energy Policy. 2018;112:361–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patinvoh RJ, Taherzadeh MJ. Challenges of biogas implementation in developing countries. Curr Opin Environ Sci Health. 2019;12:30–37.
   Google Scholar
• Ammenberg J, Anderberg S, Lönnqvist T, et al. Biogas in the transport sector—actor and policy analysis focusing on the demand side in the Stockholm region. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2018;129:70–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capodaglio A, Callegari A, Lopez M. European framework for the diffusion of biogas uses: emerging technologies, acceptance, incentive strategies, and Institutional-Regulatory support. Sustainability. 2016;8(4):298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlgren S, Kanda W, Anderberg S. Drivers for and barriers to biogas use in manufacturing, road transport and shipping: a demand-side perspective. Biofuels. 2022;13(2):177–188.
   Google Scholar
• Lönnqvist T, Anderberg S, Ammenberg J, et al. Stimulating biogas in the transport sector in a swedish region – an actor and policy analysis with supply side focus. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2019;113:109269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danish Energy Agency (Energistyrelsen). Perspektiver for produktion og anvendelse af biogas i Danmark. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Chodkowska-Miszczuk J, Kulla M, Novotný L. The role of energy policy in agricultural biogas energy production in visegrad countries. Bull Geogr Socio-Econ Ser. 2017;35(35):19–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue S, Song J, Wang X, et al. A systematic comparison of biogas development and related policies between China and Europe and corresponding insights. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2020;117:109474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim Y-S, Yoon Y-M, Kim C-H, et al. Status of biogas technologies and policies in South Korea. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2012;16(5):3430–3438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadian Biogas Association. Current Status and Future Potential of Biogas Production from Canada’s Agriculture and Agri-Food Sector. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Green J. Canadian Biogas Association 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Cuellar AD, Webber ME. Policy incentives, barriers and recommendations for biogas production. San Francisco: 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards J, Othman M, Burn S. A review of policy drivers and barriers for the use of anaerobic digestion in Europe, the United States and Australia. Renew Sustain Energy Rev . 2015;52:815–828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanda W, Zanatta H Magnusson T, Hjelm O, Larsson M Policy coherence in a fragmented context: the case of biogas systems in Brazil. Energy Res Social Sci. 2022;87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar