Evaluation of effectiveness of an innovative semen extender (Formula^®) comparing with a traditional extender (Lepus^®) for artificial insemination in rabbits does

References

• Aksoy M, Erdem H, Hatipo?lu F, Lehimcio?lu NC, Akman O, Özkan K. 2009. Ultrasonographic examination of the scrotal content in the rabbit. Reprod Dom Anim. 44:156–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettini R, Parmigiani E, Bresciani C, Bianchera A. 2015. International patent application PCT/EP2015/063394. International Publication Number WO 2015/193265 A1.
   Google Scholar
• Bresciani C, Morini G, Bettini R, Bigliardi E, Di Ianni F, Cabassi CS, Sabbioni A, Parmigiani E. 2013. Reproductive efficiency of a new modified boar semen extender for liquid storage. Livest Sci. 157:384–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bresciani C, Cabassi CS, Morini G, Taddei S, Bettini R, Bigliardi E, Di Ianni F, Sabbioni A, Parmigiani E. 2014. Boar semen bacterial contamination in Italy and antibiotic efficacy in a modified extender. Ital J Anim Sci. 13:83–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brun JM, Theau-Clément M, Bolet G. 2002. The relationship between rabbit semen characteristics and reproductive performance after artificial insemination. Anim Reprod Sci. 70:139–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryła M, Trzcińska M. 2015. Quality and fertilizing capacity of boar spermatozoa during liquid storage in extender supplemented with different antibiotics. Anim Reprod Sci. 163:157–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castellini C. 1996. Recent advances in rabbit artificial insemination. World Rabbit Sci. 2:9–12.
   Google Scholar
• Curry MR. 2000. Cryopreservation of semen from domestic livestock. Rev Reprod. 5:46–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Daniel N, Renard JP. 2010. Artificial insemination in rabbits. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2010. doi:10.1101pdb.prot.5358.
   Google Scholar
• Di Iorio M, Marchisi A, Rocco M, Chrenek P, Iaffaldano N. 2014. Comparison of different extenders on the preservability of rabbit semen stored at 5 °C for 72 hours. Ital J Anim Sci. 13:710–714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Tarabany MS, El-Bayomi K, Abdelhamid T. 2015. Semen characteristics of purebred and crossbred male rabbits. PLoS One. 10:e0128435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Facchin E, Zanirato MG, Gualterio L, Valentini A. 1988. AI in rabbit breeding. Note 1: AI service for meat rabbit breeding. In: Proceedings of 4th World Rabbit Congress, Budapest, Hungary; 2: 121–130.
   Google Scholar
• Gogol P. 2013. Motility parameters and intracellular ATP content of rabbit spermatozoa stored for 3 days at 15 degrees C. Folia Biol (Krakow). 61:87–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gogol P, Trzcińska M, Bryla M. 2014. Motility, mitochondrial membrane potential and ATP content of rabbit spermatozoa stored in extender supplemented with GnRH analogue [des-Gly10, D-Ala6]-LH-RH ethylamide. Polish J Vet Sci. 17:571–575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iaffaldano N, Di Iorio M, Rosato MP. 2012. The cryoprotectant used, its concentration, and the equilibration time are critical for the successful cryopreservation of rabbit sperm: dimethylacetamide versus dimethylsulphoxide. Theriogenology. 78:1381–1389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones AR, Chantrill LA. 1989. Glycolytic enzyme activity is essential for domestic cat (Felis catus) and cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) sperm motility and viability in a sugar-free medium. Reprod Fertil Dev. 1:357–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones AR, Bubb WA. 2000. Substrates for endogenous metabolism by mature boar spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil. 119:129–135.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lavara R, Mocè E, Lavara F, Viudes De Castro MP, Vicente JS. 2005. Do parameters of seminal quality correlate with the results of on farm inseminations in rabbits? Theriogenology. 64:1130–1141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Gatius F, Sances G, Sancho M, Yániz J, Santolaria P, Gutiérrez R, Núñez M, Núñez J, Soler C. 2005. Effect of solid storage at 15 degrees C on the subsequent motility and fertility of rabbit semen. Theriogenology. 64:252–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mocé E, Lavara R, Vicente JS. 2010. Effect of cooling rate to 5°C straw size and farm on fertilising ability of cryopreserved rabbit sperm. Reprod Domest Anim. 45:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mocé E, Vicente JS. 2009. Rabbit sperm cryopreservation: a review. Anim Reprod Sci. 110:1–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrell JM. 1995. Artificial insemination in rabbits. Br Vet J. 151:477–488.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nagy S, Sinkovics G, Kovács A. 2002. Viability and acrosome integrity of rabbit spermatozoa processed in a gelatin-supplemented extender. Anim Reprod Sci. 70:283–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson JM, Schubert MP. 1928. Water concentration and the rate of hydrolysis of sucrose by invertase. J Am Chem Soc. 50:2188–2193.
   Google Scholar
• Roca J, Martınez S, Vázquez JM, Lucas X, Parrilla I, Martınez EA. 2000. Viability and fertility of rabbit spermatozoa diluted in Tris-buffer extenders and stored at 15 degrees C. Anim Reprod Sci. 64:103–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosato MP, Iaffaldano N. 2011. Effect of chilling temperature on the long-term survival of rabbit spermatozoa held either in a Tris-based or a jellified extender. Reprod Domest Anim. 46:301–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosato MP, Iaffaldano N. 2013. Cryopreservation of rabbit semen: comparing the effects of different cryoprotectans, cryoprotectant-free vitrification, and the use of albumin plus osmoprotectans on sperm survival and fertility after standard vapour freezing and vitrification. Theriogenology. 79:508–516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Sánchez AL, O’Donoghue R, Novak S, Dyck MK, Cosgrove JR, Dixon WT, Foxcroft GR. 2006. The predictive value of routine semen evaluation and IVF technology for determining relative boar fertility. Theriogenology. 66:736–748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAS. 2008. SAS/STAT^® User’s Guide Version 9.2. Cary (NC): SAS Institute Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Sepúlveda L, Bussalleu E, Yeste M, Bonet S. 2014. Effects of different concentrations of Pseudomonas aeruginosa on boar sperm quality. Anim Reprod Sci. 150:96–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sepúlveda L, Bussalleu E, Yeste M, Bonet S. 2016. Effect of Pseudomonas aeruginosa on sperm capacitation and protein phosphorylation of boar spermatozoa. Theriogenology. 85:1421–1431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shipley C. 1999. Breeding soundness examination in the boar. Swine Health Prod. 7:117–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinkovicks G, Medgyes I, Paljak J. 1983. Some results of artificial insemination in rabbits. J Appl Rabbit Res. 6:43–48.
   Google Scholar
• Volta A, Manfredi S, Vignoli M, Russo M, England GCW, Rossi F, Bigliardi E, Di Ianni F, Parmigiani E, Bresciani C, Parmigiani E. 2014. Use of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in chronic pathologic canine testes. Reprod Dom Anim. 49:202–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildiz C, Kaya A, Aksoy M, Tekeli T. 2000. Influence of sugar supplementation of the extender on motility, viability and acrosomal integrity of dog spermatozoa during freezing. Theriogenology. 54:579–585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar