573
Views
33
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Nature and economic growth in Turkey: what does ecological footprint imply?

&
Pages 101-115 | Received 02 Jun 2015, Accepted 16 Nov 2016, Published online: 10 Feb 2017

References

  • Akbostancı, E., Türüt-Aşık, S., & Tunç, G. İ. (2009). The relationship between income and environment in Turkey: Is there an environmental Kuznets curve? Energy Policy, 37(3), 861–867. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.088
  • Altıntaş, H. (2013). Türkiye’de Birincil Enerji Tüketimi, Karbondioksit Emisyonu ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: Eşbütünleşme ve Nedensellik Analizi, Eskisehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. Nisan, 8(1), 263–294.
  • Asici, A. A. (2014). On economic growth, current account and biocapacity deficits in Turkey. ITU Management Engineering Department Working Paper.
  • Atıcı, C., & Kurt, F. (2007). Türkiye’nin Dış Ticareti ve Çevre Kirliliği: Çevresel Kuznets Eğrisi Yaklaşımı. Tarım Ekonomisi Dergisi, 13(2), 61–69.
  • Bagliani, M., Bravo, G., & Dalmazzone, S. (2008). A consumption-based approach to environmental Kuznets curves using the ecological footprint indicator. Ecological Economics, 65(3), 650–661. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.01.010
  • Borucke, M., Moore, D., Cranston, G., Gracey, K., K. Iha, J. Larson, … Galli, A. 2012. Calculation methodology for the national footprint accounts, 2011 edition. Oakland: Global Footprint Network.
  • Caviglia-Harris, J. L., Chambers, D., & Kahn, J. R. (2009). Taking the ‘U’ out of Kuznets: A comprehensive analysis of the EKC and environmental degradation. Ecological Economics, 68, 1149–1159. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.08.006
  • Chen, D., & Ma, X. (2010). The inequality of natural resources consumption and its relationship with the social development level based on The ecological footprint and The HDI. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 12(1), 69–86. doi: 10.1142/S1464333210003528
  • Duman, A., & Özgüzer, G. E. (2010). A sectoral approach to the surging imports in Turkey (WP No: 1005). Izmir Economics University.
  • Galeotti, M., Manera, M., & Lanza, A. (2009). On the robustness of robustness checks of the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis. Environmental and Resource Economics, 42(4), 551–574. doi: 10.1007/s10640-008-9224-x
  • Galli, A., Kitzes, J., Niccolucci, V., Wackernagel, M., Wadad, Y., & Marchettini, N. (2012). Assessing the global environmental consequences of economic growth through the ecological footprint: A focus on China and India. Ecological Indicators, 17(2012), 99–107. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.022
  • Galli, A., Kitzes, J., Wermer, P., Wackernagel, M., Niccolucci, V., & Tiezzi, E. (2007). An exploration of the mathematics behind the ecological footprint. International Journal of Ecodynamics, 2(4), 250–257. doi: 10.2495/ECO-V2-N4-250-257
  • Global Footprint Network. (2012). National Footprint Accounts, 2011 Edition. Retrieved from http://www.footprintnetwork.org
  • Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental Impacts of North American Free Trade Agreement (NBER Working Paper Series No: 3914).
  • Hettige, H., Mani, M., & Wheeler, D. (2000). Industrial pollution in economic development: The environmental Kuznets curve revisited. Journal of Development Economics, 62, 445–476. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3878(00)00092-4
  • IMF. (2014). World economic outlook. Washington, DC: Author.
  • Johansen, S. (1995). Likelihood-based inference in cointegrated vector autoregressive models. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Jorgenson, A. K., & Burns, T. J. (2007). The political-economic causes of change in the ecological footprints of nations, 1991–2001: A quantitative investigation. Social Science Research, 36, 834–853. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.06.003
  • Kaufmann, R. K., Davidsdottir, B., Garnham, S., & Pauly, P. (1998). The determinants of atmospheric SO2 concentrations: Reconsidering the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecological Economics, 5, 209–230. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00181-X
  • Lise, W. (2006). Decomposition of CO2 emissions over 1980–2003 in Turkey. Energy Policy, 34, 1841–1852. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.12.021
  • Meadows, D., Meadows, D., Randers, D. L., & Behrens, W. (1972). The limits to growth. New York: Universe Books.
  • Oliver, J. G. J., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Muntean, M., & Peters, J. A. H. W. (2013). Trends in global CO2 emissions; 2013 Report. The Hague: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.
  • Özler, Ş. İ., & Obach, B. K. (2009). Capitalism, state economic policy and ecological footprint: An international comparative analysis. Global Environmental Politics, 9(1), 79–108. doi: 10.1162/glep.2009.9.1.79
  • Ozturk, I., & Acaravci, A. (2010). CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14, 3220–3225. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.005
  • Panayotou, T. (1993). Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development (ILO Working Paper WP238).
  • Perman, R., & Stern, D. I. (2003). Evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests that the environmental Kuznets curve does not exist. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 47, 325–347. doi: 10.1111/1467-8489.00216
  • Schütz, H., Moll, S., & Bringezu, S. (2004). Globalisation and the shifting environmental burden: material trade flows of the European Union (Wuppertal Papers No. 134e). Wuppertal: Wuppertal Institute für Klima.
  • Shafik, N., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (1992). Economic growth and environmental quality: Time series and cross-country evidence, background paper for World Development Report 1992. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
  • Singh, R. K., Murty, H. R., Gupta, S. K., & Dikshit, A. K. (2012). An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecological Indicators, 15, 281–299. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.01.007
  • Stern, D. I., & Common, M. S. (2001). Is there an environmental Kuznets curve for sulfur? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 41, 162–178. doi: 10.1006/jeem.2000.1132
  • Soytas, U., & Sari, R. 2009. Energy consumption, economic growth, and carbon emissions: Challenges faced by an EU candidate member. Ecological Economics, 68, 1667–1675. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.06.014
  • Turkish Ministry of Development. (2012). Turkey’s Sustainable Development Report: Claiming the Future, [internet document]. Retrieved April 22, 2014, from http://www.uncsd2012.org/content/documents/490Turkey'sSustainableDevelopmentReportClaimingtheFuture2012.pdf
  • Turkish Ministry of Economy. (2012a). Girdi Tedarik Stratejisi ve Eylem Planı (2013-2015), [internet document]. Retrieved April 21, 2014, from http://www.ekonomi.gov.tr/upload/AB20A4A2-D8D3-8566-452020E6BC3D4DAE/gites_raporu.pdf
  • Turkish Ministry of Economy. (2012b). The New Investment Incentives Program, [internet document]. Retrieved April 21, 2014 from http://www.ekonomi.gov.tr/index.cfm?sayfa=EE4E7DE2-D8D3-8566-4520C9A5A5C65EAD]
  • Wackernagel, M., Monfreda, C., Schulz, N. B., Erb, K. H., Haberl, H., & Krausmann, F. (2004). Calculating national and global ecological footprint time series: Resolving conceptual challenges. Land Use Policy, 21(3), 271–278. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.10.006
  • Wackernagel, M., Schulz, N. B., Deumling, D., Linares, A. C., Jenkins, M., Kapos, V., … Randers, J. (2002). Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(14), 9266–9271. doi: 10.1073/pnas.142033699
  • World Bank. (2012). World Development Indicators Online (WDI) database. Retrieved August 2012.
  • York, R., Rosa, E. A., & Dietz, T. (2005). The ecological footprint intensity of national economies. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 8(4), 139–154. doi: 10.1162/1088198043630487
  • Zafir, C. Z., & Sezgin, F. H. (2012). Analysis of the effects of foreign direct investment on the financing of current account deficits in Turkey. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(10), 68–78.
  • Zhao, S., Wu, C., Hong, H., & Zhang, L. (2009). Linking the concept of ecological footprint and valuation of ecosystem services – a case study of economic growth and natural carrying capacity. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 16(2), 137–142. doi: 10.1080/13504500902796310

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.