Equivalence scales and the change in poverty levels across time: Turkish case

References

• Araar, A., & Duclos, J. Y. (2007). DASP: Distributive analysis Stata Package. Montreal: PEP, World Bank, UNDP, and Universite Laval.
   Google Scholar
• Batana, Y., Bussolo, M., & Cockburn, J. (2013). Global extreme poverty rates for children, adults and the elderly. Economics Letters, 120, 405–407. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2013.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betti, G., Karadag, M. A., Sarica, O., & Ucar, B. (2016). How to reduce the impact of equivalence scales on poverty measurement: Evidence from Turkey. Social Indicators Research, 132(3), 1023–1035. doi: 10.1007/s11205-016-1335-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betti, G., Karadag, M. A., Sarica, O., & Ucar, B. (2017). Regional differences in equivalence scales in Turkey. Ekonomika Regiona [Economy of Region], 13(1), 63–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhman, B., Rainwater, L., Schmaus, G., & Smeeding, T. (1988). Equivalence scales, well-being, inequality and poverty: Sensitivity estimates across ten countries using the Luxembourg Income Study (LIS) database. Review of Income and Wealth, 34, 115–142. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4991.1988.tb00564.x
   Google Scholar
• Burkhauser, R. V., Smeeding, T. M., & Merz, J. (1996). Relative inequality and poverty in Germany and the United States using alternative equivalence scales. Review of Income and Wealth, 42, 381–400. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4991.1996.tb00190.x
   Google Scholar
• Chen, W., & Duclos, J. Y. (2011). Testing for poverty dominance: An application to Canada. Canadian Journal of Economics, 44(3), 781–803. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5982.2011.01654.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, D. M., & Katz, L. F. (1992). Rising inequality? Changes in the distribution of income and consumption in the 1980s. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 82(2), 546–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Ree, J., Alessie, R., & Pradhan, M. (2013). The price and utility dependence of equivalence scales: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Public Economics, 97, 272–281. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vos, K., & Zaidi, M. A. (1997). Equivalence scale sensitivity of poverty statistics for the member states of the European community. Review of Income and Wealth, 43, 319–333. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4991.1997.tb00222.x
   Google Scholar
• Duclos, J.-Y., & Mercader-Prats, M. (1999). Household needs and poverty: With application to Spain and the UK. Review of Income and Wealth, 45, 77–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4991.1999.tb00313.x
   Google Scholar
• Jürgen, F. (2012). Chapter 12 variable equivalence scales and trends in German income inequality. In J. A. Bishop & R. Salas (Eds.), Inequality, mobility and segregation: Essays in honor of Jacques Silber (research on economic inequality, Volume 20) (pp. 311–336). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.
   Google Scholar
• Ndeffo, L. N., Ngwen, N., Tegoum, P. J. N., Kamdem, C. B., & Tene, M. M. (2014). Impact of equivalence scales on The Spatial distribution of poverty in Cameroon: A dynamic approach. The Journal of Developing Areas, 48(1), 253–273. doi: 10.1353/jda.2014.0002
   Google Scholar
• Okamoto, M. (2012). The Relationship between the Equivalence Scale and the Inequality Index and its impact on the measurement of income inequality (LIS Working Paper Series, 575).
   Google Scholar
• Seker, S. D., & Jenkins, S. P. (2015). Poverty trends in Turkey. Journal of Economic Inequality, 13, 401–424. doi: 10.1007/s10888-015-9300-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szekely, M., Lustig, N., Cumpa, M., & Antonio, M. (2004). Do we know how much poverty there is? Oxford Development Studies, 32(4), 523–558. doi: 10.1080/1360081042000293335
   Google Scholar
• White, H., & Masset, E. (2003). The importance of household size and composition in constructing poverty profiles: An illustration from Vietnam. Development and Change, 34(1), 105–126. doi: 10.1111/1467-7660.00298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank/SIS. (2005). Turkey: Joint poverty assessment report (Report No. 29619-TU). Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar