Correlation of MRI features and pathohistological prognostic factors in invasive ductal breast carcinoma

References

• Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, et al. International agency for research on cancer. GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11. globocan.iarc.fr [cited 2013 Dec 12].
   Google Scholar
• Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C, Törnberg S, Holland R, von Karsa L. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Fourth edition–summary document. Ann Oncol. 2008;19:614–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter CL, Allen C, Henson DE. Relation of tumor size, lymph node status, and survival in 24,740 breast cancer cases. Cancer. 1989;63:181–187.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beran L, Liang W, Nims T, Paquelet J, et al. Correlation of targeted ultrasound with magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities of the breast. Am J Surg. 2005;190:592–594.10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.06.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of an enhancing lesion? Radiology. 1999;211:101–110.10.1148/radiology.211.1.r99ap38101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mussurakis S, Buckley DL, Horsman A. Dynamic MR imaging of invasive breast cancer: correlation with tumour grade and other histological factors. Br J Radiol. 1997;70:446–451.10.1259/bjr.70.833.9227224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuncbilek N, Karakas HM, Okten OO. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in determining histopathological prognostic factors of invasive breast cancers. Eur J Radiol. 2005;53:199–205.10.1016/j.ejrad.2003.11.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vassiou K, Kanavou K, Vlychou M, et al. Morphological and kinetic characteristics of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) correlated with histopathological factors of breast cancer: A potential prognostic role of breast MRI? Eur J Radiol. 2009;1:124–32.
   Google Scholar
• Jinguji M, Kajiya Y, Kamimura K, et al. Rim enhancement of breast cancers on contrast-enhanced MR imaging: relationship with prognostic factors. Breast Cancer. 2006;13:64–73.10.2325/jbcs.13.64
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chang YW, Kwon KH, Choi DL, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of breast cancer and correlation with prognostic factors. Acta Radiol. 2009;50:990–998.10.3109/02841850903225180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buadu LD, Murakami J, Murayama S, et al. Patterns of peripheral enhancement in breast masses: correlation of findings on contrast medium enhanced MRI with histologic features and tumor angiogenesis. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1997;21:421–430.10.1097/00004728-199705000-00016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teifke A, Behr O, Schmidt M, et al. Dynamic MR imaging of breast lesions: correlation with microvessel distribution pattern and histologic characteristics of prognosis. Radiology. 2006;239:351–360.10.1148/radiol.2392050205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SH, Cho N, Kim SJ, et al. Correlation between High resolution dynamic MR features and prognostic factors in breast cancer. Korean J Radiol. 2008;9:10–8.10.3348/kjr.2008.9.1.10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montemurro F, Martincich L, Sarotto I, Bertotto I, Ponzone R, Cellini, L. Relationship between DCE-MRI morphological and functional features and histopathological characteristics of breast cancer. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:1490–1497.10.1007/s00330-006-0505-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szabo BK, Aspelin P, Wiberg MK, Bone B. Dynamic MR imaging of the breast. Analysis of kinetic and morphologic diagnostic criteria. Acta Radiol. 2003;44:379–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vassiou K, Kanavou T, Vlychou M, Poultsidi A, Athanasiou E, Arvanitis DL, et al. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound. Eur J Radiol. 2009;70:69–76.10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.01.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum F, Fischer U, Vosshenrich R, Grabbe E. Classification of hypervascularized lesions in CE MR imaging of the breast. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:1087–1092.10.1007/s00330-001-1213-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tozaki M, Igarashi T, Matsushima S, Fukuda K. High-spatial resolution MR imaging of focal breast masses: interpretation model based on kinetic and morphological parameters. Radiat Med. 2005;23:43–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lakhani SR, Ellis IO, Schnitt SJ, Tan PH, van de Vijver MJ, et al. WHO classification of tumours of the breast. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC Press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Singletary SE, Allred C, Ashley P, Bassett LW, Berry D, Bland KI. Revision of the American joint committee on cancer staging system for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:3628–3636.10.1200/JCO.2002.02.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacobuzio-Donahue CA, Argani P, Hempen PM, Jones J, Kern SE. The desmoplastic response to infiltrating breast carcinoma: gene expression at the site of primary invasion and implications for comparisons between tumor types. Cancer Res. 2002;62:5351–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stavros AT. Malignant solid breast nodules: specific type. In: Stavros AT, editor. Breast ultrasound. 1st ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004. p. 597–688.
   Google Scholar
• Cahill RA, Walsh D, Landers RJ, Watson RG. Preoperative profiling of symptomatic breast cancer by diagnostic core biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:45–51.10.1245/ASO.2006.03.047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burge CN, Chang HR, Apple SK. Do the histologic features and results of breast cancer biomarker studies differ between core biopsy and surgical excision specimens? Breast. 2006;15:167–172.10.1016/j.breast.2005.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szabo BK, Aspelin P, Kristoffersen Wiberg M, Tot T, Bone B. Invasive breast cancer: correlation of dynamic MR features with prognostic factors. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:2425–2435.10.1007/s00330-003-2000-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar