Exploring the Understanding of Concept Inventories for Classroom Assessment by Physics Tutors and Pre-Service Teachers in Tanzania

References

• Adams, W.K., & Wieman, C.E. (2011). Development and validation of instruments to measure learning of expert-like thinking. International Journal of Science Education, 33(9), 1289–1312. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.512369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, J.M., Johnson, B., Prather, E.E., & Slater, T.F. (2012). Development and validation of the star properties concept inventory. International Journal of Science Education, 34(14), 2257–2286. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.589869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beichner, R.J. (1994). Testing student interpretation of kinematics graphs. American Journal of Physics, 62(8), 750–762. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.17449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Chastenay, P., & Riopel, M. (2020). Development and validation of the moon phases concept inventory for middle school. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(2), article 020107. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020107
   Google Scholar
• Dick-Perez, M., Luxford, C.J., Windus, T.L., & Holme, T. (2016). A quantum chemistry concept inventory for physical chemistry classes. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(4), 605–612. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, L., Chabay, R., Sherwood, B., & Beichner, R. (2006). Evaluating an electricity and magnetism assessment tool: Brief electricity and magnetism assessment. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 2(1), article 010105. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.2.010105
   Google Scholar
• Dixson, D.D., & Worrell, F.C. (2016). Formative and summative assessment in the classroom. Theory into Practice, 55(2), 153–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1148989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Docktor, J.L., & Mestre, J.P. (2014). Synthesis of discipline-based education research in physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 10(2), article 020119. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020119
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, J. (2013). The Calculus concept inventory—Measurement of the effect of teaching methodology in mathematics. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 60(8), 1018–1027. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4493984
   Google Scholar
• Georgiou, H., Maton, K., & Sharma, M. (2014). Recovering knowledge for science education research: Exploring the ‘Icarus effect’ in student work. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 14(3), 252–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2014.935526
   Google Scholar
• Halloun, I.A., & Hestenes, D. (1985). Common sense concepts about motion. American Journal of Physics, 53(11), 1056–1065. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.14031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhammer, G. (1992). Force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30(3), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2343497
   Google Scholar
• Joel, N.F., & Mungwabi, H. (2016). Factors constraining effective application of ICTs in teachers training colleges in Tanzania. University of Dar es Salaam Library Journal, 11(1), 53–70. http://196.44.162.39/index.php/lj/article/view/83
   Google Scholar
• Kafyulilo, A., Fisser, P., Pieters, J., & Voogt, J. (2015). ICT use in science and mathematics teacher education in Tanzania: Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(4), 381–399. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalas, P., O’Neill, A., Pollock, C., & Birol, G. (2013). Development of a meiosis concept inventory, CBE. Life Sciences Education, 12(4), 655–664. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-10-0174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallio, H., Pietilä, A.M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954–2965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirya, K.R., Mashood, K.K., & Yadav, L.L. (2021). A methodological analysis for the development of a circular-motion concept inventory in a Ugandan context by using the Delphi technique. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(10), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.10.4
   Google Scholar
• Lucero, M.M., & Petrosino, A.J.A. (2016). Resource for eliciting student alternative conceptions: Examining the adaptability of a concept inventory for natural selection at the Secondary School Level. Research in Science Education, 47(4), 705–730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9524-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mafenya, P.N. (2016). A study of students’ experiences of formative and summative assessment in open distance learning: Insights from meta-synthesis. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 15(3), 529–537. https://doi.org/10.1080/09751122.2016.11890563
   Google Scholar
• Martin-Blas, T., Seidel, L., & Serrano-Fernández, A. (2010). Enhancing force concept inventory diagnostics to identify dominant misconceptions in first-year engineering physics. European Journal of Engineering Education, 35(6), 597–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2010.497552
   Google Scholar
• Mbonyiryivuze, A., Yadav, L.L., & Amadalo, M.M. (2021). Physics students’ conceptual understanding of electricity and magnetism in nine years basic education in Rwanda. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(1), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.1.83
   Google Scholar
• Mkimbili, S., & Kitta, S.K.R. (2020). The rationale of continuous assessment for development of competencies in Tanzania secondary schools. Advanced Journal of Social Science, 6(1), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.21467/ajss.6.1.64-70
   Google Scholar
• Mokoro, D. (2020). Perception of teachers on their preparedness for implementation of the competence-based curriculum among secondary schools in Arumeru district, Tanzania. East African Journal of Education and Social Sciences (EAJESS), 1(2), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.46606/eajess2020v01i02.0026
   Google Scholar
• Mpate, H.M., Campbell-Evans, G., & Gray, J. (2021). Triad role in shaping Tanzanian pre-service teachers’ experience of teaching practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 46(8), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2021v46n8.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ndihokubwayo, K., Uwamahoro, J., Ndayambaje, I., & Ralph, M. (2020). Light phenomena conceptual assessment: an inventory tool for teachers. Physics Education, 55(3), article 035009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ab6f20
   Google Scholar
• Onwu G.O.M., & Kyle, W.C. (2011). Increasing the socio-cultural relevance of science education for sustainable development. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(3), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2011.10740715
   Google Scholar
• O’Shea, A., Breen, S., & Jaworski, B. (2016). The development of a function concept inventory. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 2(3), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-016-0030-5
   Google Scholar
• Samson, D., & Marongwe, A.D. (2013). Continuous assessment results versus end-of-year examination marks in Grade 10 mathematics in Namibia: the statistics and teachers’ opinions. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(3), 196–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2013.839153
   Google Scholar
• Sands, D., Parker, M., Hedgeland, H., Jordan, S., & Galloway, R. (2018). Using concept inventories to measure understanding. Higher Education Pedagogies, 3(1), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2018.1433546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semak, M.R., Dietz, R.D., Pearson, R.H., & Willis, C.W. (2017). Examining evolving performance on the force concept inventory using factor analysis. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(1), Article 010103. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.010103
   Google Scholar
• Stuckey, M., Hofstein, A., Mamlok-Naaman, R., & Eilks, I. (2013). The meaning of ‘relevance’ in science education and its implications for the science curriculum. Studies in Science Education, 49(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.802463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanzania Institute of Education. (2007). Curriculum for Diploma in Teacher Education Programmes in Tanzania. Tanzania Institute of Education. file:///C:/Users/hp/Downloads/Curriculum-for-Diploma-in-Teacher-Education-Programmes-in-Tanzania.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tarmo, A. (2016). Pre-service science teachers’ epistemological beliefs and teaching reforms in Tanzania. Cogent Education, 3(1), article 1178457. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1178457
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C., Zingaro, D., Porter, L., Webb, K.C., Lee, C.B., & Clancy, M. (2014). Computer science concept inventories: Past and future. Computer Science Education, 24(4), 253–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2014.970779
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, R.K., & Sokoloff, D.R. (1998). Assessing student learning of Newton’s laws: The force and motion conceptual evaluation and the evaluation of active learning laboratory and lecture curricula. American Journal of Physics, 66(4), 338–352. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, J., Henderson, R., Stewart, J., Stewart, G., Yang, J., & Traxler, A. (2019). Exploring the structure of misconceptions in the Force Concept Inventory with modified module analysis. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(2), article 020122. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020122
   Google Scholar
• Yang. F. M., & Kao, S.T. (2014). Item response theory for measurement validity. Shanghai Archives of Psychiatry, 26(3), 171–177. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-0829.2014.03.010
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yazan, B. (2015). Three approaches to case study methods in education: Yin, Merriam, and Stake. The Qualitative Report, 20(2), 134–152. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=0ec8d6a166fef802b45f2538796fb2cab7360461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar