What Sequence do we Follow in Teaching Concepts in Chemistry? A Study of High School Physical Science Teachers’ PCK

References

• Aydin, S., Friedrichsen, P. M., Boz, Y., & Hanuscin, D. L. (2014). Examination of the topic-specific nature of pedagogical content knowledge in teaching electrochemical cells and nuclear reactions. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(4), 658–674. doi: 10.1039/C4RP00105B
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergqvist, A., Drechsler, M., & Chang Rundgren, S. N. (2016). Upper secondary teachers’ knowledge for teaching chemical bonding models. International Journal of Science Education, 38(2), 298–318. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2015.1125034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodzin, A. M., Cates, W. M., & Price, B. (2003). Formative evaluation of the exploring life curriculum: Year two implementation fidelity findings. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, B & Wei, B. (2015). Investigating the factors that influence chemistry teachers’ use of curriculum materials: The case of China. Science Education International, 26(2), 195–216.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, E. A., Janssen, F.J.J., & Van Driel, J. H. (2016). Teachers and science curriculum materials: Where we are and where we need to go. Studies in Science Education, 52(2), 127–160. doi: 10.1080/03057267.2016.1161701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Beer, J (2002). The NEPAD road to 2061, Reflections on science education in Southern Africa. Paper read at the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) meeting, Washington, DC, 4 October 2002. Retrieved from https://www.aaas.org/page/nepad-road-2061-reflections-science-education-southern-africa
   Google Scholar
• De Jong, O., Van Driel, J. H & Verloop, N. (2005). Preservice teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of using particle models in teaching chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(8), 947–964. doi: 10.1002/tea.20078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Education (2006). National curriculum statement FET physical science (NCS). Pretoria: Government Printers.
   Google Scholar
• Dhindsa, H. S., & Treagust, D. F. (2014). Prospective pedagogy for teaching chemical bonding for smart and sustainable learning. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15, 435–446. doi: 10.1039/C4RP00059E
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedrichsen, P. J., Abell, S. K., Pareja, E. M., Brown, P. L., Lankford, D. M. & Volkmann, M. J. (2009). Does teaching experience matter? Examining biology teachers’ prior knowledge for teaching in an alternative certification program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(4), 357–383. doi: 10.1002/tea.20283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gericke, N., Hagberg, M., Santos, V. C., Joaquim, L. M., & El-Hani, C. N. (2014). Conceptual variation or incoherence? Textbook discourse on genes in six countries. Science and Education, 23(2), 381–416. doi: 10.1007/s11191-012-9499-8
   Google Scholar
• Gess-Newsome, J. (2015). A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK: Results of the thinking from the PCK summit. In A. Berry, P. J. Fredrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 28–42). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ghirardi, M., Marchetti, F., Pettinari, C., Regis, A. & Roletto, E. (2014). A teaching sequence for learning the concept of chemical equilibrium in secondary school education. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(1), 59–65. doi: 10.1021/ed3002336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guisasola, J., Almudi, J. M., Ceberio, M. & Zubimendi, J. L. (2009). Designing and evaluating research based instructional sequences for introducing magnetic fields. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(4), 699–722. doi: 10.1007/s10763-008-9138-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haara, F. O (2015). Teachers’ choice of using practical activities: A hierarchical classification attempt. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(4), 323–336.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kauffman, D., Johnson, S. M., Kardos, S. M., Liu, E., & Peske, H. G. (2002). ‘Lost at sea’: New teachers’ experiences with curriculum and assessment. Teachers College Record, 104, 273–300. doi: 10.1111/1467-9620.00163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: Perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 169–204. doi: 10.1080/03057260903142285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E., & Luft, J. A. (2008). Experienced secondary science teachers’ representation of pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1343–1363. doi: 10.1080/09500690802187058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, G. M., Remillard, J. T., & Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A. (2009). Teachers’ use of curriculum materials: An emerging field. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 3–14). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2006). Understanding and developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J. & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome, & Lederman, N.G. (Eds), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Mavhunga, E. & Rollnick, M. (2013). Improving PCK of chemical equilibrium in pre-service teachers. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(1), 113–125. doi: 10.1080/10288457.2013.828406
   Google Scholar
• Moloi, M., & Strauss, J. (2005). The SACMEQ II Projects in South Africa: A study of the conditions of schooling and the quality of education. SACMEQ II National Reports, Cape Town, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Morse, J. M. (2003). Principles of mixed methods and multi-method research design. In C. Teddlie & A. Tashakkori (Eds), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioural research (pp. 189–208). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Nahum, L.T., Mamlok-Naaman, R., & Hofstein, A. (2013). Teaching and learning of the chemical bonding concept: Problems and some pedagogical issues and recommendations. In G. Tsaparlis, & H. Sevian (Eds), Concepts of matter in science education (pp. 373–390). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nargund-Joshi, V., Rogers, M. A. P., & Akerson, V. L. (2011). Exploring Indian secondary teachers’ orientations and practice for teaching science in an era of reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 624–647. doi: 10.1002/tea.20429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozmen, H. (2004). Some student misconception in chemistry: A literature review of chemical bonding. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(2), 147–159. doi: 10.1023/B:JOST.0000031255.92943.6d
   Google Scholar
• Padilla, K., & Van Driel, J. (2011). The relationship between PCK components: The case of quantum chemistry professors. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 12, 367–378. doi: 10.1039/C1RP90043A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S., & Chen, Y.C. (2012). Mapping out the integration of the components of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): Examples from high school biology classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(7), 922–941. doi: 10.1002/tea.21022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitjeng-Masabala, P. & Rollnick, M. (2018). Exploring the development of novice unqualified graduate teachers’ topic-specific PCK in teaching the particulate nature of matter in South Africa’s classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 40(7), 742–770. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2018.1446569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75, 211–246. doi: 10.3102/00346543075002211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rollnick, M., Bennett, J., Rhemtula, M., Dharsey, N., & Ndlovu, T. (2008). The place of subject matter knowledge in pedagogical content knowledge: A case study of South African teachers teaching the amount of substance and chemical equilibrium. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1365–1387. doi: 10.1080/09500690802187025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherin, M. G., & Drake, C. (2009). Curriculum strategy framework: Investigating patterns in teachers’ use of a reform-based elementary mathematics curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 41, 467–500. doi: 10.1080/00220270802696115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. doi: 10.3102/0013189X015002004
   Google Scholar
• Sibanda, D. & Hobden, P. (2015). Planning teaching sequences for teaching chemical bonding. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(1), 23–33. doi: 10.1080/10288457.2014.1002298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treagust, D., Chittleborough, G., & Mamiala, T. (2003). The role of submicroscopic and symbolic representations in chemical explanations. International Journal of Science Education, 25(11), 1353–1368. doi: 10.1080/0950069032000070306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, E. M., & Kattmann, U. (2007). A research model for the study of science teachers’ PCK and improving teachers’ education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 885–897. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2006.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vos, M. A. J., Taconis, R., Jochems, W. M. G., & Pilot, A. (2011). Classroom implementation of context-based chemistry education by teachers: The relation between experiences of teachers and the design of materials. International Journal of Science Education, 33, 1407–1432. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2010.511659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar