Maximum difference analysis: a new empirical method for genome-wide association studies

References

• Anderson CM, Thawaiters DT. 2010. Hijacking solute carriers for proton coupled drug transport. Physiology (Bethesda). 25:364–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aulchenko YS, Ripke S, Isaacs A, van Duijn CM. 2007. GenABEL: an R library for genome-wide association analysis. Bioinformatics. 23:1294–1296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baik M, Etchebarne BE, Bong J, VandeHaar MJ. 2009. Gene expression profiling of liver and mammary tissues of lactating dairy cows. Asian-Australasian J Anim Sci. 22:871–884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldin DJ. 2006. A tutorial on statistical methods for population association studies. Nat Rev Genet. 7:781–791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennewitz J, Reinsch N, Grohs C, Levéziel H, Malafosse A, Thomsen H, Xu N, Looft C, Kühn C, Brockmann GA, et al. 2003. Combined analysis of data from two granddaughter designs: a simple multivariate analysis of a genome-wide association study in dairy cattle strategy for QTL confirmation and increasing experimental power in dairy cattle. Genet Sel Evol. 35:319–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bionaz M, Loor JJ. 2008. ACSL1, AGPAT6, FABP3, LPIN1, and SLC27A6 are the most abundant isoforms in bovine mammary tissue and their expression is affected by stage of lactation. J Nutr. 138:1019–1024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blott S, Kim JJ, Moisio S, Schmidt-Kuntzel A, Cornet A, Berzi P, Cambisano N, Ford C, Grisart B, Johnson D, et al. 2003. Molecular dissection of a quantitative trait locus: a phenylalanine-to-tyrosine substitution in the transmembrane domain of the Bovine growth hormone receptor is associated with a major effect on milk yield and composition. Genetics. 163:253–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolormaa S, Pryce JE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME. 2010. Multivariate analysis of a genome-wide association study in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 93:3818–3833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Churchill GA, Doerge RW. 1994. Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics. 138:963–971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobanoglu O, Zaitoun I, Chang YM, Shook GE, Khatib H. 2006. Effects of the signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1) gene on milk production traits in Holstein dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 89:4433–4437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen S. 2003. Maximum difference scaling: improved measures of importance and preference for segmentation. Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings, Sequim, WA: Sawtooth Software, Inc., 530:61–74.
   Google Scholar
• Finucane KA, McFadden TB, Bond JP, Kennelly JJ, Zhao FQ. 2008. Onset of lactation in the bovine mammary gland: gene expression profiling indicates a strong inhibition of gene expression in cell proliferation. Funct Integr Genomics. 8:251–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrick DJ, Taylor FJ, Fernando LR. 2009. Deregressing estimated breeding values and weighting information for genomic regression analyses. Genet Sel Evol. 41:55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gautier M, Capitan A, Fritz S, Eggen A, Boichard D, Druet T. 2007. Characterization of the DGAT1 K232A and variable number of tandem repeat polymorphisms in French dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 90:2980–2988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grisart B, Coppieters W, Farnir F, Karim L, Ford C, Berzi P, Cambisano N, Mni M, Reid S, Simon P, et al. 2002. Positional candidate cloning of a QTL in dairy cattle: identification of a missense mutation in the bovine DGAT1 gene with major effect on milk yield and composition. Genome Res. 12:222–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes BJ, Goddard M. 2010. Genome-wide association and genomic selection in animal breeding. Genome. 53:876–883.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes BJ, Pryce J, Chamberlain AJ, Bowman PJ, Goddard ME. 2010. Genetic architecture of complex traits and accuracy of genomic prediction: coat colour, milk-fat percentage, and type in Holstein cattle as contrasting model traits. PLoS Genetics. 6:e1001139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He L, Basiliou K, Nebert DW. 2009. Analysis and update of the human solute carrier (SLC) gene superfamily. Hum Genomics. 3:195–206.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ishii A, Yamaji K, Uemoto Y, Sasago N, Kobayashi E, Kobayashi N, Matsuhashi T, Maruyama S, Matsumoto H, Sasaki H, et al. 2013. Genome-wide association study for fatty acid composition in Japanese Black cattle. J Anim Sci. 84:675–682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang L, Liu J, Sun D, Ma P, Ding X, Yu Y, Zhang Q. 2010. Genome wide association studies for milk production traits in Chinese Holstein population. PLoS One. 5:e13661
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly PA, Bachelot A, Kedzia C, Hennighausen L, Ormandy CJ. 2002. The role of prolactin and growth hormone in mammary gland development. Mol Cell. Endocrinol. 197:127–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemay DG, Lyn D, Martin WF, Neville MC, Casey TM, Rincon G, Kriventseva EV, Barris WC, Hinrichs AS, Molenaar AJ, et al. 2009. The bovine lactation genome: insights into the evolution of mammalian milk. Genome Biol. 10:R43–R18. doi: 10.1186/gb-2009-10-4-r43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma L, Wiggans GR, Wang S, Sonstegard TS, Yang J, Crooker BA, Cole JB, Van Tassell CP, Lawlor TJ, Da Y. 2012. Effect of sample stratification on dairy GWAS results. BMC Genomics. 13:536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macciotta NPP, Mele M, Conte G, Serra A, Cassandro M, Dal Zotto R, Borlino AC, Pagnacco G, Secchiari P. 2008. Association between a polymorphism at the stearoyl CoA desaturase locus and milk production traits in Italian Holsteins. J Dairy Sci. 91:3184–3189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mai MD, Sahana G, Christiansen FB, Guldbrandtsen B. 2010. A genome-wide association study for milk production traits in Danish Jersey cattle using a 50K single nucleotide polymorphism chip. J Anim Sci. 88:3522–3528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marley AAJ, Louviere JJ. 2005. Some probabilistic models of best, worst, and best–worst choices. J Math Psychology. 49:464–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mele M, Conte G, Castiglioni B, Chessa S, Macciotta NPP, Serra A, Buccioni A, Pagnacco Secchiari P. 2007. Stearoyl-coenzyme A desaturase gene polymorphism and milk fatty acid composition in Italian Holsteins. J Dairy Sci. 90:4458–4465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meredith BK, Kearney FJ, Finlay EK, Bradley DG, Fahey AG, Berry DP, Lynn DJ. 2012. Genome-wide associations for milk production and somatic cell score in Holstein-Friesian cattle in Ireland. BMC Genetics. 13:21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minozzi G, Nicolazzi EL, Stella A, Biffani S, Negrini R, Lazzari B, Ajmone-Marsan P, Williams JL. 2013. Genome wide analysis of fertility and production traits in italian holstein cattle. PLoS One. 8:e80219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platt A, Vilhjálmsson BJ, Nordborg M. 2010. Conditions under which genome-wide association studies will be positively misleading. Genetics. 186:1045–1052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryce JE, Bolormaa S, Chamberlain AJ, Bowman PJ, Savin K, Goddard ME, Hayes BJ. 2010. A validated genome-wide association study in 2 dairy cattle breeds for milk production and fertility traits using variable length haplotypes. J Dairy Sci. 93:3331–3345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qanbari S, Pimentel ECG, Tetens J, Thaller G, Lichtner P, Sharifi AR, Simianer H. 2010. A genome‐wide scan for signatures of recent selection in Holstein cattle. Anim Genet. 41:377–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smaragdov MG. 2006. Genetic mapping of loci responsible for milk production traits in dairy cattle. Russian J Genet. 42:1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens M, Balding DJ. 2009. Bayesian statistical methods for genetic association studies. Nat Rev Genet. 10:681–690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strucken EM, Bortfeldt RH, De Koning DJ, Brockmann GA. 2012. Genome-wide associations for investigating time-dependent genetic effects for milk production traits in dairy cattle. Anim Genet. 43:375–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Binsbergen R, Veerkamp RF, Calus MPL. 2012. Makeup of the genetic correlation between milk production traits using genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism information. J Dairy Sci. 95:2132–2143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viitala S, Szyda J, Blott S, Schulman N, Lidauer M, Maki-Tanila A, Georges M, Vilkki J. 2006. The role of the bovine growth hormone receptor and prolactin receptor genes in milk, fat and protein production in Finnish ayrshire dairy cattle. Genetics. 173:2151–2164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng X, Ju Z, Wang J, Li Q, Huang J, Zhang A, Zhong J, Wang C. 2011. Single nucleotide polymorphisms, haplotypes and combined genotypes of LAP3 gene in bovine and their association with milk production traits. Mol Biol Rep. 38:4053–4061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar