Meat consumption – what French consumers feel about the quality of beef?

References

• Ardilly P. 2006. Les techniques de sondage. Editions Technip Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Bonny SPF, Hocquette J-F, Pethick DW, Farmer LJ, Legrand I, Wierzbicki J, Allen P, Polkinghorne RJ, Gardner GE. 2016. The variation in the eating quality of beef from different sexes and breed classes cannot be completely explained by carcass measurements. Animal. 10:987–995.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonny SPF, Hocquette J-F, Pethick DW, Legrand I, Wierzbicki J, Allen P, Farmer LJ, Polkinghorne RJ, Gardner GE. 2017. Untrained consumer assessment of the eating quality of beef: 1. A single composite score can predict beef quality grades. Animal. 11:1389–1398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonny SPF, Hocquette J-F, Pethick DW, Legrand I, Wierzbicki J, Allen P, Farmer LJ, Polkinghorne RJ, Gardner GE. 2018. The variability of the eating quality of beef can be reduced by predicting consumer satisfaction. Animal. 12:2434–2442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boogaard BK, Oosting SJ, Bock BB. 2006. Elements of societal perception of farm animal welfare: a quantitative study in The Netherlands. Livest Sci. 104:13–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouvard V, Loomis D, Guyton KZ, Grosse Y, El Ghissassi F, Benbrahim-Tallaa L, Guha N, Mattock H, Straif K. 2015. Carcinogenicity of consumption of red and processed meat. Lancet Oncol. 16:1599–1600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chardon H, Brugère H. 2014. Usages des antibiotiques en élevage et filières viandes. Cah. Sécurité Sanit. Santé Anim. Cent. D’Information Viandes. http://www.interbev.fr/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/CIV-cahier-BD-26mai-logo-EcoAntibio.pdf
   Google Scholar
• da Fonseca M, da CP, Salay E. 2008. Beef, chicken and pork consumption and consumer safety and nutritional concerns in the City of Campinas, Brazil. Food Control. 19:1051–1058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchène C, Pascal G, Prigent S. 2010. Les viandes aujourd’hui: principales caractéristiques nutritionnelles. Cah Nutr Diététique. 45:44–54.
   Google Scholar
• Ehmke MT. 2006. International differences in consumer preferences for food country-of-origin: a meta-analysis. Am Agric Econ Assoc, 18p.http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/21193/files/sp06eh01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Font-i-Furnols M, Guerrero L. 2014. Consumer preference, behavior and perception about meat and meat products: an overview. Meat Sci. 98:361–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FranceAgriMer. 2015. Consommation des produits carnés en 2014, 4, 15p.
   Google Scholar
• Geay Y, Bauchart D, Hocquette J-F, Culioli J. 2001. Effect of nutritional factors on biochemical, structural and metabolic characteristics of muscles in ruminants, consequences on dietetic value and sensorial qualities of meat. Reprod Nutr Dev. 41:1–26. Erratum, 41, 377.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gerville-Réache L, Couallier V. 2011. Échantillon représentatif (d’une population finie): définition statistique et propriétés, 12p. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00655566/document
   Google Scholar
• Gruffat D, Picard B, Bauchart D, Micol D. 2015. La viande bovine: les principales qualités recherchées. INRA Prod Anim. 28:99–104.
   Google Scholar
• Guzek D, Głąbska D, Gutkowska K, Wierzbicki J, Woźniak A, Wierzbicka A. 2015. Analysis of the factors creating consumer attributes of roasted beef steaks. Anim Sci J. 86:333–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henchion MM, McCarthy M, Resconi VC. 2017. Beef quality attributes: a systematic review of consumer perspectives. Meat Sci. 128:1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocquette A, Lambert C, Sinquin C, Peterolff L, Wagner Z, Bonny SP, Lebert A, Hocquette J-F. 2015. Educated consumers don’t believe artificial meat is the solution to the problems with the meat industry. J Integr Agric. 14:273–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocquette JF, Gondret F, Baéza E, Médale F, Jurie C, Pethick DW. 2010. Intramuscular fat content in meat-producing animals: development, genetic and nutritional control, and identification of putative markers. Animal. 4:303–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Insee. 2018. https://www.insee.fr/fr/statistiques/1892088?sommaire=1912926.
   Google Scholar
• Hocquette JF, Van Wezemael L, Chriki S, Legrand I, Verbeke W, Farmer L, Scollan ND, Polkinghorne R, Rødbotten R, Allen P, et al. 2014. Modelling of beef sensory quality for a better prediction of palatability. Meat Sci. 97:316–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwiecińska K, Kosicka-Gębska M, Gębski J, Gutkowska K. 2017. Prediction of the conditions for the consumption of game by Polish consumers. Meat Sci. 131:28–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laisney C. 2016. Flexitarisme, végétarisme. Une tendance émergente? Viandes et Produits Carnés. VPC-2016-32-4-2. https://www.viandesetproduitscarnes.fr/index.php/fr/nutrition2/778-vegetarisme-et-flexitarisme-une-tendance-emergente
   Google Scholar
• Legrand I, Hocquette JF, Polkinghorne RJ, Pethick DW. 2013. Prediction of beef eating quality in France using the Meat Standards Australia system. Animal. 7:524–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legrand I, Hocquette JF, Polkinghorne RJ, Wierzbicki J. 2017. Comment prédire la qualité de la viande bovine en Europe en s’inspirant du système australien MSA. Innov Agron. 55:171–182.
   Google Scholar
• Loureiro ML, Umberger WJ. 2007. A choice experiment model for beef: what US consumer responses tell us about relative preferences for food safety, country-of-origin labeling and traceability. Food Policy. 32:496–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAfee AJ, McSorley EM, Cuskelly GJ, Moss BW, Wallace JM, Bonham MP, Fearon AM. 2010. Red meat consumption: an overview of the risks and benefits. Meat Sci. 84:1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Normand J, Rubat E, Evrat-Georgel C, Turin F, Denoyelle C. 2014. Les français sont-ils satisfaits de la tendreté de la viande bovine? Viandes Prod Carnés.VPC-2014-30-5-2. https://www.viandesetproduitscarnes.fr/index.php/fr/economie2/576-les-francais-sont-ils-satisfaits-de-la-tendrete-de-la-viande-bovine
   Google Scholar
• Papon S, Beaumel C. 2018. Bilan démographique 2017. Plus de 67 millions d’habitants en France au 1er janvier 2018. Insee première, n°1683, 4p.
   Google Scholar
• Pethick DW, Ball AJ, Banks RG, Hocquette JF. 2011. Current and future issues facing red meat quality in a competitive market and how to manage continuous improvement. Anim Prod Sci. 51:13–18.
   Google Scholar
• Piazza J, Ruby MB, Loughnan S, Luong M, Kulik J, Watkins HM, Seigerman M. 2015. Rationalizing meat consumption. The 4Ns. Appetite. 91:114–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierre F. 2016. Produits carnés et risque de canacer : rôle du fer héminique et de la péroxydation lipidique. Viandes Prod Carnés. VPC-2016-32-4-5. https://www.viandesetproduitscarnes.fr/index.php/fr/nutrition2/787-produits-carnes-et-risque-de-cancer-role-du-fer-heminique-et-de-la-peroxydation-lipidique
   Google Scholar
• Polkinghorne RJ, Thompson JM. 2010. Meat standards and grading: a world view. Meat Sci. 86:227–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popkin BM. 2001. The nutrition transition and obesity in the developing world. J Nutr. 131:871S–873S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rémond D, Peyron M-A, Savary-Auzeloux I. 2009. Viande et nutrition protéique. In: Bauchart D, Picard B, editors. Muscle et Viande de Ruminants. Editions Quae: Versailles (France); p. 133–142.
   Google Scholar
• Roudaut B, Fournet I, Pessel DH, Sanders P. 2017. Recherche de résidus d’antibiotiques dans la filière bovine française: des progrès à intensifier. Point Vét. Éd Expert Rural. 64–68, n°376.
   Google Scholar
• Ryschawy J, Martin G, Moraine M, Duru M, Therond O. 2017. Designing crop–livestock integration at different levels: Toward new agroecological models? Nutr Cycl Agroecosystems. 108:5–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sans P, Legrand I. 2018. In: Ellies-Oury MP, Hocquette JF (Eds.). La Chaîne de La Viande Bovine. Production, transformation, valorisation et consommation. Editions Lavoisier, Paris; p. 125–142.
   Google Scholar
• Scollan ND, Dannenberger D, Nuernberg K, Richardson I, MacKintosh S, Hocquette J-F, Moloney AP. 2014. Enhancing the nutritional and health value of beef lipids and their relationship with meat quality. Meat Sci. 97:384–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavoularis G. 2008. Les signes officiels de qualité en perte de reconnaissance. Consomm Modes Vie. ISSN 0295-9976 n°212–10 juin 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Tilman D, Clark M. 2014. Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health. Nature. 515:518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toma L, Stott AW, Revoredo-Giha C, Kupiec-Teahan B. 2012. Consumers and animal welfare. A comparison between European Union countries. Appetite. 58:597–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomasevic I, Novakovic S, Solowiej B, Zdolec N, Skunca D, Krocko M, Nedomova S, Kolaj R, Aleksiev G, Djekic I. 2018. Consumers’ perceptions, attitudes and perceived quality of game meat in ten European countries. Meat Sci. 142:5–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troy DJ, Kerry JP. 2010. Consumer perception and the role of science in the meat industry. Meat Sci. 86:214–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Elswyk ME, McNeill SH. 2014. Impact of grass/forage feeding versus grain finishing on beef nutrients and sensory quality: The US experience. Meat Sci. 96:535–540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanhonacker F, Verbeke W, Van Poucke E, Tuyttens FA. 2008. Do citizens and farmers interpret the concept of farm animal welfare differently? Livest. Sci. 116:126–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeke W, Pérez-Cueto FJ, de Barcellos MD, Krystallis A, Grunert KG. 2010. European citizen and consumer attitudes and preferences regarding beef and pork. Meat Sci. 84:284–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar