On ancient vs. modern, eastern vs. western, contributions to text coherence theory

References

• Alonso, Pilar. 2014. A Multi-dimensional Approach to Discourse Coherence: From Standardness to Creativity. Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Anna, Morpurgo Davies, & Giulio C. Lepschy, eds. 1998. History of Linguistics IV: Nineteenth-century Linguistics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle. 1902. Poetics. Translated and edited by H. S. Butcher, 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan Company.
   Google Scholar
• Bellert, Irena. 1970. “On a Condition of the Coherence of Texts.” Semiotica 2 (4): 335–63. doi:10.1515/semi.1970.2.4.335.
   Google Scholar
• Blanco Pena, José Miguel. 2000. Bases Filosóficas, Psicológicas y Sociológicas de la Coherencia Lingüística. [Philosophical, Psychological and Sociological Bases of Linguistic Coherence.]. Tamkang Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 6: 101–36.
   Google Scholar
• Bublitz, Wolfran. 2010. Accessed 12 September 2019. “A Bibliography of Coherence and Cohesion.” http://docplayer.net/16240234-A-bibliography-of-coherence-and-cohesion-wolfram-bublitz-universitat-augsburg.html.
   Google Scholar
• Charolles, Michel. 1985. “Text Connexity, Text Coherence and Text Interpretation Processing.” In Text Connexity, Text Coherence. Aspects, Methods, Results, edited by Emel Sözer, 1–15. Hamburg: Buske.
   Google Scholar
• Charolles, Michel. 1989. “Coherence as a Principle in the Regulation of Discourse Production.” In Connexity and Coherence. Analysis of Text and Discourse, edited by Wolfgang Heydrich, Fritz Neubauer, Janos S. Petöfi, & Emel Sözer, 3–15. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Conte, Maria-Elisabeth. 1988. Condizioni Di Coherenza. Richerche Di Linguistica Testuale [Coherence Conditions. Research on Text Linguistics]. Florence: La Nuova Italia.
   Google Scholar
• Coseriu, Eugenio. 1999. ““Premisas Históricas de la Lingüística Moderna” [Historical Premises of Modern Linguistics].” In Lecciones de Lingüística General [General Linguistcs Lessons], 15–32. Madrid: Gredos.
   Google Scholar
• Coseriu, Eugenio. 2007. Lingüística del Texto. Introducción a la Hermenéutica Del Sentido [Text Linguistic. Introduction to the Hermeneutics of Meaning]. Madrid: Arco/Libros.
   Google Scholar
• Encyclopaedia Britannica. 2019.  “Organic unity.“ Encyclopaedia Britannica. Accessed 15 November 2019. https://www.britannica.com/art/organic-unity.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, Achilles. 1951. “Rhymeprose on Literature: The Wên-Fu of Lu Chi (A.D. 261–303).” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 14 (3/4): 527–66. doi:10.2307/2718186.
   Google Scholar
• Formigari, Lia, & Daniele Gambarara, eds. 1995. Historical Roots of Linguistic Theories. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1975. “The Problem of Historical Consciousness.” Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 5 (1): 8–52. doi:10.5840/gfpj1975512.
   Google Scholar
• Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 2004. Truth and Method. 2nd ed. Translation revised by Joel Weinsheimer & Donald G. Marshall. London-New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Garrod, Simon, & Anthony Sanford. 1994. “Coherence: Psychological Approaches.” In The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, edited by Ronald E. Asher, 600–03. Vol. 2. New York: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Giora, Rachel. 1985. “What’s a Coherent Text?” In Text Connexity, Text Coherence: Aspects, Methods, Results, edited by Emel Sözer, 16–35. Hamburg: Buske.
   Google Scholar
• Giuffrè, Mauro. 2017. Text Linguistics and Classical Studies: Dressler and De Beaugrande’s Procedural Approach. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47931-6.
   Google Scholar
• Hatakeyama, Katsuhiko, Janos S. Petöfi, & Emel Sözer. 1985. “Text, Connexity, Cohesion, Coherence.” In Text Connexity, Text Coherence. Aspects, Methods, Results, edited by Emel Sözer, 36–105. Hamburg: Buske.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs, Jerry R. 1983. “Why Is Discourse Coherent.” In Coherence in Natural-Language Text, edited by Fritz Neubauer, 29–70. Hamburg: Buske.
   Google Scholar
• Hymes, Dell H., ed. 1974. Studies in the History of Linguistics. Traditions and Paradigms. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Janiszewska, Hanna. 2012. “Organicism”. In The Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics, edited by Roland Greene, 4th ed., 981. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, Vivien. 2003. The History of Linguistics in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lepschy, Giulio C., ed. 1994a. History of Linguistics I: The Eastern Tradition of Linguistics. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Lepschy, Giulio C., ed. 1994b. History of Linguistics II: Classical and Medieval Linguistics. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Lepschy, Giulio C., ed. 1998. History of Linguistics III. Renaissance and Early Modem Linguistics. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Xie. 1983. The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons. Translated and edited by Vincent Yu-chung Shih. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Louwerse, Max M., & Arthur C. Graesser. 2005. “Coherence in Discourse.” In Encyclopedia of Linguistics, edited by Philipp Strazny, 216–18. Vol. 2. New York, NY: Fitzroy Dearborn.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, Ji. 1994. “Rhymeprose on Literature.” In Columbia Anthology of Traditional Chinese Literature, edited by Victor H. Mair, 124–33. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lundquist, Lita. 1980. La Coherence Textuelle: Syntaxe, Sémantique, Pragmatique [Text Coherence: Syntax, Semantics, Pragmatics]. Copenhaguen: A. Busck.
   Google Scholar
• Mantzavinos, Chrysostomos. 2016. “Hermeneutics.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Accessed 27 March 2020. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/hermeneutics/.
   Google Scholar
• Mounin, Georges. 1967. Histoire de la Linguistique. Des Origines au XXe Siècle [History of Linguistics. From Origins to the 20th Century]. Paris: PUF.
   Google Scholar
• Orsini, Gian, & Napoleone Giordano. 1975. Organic Unity in Ancient and Later Poetics: The Philosophical Foundations of Literary Criticism. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rickett, Adele Austin, ed. 1978. Chinese Approaches to Literature from Confucius to Liang Ch’i-Ch’ao. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctt13x176h.
   Google Scholar
• Robins, Robert Henry. 1997. A Short History of Linguistics. 4th ed. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, Ted, & Henk Pander Maat. 2006. “Cohesion and Coherence: Linguistic Approaches.” In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, 2nd ed. Vol. 2. edited by Keith Brown, 591–95. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Sanford, Anthony. 2006. “Coherence: Psycholinguistic Approach.” In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, 2nd ed. Vol. 2. edited by Keith Brown, 585–91. Amsterdam:Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Schleiermacher, Friedrich. 1998. “General Hermeneutics.” In Hermeneutics and Criticism and Other Writings, edited by Andrew Bowie, 225–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seuren, Pieter A. M. 1998. Western Linguistics: An Historical Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Shih, Vincent Yu-chung, ed. 1983. The Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Daniel J. 1987. The History of Linguistics in the Classical Period. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, Teun A. 1977. Text and Context. Explorations in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Vilarnovo, Antonio. 1990. ““Coherencia Textual: ¿Coherencia Interna oExterna?” [Text Coherence: Internal or External Coherence?].” ELUA (Estudios de Lingüística Universidad de Alicante) 6: 229–39. doi:10.14198/ELUA1990.6.12.
   Google Scholar
• Wales, Katie. 1994. “Cohesion and Coherence in Literature.” In The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, edited by Ronald E. Asher, 603–04. Vol. 2. New York, NY: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar