Genetic parameters of calving ease in dairy cattle using threshold and linear models

References

• Carlen E, Emanuelson U, Strandberg E. 2006. Genetic evaluation of mastitis in dairy cattle using linear models, threshold models, and survival analysis: a simulation study. J Dairy Sci. 89:4049–4057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnier P, Albera A, Dal Zotto R, Groen AF, Bona M, Bittante G. 2000. Genetic parameters for direct and maternal calving ability over parities in Piedmontese cattle. J Anim Sci. 78:2532–2539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervantes I, Gutierrez JP, Fernandez I, Goyache F. 2010. Genetic relationships among calving ease, gestation length, and calf survival to weaning in the Asturiana de los Valles beef cattle breed. J Anim Sci. 88:96–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekkers JC. 1994. Optimal breeding strategies for calving ease. J Dairy Sci. 77:3441–3453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eaglen SA, Bijma P. 2009. Genetic parameters of direct and maternal effects for calving ease in Dutch Holstein-Friesian cattle. J Dairy Sci. 92:2229–2237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eaglen SA, Coffey MP, Woolliams JA, Wall E. 2012. Evaluating alternate models to estimate genetic parameters of calving traits in United Kingdom Holstein-Friesian dairy cattle. Genet Select Evol. 44:23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eaglen SA, Coffey MP, Woolliams JA, Wall E. 2013. Direct and maternal genetic relationships between calving ease, gestation length, milk production, fertility, type, and lifespan of Holstein-Friesian primiparous cows. J Dairy Sci. 96:4015–4025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foulley JL. 2000. A completion simulator for the two-sided truncated normal distribution. Genet Select Evol. 32:631–635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gianola D. 1982. Theory and analysis of threshold characters. J Anim Sci. 54:1079–1096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gianola D, Foulley J. 1983. Sire evaluation for ordered categorical data with a threshold model. Genet Sel Evol. 15:201–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Cullis BR, Thompson R. 2009. ASReml User Guide Release 3.0. VSN International Ltd, Hemel Hempstead, HP1 1ES, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Gutie´rrez JP, Goyache F, Ferna´ndez I, Alvarez I, Royo LJ. 2007. Genetic relationships among calving ease, calving interval, birth weight, and weaning weight in the Asturiana de los Valles beef cattle breed. J Anim Sci. 85:69–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagger C, Hofer A. 1990. Genetic analyses of calving traits in the swiss black and white, braunvieh and simmental breeds by REML and MAPP procedures. Livest Prod Sci. 24:93–107.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen M, Misztal I, Lund MS, Pedersen J, Christensen LG. 2004. Undesired phenotypic and genetic trend for stillbirth in Danish Holsteins. J Dairy Sci. 87:1477–1486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heringstad B, Rekaya R, Glanola D, Klemetsdal G, Welgel KA. 2003. Genetic change for clinical mastitis in Norwegian cattle: a threshold model analysis. J Dairy Sci. 86:369–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey JM, Keane MG, Kenny DA, Cromie AR, Amer PR, Veerkamp RF. 2007. Heterogeneity of genetic parameters for calving difficulty in Holstein heifers in Ireland. J Dairy Sci. 90:3900–3908.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoeschele J. 1988. Comparison of “Maximum A-Posteriori Estimation” and “Quasi Best Linear Unbiased Prediction” with threshold characters. J Anim Breed Genet. 105:337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxley JN, Whay HR. 2006. Current attitudes of cattle practitioners to pain and the use of analgesics in cattle. Vet. Rec. 159:662–668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee D, Misztal I, Bertrand JK, Rekaya R. 2002. National evaluation for calving ease, gestation length and birth weight by linear and threshold model methodologies. J Appl Genet. 43:209–216.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lopez de Maturana E, Legarra A, Varona L, Ugarte E. 2007. Analysis of fertility and dystocia in Holsteins using recursive models to handle censored and categorical data. J Dairy Sci. 90:2012–2024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matos CA, Thomas DL, Gianola D, Perez-Enciso M, Young LD. 1997. Genetic analysis of discrete reproductive traits in sheep using linear and nonlinear models: II. Goodness of fit and predictive ability. J Anim Sci. 75:88–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mee JF. 2008. Prevalence and risk factors for dystocia in dairy cattle: a review. Vet J. 176:93–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijering A, Gianola D. 1985. Linear versus nonlinear methods of sire evaluation for categorical traits: a simulation study. Genet Select Evol. 17:115–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misztal I, Gianola D, Foulley JL. 1989. Computing aspects of a nonlinear method of sire evaluation for categorical data. J Dairy Sci. 72:1557–1568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misztal I, Tsuruta S, Strabel T, Auvray B, Druet T, Lee DH 2002. BLUPF90 and related programs (BGF90). Commun. No. 28–07 in Proc. 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Montpellier, France.
   Google Scholar
• Phocas F, Laloe D. 2003. Evaluation models and genetic parameters for calving difficulty in beef cattle. J Anim Sci. 81:933–938.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez-Valverde R, Misztal I, Bertrand JK. 2001. Comparison of threshold vs linear and animal vs sire models for predicting direct and maternal genetic effects on calving difficulty in beef cattle. J Anim Sci. 79:333–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith BJ. 2005. Bayesian output analysis program (BOA). [Accessed 2015 October 24]. Version 1.1.5 http://www.public-health.uiowa.edu/boa.
   Google Scholar
• Steinbock L, Nasholm A, Berglund B, Johansson K, Philipsson J. 2003. Genetic effects on stillbirth and calving difficulty in Swedish Holsteins at first and second calving. J Dairy Sci. 86:2228–2235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanderick S, Troch T, Gillon A, Glorieux G, Gengler N. 2014. Genetic parameters for direct and maternal calving ease in Walloon dairy cattle based on linear and threshold models. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 131:513–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varona L, Misztal I, Bertrand JK. 1999. Threshold-linear versus linear-linear analysis of birth weight and calving ease using an animal model: II. Comparison of models. J Anim Sci. 77:2003–2007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weller JI, Gianola D. 1989. Models for genetic analysis of dystocia and calf mortality. J Dairy Sci. 72:2633–2643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weller JI, Misztal I, Gianola D. 1988. Genetic analysis of dystocia and calf mortality in Israeli-Holsteins by threshold and linear models. J Dairy Sci. 71:2491–2501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggans GR, Misztal I, Van Tassell CP. 2003. Calving ease (Co)variance components for a sire-maternal grandsire threshold model. J Dairy Sci. 86:1845–1848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar