Restoring degraded landscapes: Assessing the utility of biodiversity offsets for the business sector in Africa

References

• Bayon, R. 2008. Banking on biodiversity. In State of the World 2008 - Innovations for a Sustainable Economy. Copenhagen: World Watch Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, J., Kapila, S., Hicks, F., Mitchell, P., and Vorhies, F. 2008. Building biodiversity business. Gland: IUCN.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, J., Kapila, S., Hicks, F., Mitchell, P., and Vorhies, F. 2009. New business models for biodiversity conservation. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 28: 285–303.
   Google Scholar
• Business and Biodiversity Offsets Programme (BBOP). 2009. The Relationship between biodiversity offsets and impact assessment: A BBOP Resource Paper. BBOP, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Business and Biodiversity Offsets Programme (BBOP). 2012. Biodiversity Offset Design Handbook-Updated. Washington, D.C.: BBOP.
   Google Scholar
• Brownlie, S., King, N., and Treweek, J. 2012. Biodiversity Tradeoffs & Offsets in Impact Assessment & Decision Making: Can we Stop the Loss? Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, March 2013, 31(1): 24–33.
   Google Scholar
• Bull, J.W., Suttle, K.B., Gordon, A., Singh, N.J. and Milner-Gulland, E.J. 2013. Biodiversity offsets in theory & practice. Fauna & Flora International, Oryx, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Burgin, S. 2010. ‘Mitigation Banks’ for wetland conservation: A major success or an unmitigated disaster? Wetlands Ecol Manage 18: 49–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Environmental Affairs & Development Planning (DEA). 2011. Information Document on Biodiversity Offsets. EIA Guideline and Information Document Series. Western Cape Department of Environmental Affairs & Development Planning (DEA & DP), Cape Town, South Africa. http://www.iaia.co.za/File_Uploads/File/DEADP_EIA_Info_Doc_on_Biodiversity_Offsets_Oct2011.pdf/ (accessed 6 June 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Department of Environmental Affairs & Development Planning/ SANBI. 2013. Mining and biodiversity guideline: Mainstreaming biodiversity into the mining Sector. DEA, Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• Diaz, S., Lavorel, S., de Bello, F., Quétier, F., and Grigulis, K. 2007. Incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem service assessments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104: 20684–20689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doswald, N., Barcellos H.M., Jones, M., Pilla, E. and Mulder, I. 2012. Biodiversity offsets: Voluntary and compliance regimes - A review of existing schemes, initiatives and guidance for financial institutions. Cambridge: UNEP-WCMC.
   Google Scholar
• Drechsler, M. and Wätzold, F. 2009. Applying Tradable Permits to Biodiversity Conservation: Effects of Space-dependent Conservation Benefits and Cost Heterogeneity on Habitat Allocation. Ecological Economics 68: 1083–1092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, T. and Von Hase, A. 2012. Key ingredients for biodiversity offsets to achieve No Net Loss. Unpublished report to the New Zealand Department of Conservation. http://www.doc.govt.nz/upload/documents/conservation/key-ingredients-for-biodiversity-offsets.pdf/ (accessed 24 August 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons P. and Lindenmayer, D.B. 2007. Offsets for Land Clearing: No Net Loss or the Tail Wagging the Dog? Ecol. Mgmt Restor. 8: 26–31.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, R. and Richards, K. 2010. Environmental offset programs: Survey and synthesis. Manchester: Sustainable Consumption Institute.
   Google Scholar
• International Council on Mining and Metals (ICMM) 2013. Independent report on biodiversity offsets. Biodiversity Consultancy. www.icmm.com/biodiversity-offsets/ (accessed 22 August 2014).
   Google Scholar
• International Finance Corporation (IFC). 2012. Performance Standard 6: Biodiversity conservation & sustainable management of living natural resources. Washington, DC: IFC.
   Google Scholar
• IUCN / ICMM. 2003. Mining & biodiversity: Towards best practice. Summary and discussion of the results of the IUCN-ICMM workshop on Mining, Protected Areas and Biodiversity Conservation: Searching and Pursuing Best Practice and Reporting in the Mining Industry. 7 – 9 July, Gland, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Kate, K., Bishop, J. and Bayon, R. 2004. Biodiversity offsets: Views, experience, and the business case. London: IUCN.
   Google Scholar
• Kiss, A. 2002. Making biodiversity conservation a land use priority. UCLA: Columbia University Press. http://epp.gsu.edu/pferraro/special/AgiBookChapter2002.pdf/ (accessed 22 August 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Kiesecker, J.M., Copeland, H., Pocewicz, A. and McKenney, B. 2010. Development by design: Blending landscape-level planning with the mitigation hierarchy. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 8: 261–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landell-Mills, N. and Porras, I.T. 2002. Silver bullet or Fools’ Gold? A global review of markets for forest environmental services and their impact on the poor. London: IIED.
   Google Scholar
• Landsberg, F., Ozment, S., Stickler, M., Henninger, N., Treweek, J., Venn, O. and Mock, G. 2011. Ecosystem services review for impact assessment: Introduction & guide to scoping. WRI Working Paper. Washington D.C.: World Resources Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Madsen, B., Nathaniel, C., Daniel, K. and Genevieve, B. 2011. Update: State of biodiversity markets - Offset and compensation programs worldwide. Forest Trends 2011, Washington, DC. http://www.ecosystemmarketplace.com/reports/2011_update_sbdm/ (accessed 25 August 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Maron, M., Dunn, P.K., McAlpine, C.A. and Apan, A. 2010. Can offsets really compensate for habitat removal? The case of the endangered red-tailed black-cockatoo. Journal of Applied Ecology 47: 348–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenney, B.A. and Kiesecker, J.M. 2010. Policy development for biodiversity offsets: A review of offset frameworks. Environmental Management 45: 65–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA). 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: Opportunities and challenges for business and industry. Washington, DC.: World Resources Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, R.K.A., Alonso, I., Jefferson, R.G. and Kirby, K.J. 2006. The creation of compensatory habitat—Can it secure sustainable development? Journal for Nature Conservation 14: 106–116.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, N., Bishop, J. and Anstee, S. 2011. Exploring ecosystem valuation to move towards net positive impact on biodiversity in the mining sector. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. http://data.iucn.org/dbtw-wpd/edocs/2011-062.pdf/ (accessed 25 August 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Pouzols, F.M., Burgman, M.A. and Moilanen, A. 2012. Methods for allocation of habitat management, maintenance, restoration and offsetting, when conservation actions have uncertain consequences. Biological Conservation 153: 41–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quétier, F. and Lavorel, S. 2011. Assessing ecological equivalence in biodiversity offset schemes: Key issues and solutions. Biological Conservation 253: 51–62.
   Google Scholar
• Rajvanshi A, Brownlie S, Slootweg R. and Arora R. 2011. Maximizing benefits for biodiversity: The potential of enhancement strategies in impact assessment. Impact Assess Project Appraisal 29 (3): 181–193.
   Google Scholar
• Rio Tinto. 2008. Rio Tinto and biodiversity - Achieving results on the ground. London: Rio Tinto.
   Google Scholar
• Suding, K.N. 2011. Toward an era of restoration in ecology: Successes, failures, and opportunities ahead. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution & Systematic 42: 65–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temple, H.J., Anstee, S., Ekstrom, J., Pilgrim, J.D., Rabenantoandro, J., Ramanamanjato, J.B., Randriatafika, F. and Vincelette, M. 2012. Forecasting the path towards a net positive impact on biodiversity for Rio Tinto QMM. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
   Google Scholar
• Tischew, S., Baasch, A., Conrad, M.K. and Kirmer, A. 2010. Evaluating restoration success of frequently implemented compensation measures: Results & demands for control procedures. Restoration Ecology 18: 467–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2007. Global economic prospects 2007: Managing the next wave of globalization. Washington, DC.: World Bank.
   Google Scholar