Apport d'une méthode électromécanique à la caractérisation des sols en surface

10. Bibliographie

• Abu-Farsakh , M. Y. , Alshibli , K. A. , Nazzal , M. and Seyman , E. 2003 . “ Assessment of ” . In in situ test technology for construction control of base courses and embankments, Report N° FHWA/LA/385
   Google Scholar
• Abu-Farsakh , M. Y. , Alshibli , K. A. , Nazzal , M. and Seyman , E. “Evaluating the stiffness of highway materials from the Geogauge™ device” . Geo Jordan Conference 2004 Advances in Geotechnical Engineering with emphasis on dams, highway materials and soil improvement, Conference proceeding , 2004 287 – 298 .
   Google Scholar
• AFNOR . 2000 . NF 94-117-1 D, Sol: Reconnaissance et essai. Portance des plates-formes
   Google Scholar
• Alshibli , K. A. , Abu-Farsakh , M. Y. and Seyman , E. 2005 . “Laboratory evaluation of the Geogauge™ and light falling weight deflectometer as construction tools” . Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering ASCE , 17 ( n° 5 ) : 560 – 569 .
   Google Scholar
• Aouad , M. F. 1993 . Evaluation of flexible pavements and subgrades using the SASW method Ph.D. Thesis, Dept of civil and transportation engineering, University of Texas, Austin
   Google Scholar
• ASTM . 2002 . D 6758–02, Standard test method for measuring stiffness and apparent modulus of soil and soil aggregate in place by an electro-mechanical method
   Google Scholar
• Chassaing , P. , Corte , J. F. , Froumentin , M. and Schaeffner , M. 1995 . «La dynaplaque 2 Etude d'un nouveau matériel» . Bulletin de liaison des Ponts et Chaussées , : 3 – 13 . janvier-février
   Google Scholar
• CNA Consulting Engineers . 2000 . Comparison of quasi-static plate load tests with the Humboldt Geogauge™, CNA report
   Google Scholar
• Egorov , K. E. 1965 . “Calculation of bed for foundation with ring footing” . Proceeding 6^th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. , 4 : 41 – 45 .
   Google Scholar
• Fiedler , S. , Nelson , C. , Berkman , E. F. and Di Millio , A. 1998 . “Soil stiffness gauge for soil compaction control” . Journal of Public Roads , 61 ( n °5 ) mars-avril, US department of transportation FHWA
   Google Scholar
• Hryciw , R. D. and Thomann , T. G. 1993 . “Stress history based model for cohesionless soils” . Journal of Geotechnical Engineering , 119 ( n° 7 )
   Google Scholar
• Humboldt, Mfg. Co . 1999 . Soil stiffness gauge Geogauge™ user guide, Model H-4140
   Google Scholar
• Humboldt, Mfg. Co . 2000 . Test results: controlling base quality and asphalt compaction utilizing the Humboldt Geogauge™, Geogauge™ documents CD ROM, version 02–03.1
   Google Scholar
• Main , M. 2000 . Proposed approaches developing methods for evaluating compaction with the Humboldt Geogauge™, Geogauge™ documents CD ROM, version 02–03.1
   Google Scholar
• Mandour , H. 2003 . Mesure de la portance des couches routières par une méthode electromécanique. Limites et performances de l'appareil Geogauge™, Rapport de DEA, Université de Caen
   Google Scholar
• Poulos , H. G. and Davis , E. H. 1974 . Elastic solutions for soil and rock mechanics 167 – 168 . John Wiley & Sons .
   Google Scholar
• Sawangsuriya , A. 2001 . Evaluation of soil stiffness gauge, Master in Sciences Thesis, Dept of civil and environmental engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI
   Google Scholar
• Sawangsuriya , A. and Edil , T. B. 2005 . “Evaluating stiffness and strength of pavement materials” . Geotechnical Engineering Journal , 158 ( n° 4 ) : 217 – 230 .
   Google Scholar
• Shrivastava , A. K. and Levacher , D. 2005 . “Use of soil stiffness gauge in pavement design” . In Proceeding International Conference Innovative Technologies for Infrastructures and Housing 12–13 octobre 131 – 138 . Lille
   Google Scholar
• Tolleson , A. R. , Mahdevian , E. , Shatnawi , F. M. and Harman , N. E. September 2003 . An evaluation of strength change on subgrade soils stabilized with an enzyme catalyst solution using CBR and SSG comparisons, Final report, Geometrics Inc., & South Carolina State University September ,
   Google Scholar