Farmers’ preferences and willingness to adopt anaerobic digestion technologies: a case study in rural areas in Colombia

References

• OECD/IEA. World energy balances: overview. Paris (France): EA Publishing; 2022 [cited 2022 May 27]. Available from: https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-balances-overview
   Google Scholar
• OECD/IEA. Colombia. Paris (France): EA Publishing; 2022 [cited 2022 July 25]. Available from: https://www.iea.org/countries/colombia
   Google Scholar
• Rocha-Meneses L, Bergamo TF, Kikas T. Potential of cereal-based agricultural residues available for bioenergy production. Data Brief. 2019;23:103829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAO. Natural resources - biomass potential assessment: BEFS RA tool; 2018 [cited 2022 July 25]. Available from: https://www.fao.org/energy/bioenergy/bioenergy-and-food-security/assessment/befs-ra/natural-resources/es/
   Google Scholar
• Viviana M, Castillo OL. Colombian energy planning - neither for energy, nor for Colombia. Energy Policy. 2019;129:1132–1142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagastume Gutiérrez A, Cabello Eras JJ, Hens L, et al. The energy potential of agriculture, agroindustrial, livestock, and slaughterhouse biomass wastes through direct combustion and anaerobic digestion. The case of Colombia. J Clean Prod. 2020;269:122317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burg V, Troitzsch KG, Akyol D, et al. Farmer’s willingness to adopt private and collective biogas facilities: an agent-based modeling approach. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2021;167:105400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali S, Yan Q, Irfan M, et al. Evaluating barriers on biogas technology adoption in China. The moderating role of awareness and technology understanding. Front Environ Sci. 2022;10:887084.
   Google Scholar
• Escalante Hernández H. Atlas del potencial energético de la biomasa residual en Colombia 2010. Bucaramanga (Colombia): Universidad Industrial de Santander; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Unidad de Planificación Rural Agropecuaria - UPRA. Department Profiles (Perfiles Departamentales); 2022 [cited 2022 August 8]. Available from: https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/f63f655e2a534213848432434325f852/page/Perfiles-Departamentales/?views=Educación%2CPecuaria-%2CPIB
   Google Scholar
• Venables WN, Ripley BD. Modern applied statistics with S. 4th ed. New York: Springer; 2002. https://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/MASS4/
   Google Scholar
• Jan I. Socio-economic characteristics influencing farmers’ willingness-to-adopt domestic biogas technology in rural Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021;28(16):20690–20699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calderón Márquez AJ, Rutkowski EW. Waste management drivers towards a circular economy in the global South – the colombian case. Waste Manag. 2020;110:53–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliana Andrea M-M, Ana Carolina T-E, Tito José C-B, et al. Evaluation of contaminants in agricultural soils in an irrigation district in Colombia. Heliyon. 2019;5(8):e02217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espinoza Pérez L, Ziegler-Rodríguez K, Espinoza Pérez AT, et al. Closing the gap in the municipal solid waste management between metropolitan and regional cities from developing countries: a life cycle assessment approach. Waste Manag. 2021;124:314–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everest B. Willingness of farmers to establish a renewable energy (solar and wind) cooperative in NW Turkey. Arab J Geosci. 2021;14(6):517.
   Google Scholar
• Sarker SA, Wang S, Adnan KMM, et al. Economic feasibility and determinants of biogas technology adoption: evidence from Bangladesh. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2020;123:109766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serrano Robayo SC. Solidarity income: a reason to study the classification of social classes in Colombia (ingreso solidario: un motivo Para estudiar la clasificación de las clases sociales en Colombia) [Master in Economy]. Bogotá: C.A.A. Gallo. Universidad de los Andes; 2022. p. 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Polo-Murcia SM, Terán-Chaves CA. How rural income diversification influence agricultural technical efficiency of smallholder farmers? Evidence from Colombia (cómo influye la diversificación de los ingresos rurales en la eficiencia técnica agrícola de los pequeños agricultores? Evidencia de Colombia). ER. 2022;12(25):1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Echavarria-Soto JJ, Villamizar-Villegas M, Restrepo-Tamayo S, et al. La calidad de vida en el sector agropecuario colombiano: una mirada a la poblacion rural. In Superando barreras: el impacto del credito en el sector agrario en Colombia. Bogotá: Banco de la Republica; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Marie M, Yirga F, Alemu G, et al. Status of energy utilization and factors affecting rural households’ adoption of biogas technology in North-Western Ethiopia. Heliyon. 2021;7(3):e06487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendieta O, Castro L, Vera E, et al. Toward the adoption of anaerobic digestion technology through low-cost biodigesters: a case study of non-centrifugal cane sugar producers in Colombia. Water. 2021;13(18):2566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puzzolo E, Pope D, Stanistreet D, et al. Clean fuels for resource-poor settings: a systematic review of barriers and enablers to adoption and sustained use. Environ Res. 2016;146:218–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jan I, Akram W. Willingness of rural communities to adopt biogas systems in Pakistan: critical factors and policy implications. Renew Sust Energy Rev. 2018;81:3178–3185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar