Effect of Italian heavy pig diets based on different barley varieties with or without non-starch polysaccharides degrading enzymes on growth performance, carcass characteristics and fresh thigh quality

References

• AOAC. 1990. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Official methods of analysis. 15th ed. Arlington, USA: AOAC.
   Google Scholar
• AOAC. 2012. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Official methods of analysis. 19th ed. Washington, USA: AOAC.
   Google Scholar
• Bach Knudsen KE. 2011. Triennial Growth Symposium: effects of polymeric carbohydrates on growth and development in pigs. J Anim Sci. 89:1965–1980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell JM, Shires A, Keith MO. 1983. Effect of hull and protein contents of barley on protein and energy digestibility and feeding value for pigs. Can J Anim Sci. 63:201–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biel W, Yacyno E. 2013. Chemical composition and nutritive value of spring hulled barley varieties. Bulg J Agric Sci. 19:721–727.
   Google Scholar
• Bosi P, Russo V. 2004. The production of the heavy pig for high quality processed products. Ital J Anim Sci. 3:309–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman JGP, Blake TK, Surber LMM, Harbernicht DK, Bockelman H. 2001. Feed-quality variation in the barley core collection of the USDA national small grains collection. Crop Sci. 41:863–870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camp LK, Southern LL, Bidner TD. 2003. Effect of carbohydrate source on growth performance, carcass traits, and meat quality of growing-finishing pigs. J Anim Sci. 81:2488–2495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christie WW. 1989. Gas chromatography and lipids: a practical guide. Dundee, UK: The Oily Press.
   Google Scholar
• Consorzio del Prosciutto di Parma. 2015. Il disciplinare produttivo. Parma, Italy: Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato Agricoltura; [cited 2015 Sept 18]. Available from: http://www.prosciuttodiparma.com/pdf/it_IT/disciplinare.28.11.2013.it.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Consorzio del Prosciutto di San Daniele. 2015. Disciplinare di produzione. Udine, Italy: San Daniele del Friuli; [cited 2015 Sept 18]. Available from: http://consorzio.prosciuttosandaniele.it/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/DISCIPLINARE-DI-PRODUZIONE-San-Daniele.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Doti S, Suàrez-Belloch J, Latorre MA, Guada JA, Fondevilla M. 2014. Effect of dietary starch source on growth performance: digestibility and quality traits of growing pigs. Livest Sci. 164:119–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggum BO. 1968. A description of the method used at the National Institute of Animal Science. Acta Agric Scand. 18:127–131.
   Google Scholar
• Englyst HN, Veenstra J, Hudson GJ. 1996. Measurement of rapidly available glucose (RAG) in plant foods: a potential in vitro predictor of the glycaemic response. Br J Nutr. 75:327–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EPA. 1996. Method 3052: microwave assisted acid digestion of siliceous and organically based matrices. Washington: US Environmental Protection Agency; [cited 2015 May 6]. Available from: http://www.caslab.com/EPA-Method-3052/.
   Google Scholar
• EPA. 2000. Method 6010C: inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry. Washington: US EPA; [cited 2015 May 6]. Available from: http://www.caslab.com/EPA-Method-6010C/.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson IS, Elmquist H, Stern S, Nybrant T. 2005. Environmental system analysis of pig production-the impact of feed choice. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 10:143–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2014. Commission implementing decision of 24 January 2014 authorizing methods for grading pig carcasses in Italy; 2014/38/EU. Official Journal. L 23 28/01/2014; pp. 35–40.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. 2010. Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes; 2010/63/EU. Official Journal. L 276 20/10/2010; pp. 33–79.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbairn SL, Patience JF, Classen HL, Zijlstra RT. 1999. The energy content of barley fed to growing pigs: characterizing the nature of its variability and developing prediction equations for its estimation. J Anim Sci. 77:1502–1512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan CL, Han Y, Xu ZR, Wang LJ, Shi LR. 2009. Effects of β-glucanase and xylanase supplementation on gastrointestinal digestive enzyme activities of weaned piglets fed a barley based diet. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 93:271–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuberti G, Gallo A, Cerioli C, Masoero F. 2012. In vitro starch digestion and predicted glycemic index of cereal grains commonly utilized in pig nutrition. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 174:163–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuberti G, Gallo A, Masoero F. 2012. Plasma glucose response and glycemic indices in pigs fed diets differing in in vitro hydrolysis indices. Animal. 6:1068–1076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuberti G, Gallo A, Masoero F, Ferraretto LF, Hoffman PC, Shaver RD. 2014. Factors affecting starch utilization in large animal food production system: a review. Starch. 66:72–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtekjølen AK, Uhlen AK, Bråthen E, Sahlstrøm S, Knutsen SH. 2006. Contents of starch and non-starch polysaccharides in barley varieties of different origin. Food Chem. 94:348–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hugo A, Roodt E. 2007. Significance of porcine fat quality in meat technology: a review. Food Rev Int. 23:175–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jha R, Rossnagel B, Pieper R, Van Kessel A, Leterme P. 2010. Barley and oat cultivars with diverse carbohydrate composition alter ileal and total tract nutrient digestibility and fermentation metabolites in weaned piglets. Animal. 4:724–731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Just A. 1982. The influence of crude fibre from cereals on the net energy value of diets for growing pigs. Livest Prod Sci. 9:569–580.
   Google Scholar
• Just A. 1984. Nutritional manipulation and interpretation of body compositional differences in growing swine. J Anim Sci. 58:740–752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr BJ, Shurson GC. 2013. Strategies to improve fiber utilization in swine. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 4:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim BG, Wulf DM, Maddock RJ, Peters DN, Pedersen C, Liu Y, Stein HH. 2014. Effects of dietary barley on growth performance, carcass traits and pork quality of finishing pigs. Rev Colom Cienc Pecua. 27:102–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knutsen SH, Holtekjølen AK. 2007. Preparation and analysis of dietary fibre constituents in whole grain from hulled and hull-less barley. Food Chem. 102:707–715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li TJ, Huang RL, Wu GY, Lin YC, Jiang ZY, Kong XF, Chu WY, Zhang YM, Kang P, Hou ZP, et al. 2007. Growth performance and nitrogen metabolism in weaned pigs fed diets containing different sources of starch. Livest Sci. 109:73–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W-F, Feng J, Xu Z-R, Yang C-M. 2004. Effects of non-starch polysaccharides enzymes on pancreatic and small intestinal digestive enzyme activities in piglet fed diets containing high amounts of barley. World J Gastroenterol. 10:856–859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majumdar DK. 2013. Irrigation water management: principles and practice. 2nd ed. Delhi, India: PHI Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Manini R, Piva A, Prandini A, Mordenti A, Piva G, Dourmad JY. 1997. Protein retention in Italian heavy pigs: development of a factorial approach for the determination of lysine requirement. Livest Prod Sci. 47:253–259.
   Google Scholar
• Masoero F, Gallo A, Zanfi C, Giuberti G, Spanghero M. 2010. Chemical composition and rumen degradability of three corn hybrids treated with insecticides against the European corn borer (Ostrinia nubilalis). Anim Feed Sci Tech. 155:25–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore S. 1963. On the determination of cystine as cysteic acid. J Biol Chem. 238:235–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore S, Spackman DH, Stein WH. 1980. Official methods of analysis. 13th ed. Arlington (VA, USA): AOAC.
   Google Scholar
• NRC. 1998. Nutrient requirements of swine. 10th ed. Washington, USA: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nishioka T, Irie M. 2006. Fluctuation and criteria of porcine fat firmness. Anim Sci. 82:929–935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noblet J, Le Goffe G. 2001. Effect of dietary fibre on the energy value of feeds for pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 90:35–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez JM, Ramoelintsalama B, Bourdon D. 1980. Prévision de la valeur énergétique de l’orge pour le porc a partir des teneurs en constituants membranaires. Journées Rech Porcine France. 12:273–284.
   Google Scholar
• Prandini A, Sigolo S, Gallo A, Faeti V, Della Casa G. 2015. Characterization of protected designation of origin Italian meat products obtained from heavy pigs fed barley-based diets. J Anim Sci. 93:4510–4523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prandini A, Sigolo S, Giuberti G, Moschini M, Marchetto G, Della Casa G. 2015. Effect of replacing corn with hulled and hulless or low-amylose hulless barley varieties on growth performance and carcass quality of Italian growing-finishing pig. J Anim Sci. 93:598–605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prandini A, Sigolo S, Morlacchini M, Giuberti G, Moschini M, Rzepus M, Della Casa G. 2014. Addition of nonstarch polysaccharides degrading enzymes to two hulless barley varieties fed in diets for weaned pigs. J Anim Sci. 92:2080–2086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prandini A, Sigolo S, Morlacchini M, Marocco A, Lo Pinto M. 2011. High-protein maize in diets for growing pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 165:105–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prandini A, Sigolo S, Tansini G, Brogna N, Piva G. 2007. Different level of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) in dairy products from Italy. J Food Compos Anal. 20:472–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regmi PR, van Kempen TA, Matte JJ, Zijlstra RT. 2011. Starch with high amylose and low in vitro digestibility increases short-chain fatty acid adsorption, reduces peak insulin secretion, and modulates incretin secretion in pigs. J Nutr. 19:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Sauvant D, Perez JM, Tran G. 2002. Tables de composition et de valeur nutritive des matières premières destinées aux animaux d élevage. Paris, France: INRA Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Shelton JL, Matthews JO, Southern LL, Higbie AD, Bidne TD, Fernandez JM, Pontif JE. 2004. Effect of nonwaxy and waxy sorghum on growth, carcass traits, and glucose and insulin kinetics of growing-finishing barrows and gilts. J Anim Sci. 82:1699–1706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoffel W, Chu F, Ahrens EN. 1959. Analysis of long chain fatty acids by gas-liquid chromatography. Micromethod for preparation of methyl esters. Analyt Chem. 31:307–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNECE. 2006. Standard for porcine meat carcasses and cuts. New York and Geneva: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe standard; [cited 2015 Apr 17]. Available from: http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trade/agr/standard/meat/e/Porcine_2006_e_Publication.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. 1991. Method for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci. 74:3583–3597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood JD, Richardson RI, Nute GR, Fisher AV, Campo MM, Kasapidou E, Sheard PR, Enser M. 2003. Effects of fatty acids on meat quality: a review. Meat Sci. 66:21–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar