Physical and frictional behaviors of loblolly pine residues

References

• Oswalt SN, Smith WB, Miles PD, et al. Forest resources of the United States, 2017: a technical document supporting the Forest service 2020 RPA assessment. General technical report WO-97. Washington (DC): U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service; 2019. p. 223.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons BA, Loque D, Blanch HW. Next-generation biomass feedstocks for biofuel production. Genome Biol. 2008;9(12):242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oginni O, Singh K. Effect of carbonization temperature on fuel and caffeine adsorption characteristics of white pine and Norway spruce needle derived biochars. Ind Crops Prod. 2021;162:113261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perlack RD, Stokes BJ. U.S. billion-ton update: biomass supply for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry. Oak Ridge (TN): U.S. Department of Energy; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Oginni O, Fasina O, Adhikari S, et al. Physical and flow properties of fractionated loblolly pine grinds. Trans ASABE. 2016;59:999–1008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oginni O, Fasina O. Theoretical estimation of silo design parameters for fractionated loblolly pine grinds – moisture content and particle size effects. Ind Crops Prod. 2018;123:379–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamlou PA. Handling of bulk solids – theory and practice. London (UK): Butterworths & Co.; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Olatunde G, Fasina O, Adikari S, et al. Size measurement method for loblolly pine grinds and influence on predictability of fluidization. Can Biosyst Eng. 2016;58(1):4.1–4.10.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley MSA, Berry RJ, Farnish RJ. Methods for design of hoppers for reliable gravity flow, for pharmaceutical, food, mineral and other applications. University of Greenwich, Chatham, UK. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Sokhansanj S, Fenton J. Cost benefit of biomass supply and pre-processing. In: BIOCAP Research Integration Program Synthesis Paper, BIOCAP Canada Foundation, Ottawa, Canada; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock CR, Mason JS. Bulk solids handling: an introduction to the practice and technology. New York (NY): Chapman and Hall; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Rezaei H, Lim CJ, Lau A, et al. Size, shape and flow characterization of ground wood chip and ground wood pellet particles. Powder Technol. 2016;301:737–746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nokhodchi A. An overview of the effect of moisture on compaction and compression. Pharm Technol. 2005; 29:46–66.
   Google Scholar
• Gil M, Schott D, Arauzo I, et al. Handling behavior of two milled biomass: SRF poplar and corn stover. Fuel Process Technol. 2013;112:76–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beakawi Al-Hashemi HM, Baghabra Al-Amoudi OS. A review on the angle of repose of granular materials. Powder Technol. 2018;330:397–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iqbal T, Fitzpatrick JJ. Effect of storage conditions on the wall friction characteristics of three food powders. J Food Eng. 2006;72(3):273–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prescott JK, Ploof DA, Carson JW. Developing a better understanding of wall friction. Powder Handl Process. 1999; 11(1):19–26.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM, E1757. Standard practice for preparation of biomass for compositional analysis. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• ASABE. Method of determining and expressing fineness of feed materials by sieving. S319.4. St. Joseph (MI): ASABE; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, et al. Determination of ash in biomass: laboratory analytical procedure. Golden (CO): National Renewable Energy Laboratory; 2008 (Technical Report NREL/TP-510-42622).
   Google Scholar
• SIS, CEN/TS 15148. Solid biofuels-method for the determination of the content of volatile matter. Stockholm (Sweden): Swedish Standards Institute; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes M. Introduction to particle technology. New York (NY): John Wiley and Sons; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Yang W, Sokhansanj S, Crerer WJ, et al. Size and shape related characteristics of alfalfa grind. Can Agric Eng. 1996;38:201–205.
   Google Scholar
• Mani S, Tabil LG, Sokhansanj S. Grinding performance and physical properties of wheat and barley straws, corn stover and switchgrass. Biomass Bioenergy. 2004;27(4):339–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adapa PK, Tabil LG, Schoenau GJ. Physical and frictional properties of ground non-treated and steam exploded barley, canola, oat and wheat straw grinds. J Powder Technol. 2010;201(3):230–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick JJ, Barringer SA, Iqbal T. Flow property measurement of food powders and sensitivity of Jenike’s hopper design methodology to the measured values. J Food Eng. 2004;61(3):399–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teunou E, Fitzpatrick JJ. Effect of relative humidity and temperature on food powder flowability. J Food Eng. 1999;42(2):109–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein EI, Kurt AR. On the physical properties of distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS), 2008 Providence, Rhode Island, June 29 – July 2, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Oginni O. Contribution of particle size and moisture content to flowability of fractionated ground loblolly pine. Auburn (AL): Biosystems Engineering, Masters Thesis, Auburn University; 2014. p. 138.
   Google Scholar
• Goncalves B, Till D, Fasina O, et al. Influence of bark on the physical and thermal decomposition properties of short-rotation eucalyptus. Bioenerg. Res. 2015;8(3):1414–1423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganesan V, Rosentrater KA, Muthukumarappan K. Physical and flow properties of regular and reduced fat distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS). Food Bioprocess Technol. 2009;2(2):156–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenike AW. Storage and flow of solids. University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT; 1964.
   Google Scholar
• Drzymała Z. Industrial briquetting: fundamentals and methods. Elsevier, New York; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Puri VM. Characterizing powder flowability. Chem Process. 2002; 65(1):39–42.
   Google Scholar
• Wu MR, Schott DL, Lodewijks G. Physical properties of solid biomass. Biomass Bioenergy. 2011;35(5):2093–2105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick JJ, Barry K, Cerqueira PSM, et al. Effect of composition and storage conditions on the flowability of dairy powders. Int Dairy J. 2007;17(4):383–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obernberger I, Brunner T, Bärnthaler G. Chemical properties of solid biofuels – significance and impact. Biomass Bioenergy. 2006;30(11):973–982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oginni O, Singh K, Zondlo JW. Pyrolysis of dedicated bioenergy crops grown on reclaimed mine land in West Virginia. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2017;123:319–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Quek A, Kent Hoekman S, et al. Production of solid biochar fuel from waste biomass by hydrothermal carbonization. Fuel. 2013;103:943–949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar