Bioethanol processing from wheat straw: investment appraisal of a full-scale UK biofuel refinery

References

• Hammond GP, Mansell RV. A comparative thermodynamic evaluation of bioethanol processing from wheat straw. Appl Energy. 2018;224:136–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Climate Change Act 2008 [CCA]. 2050 Target Amendment Order. The Stationary Office Limited, London, UK, Order N.o. 1056; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament [EP]. The European green deal. EP, Brussels, Belgium: EP Document P9_TA(2020)0005; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Transport [DfT]. Transport and environment statistics – 2021 annual report. London, UK: DfT; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond GP, Kallu S, McManus MC. The development of biofuels for the UK automotive market. Appl Energy. 2008;85(6):506–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency [IEA]. Future biomass-based transport fuels – summary and conclusions from the IEA bioenergy ExCo67 workshop. Paris, France: Organisation of economic Co-operation and development (OECD)/IEA; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency [IEA]. Technology roadmap: biofuels for transport. Paris, France: Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)/IEA; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond GP, Seth SM. Carbon and environmental footprinting of global biofuel production. Appl Energy. 2013;112:547–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond GP, Li B. Environmental and resource burdens associated with world biofuel production out to 2050: footprint components from carbon emissions and land use to waste arisings and water consumption. Glob Change Biol Bioenergy. 2016;8(5):894–908.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slade R, Bauen A, Shah N. The commercial performance of cellulosic ethanol supply-chains in Europe. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2009;2(1):3–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fairley P. Next generation biofuels. Nature Outlook – Biofuels. 2011;474(7352):S2–S5.
   Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency [IEA]. Renewables 2020: Analysis and forecast to 2025. Paris, France: Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)/IEA; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Glithero NJ, Wilson P, Ramsden SJ. Straw use and availability for second generation biofuels in England. Biomass Bioenergy. 2013;55:311–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glithero NJ, Ramsden SJ, Wilson P. Barriers and incentives to the production of bioethanol from cereal straw: a farm business perspective. Energy Policy. 2013;59(100):161–171.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend TJ, Sparkes DL, Ramsden SJ, et al. Wheat straw availability for bioenergy in England. Energy Policy. 2018;122:349–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lozano P, Bernal B, Recio I, et al. A cyclic process for full enzymatic saccharification of pretreated cellulose with full recovery and reuse of the ionic liquid 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride. Green Chem. 2012;14(9):2631–2637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson DB. Cellulases and biofuels. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2009;20(3):295–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandra RP, Bura R, Mabee WE, et al. Substrate pretreatment: the key to effective enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosics? Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology. 2007;108:67–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talebnia F, Karakashev D, Angelidaki I. Angelidaki, I. Production of bioethanol from wheat straw: an overview on pretreatment, hydrolysis and fermentation. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101(13):4744–4753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng Y, Pan Z, Zhang R. Overview of biomass pretreatment for cellulosic ethanol production. Int J Agric Biol Eng. 2009;2(3):51–68.
   Google Scholar
• Taherzadeh MJ, Karimi K. Enzyme-based hydrolysis processes for ethanol from lignocellulosic materials: a review. BioResources. 2007;2(4):707–738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar P, Barrett DM, Delwiche MJ, et al. Methods for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for efficient hydrolysis and biofuel production. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2009;48(8):3713–3729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balat M, Balat H, Öz C. Progress in bioethanol processing. Prog Energy Combust Sci. 2008;34(5):551–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdei B, Frankó B, Galbe M, et al. Separate hydrolysis and co-fermentation for improved xylose utilization in integrated ethanol production from wheat meal and wheat straw. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2012;5(1):12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klinke HB, Thomsen AB, Ahring BK. Inhibition of ethanol-producing yeast and bacteria by degradation products produced during pre-treatment of biomass. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004;66(1):10–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKendry P. Energy production from biomass (part 2): conversion technologies. Bioresour Technol. 2002;83(1):47–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen PE, Hammond GP. Bioenergy utilization for a low carbon future in the UK: the evaluation of some alternative scenarios and projections. BMC Energy. 2019;1(1):3.
   Google Scholar
• Mood SH, Golfeshan AH, Tabatabaei M, et al. Lignocellulosic biomass to bioethanol, a comprehensive review with a focus on pretreatment. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2013;27:77–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoo HH. Review of bio-conversion pathways of lignocellulose-to-ethanol: sustainability assessment based on land footprint projections. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2015;46:100–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar R, Tabatabaei M, Karimi K, et al. Recent updates on lignocellulosic biomass derived ethanol – a review. Biofuel Res. J. 2016;3(1):347–356.
   Google Scholar
• Gross R, Leach M, Bauen A. Progress in renewable energy. Environ Int. 2003;29(1):105–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies SM, Linforth RS, Wilkinson SJ, et al. Rapid analysis of formic acid, acetic acid, and furfural in pretreated wheat straw hydrolysates and ethanol in a bioethanol fermentation using atmospheric pressure chemical ionisation mass spectrometry. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2011;4:28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimalasena TT, Greetham D, Marvin ME, et al. Phenotypic characterisation of saccharomyces spp. yeast for tolerance to stresses encountered during fermentation of lignocellulosic residues to produce bioethanol. Microb Cell Fact. 2014;13(1):47.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chandel AK, Chandrasekhar G, Radhika K, et al. Bioconversion of pentose sugars into ethanol: a review and future directions. Biotechnol Mol Biol Rev. 2011;6(1):8–20.
   Google Scholar
• Faaij A. Modern biomass conversion technologies. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change. 2006;11(2):343–375.
   Google Scholar
• Mabee WE, McFarlane PN, Saddler JN. Biomass availability for lignocellulosic ethanol production. Biomass Bioenergy. 2011;35(11):4519–4529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta A, Verma JP. Sustainable bio-ethanol production from agro-residues: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2015;41:550–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albashabsheh NT, Stamm JLH. Optimization of lignocellulosic biomass-to-biofuel supply chains with densification: literature review. Biomass Bioenergy. 2021;144:105888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaparaju P, Serrano M, Thomsen AB, et al. Bioethanol, biohydrogen and biogas production from wheat straw in a biorefinery concept. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100(9):2562–2568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar B, Verma P. Biomass-based biorefineries: an important architype towards a circular economy. Fuel. 2021;288:119622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nanda S, Azargohar R, Dalai AK, et al. An assessment on the sustainability of lignocellulosic biomass for biorefining. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2015;50:925–941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad S, Singh A, Korres NE, et al. Sustainable utilization of crop residues for energy generation: a life cycle assessment (LCA) perspective. Bioresour Technol. 2020;303:122964.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond GP, Jones CI, O'Grady Á. Environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) of energy systems. In: Yan, J. (ed.) Handbook of clean energy systems. Vol. 6. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons; 2015. 3343–3368.
   Google Scholar
• British Standards Institution [BSI]. Sustainability criteria for the production of biofuels and bioliquids for energy applications – principles, criteria, indicators and verifiers. Part 1: Terminology. London, UK: BS EN 16214-1. BSI; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• British Standards Institution [BSI]. Sustainability criteria for the production of biofuels and bioliquids for energy applications – principles, criteria, indicators and verifiers. Part 2: Conformity assessment including chain of custody and mass balance. London, UK: BS CEN TS 16214-2. BSI; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• British Standards Institution [BSI]. Sustainability criteria for the production of biofuels and bioliquids for energy applications – principles, criteria, indicators and verifiers. Part 3: Biodiversity and environmental aspects related to nature protection purposes. London, UK: BS EN 16214-3. BSI; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• British Standards Institution [BSI]. Sustainability criteria for the production of biofuels and bioliquids for energy applications – principles, criteria, indicators and verifiers. Part 4: Calculation methods of the greenhouse gas emission balance using a life cycle analysis approach. London, UK: BS EN 16214-4. BSI; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Awasthi MK, Sarsaiya S, Patel A, et al. Refining biomass residues for sustainable energy and bio-products: an assessment of technology, its importance, and strategic applications in circular bio-economy. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2020;127:109876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humbird D, Davis R, Tao L, et al. Process design and economics for biochemical conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol: dilute-acid pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of corn stover. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, Colorado, USA, Technical Report NREL/TP-5100-47764; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs [Defra]. Crop map of England (CROME) 2019. London, UK: Defra; 2021. https://environment.data.gov.uk/dataset/b498a2be-f3de-49fb-91a4-3381bb3868c2 (accessed 28 February 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board [AHDB]. UK human and industrial cereal usage. Kenilworth, Warwickshire, UK: AHDB; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• McMillan J, Saddler J, Ebadian M. Commercialising Conventional and Advanced Liquid Biofuels from Biomass. Report to IEA Bioenergy Task 39. Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)/IEA, Paris, France; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Road Haulage Association (RHA). Cost tables. Peterborough, UK: RHA; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Brent RJ. Applied cost-benefit analysis. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Dorfman R, Dorfman NS. (eds). Economics of the environment. 3rd Edition. Norton: New York, USA; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond GP, Winnett AB. Interdisciplinary perspectives on environmental appraisal and valuation techniques. Proc Instn Civil Engrs: Waste Res Manag. 2006;159(3):117–130.
   Google Scholar
• Allen SR, Hammond GP, Harajli HA, et al. Integrated appraisal of micro-generators: methods and applications. Proc Instn Civil Engrs: Energy. 2008;161(2):73–86.
   Google Scholar
• Kohyama H. Selecting discount rates for budgetary purposes. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard Law School; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• HM Treasury [HMT]. The green book: Central government guidance on appraisal and evaluation. London, UK: Her Majesty's treasury; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• The Chemical Engineering Plant Cost Index [CEPCI]. Chemical Engineering magazine, New York, NY, USA; 2022. https://www.chemengonline.com/pci-home. (accessed 28 February 2022).
   Google Scholar
• United Kingdom Petroleum Industry Association [UKPIA]. Briefing paper – understanding pump prices. London, UK: UKPIA; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• United Kingdom Petroleum Industry Association [UKPIA]. Briefing paper – biofuels in the UK. London, UK: UKPIA; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Voytenko Y, Peck P. Organisational frameworks for straw-based energy systems in Sweden and Denmark. Biomass Bioenergy. 2012;38:34–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butcher L. Lorry sizes and weights. London, UK: House of Commons Library. Standard Note SN/BT/654; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hamelinck NC, Hooijdonk G, Faaij, AP, C. Ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass: techno-economic performance in short-, middle- and long-term. Biomass Bioenergy. 2005;28(4):384–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnansounou E, Dauriat A. Techno-economic analysis of lignocellulosic ethanol: a review. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101(13):4980–4991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towler GP. Chemical engineering design: principles, practice and economics of plant and process design. Amsterdam; London: Elsevier; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Ghatak HR. Bio refineries from the perspective of sustainability: feedstocks, products, and processes. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2011;15(8):4042–4052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenney KL, Smith WA, Gresham GL, et al. Understanding biomass feedstock variability. Biofuels. 2013;4(1):111–127.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes DJ. An examination of biorefining processes, catalysts and challenges. Catal Today. 2009;145(1–2):138–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KPMG International. Cost of capital study 2011/12 – developments in volatile markets. Amstelveen, Netherlands: KPMG International; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• E4tech. Advanced drop-in biofuels: UK production capacity outlook to 2030. E4tech Ltd for the UK Department of Transport in partnership with TRL, Temple and Scarlett Research. PPRO 04/75/17. London, UK; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Tester JW, Drake EM, Driscoll MJ, et al. Sustainable energy: choosing among options. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin PW, Hammond GP, Norman JB. Industrial energy use and carbon emissions reduction in the chemicals sector: a UK perspective. Appl Energy. 2018;227:587–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Royal Society [RoySoc]. Sustainable biofuels: prospects and challenges. Policy Document 01/08, No. 22. London, UK: The Royal Society; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Royal Academy of Engineering [RAEng]. Sustainability of liquid biofuels. London, UK: RAEng; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper SJG, Hammond GP. Decarbonising’ UK industry: towards a cleaner economy. Proc Instn Civil Engrs: Energy. 2018;171(4):147–157.
   Google Scholar
• Patel M, Crank M, Dornburg V, et al. Medium and long-term opportunities and risks of the biotechnological production of bulk chemicals from renewable resources – the potential of white biotechnology. Utrecht, The Netherlands: The BREW Project. Utrecht University; 2006.
   Google Scholar