The determinants of voting for Islamists in Egypt’s first post-revolution elections 2011–2012

References

• Akarca, A. T., & Tansel, A. (2007). Social and economic determinants of Turkish voter choice in the 1995 parliamentary election. Electoral Studies, 26(3), 633–647. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2007.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Ississ, M., & Atallah, S. (2015). Patronage and ideology in electoral behavior: Evidence from Egypt’s first presidential elections. European Journal of Political Economy, 37, 241–248. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2014.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Başlevent, C., Kirmanoğlu, H., & Şenatalar, B. (2005). Empirical investigation of party preferences and economic voting in Turkey. European Journal of Political Research, 44(4), 547–562. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2005.00238.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Başlevent, C., Kirmanoğlu, H., & Şenatalar, B. (2009). Party preferences and economic voting in Turkey (now that the crisis is over). Party Politics, 15(3), 377–391. doi: 10.1177/1354068808097896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1979). A simple test for heteroscedasticity and random coefficient variation. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 47, 1287–1294. doi: 10.2307/1911963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Carter Center. (2012a). Final report of the carter center mission to witness the 2011–2012 parliamentary elections in Egypt. Carter Center, Presidential Election in Egypt.
   Google Scholar
• The Carter Center. (2012b). Final report of the the presidential election in Egypt. Carter Center, Presidential Election in Egypt.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J. A. (2004). Islam, charity, and activism: Middle-class networks and social welfare in Egypt, Jordan, and Yemen. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Çarkoğlu, A., & Hinich, M. J. (2006). A spatial analysis of Turkish party preferences. Electoral Studies, 25(2), 369–392. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2005.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsayyad, M., & Hanafy, S. (2014). Voting Islamist or voting secular? An empirical analysis of voting outcomes in Egypt’s ‘Arab spring’. Public Choice, 160(1–2), 109–130. doi: 10.1007/s11127-014-0173-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gidengil, E., & Karakoç, E. (2016). Which matters more in the electoral success of Islamist (successor) parties–religion or performance? The Turkish case. Party Politics, 22(3), 325–338. doi: 10.1177/1354068814549341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanusch, M. (2013). Islam and democracy: A response. Public Choice, 154(3–4), 315–321. doi: 10.1007/s11127-012-0025-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maseland, R., & van Hoorn, André (2011). Why Muslims like democracy yet have so little of it. Public Choice, 147(3–4), 481–496. doi: 10.1007/s11127-010-9642-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masoud, T. (2014). Counting Islam: Religion, class, and elections in Egypt problems of international politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Minnesota Population Center. (2013). Integrated public use microdata series: International: Version 6.2 [Machine-readable database].
   Google Scholar
• Potrafke, N. (2012). Islam and democracy. Public Choice, 151(1–2), 185–192. doi: 10.1007/s11127-010-9741-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowley, C. K., & Smith, N. (2009). Islam’s democracy paradox: Muslims claim to like democracy, so why do they have so little? Public Choice, 139(3–4), 273–299. doi: 10.1007/s11127-008-9393-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, D. J., & Abed-Kotob, S. (1999). Islam in contemporary Egypt: Civil society vs. The state. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Wedeen, L. (2003). Beyond the crusades: Why Huntington, and Bin Laden, are wrong. Middle East Policy, 10(2), 54–61. doi: 10.1111/1475-4967.00105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickham, C. R. (2002). Mobilizing Islam: Religion, activism and political change in Egypt. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiktorowicz, Q. (2004). Islamic activism: A social movement theory approach. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zellner, A. (1962). An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests for aggregation bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 57(298), 348–368. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1962.10480664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar