Reproductive performance of sexed versus conventional semen in Holstein heifers in various semiarid regions of Iran

References

• Andersson M, Taponen J, Kommeri M, Dahlbom M. 2006. Pregnancy rates in lactating Holstein-Friesian cows after artificial insemination with sexed sperm. Reprod Domest Anim. 41:95–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barba A, Ducolomb YC, Romo S. 2006. Use of sexed semen for artificial insemination in Holstein heifers in Mexico: preliminary results. Reprod Fertil Dev. 18:113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodmer M, Janett F, Hässig M, Daas N, Reichert P, Thun R. 2005. Fertility in heifers and cows after low dose insemination with sex-sorted and non-sorted sperm under field conditions. Theriogenology. 64:1647–1655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borchersen S, Peacock M. 2009. Danish A.I. field data with sexed semen. Theriogenology. 71:59–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerchiaro I, Cassandro M, Dal Zotto R, Carnier P, Gallo L. 2007. A field study on fertility and purity of sex-sorted cattle sperm. J Dairy Sci. 90:2538–2542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chebel RC, Guagnini FS, Santos JEP, Fetrow JP, Lima JR. 2010. Sex-sorted semen for dairy heifers: effects on reproductive and lactational performances. J Dairy Sci. 93:2496–2507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colburn DJ, Deutscher GH, Nielsen MK, Adams DC. 1997. Effects of sire, dam traits, calf traits, and environment on dystocia and subsequent reproduction of two-year-old heifers. J Anim Sci. 75:1452–1460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries A, Overton M, Fetrow J, Leslie K, Eicker S, Rogers G. 2008. Exploring the impact of Sexed semen on the structure of the dairy industry. J Dairy Sci. 91:847–856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeJarnette JM, Leach MA, Nebel RL, Marshall CE, McCleary CR, Moreno JF. 2011. Effects of sex-sorting and sperm dosage on conception rates of Holstein heifers: is comparable fertility of sex-sorted and conventional semen plausible? J Dairy Sci. 94:3477–3483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeJarnette JM, Nebel RL, Marshall CE. 2009. Evaluating the success of sex-sorted semen in US dairy herds from on farm records. Theriogenology. 71:49–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Río NS, Stewart S, Rapnicki P, Chang YM, Fricke PM. 2007. An observational analysis of twin births, calf sex ratio, and calf mortality in Holstein dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 90:1255–1264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djedovic R, Bogdanovic V, Stanojevic D, Nemes Z, Gaspardy A, Cseh S. 2016. Involuntary reduction in vigour of calves born from sexed semen. Acta Veterinaria Hungarica. 64:229–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garner DL, Seidel Jr GE. 2008. History of commercializing sexed semen for cattle. Theriogenology. 69:886–895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamano K. 2007. Sex preselection in bovine by separation of X- and Y-chromosome bearing spermatozoa. J Reprod Dev. 53:27–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy AA, House JK, Thomson PC. 2013. Artificial insemination field data on the use of sexed and conventional semen in nulliparous Holstein heifers. J Dairy Sci. 96:1905–1914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karakaya E, Yilmazbas-Mecitoglu G, Keskin A, Alkan A, Tasdemir U, Santos JEP, Gumen A. 2014. Fertility in dairy cows after artificial insemination using sex-sorted sperm or conventional semen. Reprod Domest Anim. 49:333–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellado M, Sepulveda E, Macias-Cruz U, Avendaño L, Garcia J, Veliz F, Rodríguez A. 2014. Effects of month of breeding on reproductive efficiency of Holstein cows and heifers inseminated with sex-sorted or conventional semen in a hot environment. Trop Anim Health Prod. 46:265–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikkola M, Andersson M, Taponen J. 2015. Transfer of cattle embryos produced with sex-sorted semen results in impaired pregnancy rate and increased male calf mortality. Theriogenology. 84:1118–1122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noonan EJ, Kelly JC, Beggs DS. 2016. Factors associated with fertility of nulliparous dairy heifers following a 10-day fixed-time artificial insemination program with sex-sorted and conventional semen. Aust Vet J. 94:145–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman HD, Hutchison JL, Miller RH. 2010. Use of sexed semen and its effect on conception rate, calf sex, dystocia, and stillbirth of Holsteins in the United States. J Dairy Sci. 93:3880–3890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman HD, Hutchison JL, VanRaden PM. 2011. Evaluations for service-sire conception rate for heifer and cow inseminations with conventional and sexed semen. J Dairy Sci. 94:6135–6142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roche JR, Lee JM, Berry DP. 2006. Climatic factors and secondary sex ratio in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 89:3221–3227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartori R, Rosa GJM, Wiltbank MC. 2002. Ovarian structures and circulating steroids in heifers and lactating cows in summer and lactating and dry cows in winter. J Dairy Sci. 85:2813–2822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidel GE Jr. 2003. Economics of selecting for sex: the most important genetic trait. Theriogenology. 59:585–598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidel GE Jr. 2007. Overview of sexing sperm. Theriogenology. 68:443–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinhauser CB, Graham JK, Lenz RW, Seidel GE Jr. 2016. Removing seminal plasma improves bovine sperm sex-sorting. Andrology. 4:1131–1137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tubman LM, Brink Z, Suh TK, Seidel GE. 2004. Characteristics of calves produced with sperm sexed by flow cytometry/cell sorting. J Anim Sci. 82:1029–1036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turk G, Yuksel M, Sonmez M, Gur S, Ozer Kaya S, Demirci E. 2015. Effect of semen sexing kits (HeiferplusTM and BullplusTM) supplemented to frozen-thawed bull semen on pregnancy rates, foetal sex ratios and selected reproductive parameters in cows. Veterinarni Medicina. 60:309–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Tassell CP, Wiggans GR, Misztal I. 2003. Implementation of a sire-maternal grandsire model for evaluation of calving ease in the United States. J Dairy Sci. 86:3366–3373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weigel KA. 2004. Exploring the role of sexed semen in dairy production systems. J Dairy Sci. 87:E120–E130.
   Google Scholar