Crushed crambe from biodiesel production as replacement for soybean meal in the supplement of steers grazing

References

• AFRC. 1993. Energy and protein requirements of ruminants. Agricultural and Food Research Council. Wallingford, UK: CAB International; p. 159.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson VL, Caton JS, Kirsch JD, Redmer DA. 2000. Effect of crambe meal on performance, reproduction, and thyroid hormone levels in gestating and lactating beef cows. J Anim Sci. 78:2269–2274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson VL, Slanger WD, Boyles SL, Berg PT. 1993. Crambe meal is equivalent to soybean meal for back grounding and finishing beef steers. J Anim Sci. 71:2608–2613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anjos AJ dos, Gomide CA de M, Ribeiro KG, Madeiro AS, Morenz MJF, Paciullo DSC. 2016. Forage mass and morphological composition of Marandu palisade grass pasture under rest periods. Ciênc. agrotec. 40:76–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AOAC. 2006. Official Methods of Analysis. 18th ed. Arlington (VA): Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
   Google Scholar
• Assis AJ, Campos JMS, Queiroz AC, Valadares Filho SC, Euclydes RF, Lana RP, Magalhães ALR, Neto JM, Mendonça SS. 2004. Citrus pulp in diets for milking cows. 2. Digestibility of nutrients in two periods of feces collection and rumen fluid pH and ammonia nitrogen. Rev Bras Zootecn. 3:251–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baroni CES, Lana RP, Mancio AB, Mendonça BPC, Leão MI, Sverzut CB. 2010. Intake and digestibility of nutrients in steers supplemented and finished on pasture in the dry season. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec. 62:365–372.
   Google Scholar
• Bassegio D, Zanotto MD, Santos RF, Werncke I, Dias PP, Olivo M. 2016. Oilseed crop crambe as a source of renewable energy in Brazil. Renew Sust Energy Rev. 66:311–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhme H, Kampf D, Lebzien P, Flachowsky G. 2005. Feeding value of crambe press cake and extracted meal as well as production responses of growing-finishing pigs and dairy cows fed these by-products. Arch Anim Nut. 59:111–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brody S. 1945. Bioenergetics and growth. New York, NY, USA: Reinhold Publishing; p.1023.
   Google Scholar
• Canova ÉB, Bueno MS, Moreira HL, Possenti R, Brás P. 2015. Crambe cake (Crambe abyssinica hochst) on lamb diets. Ciênc agrotec. 39:75–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capelle ER, Valadares Filho SC, Silva JFC, Cecon PR. 2001. Estimates of the energy value from chemical characteristics of the feedstuffs. Rev Bras Zootec. 30:1837–1856.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson KD, Tookey HL. 1983. Crambe meal as a protein source for feed. J Am Oil Chem Soc. 60:1979–1985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carneiro MMY, Goes RH de TB de, Silva LHX da, Fernandes ARM, Oliveira RT de, Cardoso CAL, Hirata ASO. 2016. Quality traits and lipid composition of meat from crossbreed Santa Ines ewes fed diets including crushed crambe. Rev Bras Zootecn. 45:319–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen XB, Gomes MJ. 1992. Estimation of microbial protein supply to sheep and cattle based on urinary excretion of purine derivatives – an overview of technical details. (Occasional publication) International Feed Research Unit. Bucksburn, Aberdeen: Rowett Research Institute; p. 21.
   Google Scholar
• Chizzotti ML, Valadares Filho SC, Valadares RFD, Chizotti FHM, Campos JMS, Marcondes MI, Fonseca MA. 2006. Intake, digestibility and urinary excretion of urea and purine derivatives in heifers with different body weights. Rev Bras Zootecn. 35:1813–1821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa JB, Oliveira RL, Silva TM, Ribeiro RDX, Silva AM, Leão AG, Bezerra LR, Rocha TC. 2016. Intake, digestibility, nitrogen balance, performance, and carcass yield of lambs fed licuri cake. J Anim Sci. 94:2973–2980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detmann E, Cecon PR, Paulino MP, Valadares Filho SC, Henriques LT, Detmann KSC. 2007. Rumen variables evaluated through continuum mathematical functions. Pesq Agr Bras. 42:1651–1657.
   Google Scholar
• Detmann E, Valente TNP, Sampaio CB. 2012. Avaliação da fibra em detergente neutro indigestível e da fibra em detergente ácido indigestível. In: Detmann, E, editor. Métodos para análise de alimentos. Visconde do Rio Branco, MG, Brazil: INCT – Ciência Animal. Suprema Editora; pp. 147–163.
   Google Scholar
• Dubbs TM, Vanzant ES, Kitts SE, Bapst RF, Fieser BG, Howlett CM. 2003. Characterization of season and sampling method effects on measurement of forage quality in fescue-based pastures. J Anim Sci. 81:1308–1315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan AJ, Milne JA. 1992. Rumen microbial degradation of allyl cyanide as a possible explanation for the tolerance of sheep to Brassica-derived glucosinolates. J Sci Food Agric. 58:15–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erwin ES, Marco GJ, Emery EM. 1961. Volatile fatty acid analyses of blood and rumen fluid by gas chromatograph. J Dairy Sci. 44:1768–1771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira MA, Valadares Filho SC, Silva LFC, Nascimento FB, Detmann E, Valadares RFD. 2009. Prediction of individual dry matter intake in group-fed lactating dairy cows. Rev Bras Zootec. 38:1574–1580.
   Google Scholar
• Getachew G, Makkar HPS, Becker K. 2002. Tropical browses: contents of phenolic compounds, in vitro gas production and stoichiometric relationship between short chain fatty acid and in vitro gas production. J Agric Sci. 139:341–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goes RHTB, Lambertucci DM, Brabes KCS, Alves DD. 2008. Energetic and protein supplementation for beef cattle in tropical pasture. Arq Ci Vet Zool. 11:129–137.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzaga Neto S, Oliveira RL, Lima FH, Medeiros AN, Bezerra LR, Viégas J, Nascimento NG Jr, Freitas Neto MD. 2015. Milk production, intake, digestion, blood parameters, and ingestive behavior of cows supplemented with by-products from the biodiesel industry. Trop Anim Health Prod. 47:191–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ítavo LCV, Souza ADV de, Fávaro SP, Ítavo CCBF, Petit HV, Dias AM, Morais MG, Coelho RG, Reis FA, Costa JAA, et al. 2016. Intake, digestibility, performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality of lambs fed different levels of crambe meal in the diet. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 216:40–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Licitra G, Hernandez TM, Van Soest PJ. 1996. Standardization of procedures for nitrogen fractionation of ruminant feeds. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 57:347–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima HL, Goes RHTB, Cerilo SLN, Oliveira ER, Gressler MGM, Brabes KCS. 2013. Nutritional parameters of steers receiving different levels of sunflower crushed in partial replacement of soybean meal. Ann Braz Acad Sci. 85:1513–1522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magalhães KA, Valadares Filho SC, Valadares RFD, Paixão ML, Pina DS, Paulino PV R, Chizzotti ML, Marcondes MI, Araújo AM, Porto MO. 2005. Effects of feeding different levels of urea or cottonseed hulls on microbial protein synthesis, plasma urea concentration and urea excretion in steers. Rev Bras Zootecn. 34:1400–1407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marín ALM, Hernández MP, Alba LP, Castro GG. 2010. Digestión de los lípidos en los rumiantes: Una Revisión. Interciencia 35:240–246.
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros FF, Silva AMA, Carneiro H, Araujo DRC, Morais RKO, Moreira MN, Bezerra LR. 2015a. Alternative protein sources derived from the biodiesel production chain for feeding to ruminants. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec. 67:519–526.
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros FF, Bezerra LR, Silva AMA, Carneiro H, Morais RKO, Moreira MN, Pereira Filho JM. 2015b. Greenhouse gases, short-chain fatty acids and ruminal pH in vitro of biodiesel byproducts to replace corn silage. Rev. Bras. Saúde Prod. Anim. 16:935–947.
   Google Scholar
• Mendonça BPC, Lana RP, Detmann E, Goes RHTB, Castro TR. 2015. Crambe meal in finishing of beef cattle in feedlot. Arq Bras de Med Vet Zootec. 67:583–590.
   Google Scholar
• Mertens, D.R. 2002. Gravimetric determination of amylase treated neutral detergent fiber in feeds with refluxing in beakers or crucibles. Collaborative study. J AOAC. 85:1212–1240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore JE, Brant MH, Kunkle WE, Hopkins DI. 1999. Effects of supplementation on voluntary forage intake, diet digestibility, and animal performance. J Anim Sci. 77:122–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morais RKO, Silva AMA, Bezerra LR, Carneiro H, Moreira MN, Medeiros FF. 2015. In vitro degradation and total gas production of byproducts generated in the biodiesel production chain. Acta Scient Anim Sci. 37:143–148.
   Google Scholar
• Moreira MN, Silva AMA, Bezerra LR, Carneiro H, Morais RKO, Medeiros FF. 2016. Effect of replacement of sugarcane by oilseed press cakes in greenhouse gases and volatile fatty acids production in vitro. Acta Scient Anim Sci. 38:293–300.
   Google Scholar
• Moreira MN, Silva AMA, Carneiro H, Bezerra LR, Morais RKO, Medeiros FF. 2014. In vitro degradability and total gas production of biodiesel chain byproducts used as a replacement for cane sugar feed. Acta Scient Anim Sci. 36:399–403.
   Google Scholar
• Myers WD, Ludden PA, Nayigihugu V, Hess BW. 2004. Technical Note: a procedure for the preparation and quantitative analysis of samples for titanium dioxide. J Anim Sci. 82:179–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NRC. 1996. Nutrient of requirements of beef cattle. 6th ed. Washington, DC, USA: The National Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• NRC. 2000. Nutrient requirements of beef cattle. 7th ed. Washington, DC, USA: The National Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rennó LN, Valadares RFD, Valadares Filho SC, Leão M I, Silva JFC, Cecon PR, Gonçalves LC, Dias HLC, Linhares RS. 2000. Plasma urea concentration and urea and creatinine excretions in steers. Rev Bras Zootecn. 29:1235–1243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennó LN, Valadares Filho SC, Paulino MF, Leão MI, Valadares RFD, Rennó FP, Paixão ML. 2008. Urea levels in diet for steers of four genetic groups: ruminal parameters, plasma urea, urea and creatinine excretions. Rev Bras Zootecn. 37:556–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell JB. 2002. Rumen microbiology and its role in ruminant nutrition. Ithaca; p. 119.
   Google Scholar
• Russell JB, Wilson DB. 1996. Why are ruminal cellulolytic bacteria unable to digest cellulose at low pH? J Dairy Sci. 79:1503–1509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva TM, de Medeiros AN, Oliveira RL, Gonzaga Neto S, Queiroga Rde C, Ribeiro RD, Leão AG, Bezerra LR. 2016. Carcass traits and meat quality of crossbred Boer goats fed peanut cake as a substitute for soybean meal. J Anim Sci. 93:2998–3005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart AJ, Schacht WH, Moser LE, 2001. Predicting leaf/stem ratio and nutritive value in grazed and nongrazed big bluestem. Agron J. 93:1243–1249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza ADV, Fávaro SP, Ítavo LCV, Roscoe R. 2009. Chemical characterization of seeds and press cakes of physic nut, radish and crambe. Pesq Agr Bras. 44:1328–1335.
   Google Scholar
• The R Core Team. 2014. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. URL: http://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Tripathi MK, Mishra AS. 2007. Glucosinolates in animal nutrition: a review. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 132:1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Soest PJ. 1994. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. 2nd ed. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; p. 476.
   Google Scholar
• Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB. 1985. Analysis of forages and fibrous foods. Ithaca: Cornell University.
   Google Scholar
• Van Soest PJ, Wine RH. 1968. Determination of lignin and cellulose in acid-detergent fiber with permanganate. J. Assoc Off Anal Chem. 51:780–785.
   Google Scholar
• Verbic J, Chen XB, Macleod NA, Ørskov ER. 1990. Excretion of purine derivatives by ruminants. Effect of microbial nucleic acid infusion on purine derivative excretion by steers. J Agric Sci. 114:243–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallig MA, Belyea RL, Tumbleson ME. 2002. Effect of pelleting on glucosinolate content of Crambe meal. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 99:205–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar