Infrared thermography to select commercial varieties of maize in relation to drought adaptation

References

• United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division [Internet]; [cited 2015 December 12]. Available from: http://www.unpopulation.org.
   Google Scholar
• García-Tejero IF, Durán-Zuazo VH, Muriel-Fernández JL. Towards sustainable irrigated Mediterranean agriculture: implications for water conservation in semi-arid environments. Water Int. 2014;39:635–648. doi:10.1080/02508060.2014.931753.10.1080/02508060.2014.931753
   Google Scholar
• Plant phenotyping [Internet]; [cited 2016 January 2]. Available from: www.plantphenomics.com.
   Google Scholar
• Walter A, Silk WK, Schurr U. Environmental effects on spatial and temporal patterns of leaf and root growth. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 2009;60:279–304.10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar P, Huang C, Cai J, et al. Root phenotyping by root tip detection and classification through statistical learning. Plant Soil. 2014;380:193–209.10.1007/s11104-014-2071-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golzarian MR, Frick RA, Rajendran K, et al. Accurate inference of shoot biomass from high-throughput images of cereal plants. Plant Methods. 2011;7:1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen M, Gilmer F, Biskup B, et al. Simultaneous phenotyping of leaf growth and chlorophyll fluorescence via grow screen fluoro allows detection of stress tolerance in arabidopsis thaliana and other rosette plants. Funct. Plant Biol. 2009;36:902–914.10.1071/FP09095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monforte AJ, Diaz AI, Caño-Delgado A, et al. The genetic basis of fruit morphology in horticultural crops: lessons from tomato and melon. J. Exp. Bot.; 2014;65:4635–4637. doi:10.1093/jxb/eru017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao NKS, Laxman RH. Phenotyping horticultural crops for abiotic stress tolerance. In: Singh HCP, Rao NKS, Shivashankar KS, editors. Climate-resilient horticulture: adaptation and mitigation strategies. Berlin: Springer; 2013. p. 147–157.
   Google Scholar
• Tagne A, Feujio TP, Sonna, C. Essential oil and plant extracts as potential substitutes to synthetic fungicides in the control of fungi. In: ENDURE International Conference 2008 Diversifying crop protection; 2008 October 12–15; La Grande-Motte, France; Oral presentations
   Google Scholar
• Farré I, Faci JM. Comparative response of maize (Zea mays L.) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) to deficit irrigation in a Mediterranean environment. Agric. Water Manage. 2006;83:135–143.10.1016/j.agwat.2005.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domínguez A, de Juan JA, Tarjuelo JM, et al. Determination of optimal regulated deficit irrigation strategies for maize in a semi-arid environment. Agric. Water Manage. 2012;110:67–77.10.1016/j.agwat.2012.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey RK, Maranville JW, Admou A. Deficit irrigation and nitrogen effects on maize in a Sahelian environment. Agric. Water Manage. 2000;46:1–13.10.1016/S0378-3774(00)00073-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmo-Silva A, Soares A, Marques da Silva J, et al. Photosynthetic responses of three C 4 grasses of different metabolic subtypes to water deficit. Funct. Plant Biol. 2007;34:204–213.10.1071/FP06278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nayyar H. Accumulation of osmolytes and osmotic adjustment in water-stressed wheat (Triticum aestivum) and maize (Zea mays) as affected by calcium and its antagonists. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2003;50:253–264.10.1016/S0098-8472(03)00038-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phenodays [Internet]; [cited 2014 October 10]; 2014. Available from: http://www.phenodays.com/
   Google Scholar
• Fiorani F, Schurr U. Future scenarios for plant phenotyping. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 2013;64:267–291.10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L, Zhang Q, Huang D. A review of imaging techniques for plant phenotyping. Sensors. 2014;14:20078–20111.10.3390/s141120078
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvidsson S, Pérez-Rodríguez P, Mueller-Roeber BA. A growth phenotyping pipeline for Arabidopsis thaliana integrating image analysis and rosette area modeling for robust quantification of genotype effects. New Phytol. 2011;191:895–907.10.1111/nph.2011.191.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deikman J, Petracek M, Heard JE. Drought tolerance through biotechnology: improving translation from the laboratory to farmers’ fields. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2012;23:243–250.10.1016/j.copbio.2011.11.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang W, Duan L, Chen G, et al. Plant phenomics and high-throughput phenotyping: accelerating rice functional genomics using multidisciplinary technologies. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2013;16:180–187.10.1016/j.pbi.2013.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Tejero IF, Costa JM, Lima RSN, et al. Thermal imaging to phenotype traditional maize landraces for drought tolerance. Com. Sci. 2015;6:334–343.
   Google Scholar
• García-Tejero IF, Durán-Zuazo VH, Muriel-Fernández JL, et al. Water and sustainable agriculture. Springer briefs in agriculture. Dordrecht: Springer; 2011. 94pp.
   Google Scholar
• James RA, Siraut XRR. Infrared thermography in plant phenotyping for salinity tolerance. In: Plant salt tolerance: methods and protocols. Vol. 913, Methods in molecular biology series; New York: Springer; 2012. p. 173–189.
   Google Scholar
• Jones HG, Vaughan RA. Remote sensing of vegetation: principles, techniques and applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Jones HG, Serraj R, Loveys BR, et al. Thermal infrared imaging of crop canopies for the remote diagnosis and quantification of plant responses to water stress in the field. Funct. Plant Biol. 2009;36:978–989.10.1071/FP09123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Subhash C, Yan J, et al. Maize leaf temperature responses to drought: thermal imaging and quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2011;71:158–165.10.1016/j.envexpbot.2010.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa JM, Ortuño MF, Lopes CM, et al. Grapevine varieties exhibiting differences in stomatal response to water deficit. Funct. Plant Biol. 2012;39:179–189.10.1071/FP11156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berni JAJ, Zarco-Tejada PJ, Sepulcre-Cantó G, et al. Mapping canopy conductance and CWSI in olive orchards using high resolution thermal remote sensing imagery. Remote Sens. Environ. 2009a;113:2380–2388.10.1016/j.rse.2009.06.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Tejero IF, Durán-Zuazo VH, Muriel-Fernández JL, et al. Linking canopy temperature and trunk diameter fluctuations with other physiological water status tools for water stress management in citrus orchards. Funct. Plant Biol. 2011;38:106–117.10.1071/FP10202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urrestarazu M. Infrared thermography used to diagnose the effects of salinity in a soilless culture. Quant. InfraRed Thermogr. J. 2013;10:1–8.10.1080/17686733.2013.763471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales I, Álvaro JE, Urrestarazu M. Contribution of thermal imaging to fertigation in soilless culture. J. Thermal Anal. Calorim. 2014;116:1033–1039.10.1007/s10973-013-3529-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales I, Urrestarazu M. Thermography study of moderate electrical conductivity and nutrient solution distribution system effects on grafted tomato soilless culture. HortSci. 2013;48:1508–1512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones HG, Stoll M, Santos T, et al. Use of infrared thermography for monitoring stomatal closure in the field: application to grapevine. J. Exp. Bot. 2002;53:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pou A, Diago MP, Medrano H, et al. Validation of thermal indices for water status identification in grapevine. Agric. Water Manage. 2014;134:60–72.10.1016/j.agwat.2013.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zia S, Spohrer K, Merkt N, et al. Non-invasive water status detection in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) by thermograph. Int. J. Agric Biol. Eng. 2009;2:46–54.
   Google Scholar
• Fuentes S, De Bei R, Pech J, et al. Computational water stress indices obtained from thermal image analysis of grapevine canopies. Irrig. Sci. 2012;30:523–536.10.1007/s00271-012-0375-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellvert J, Marsal J, Girona J, et al. Seasonal evolution of crop water stress index in grapevine varieties determined with high resolution remote sensing thermal imagery. Irrig. Sci. 2015;33:81–93.10.1007/s00271-014-0456-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreiber U, Schliwa U, Bilger W. Continuous recording of photochemical and non-photochemical chlorophyll fluorescence quenching with a new type of modulation fluorometer. Photosyn. Res. 1986;10:51–62.10.1007/BF00024185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadras VO, Reynolds MP, de la Vega AJ, et al. Phenotypic plasticity of yield and phenology in wheat, sunflower and grapevine. Field Crops Res. 2009;110:242–250.10.1016/j.fcr.2008.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jongdee B, Fukai S, Cooper M. Leaf water potential and osmotic adjustment as physiological traits to improve drought tolerance in rice. Field Crop. Res. 2002;76:153–163.10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00036-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones HG. Use of infrared thermometry for estimation of stomatal conductance as a possible aid to irrigation scheduling. Agric. Forest Met. 1999;95:139–149.10.1016/S0168-1923(99)00030-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merlot S, Mustilli AC, Genty B, et al. Use of infrared thermal imaging to isolate Arabidopsis mutants defective in stomatal regulation. Plant J. 2002;30:601–609.10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01322.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Tejero IF, Muriel-Fernández JL, Durán-Zuazo VH, et al. Uso eficiente del agua en la agricultura [Efficient water use in agriculture]. Seville: Instituto de Investigación y Formación Agraria y Pesquera. CAPDR; 2013. 104pp.
   Google Scholar
• Costa JM, Grant OM, Chaves MM. Thermography to explore plant-environment interactions. J. Exp. Bot. 2013;64:3937–3949.10.1093/jxb/ert029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masuka B, Araus JL, Das B, et al. Phenotyping for abiotic stress tolerance in maize. J. Int. Plant Biol. 2012;54:238–249.10.1111/jipb.2012.54.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Tejero I, Durán-Zuazo VH, Muriel-Fernández JL. Thermal imaging to assess the plant water status under arid and semi-arid conditions. In: Ferguson G., editor. Arid and semi-arid environments. Biogediversity, impacts, and environmental challenges. NJ: Nova Publishers; 2015. p. 15–35.
   Google Scholar
• García-Tejero I, Durán-Zuazo VH, Arriaga J, et al. Approach to assess infrared thermal imaging of almond trees under water-stress conditions. Fruits. 2012;67:463–474.10.1051/fruits/2012040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Tejero IF, Rodríguez VM, Ponce JR, et al. Estimating almond crop coefficients and physiological response to water stress in semiarid environments (SW Spain). J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2015;17:1255–1266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar